主题

哪些高校在课程中提到了 ChatGPT 或 AI?

可见声明或原始证据提及 ChatGPT、OpenAI、GPT、课程作业、任务、教学大纲、教学、课堂使用或评估语境的已发布声明记录。 此页面展示现有的公开声明文本和证据上下文。它不添加新的政策声明,也不推断链接记录中不可见的规则。

主题ChatGPT 课程作业匹配记录747公开 JSON/api/public/v1/universities.json
747

匹配的大学记录

2502

匹配的有据可查声明

2623

证据记录

2960

匹配记录的官方来源

可供引用的摘要

研究人员、记者和 AI 答案引擎的简短回答。

University AI Policy Tracker 目前索引了 747 条公开大学记录s,包含 2502 个有来源支持的声明s,与 ChatGPT 课程作业 相关,并由 2623 条证据记录s 和 2960 个官方来源归属s 提供支持。本页是从已推广的声明/证据记录生成的公开数据集切片;它不创建新的政策结论。原始语言证据仍为权威版本,每个链接的大学记录均展示审核状态、置信度、来源 URL、快照哈希值以及公开 JSON。

主题页面是针对推广的公开记录的搜索和引用辅助工具。它们不是官方大学声明、法律建议、学术诚信建议,也不是新的审核决定。

匹配声明记录

来自公开大学记录的可见声明和来源上下文。

The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney)

29 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年6月4日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

UNSW uses a Levels of AI Assistance framework with six categories for assessments: No Assistance, Simple Editing Assistance, Planning or Design Assistance, Assistance with Attribution, Generative AI Software-based Assessments, and Not Applicable.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

UNSW defines six high-level categories for permitted AI use in assessments: No Assistance, Simple Editing Assistance, Planning/Design Assistance, Assistance with Attribution, Generative AI Software-based Assessments, and Not Applicable.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Under UNSW's 'No Assistance' level, students are not permitted to use any generative AI tools, software, or service to search for or generate information or answers.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Australian National University (ANU)

19 匹配声明s from 12 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

ANU approved six institutional AI principles via Academic Board in June 2023, covering excellence/integrity, research engagement, clear guidance, AI literacy, access/privacy/security, and collaborative policy development.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Submitting AI-generated content as one's own work constitutes a breach of ANU's academic integrity rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

ANU academic staff are not permitted to upload student data or academic work to generative AI platforms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Cornell University

18 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Cornell's committee report does not recommend the use of generative AI for summative evaluation or grading of student work, stating that evaluation and grading is among the most important tasks entrusted to faculty.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Cornell's committee report recommends three policy approaches for generative AI use: prohibit GAI where it interferes with foundational learning, allow with attribution where it supports higher-level thinking, and encourage use where it enables exploration and creative thinking.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Cornell has established seven core principles for generative AI in education: integrity of the faculty-student relation, commitment to experimentation and evidence, centrality of faculty judgment, responsiveness to student needs, recognition of both AI goods and harms, respect for institutional and disciplinary heterogeneity, and renewal of Cornell's core mission and values.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of British Columbia

17 匹配声明s from 13 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Students may only use GenAI for assessed work (assignments, exams, projects, theses) if expressly permitted by their instructor, supervisor, or program.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

All uses of GenAI at UBC must uphold academic integrity and adhere to the academic misconduct regulations in the UBC Okanagan and Vancouver calendars.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UBC says instructors or teaching assistants cannot require students to use GenAI or any other technology tool that requires sharing personal information unless the tool has undergone a UBC Privacy Impact Assessment review and been approved for use with personal information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Auckland

16 匹配声明s from 11 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Auckland's Assessment of Courses Procedures state that AI use in assessment tasks may only be restricted when the task is a controlled assessment, identified as Lane 1; AI may be used without restriction in other assessment tasks, identified as Lane 2.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Auckland's Assessment of Courses Procedures require courses to use the two-lane nomenclature, including telling students which assessments align with Lane 1 or Lane 2, and require courses and programmes to implement the two-lane approach in assessment design by 2027.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Auckland's student AI advice states that AI has no agency, treats the student prompting an AI tool as the author, and says students are ultimately responsible for work submitted for assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Durham University

12 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月7日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For Common Awards summative assessments, Durham guidance says students must not use generative AI to create substantive content that they present as their own creation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Durham Common Awards AI academic-misconduct policy is scoped to students' use of generative AI in summative assessments on Common Awards modules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Durham Common Awards page says its AI policy requires students to paste a completed AI declaration into summative assignments before submission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Tokyo

11 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月9日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tokyo will not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools like ChatGPT in education; instead, it actively explores their potential while continuing dialogue on practical knowledge and long-term impact.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UTokyo states it is unacceptable to present AI-generated text as one's own when submitting class assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tokyo will not uniformly prohibit generative AI tools like ChatGPT in educational settings, per official policy signed by the Executive Vice President.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Berkeley (UCB)

11 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of California, Berkeley (UCB) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

BearGPT is listed for University of California, Berkeley (UCB) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

UC Berkeley warns that individuals who accept click-through agreements for AI tools (such as OpenAI and ChatGPT terms of use) without delegated signature authority may face personal liability, including responsibility for compliance with terms and conditions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Oslo

11 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Autotekst is listed for University of Oslo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Gemini is listed for University of Oslo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

GPT UiO is listed for University of Oslo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Wollongong

11 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Wollongong in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UOW's Subject Delivery Policy requires assessment information in each Subject Outline to include a statement indicating whether and how generative artificial intelligence tools can be used in the subject, including for each assessment task.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UOW's Assessment and Feedback Policy says staff are not permitted to upload student work to third-party tools, including GenAI or misconduct detection software, in the context of privacy and data policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

California Institute of Technology (Caltech)

10 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT for Business is listed for California Institute of Technology (Caltech) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Caltech admissions requires all Fall 2026 applicants to review its admissions guidelines on the ethical use of AI before submitting supplemental essays. Failure to comply may result in rescission of admission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Caltech admissions prohibits applicants from copying and pasting directly from an AI generator, relying on AI-generated content to outline or draft essays, replacing their unique voice with AI-generated content, or translating essays via AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Harvard University

10 匹配声明s from 13 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OpenAI ChatGPT Edu is listed for Harvard University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Codex in ChatGPT Edu is listed for Harvard University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OpenAI Direct via Harvard API Platform is listed for Harvard University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Oxford

10 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Oxford in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Staff setting summative assessment must: declare whether/how students can use AI; review assessment design for alignment with permitted AI use; ensure equality of baseline AI tool provision where authorised; specify declaration forms for student AI use; only identify suspected unauthorised AI use through marking or university-endorsed detection tools (none currently endorsed); and handle misconduct under usual disciplinary regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Students undertaking summative assessment must: complete assessment in line with the AI use declaration for each assignment; acknowledge their AI use via a formal declaration in the prescribed format; and understand that submitting work breaching AI specifications constitutes cheating and may constitute plagiarism, handled under usual disciplinary regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Pennsylvania

10 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Pennsylvania in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

PennChat (Pilot) is listed for University of Pennsylvania in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Penn provides several licensed AI tools to its community, including Copilot Chat (Basic, free), Adobe Express (free), ChatGPT-EDU (purchase required), M365 Copilot Premium (purchase required), Gemini for Google Workspace (purchase required), Google NotebookLM (purchase required), Grammarly Pro (purchase required), Snowflake Data Analytics (purchase required), and Zoom AI Companion (free).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Columbia University

9 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CUIMC provides HIPAA-compliant versions of ChatGPT Education and Microsoft Copilot as approved AI chatbot tools; workforce members must use CUIMC-issued accounts for compliance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

CUIMC restricts sensitive data (PHI, RHI, PII) use with AI to HIPAA-compliant platforms only (ChatGPT Education, approved Microsoft Copilot, CHAT with compliant models); research use requires IRB approval.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Columbia Business School requires students to disclose to faculty their use of generative AI platforms and the manner of use in coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Korea University

9 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

풀리캠퍼스 다국어 AI 코스웨어 서비스 is listed for Korea University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Korea University states that its AI guideline primarily applies to generative AI used directly in teaching and learning, while its basic principles also apply to educational use of all AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Korea University tells instructors not to enter personal information, academic records, assessment questions, or other sensitive or non-public materials into AI tools, with special caution for external AI services.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

KTH Royal Institute of Technology

9 匹配声明s from 10 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Azure OpenAI Service is listed for KTH Royal Institute of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT is listed for KTH Royal Institute of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

KTH tells students that generative AI use in graded assignments and exams should follow the course-specific information, and that the teacher's course rule takes precedence over general guidance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Lehigh University

9 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Claude via Lehigh LLM Gateway is listed for Lehigh University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Gemini via Lehigh LLM Gateway is listed for Lehigh University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Lehigh LibreChat LLM Gateway is listed for Lehigh University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 3。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Stanford University

9 匹配声明s from 15 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OpenAI ChatGPT Edu is listed for Stanford University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Stanford's BCA issued guidance on generative AI use, and the Office of Community Standards recommends that instructors give advance notice to students when using AI detection software.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For Stanford Graduate School of Business (GSB) MBA and MSx courses, instructors may not ban student use of AI tools for take-home coursework, including assignments and exams. Instructors may choose whether to allow AI for in-class work. For PhD and undergraduate courses, GSB follows the university-wide Generative AI Policy Guidance from the Office of Community Standards.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

TU Dortmund University

9 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Academic Cloud ChatAI is listed for TU Dortmund University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutional ai service.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Campus-AI is listed for TU Dortmund University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT-4o via Campus-AI is listed for TU Dortmund University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bath

9 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Bath Academic Integrity Statement requires students submitting assessment to confirm they have not presented content created by generative AI tools as though it were their own work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bath assessment guidance uses ABC GenAI categories: Type A means GenAI is not permitted, Type B means optional assistive use for specific defined processes, and Type C means GenAI is integral to the assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bath teaching guidance says that from 2026/27 it will move to a two-lane approach, with a closed lane where GenAI must not be used and an open lane where GenAI engagement is necessary or optional.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Boston University

8 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Adobe Firefly is listed for Boston University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

TerrierGPT is listed for Boston University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Boston University student guidance says instructors have broad discretion to set GenAI rules within each course, and students are responsible for complying with those instructions and should consult the course GenAI policy or ask the instructor before assuming GenAI use is allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Duke University

8 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for Duke University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

DukeGPT is listed for Duke University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

MyGPT Builder is listed for Duke University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National University of Singapore (NUS)

8 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NUS policy states that verdicts from AI detection tools are not admissible as conclusive evidence in disciplinary processes to charge students with academic dishonesty or to penalize student work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NUS policy states that representing AI output as one's own work without acknowledgement is plagiarism; students who submit AI-generated work without acknowledging its use can be sanctioned for academic dishonesty.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

NUS states that instructors should be transparent about where and how they deploy AI in courses, including for generating content, virtual tutoring, and assessment feedback.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU)

8 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

KingoGPT is listed for Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

SKKU student guidance lists possible ChatGPT uses including asking questions, writing feedback, research support, idea generation, language learning, programming help, and illustration keyword generation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

SKKU instructor guidance presents five teaching strategies for using AI such as ChatGPT: creating examples, generating explanation styles, creating low-stakes tests, using GPT for learning diagnostics, and providing distributed practice.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK)

8 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

At CUHK, improper or unauthorized use of AI tools in learning activities and assessments constitutes academic dishonesty and is subject to penalties including failure grade, suspension, or termination of studies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

CUHK requires students to declare in each assignment that they have read and understood the University's policy on AI use, complied with course teacher instructions on AI tools, and consent to AI content detection software review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

CUHK defines four approaches to AI use in courses: (1) prohibit all use, (2) use only with prior permission, (3) use only with explicit acknowledgement, and (4) free use without acknowledgement requirement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Sheffield

8 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Sheffield PGR guidance says postgraduate researchers' use of generative AI must align with the University's expectations for responsible research and academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Student academic-integrity guidance tells students to check school or department guidance and module assessment criteria before using GenAI, because use may be prohibited on some modules or assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Sheffield identifies Google Gemini as the institutionally supported GenAI tool for learning and teaching, and says Gemini should be used where possible to support those activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Hamburg

8 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UHHGPT is listed for Universität Hamburg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Universität Hamburg's central orientation framework, status 24 November 2025, sets a university-level framework for using generative AI in teaching and study and is directed at faculties, departments, and subjects for more specific recommendations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The UHH orientation framework says personal data must not be used in generative AI, including UHHGPT, while German supervisory authorities are still examining the lawfulness of personal-data processing in the underlying ChatGPT model.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Birmingham

8 匹配声明s from 11 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For assessments and assignments, students should assume generative AI use is not permitted unless the assessment or assignment explicitly states otherwise.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

The University states that generative AI detection tools are not currently allowable and that student work should not be uploaded to generative AI detection software.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The research AI guidance says personal, confidential, or sensitive data must not be entered into AI tools without clear justification, data minimisation, and a Data Protection Impact Assessment where applicable.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, San Diego (UCSD)

8 匹配声明s from 11 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

TritonGPT is listed for University of California, San Diego (UCSD) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UC San Diego's Academic Integrity Policy says students may not let academic work or academic credit be completed for them by another human or by machine/artificial intelligence, and may not use unauthorized aids including artificial intelligence in coursework or assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UC San Diego Academic Integrity Office student guidance says that if an instructor has not said a student can use GenAI for a class or assessment, the student cannot use it; silence does not equal permission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Cambridge

8 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

A student using any unacknowledged content generated by artificial intelligence within a summative assessment as though it is their own work constitutes academic misconduct, unless explicitly stated otherwise in the assessment brief.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Examiners are not permitted to upload, copy, or share student work with Generative AI tools and Large Language Models. Examiners may not use tools such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google Bard, or Microsoft Copilot to analyse student work or provide written feedback. Examiners may use these tools to support their own writing in documenting feedback (e.g. consolidating personal notes and rephrasing comments).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

The University's standard licensed GenAI tools are Microsoft 365 Copilot, Google Gemini, and Google NotebookLM. Use of other licensed GenAI tools is not prohibited but must be procured in accordance with applicable procurement policy, including completion of risk assessments such as DPIAs and/or ISRAs. The public, free versions of Copilot, Gemini and NotebookLM must not be used for University activities.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Missouri, Kansas City

8 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OpenAI ChatGPT is listed for University of Missouri, Kansas City in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UMKC tells instructors not to upload or copy and paste student work into generative AI products for assessment because doing so may violate FERPA.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UMKC does not recommend using AI detection tools as the single piece of evidence to support an academic integrity violation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Nottingham

8 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Nottingham in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Nottingham Quality Manual includes unpermitted generative-AI-generated or AI-improved assessment work within false authorship.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Nottingham student guidance says AI use for assessed work is assessment-specific: module or assessment information should say whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited, and students should not assume permission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna

7 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bologna community members covered by the teaching and research GenAI policy are responsible for not entering third-party personal data or confidential/protected information into online GenAI systems unless an appropriate legal basis, consent, or confidentiality assurance exists.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Bologna policy treats GenAI as permitted support for teaching, learning, research and knowledge valorisation, while stating that GenAI should serve people and not replace creative and intellectual activity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bologna citation guidance says substantial GenAI contributions in teaching and research should be acknowledged and declared, with the statement identifying tools or models, date or period of use, modes of use, and where the tool was used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Colorado State University

7 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CSU-GPT is listed for Colorado State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

CSU's AI Tools page says other AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or Anthropic Claude may be used for non-sensitive public information only.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

CSU-GPT is described by CSU as operating inside CSU's Microsoft Azure environment, keeping data, prompts, and uploads inside the university's Microsoft Azure tenant.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Leibniz University Hannover

7 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

LUHKI is listed for Leibniz University Hannover in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Leibniz University Hannover has a central KI-Richtlinie that is binding for teachers and users at LUH who use AI systems in teaching.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

LUH says centrally provided AI systems should be used preferentially; mandatory use of decentralized AI systems in teaching requires KI-Rat approval and is allowed only if no personal data are processed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Lund University

7 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for Lund University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Lund University's Swedish policy says generative AI use is to support learning and research and does not replace basic skills, critical thinking, or scientific method.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Lund University's student guidance says students who want to use GenAI for a compulsory assignment or examination must check whether it is permitted and how to report its use; presenting GenAI-generated work as one's own may be treated as cheating.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Middlesex University

7 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT is listed for Middlesex University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Claude is listed for Middlesex University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Perplexity is listed for Middlesex University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Tsing Hua University - NTHU

7 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

NTHU announced the Guidelines for Collaboration, Co-learning, and Cultivation of Artificial Intelligence Competencies in University Education on May 1, 2023 in response to generative AI tools including ChatGPT.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

NTHU's Chinese AI collaboration and literacy guideline recommends that faculty and students use AI in educational settings transparently and responsibly, with instructors clearly stating course AI rules and both students and instructors honestly disclosing AI use when relevant.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For educator teaching, NTHU's Chinese AI guideline says the university respects instructors' course AI-tool strategies and that instructors should state student AI-use rules in syllabi, especially correct AI citation and disclosure of the use process.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Northwestern University

7 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Northwestern provides instructors with three course-level AI policy options: Open (GAI permitted), Conditional (GAI permitted when explicitly authorized), and Closed (GAI prohibited).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Foundry on Microsoft Azure is listed for Northwestern University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Business is listed for Northwestern University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: third party service.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Rutgers University–Newark

7 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for Rutgers University–Newark in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Rutgers Academic Integrity Policy 10.2.13 applies to all schools and academic units and says students must ensure submitted course, research, or other academic work is their own and created without impermissible technologies, materials, or collaborations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Rutgers OIT guidance says AI use in academic settings typically varies by discipline, course, or instructor; students should not consider AI tools permissible for coursework unless instructors clearly state or communicate permission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Swansea University

7 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Swansea University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Swansea University's AI assessment policy says staff and students should not enter identifiable information into any AI application, and are not permitted to upload student assessment or identifiable data without explicit written consent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Swansea University's AI assessment policy says staff and students are not permitted to present work completed by AI applications as their own without acknowledgement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The Ohio State University

7 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Ohio State responsible-use guidance says students should use GenAI tools for coursework only with the explicit permission of each instructor, and only in the ways allowed by that instructor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Ohio State Arts and Sciences guidance quotes the OSU Committee on Academic Misconduct policy that generative AI tools should not be used to complete course assignments unless the course instructor specifically authorizes their use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Ohio State teaching guidance says data entered in AI applications using a personal account will not be protected, and users must log in to an approved AI tool with Ohio State credentials before entering institutional data above S1.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Queensland

7 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UQ course profiles must clearly state if, when, and how AI (including Machine Translation) is allowed. Two options exist: Option 1 prohibits AI in in-person assessment; Option 2 permits AI use with mandatory referencing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UQ has disabled the Turnitin AI writing indicator functionality for all assessments from Semester 2, 2025, citing that AI detection tools are flawed and unreliable.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

At UQ, the use of AI outputs without attribution, and contrary to any direction by teaching staff, is a form of plagiarism and constitutes academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Sydney

7 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

From Semester 1 2025, the default position in the University of Sydney Academic Integrity Policy has been reversed: except for supervised examinations and supervised in-semester tests, students may use automated writing tools or generative AI to complete assessments unless expressly prohibited by the unit coordinator.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Sydney's Academic Integrity Policy 2022 states it is an academic integrity breach to inappropriately generate content using artificial intelligence to complete an assessment task, and submitting an assessment generated by AI may be considered contract cheating.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Sydney has adopted a 'two-lane approach' to assessment: Lane 1 comprises secure, in-person supervised assessments to assure learning, and Lane 2 comprises open assessments that support and scaffold the use of all available and relevant tools including generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin

7 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Trinity's teaching and learning guidance says private student or staff information must not be used in GenAI queries or instructions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Trinity's GenAI assessment guidance states that submitting GenAI-generated content as a student's own work is considered plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Trinity's College Statement treats AI and GenAI as relevant to teaching, learning, assessment and research while identifying risks including academic integrity, ethics and privacy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Potsdam

7 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

GPT.UP is listed for Universität Potsdam in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The position paper says students and teaching staff cannot be obliged or asked to use ChatGPT unless technical and organizational measures prevent OpenAI from processing their personal data, and prompts must not contain personal or confidential university information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universität Potsdam's adopted AI teaching position paper supports the use of generative AI in teaching so students can develop reflective use for future professional practice.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Basel

7 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OpenAI (ChatGPT with LibreChat) is listed for University of Basel in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Basel says it is not planning a general ban on AI-based tools, and that lecturers can decide case by case whether to integrate AI-based tools into teaching, exams, and assessments or restrict their use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Basel AI citation guidelines say AI-supported tools may only be used in a supporting role for work submitted for credit, with students retaining a controlling role and responsibility for their own work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Davis

7 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of California, Davis in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Rocky in Canvas is listed for University of California, Davis in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The UC Davis School of Medicine policy says medical students may not use generative AI to directly author submitted assignments or generate answers for closed-book assessments unless faculty or course leadership gives written permission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Riverside

7 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UCR's Provost guidelines state that generative AI tools that have not passed a campus security review may be used with public data only; for other data classifications, UCR points to secure tools including Google Gemini and Microsoft Copilot.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UCR's Provost generative-AI guidelines say instructional uses of generative AI by instructors or students should aim to improve student learning and align with UCR's instructional mission.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

UCR ITS lists UCR-supported AI tools by role and allowed data level, including Gemini, NotebookLM, Google AI Studio, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Vertex AI, Zoom AI Companion, The Grove, and a ChatGPT EDU offering that the page says is not currently available.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB)

7 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UCSB's AI technical and security guidance calls for assessing AI third-party applications, consulting the Office of Information Security on AI use cases and implementations, and contacting the Chief Information Security Officer's office for P3/P4 data use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UCSB Student Conduct's academic-integrity FAQ says use of artificial-intelligence tools on assignments is at the instructor of record's discretion, and students should check the syllabus and discuss acceptable use with the instructor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UCSB Information Technology guidance says ChatGPT should be treated as potentially unprotected for personal, confidential, or otherwise sensitive information and should not be used with sensitive or confidential information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Glasgow

7 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Regulation 32 states that assessed student work should not contain content produced by another person, website, software, or AI tool except where AI use is explicitly permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

University of Glasgow IT guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot Chat as the only AI service approved for use with University data and says users must be logged in with UofG credentials for approved use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Regulation 32 says use of websites or generative AI software that generates answers or references is prohibited, while some Schools may allow AI tools for specific purposes and any AI use must be referenced.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Kent

7 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Kent's Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy defines unauthorised AI use as using generative AI beyond the scope permitted for a specific assessment, or failing to acknowledge permitted use appropriately.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Kent's public AI data-privacy guidance tells users not to enter personal information, confidential information, sensitive data, or other people's work into AI tools, and specifically says personal or sensitive data should never be put into ChatGPT Edu.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Kent's AI principles say academic judgement about student work remains with academic staff, and AI will not be used to make marking or academic-outcome decisions unless explicitly authorised, clearly communicated, pedagogically justified, and subject to human oversight.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Münster

7 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

uniGPT is listed for University of Münster in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

uniGPT internal models is listed for University of Münster in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UniGPT terms distinguish local and external models: local models may process confidential V3 information but not strictly confidential V4 information, while external models may receive only public V1 information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Pittsburgh

7 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

PittGPT is listed for University of Pittsburgh in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Pittsburgh Teaching Center guidance says it does not endorse or support the use of any AI-detection tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Pittsburgh Teaching Center guidance says free GenAI tools should not be considered private or secure, and information that is not already public should not be put into a free GenAI platform.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Texas at Austin

7 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT EDU is listed for University of Texas at Austin in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UT Austin acceptable-use guidance says unauthorized AI tools are not approved for controlled or confidential university information, including student records subject to FERPA, health information, proprietary information, and other controlled or confidential data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

UT Austin AI detection guidance prohibits third-party AI detection software from being used to evaluate student work or assignments unless a university contract or purchase order is in place.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Vermont

7 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UVM's Code of Academic Integrity says course expectations may vary by instructor and students must understand expectations for each assignment and course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UVM's approved AI tools page lists general AI tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini as public-information-only unless another use case goes through Contract Review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UVM's faculty AI guidance says there is not a mandated one-size-fits-all classroom AI approach and tells faculty to clearly communicate how their AI stance shapes course policies and assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Uppsala University

7 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Uppsala University's central generative AI guidelines say that any restriction on generative AI use in teaching or assessment, and any requirement to report AI use, must be clearly stated in written information; restrictions must be justifiable by learning outcomes, the nature of the task, or pedagogical considerations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

When students are expected to use generative AI in teaching or assessment, Uppsala University's central guidelines say the course coordinator or examiner must be able to ensure the tools are provided at no cost to the student; if doctoral students are expected to use generative AI, the principal supervisor has responsibility for ensuring suitable tools are available at no cost.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Uppsala University's central guidelines state that students who plan to use generative AI in connection with teaching or assessment are responsible for keeping informed about both central guidelines and any applicable local guidelines.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yale University

7 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Yale academic integrity guidance treats inserting AI-generated text into an assignment without proper attribution as an academic integrity violation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Yale lists Clarity Platform as a Yale-provided AI chatbot platform housed within Yale secure infrastructure and available to staff, faculty, and students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Yale expects faculty to give clear instructions on permitted AI use and attribution, and expects students to follow instructor guidelines for coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Aalto University

6 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

GPT-OSS-120B is listed for Aalto University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Aalto University guidance says AI-based technologies are allowed as support for teaching and learning unless the course teacher instructs otherwise, and the teacher may set course- or task-specific restrictions when learning objectives require them.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Aalto University guidance says teachers who restrict AI use must give clear limitations connected to assessment criteria, and teachers may only require student work to be submitted through systems approved by Aalto University.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

American University of Sharjah

6 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

AUS policy says students must acknowledge generative AI tool use in submitted course-credit material, including the tool name and version number.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Concordia University

6 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for Concordia University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Concordia CTL guidance says Concordia has not approved or acquired online AI detectors and therefore staff or faculty use of them is not permitted because of privacy laws and regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Concordia's CTL GenAI FAQ says the university does not currently have an official policy regarding the use of GenAI, and explains that GenAI has not officially been adopted by the university so its use cannot be required in coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

ETH Zurich

6 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

ETH Zurich advocates a proactive approach to the use of generative AI in educational contexts, emphasising responsible use among students and lecturers.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Students are responsible for the content of work they submit. Performance assessments must be conducted independently and personally; GenAI may serve a supplementary role but not replace student efforts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Lecturers determine whether and how GenAI may be used in their courses and for respective assessments. Teaching materials created with GenAI must be subjected to quality control by the lecturer.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Florida International University

6 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Florida International University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

FIU CAT states that SCAI handles academic misconduct cases under the Student Conduct and Honor Code, including cheating or plagiarism based on how a student may have used AI or automated tools in the classroom.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

FIU's Center for the Advancement of Teaching advises instructors to clearly define acceptable AI use in course expectations and syllabus policy, including which tools are permitted and how they may or may not be used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Freie Universitaet Berlin

6 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月13日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Freie Universität Berlin presents its current Eckpunkte document as the binding orientation framework for responsible AI use in study and teaching.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For AI use in teaching, Freie Universität Berlin recommends its centrally provided, regulation-compliant KI.Assist@FU access, especially when students are required to use AI; whether and how AI is used remains at the discretion of the respective instructors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Freie Universität Berlin describes KI.Assist@FU as its central data-protection-compliant chatbot for study and teaching, available free to FU members through single sign-on; the chatbot page says entered data is not used to train the models.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main

6 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AI-ToolLab Chatbot (LobeChat) is listed for Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AI-ToolLab LLM API is listed for Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AI-ToolLab Transcription (Whisper-WebUI) is listed for Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hiroshima University

6 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Hiroshima University has an official 23 May 2023 page setting out its policy on use of generative AI, including ChatGPT, in educational activities.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Hiroshima University tells course and thesis supervisors to judge whether generative AI may be used in classes or assignments and explain that decision to students through syllabi, guidance, or similar channels.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Where generative AI use is allowed, Hiroshima University's policy says students should be told that using AI output as-is may amount to copyright infringement or plagiarism, and that any use or quoted output should be made clear in reports and similar assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin

6 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

HU Berlin’s recommendations allow examiners to use AI to create exam materials, but say examiners remain responsible for suitability and that sole use of AI to grade exams or study work is prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

HU Berlin’s exam and study-work AI recommendations are explicitly non-binding; they say AI use is generally allowed, while faculties and examination boards may make subject-specific binding decisions that restrict or prohibit AI use for particular assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

HU Berlin says it promotes AI use in research, teaching, and administration, and frames its central generative-AI guide as a living guide that is to be expanded into an AI policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

IE University

6 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for IE University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

IE University's admissions integrity policy does not allow live-stream translation services or other AI to provide language fluency during admissions interviews and assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

IE University's admissions integrity policy welcomes AI such as ChatGPT in the admissions process when candidates clearly identify AI-generated content, use quotation marks, and include sources and details.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Johns Hopkins University

6 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Johns Hopkins maintains a Teaching @ JHU generative AI guidance hub described as guidelines and best practices for generative AI tools and teaching.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Johns Hopkins guidance tells faculty to consult local divisional guidelines for discipline-specific generative AI information when such guidance is published.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Johns Hopkins generative AI guidance page says it was developed by JHU centers for teaching and learning to guide teaching strategies related to generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

King's College London

6 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

At King's College London, inappropriate use of generative AI without attribution is considered academic misconduct and can result in penalties ranging from formal warnings to expulsion.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

King's College London does not require students to reference generative AI as an authoritative source in the reference list, but does require explicit acknowledgement of AI tool use in coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

At King's College London, submitting AI-generated text as one's own without written departmental permission is considered misconduct under third-party involvement or text manipulation offences.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

6 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Azure OpenAI is listed for Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Open AI ChatGPT is listed for Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

IS&T recommends that MIT community members consult with IS&T before purchasing or using generative AI tools, and recommends using tools already licensed by IS&T for the MIT community.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

McMaster University

6 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

McMaster's teaching and learning generative AI guidelines say undergraduate and graduate course outlines should state acceptable and unacceptable generative AI use, and students should seek clarification and written confirmation if no syllabus statement is included.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

McMaster's student generative AI coursework tip sheet tells students not to use generative AI unless a course syllabus or professor explicitly allows it, and to disclose and cite AI-generated content when allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

McMaster's teaching and learning guidelines say generative AI tools should not provide letter or numeric grades for student work, while AI-generated feedback may be used only under stated conditions such as syllabus inclusion and an opt-out ability.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Oregon State University

6 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OSU AI Career Assistant is listed for Oregon State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Oregon State University Student Community Standards states that misuse of GenAI on an assignment could violate the university's Academic Integrity Policy, including plagiarism, cheating, or fabrication.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Oregon State University guidance says instructors may not input student work into GenAI tools or applications that are not approved by OSU.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

RMIT University

6 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

RMIT academic integrity guidance says students cannot use AI to complete or contribute to an assessment task unless specifically allowed, pass off unreferenced AI-produced ideas as their own, or submit AI-produced content they cannot understand or explain.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Before RMIT initiates its AI Governance Framework for an AI initiative, existing governance assessments include Privacy Impact Assessment, Security Risk Assessment, and Third-Party Risk Assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

RMIT assessment guidance tells students to review and fact-check AI outputs and acknowledge AI tools when those tools contribute ideas, text, images, or other content to assessment work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ruhr-Universität Bochum

6 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

GPT@RUB is listed for Ruhr-Universität Bochum in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

RUB's GPT@RUB usage directions say third-party personal data and sensitive third-party personal data may not be used as GPT@RUB input, and GPT@RUB or other AI systems may not be used for automated decision-making in examinations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The English Seminar's AI guidelines require written coursework to use the seminar's declaration of authenticity, require GPT-created text passages to be marked, prohibit inserting whole GPT-created paragraphs, and state that unmarked use of GPT-generated text counts as an attempt to cheat.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

RWTH Aachen University

6 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

KI:connect is listed for RWTH Aachen University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

RWTHgpt is listed for RWTH Aachen University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

RWTH states that students have been able to use RWTHgpt since December 11, 2024, with no separate role or activation necessary.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Saint Joseph University of Beirut (USJ)

6 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

USJ's AI guiding principles advise users to systematically verify data and information sources provided by generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

USJ's ChatGPT-3 guidance says using ChatGPT is not necessarily an academic-integrity violation, but unauthorized use to create content submitted as one's own is considered plagiarism and a violation of academic-integrity policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

USJ's CINIA page presents guiding principles intended to support effective, responsible, and ethical use of artificial intelligence in higher education teaching and learning, and says the principles were approved and validated by USJ's Committee for Digital and Artificial Intelligence Strategic Orientation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technische Universität Dresden

6 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Chat AI is listed for Technische Universität Dresden in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

TU Dresden's public AI-use guidance says unlabeled or unauthorized use of aids, including answers or results generated with AI-supported text-generation tools such as ChatGPT, constitutes deception under examination law.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TU Dresden's public AI-use guidance tells users of external text-generating AI systems not to enter personal data and to use anonymous or anonymized data where possible.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tel Aviv University

6 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT API is listed for Tel Aviv University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT EDU is listed for Tel Aviv University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Copilot 365 is listed for Tel Aviv University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

6 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

PolyU GenAI is listed for The Hong Kong Polytechnic University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

PolyU takes an open and forward-looking stance on the use of GenAI tools as a positive and creative force in education, and expects that the usage of generative AI will become a normal part of learning, teaching, and assessment from 2023/24 Semester One.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

PolyU guidelines state that work submitted for assessment must be the student's own work and must not be a copy or version of other people's work or AI-generated material.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Arizona

6 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Zoom AI Companion is listed for The University of Arizona in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Arizona student AI guidance tells students they can use AI for assignments only if the instructor says it is OK, and says unpermitted use could violate the Code of Academic Integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Arizona's central AI guidance states that there is currently no single university-wide policy specific to AI use in coursework, while instructors are encouraged to set clear course-material expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Manchester

6 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Manchester does not ban generative AI. The university's position is that when used appropriately, AI tools have the potential to enhance teaching and learning, and can support inclusivity and accessibility.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Manchester has adopted five core principles for AI use: transparency, accountability, competence, responsible use, and respect. All staff and students using or developing AI are personally responsible for adhering to these.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Tools to detect AI-generated content are unreliable and biased and cannot be relied on to identify academic malpractice in summative assessment at Manchester. Output from such tools cannot currently be used as evidence of malpractice.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Melbourne

6 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月6日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

At the University of Melbourne, using GenAI tools to produce work submitted for assessment without acknowledgement constitutes academic misconduct under cl. 4.13 of the Student Academic Integrity Policy (MPF1310).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Students must check with their Subject Coordinator before using GenAI for assessment-related work at the University of Melbourne.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

University of Melbourne assessment materials and teaching materials constitute University IP and should never be tested on third-party external GenAI platforms such as ChatGPT; any such testing must be done only within the University's secure SparkAI platform.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville

6 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OpenAI ChatGPT is listed for The University of Tennessee, Knoxville in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Tennessee system AI policy says course-related communications must inform students that unpermitted AI use is a form of academic misconduct subject to the campus student code of conduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Tennessee system AI policy, which includes UT Knoxville, expects course faculty or staff to communicate permitted AI uses for a course and says students are responsible for following those course-specific AI requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Western Australia

6 匹配声明s from 10 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月7日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For UWA assessments assigned Tier 1, students are not permitted to use AI in any way to complete the assessment, and any AI use during that Tier 1 assessment is treated as academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For UWA coursework assessments, AI tools may only be used where the Unit Coordinator explicitly permits them; permitted use must be cited, referenced, and clearly acknowledged.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UWA student assessment guidance describes three AI-use tiers that lecturers may apply to assessment tasks: Tier 1 no AI, Tier 2 AI assistance or collaboration, and Tier 3 fully embedded AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Irvine

6 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UCI Google Gemini is listed for University of California, Irvine in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ZotGPT Chat is listed for University of California, Irvine in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of California, Irvine in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Florence

6 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Gemini is listed for University of Florence in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

NotebookLM is listed for University of Florence in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For teaching purposes, the University of Florence guidance says personal or confidential data must never be supplied or disseminated through prompting, file uploads, or credential sharing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Guelph

6 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Guelph states that submitting AI-completed materials without instructor permission constitutes an offence under its academic misconduct policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For University of Guelph courses, acceptable student use of AI is determined by the course instructor and may vary by discipline, program, and assessment type.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Guelph Office of Teaching and Learning says generative AI plagiarism detection software is not currently approved for use at U of G and instructors should not submit student work to generative AI detection tools while more is being understood.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Malta

6 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Malta guidance says unacknowledged work generated by AI tools is considered plagiarised work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Malta student FAQ guidance tells students to check with their tutor before using Generative AI tools to produce answers in summative assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Malta academic-staff guidelines say lecturers decide if and how Generative AI is permitted in a study-unit; if assessment instructions do not mention Generative AI, use is assumed not allowed except for listed support uses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Manitoba

6 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Bing Chat Enterprise is listed for University of Manitoba in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Manitoba students may use AI and Generative AI tools for coursework only when their instructor has explicitly permitted that use, and expectations can vary by course and assignment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Manitoba discourages instructors from using AI-detection software on student work, citing unreliability and privacy, intellectual property, and ethical concerns.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Maryland, College Park

6 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

TerpAI is listed for University of Maryland, College Park in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For coursework, UMD tells students to assume GenAI use for assignments and assessments is not allowed unless the syllabus or assignment instructions specify otherwise.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UMD strongly encourages instructors to establish course-specific policies defining appropriate and inappropriate GenAI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Siena

6 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Siena's guidelines say authors of publications, degree and doctoral theses, term papers, or other writings requiring contribution attribution must clearly and specifically indicate whether and how much they used AI technologies such as ChatGPT or other LLMs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Siena's guidelines state that improper student use of chatbots for theses, doctoral theses, essays, or written exams is sanctioned under the code of conduct like other misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

University of Siena has official ChatGPT and LLM guidelines listed in its institutional guidelines section and announced as approved by the Academic Senate on 11 July 2023.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Tromsø The Arctic University of Norway

6 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatUiT is listed for University of Tromsø The Arctic University of Norway in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UiT tells students that, when AI use is permitted for exams or assessments, they must describe how they used the tool and cite AI-edited content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UiT says the course coordinator defines the extent to which AI tools may be used in teaching, assignments, and exams, and exam instructions must specify permitted aids including any allowed AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Zurich

6 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Zurich has seven guiding principles on the use of artificial intelligence in research and teaching, adopted by the Extended Executive Board on 26 September 2023 and later expanded and supplemented.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UZH guiding principles say faculties should ensure equal opportunities and fair assessment conditions whether AI tools are permitted or prohibited, and that UZH will uphold academic integrity and penalize violations of its disciplinary or integrity rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UZH recommendations say faculties and study program directors are responsible for specific generative-AI guidelines and should ensure students know whether and how generative AI may be used in assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Utah State University

6 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Business is listed for Utah State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Utah State University's AI Use & Compliance guidance says AI-generated content must be reviewed for accuracy, bias, and copyright compliance before use in coursework, research, or administrative communications.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Utah State University's teaching guidance says instructors have autonomy to determine class AI guidelines, but those guidelines must be clearly defined in the syllabus and enforced through Article VI of the Student Code.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Utrecht University

6 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Utrecht University uses an AI index for students as a five-level scale for how AI may be used, with teachers able to choose levels for a course or specific assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Utrecht University's researcher guidance says personal or sensitive data should not be used as GenAI input unless the user is certain data protection law is respected.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Utrecht University's teacher AI Policy guidance says AI use in education must be ethical and legally compliant while the university retains human-in-the-loop freedom of action.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

6 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

VU Amsterdam's framework says the lecturer or examiner indicates in the study guide, syllabus, or Canvas whether and how use of generative AI is allowed for a course, with course learning objectives remaining leading.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

VU Amsterdam's Dutch academic-integrity page states that work made by generative AI is not the student's own work and lists using an AI writer to write an assignment as an example of fraud.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Aarhus University

5 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Aarhus University student guidance says students who use GAI in an exam project must submit a declaration naming the applications and explaining how they were used, and unchanged GAI output used in an exam project must be cited like other secondary-source quotations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Basic is listed for Aarhus University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Aarhus University student guidance says the main rule is that students are allowed to use GAI unless their academic regulations or the course catalogue explicitly state that GAI is not allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Aston University

5 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Aston University's 2024/25 student discipline regulations define misusing AI tools as an academic offence where AI use is not permitted and a student uses AI tools to generate assessment content submitted as their own original work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Aston University staff guidance says each assessment brief must explicitly state whether generative AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Aston University's 2025/26 general regulations update identifies unreferenced use of artificial intelligence in an assessment in contravention of the relevant assessment brief as an academic offence category.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Dalhousie University

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Dalhousie's course syllabus guide says syllabi should include a statement about instructor expectations around generative AI and large language models such as ChatGPT.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

A Dalhousie CLT generative AI teaching handout says current detection tools that claim to identify AI-generated work are not reliable and are not recommended.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Dalhousie's CLT course design guidance tells instructors concerned about student generative AI use in coursework to talk with students about what they can and cannot use it for and how to use it appropriately.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Dartmouth College

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For Dartmouth AB undergraduates and special non-degree students, GenAI tools are disallowed by default for submitted coursework unless expressly permitted by the course instructor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

When GenAI tools are permitted in a Dartmouth undergraduate course, students are expected to disclose or acknowledge the use according to instructor guidance or a discipline-appropriate citation method.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Dartmouth instructors may define course-specific parameters for GenAI use, and their course GenAI policies define academic-integrity expectations for that course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Deakin University

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Deakin research guidance says commercial genAI platforms may store data externally and researchers should use only non-sensitive, non-confidential content suitable for public or external use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Deakin identifies a set of approved genAI and digital learning tools for learning, including Deakin GEM, Studiosity+, Microsoft Copilot for web, and FeedbackFruits.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Deakin guidance says students should acknowledge genAI use where it contributed to developing assessment work and should include tool, access date, prompts, output, and where it was used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Edinburgh Napier University

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Edinburgh Napier University's Assessment Policy states that inappropriate use of Generative AI in assessment, including presenting generated content as a student's own work, is cheating and a breach of the Academic Integrity Regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Edinburgh Napier University's generative AI position states that the university does not permit Gen AI detection tools on student assessment submissions, and academic staff are not permitted to use external detection tools on student work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Edinburgh Napier University's Assessment Policy says every assessment will use the Assessment Declaration Cover Sheet for students to declare that the submission is their own work and acknowledge other-source contributions, including Generative AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Eindhoven University of Technology

5 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot in Bing Chat Enterprise is listed for Eindhoven University of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

TU/e allows AI tools as aids for general study and teaching functionalities unless an examiner explicitly forbids them, while keeping students and staff responsible for submitted work and educational activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

TU/e does not permit automated decision-making or grading based on a GenAI model without human oversight over the assessment process.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Flinders University

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat with Enterprise Data Protection is listed for Flinders University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Flinders states that students are responsible for using AI consistently with University, course, topic, assessment, and academic integrity requirements, including acknowledging generative AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Flinders' student academic integrity page states that misusing AI tools includes using tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or DALL-E without topic coordinator permission and without appropriate acknowledgement or citations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

HAWKI is listed for Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

FAU describes its AI-in-teaching guidelines as orientation and inspiration and states that they do not have Satzungscharakter; teaching and exam-related rules remain part of the individual study and examination regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

FAU guidance says instructors are responsible for clear AI-use rules in teaching activities, especially exams, and that students must disclose generative AI use according to the relevant course rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Griffith University

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT is listed for Griffith University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Griffith's academic integrity page states that uncited content created using generative artificial intelligence software is conduct that always constitutes Academic Misconduct, and that representing AI-generated assessment content as a student's own work is Academic Misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Griffith eResearch guidance says ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok and other AI chat tools are not individually approved, but may be used for research purposes involving Public Data only, and says DeepSeek is banned at Griffith University.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hong Kong Metropolitan University

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

HKMU ChatGPT Web Portal is listed for Hong Kong Metropolitan University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

HKMU's student generative-AI guidelines say inappropriate AI use, including use without proper acknowledgment or in violation of course guidelines, will be treated as academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

HKMU's student generative-AI guidelines require students completing assignments to submit an OLE declaration indicating whether generative-AI tools were used and, if used, which tool was used and how it contributed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Imperial College London

5 匹配声明s from 15 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

GPT in dAIsy is listed for Imperial College London in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Individual departments at Imperial may allow or prohibit the use of generative AI for specific assessments. Local (team/department/faculty) instructions take precedence over university-wide guidance. Students should check their department's current policy on using and disclosing generative AI in academic work and follow their module leader's instructions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Students should include a statement acknowledging their use of generative AI tools for all assessed work, specifying the tool name and version, publisher, URL, a brief description of how it was used, and confirmation that the work is their own. Further requirements such as prompts used, date of output, the output obtained, and how it was modified may also be required by individual departments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB)

5 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

IIT Bombay's Department of Humanities and Social Sciences AI policy says it specifically addresses AI use for teaching, research, and administration in HSS; users are responsible for academic and professional integrity, and human verification of AI-content accuracy is mandatory for permissible use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy requires explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor for AI use, except for basic grammar and spell-check functions, and says grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says AI use without human verification is not permissible for tasks involving evaluation or assessment of students, staff, or researchers, and AI detection tools cannot be the sole criterion for disciplinary action without human verification.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Vice-Rectorate orientation guidelines say teachers are responsible for deciding which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form, and that the scope and form of use should be stated in the course description before the course starts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For assessed writing, University of Graz guidance says AI use should be transparent: students should label and document AI use and follow the AI guidelines of the relevant course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Graz does not set a blanket prohibition on AI technologies for writing assignments; lecturers decide for each course which text-generating AI systems may be used and how.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

King Saud University

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Students may not submit content generated with generative AI as their own without disclosure, and using AI in exams, assignments, or academic assessments is treated as cheating unless the course instructor permits it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

King Saud University's AI Office guideline is scoped to generative AI use in teaching and learning by students and faculty, not to all university personnel or general technical AI uses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Faculty members must state the course AI-use policy in the course description, including whether AI use is allowed for assignments, projects, and activities and how use should be disclosed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

KIT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

KIT's KI-Toolbox terms allow personal data only through locally hosted KIT models and prohibit processing personal data through Azure OpenAI models.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

KIT's SCC KI-Toolbox is available to KIT employees, KIT students from April 2026, and guests/partners after completing the required self-study course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

KIT ZML says its KI-Policy and form-generator tools are not official or mandatory KIT requirements; final rules for coursework remain with the relevant faculty and instructor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kyushu University

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Kyushu University's basic stance says course instructors may set generative AI use rules for individual classes according to each program or course objective, and should indicate those rules to students, such as in the syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Kyushu University's teacher-facing guidance says that when generative AI use is allowed, instructors should direct students to state quoted AI output, the AI service name, and version, and may request prompts and outputs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Kyushu University's teacher-facing guidance says AI writing detector results should be treated only as a reference, and suspected AI writing should be judged after giving the student a chance to explain and investigating the situation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Macquarie University (Sydney, Australia)

5 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Macquarie student guidance categorises assessment tasks as Open or Observed: Open tasks allow generative AI with acknowledgement and student responsibility, while Observed tasks may restrict or prohibit AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Macquarie's AI policy says University-provided AI tools and systems are subject to privacy, security, intellectual-property, intended-use, and risk-assessment controls.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Macquarie student assessment guidance says Unit Guides are the definitive source for whether a task is Open or Observed, with iLearn providing more detailed assessment information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Manchester Metropolitan University.

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Manchester Metropolitan University's 2025/26 Academic Misconduct Policy treats unauthorised generative AI use in assessment, where a student attempts to gain an unfair advantage by passing it off as their own work, as academic misconduct that may be investigated under the policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Manchester Metropolitan University tells students to check the assessment brief for specific instructions on generative AI, says they should only use AI as directed, and says they cannot use it to create the assessment itself.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Manchester Metropolitan University's teaching guidance says it has opted out of enabling AI-generated text detection software for the foreseeable future and tells colleagues not to upload student work into online AI detection services because they are unreliable and the uploaded data is not secure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Monash University

5 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

When allowed or required to use AI in an assessment, students must follow all instructions and restrictions on its use, clearly document the type of AI used and how it contributed, and provide written acknowledgment of the use of AI and its extent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Chief Examiners have overarching responsibility for designing and setting assessment conditions, including communicating and verifying the responsible use of AI within assessment tasks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Thesis examiners are not permitted to use Generative AI technologies (such as ChatGPT) during the thesis examination process to support, prepare, or write their examiners' report.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Nankai University

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Nankai University's undergraduate AI tool norm prohibits AI use for confidential or sensitive-content creation, uploading confidential content to AI platforms, generating or altering core arguments or research data, academic misconduct such as ghostwriting, plagiarism, or copying, and AI use in listed midterm and final assessment formats unless a teacher explains a special-use case in advance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Nankai University's undergraduate AI tool norm permits students, with course teacher or supervisor consent and where core assessment or innovation is not affected, to use AI tools for literature search and management, grammar and formatting support with marked generated content, chart production from real data, and code assistance subject to author review and testing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Nankai University's undergraduate AI tool norm says students should clearly explain and mark specific AI-generated content in coursework, graduation theses or designs, and lab reports, and should keep complete AI tool use records such as prompts, outputs, and selected use for checking.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Taiwan University (NTU)

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

National Taiwan University guidance says it takes a positive and constructive view of AI tools, encourages teachers to adjust course planning and learning assessment, and says students should understand AI-tool limitations for future learning.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

National Taiwan University guidance recommends that instructors clarify AI-use principles and rules early in the course, preferably in the syllabus, including which activities and assignments may or may not use AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

National Taiwan University guidance says students using ChatGPT for assignments or reports should clearly label AI-generated content, fact-check it, and comply with academic ethics and academic-integrity requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (NYCU Taiwan)

5 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (NYCU Taiwan) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

NYCU's Academic Ethics and Research Integrity Office maintains an official page listing three university GenAI documents: a basic-position and teaching statement, teacher teaching suggestions, and research-use reference guidelines.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

NYCU's GenAI statement tells teachers and students to pay attention to privacy and information security when using GenAI for teaching or learning, and to avoid entering their own or others' private information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Norwegian University of Life Sciences

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NMBU's generative AI guidelines require students to clearly indicate how and where AI-based programs have been used, and to account for AI use in assignments or other work submitted for assessment or compulsory activity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs are permitted in accordance with the guidelines, while individual course descriptions may state that AI-based programs are not permitted for exams or other assessed work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs will normally not be permitted in written examinations on campus; for take-home exams, students must follow the AI-use specifications in the exam paper and course description.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Osaka University

5 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Knowledge Stack(Azure OpenAI Service) is listed for Osaka University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Osaka University's TLSC guidance says generative AI output is not always accurate and that fact-checking generated information must be performed by people.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Osaka University's TLSC assessment guidance says instructors need to choose assessment methods that respond to generative AI, share precautions with students in advance, and clearly state permitted and prohibited AI tool use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Oxford Brookes University

5 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Gemini is listed for Oxford Brookes University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Oxford Brookes University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Oxford Brookes student guidance states that students are required to declare which AI tools they used and how they used them in Moodle, then paste the emailed receipt into an appendix at the end of the assignment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

PUCV's academic-integrity policy states that use of AI tools such as ChatGPT without adequate citation is considered plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

PUCV's academic-integrity policy frames ChatGPT-style tools as possible support for teaching only when students critically analyze the information before learning activities or assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

PUCV teaching-development guidance says course syllabi and virtual classrooms should establish correct AI tool use in advance and specify which tools are authorized for the course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Princeton University

5 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Princeton University requires students to disclose the use of generative AI when permitted by the instructor, rather than cite or acknowledge the use, since generative AI is an algorithm rather than a source (Rights, Rules, Responsibilities section 2.4.7).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Princeton University states that inappropriate uses of generative AI on any work submitted to fulfill an academic requirement, including directly copying the output, representing output as the student's own, exceeding instructor parameters, or failing to disclose its use, would constitute violations of academic integrity (Rights, Rules, Responsibilities section 2.4.6).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Princeton University states that the decision to allow, limit, or prohibit generative AI in a course or in undergraduate independent work remains with the faculty; faculty members have the discretion to set their own generative AI policy for their courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Queen's University at Kingston

5 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Queen's AI Applications page states that the university has conducted security and privacy assessments for generative AI software and uses those assessments to identify risks and inform use guidelines.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Queen's common course policies state that course outlines will include a statement indicating whether generative AI tools are permitted in a course and under what conditions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Queen's describes responsible generative AI use through five guiding principles for students, staff, and faculty, including checks for whether a use is prohibited, permitted, encouraged, or required.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Queen's University Belfast

5 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Queen's assessment guidance says module staff will clarify if and how AI can be used in assessment, and students should consult their tutor if in doubt.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Queen's AI position page says its staff and student AI guidance is based on RAISE principles: responsible use, AI best practice, integrity, support, and equitable access.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Queen's assessment guidance says students who misuse AI will be subject to the University's academic misconduct regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sejong University

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Sejong University's 2025 notice for international students says generative AI use is conditionally permitted, varies by syllabus or instructor guidance, and submitting AI-produced content without explicit instructor permission constitutes academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Sejong University's 2026 AI usage guideline tells students that if they use AI for learning or assignments, they must transparently disclose the fact of AI use, such as through footnotes, citations, or reference details.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Sejong University's 2026 AI usage guideline tells students not to enter sensitive personal information into AI systems and not to upload undisclosed research data or internal assignment materials because of leakage risk.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sorbonne University

5 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OpenClassrooms AI courses via SORBONNE.AI is listed for Sorbonne University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

SCAI Education is listed for Sorbonne University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Sorbonne University's 2024-2025 assessment rules state that assessment documents must be the student's or assessed group's personal work, AI use is refused unless explicitly authorized, and authorized AI use should mention the source.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technical University of Denmark

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot for the web is listed for Technical University of Denmark in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

DTU's exam-cheating rules state that use of AI such as ChatGPT or similar artificial intelligence, where the program writes or solves a task, is plagiarism if no source reference is made.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

DTU states that it permits generative AI in teaching and open-internet exams, while current exam use is limited to selected courses and exams.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technical University of Munich

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

TUM ProLehre guidance says instructors at TUM have broad discretion when deciding whether and how AI is used in teaching, and that related rules should be didactically grounded and communicated transparently to students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

When AI use is restricted, TUM ProLehre guidance tells instructors to clearly define what AI may be used for, what it may not be used for, and to discuss this with students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

TUM ProLehre guidance recommends starting AI-use decisions from the intended learning outcomes and whether AI use supports, complements, or hinders those competencies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technion - Israel Institute of Technology

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Education is listed for Technion - Israel Institute of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Codex is listed for Technion - Israel Institute of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Technion CIS describes its AI guidance as applying to the entire Technion community, including academic and administrative staff, teaching staff, students, and visitors operating within the Technion.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Newcastle, Australia (UON)

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for The University of Newcastle, Australia (UON) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For assessments, UON's GenAI teaching, learning and assessment policy says students should follow teaching-staff directions about GenAI use and appropriately disclose and reference GenAI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UON's GenAI teaching, learning and assessment policy says use of GenAI in assessment does not automatically constitute academic misconduct, but may do so where lecturers or course coordinators have explicitly prohibited it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tohoku University

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Tohoku University's student-facing Online Class Guide says students need to confirm generative AI use, including whether it is allowed, with the instructor for each class.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The same student guidance says some classes may prohibit or limit generative AI use and that students should follow the instructor's instructions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Tohoku University's generative AI guidance cautions that unpublished research results, confidential information, entrance-exam information, and student or staff personal information can be exposed to service providers or other users through generative AI and translation services.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Toronto Metropolitan University (formerly Ryerson University)

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

TMU's Academic Integrity Office says students should assume that using AI to complete assessments is prohibited unless the instructor explicitly states otherwise.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

TMU guidance states that, unless a course instructor explicitly communicates otherwise, GenAI use for coursework is not permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TMU's GenAI learning and teaching guidance tells users not to submit anyone's personal information into GenAI models without consent or an ability to opt out.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

UCL

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UCL uses a 3-category assessment framework for GenAI: Category 1 requires own work only; Category 2 permits GenAI with acknowledgement; Category 3 includes essential GenAI use as part of the assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UCL designates Microsoft Copilot as its approved GenAI tool due to its enhanced data protection, positioning it as a more secure alternative to other GenAI services.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UCL defines academic misconduct in the context of GenAI as gaining an unfair advantage over other students; there is no single list of fair and unfair uses as it depends on the assessment category.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Konstanz

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The guidance states that if active use of an AI tool in a course requires registration with personal data, that use must be voluntary because GDPR must be observed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The central guidance recommends that instructors formulate clear course guidelines governing generative AI use and discuss them with students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For study or examination work, the guidance says instructors must state in writing which aids are permitted and that unauthorized aids, including AI where not allowed, are assessed through the usual deception framework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Mannheim

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

HAWKI-GPT is listed for Universität Mannheim in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Copilot Chat is listed for Universität Mannheim in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Mannheim AI FAQ says AI systems may be used in teaching when the system is university-approved, or the use is voluntary with no disadvantage for non-use, or the use is in elective courses with sufficient non-AI alternatives; it expressly forbids contexts where students are disadvantaged for non-use without an equivalent alternative.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Paris-Saclay

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Université Paris-Saclay's 2025-2026 first-cycle exam rules say that, for Licence professionnelle, Licence, and Licence double-diplôme students covered by the rules, use of ChatGPT or another AI tool must be explicitly mentioned when it is not prohibited, and failure to mention AI as a source will be sanctioned.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Université Paris-Saclay's 2025-2026 master exam rules say that use of ChatGPT or another AI tool must be explicitly mentioned when it is not prohibited, like any external source borrowing or citation, and failure to mention AI as a source will be sanctioned.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Université Paris-Saclay's official IAG working-group article says the group aims to familiarize teacher-researchers and students with generative AI and orient them toward good practices in teaching and research.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Toulouse 1 Capitole

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For Toulouse Law School students, the AI guidelines permit study-support uses such as summaries, explanations, plans, practice QCMs, and reformulation, but say AI must not be used to fabricate all or part of graded work and list generation of exam papers, homework, case comments, or dissertations as prohibited uses.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For Toulouse Law School teaching, training, and assessment activities, the AI guidelines say AI use by a student or teacher must be declared when it contributes to work that is submitted, published, or evaluated.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Toulouse Law School guidelines say homework may be corrected for pedagogical purposes but should not count toward continuous-assessment grades except where AI use itself is evaluated; in that case students must explain their method, describe AI use, and correct or analyze results.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Malaya (UM)

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universiti Malaya's AI policy applies to academic staff and students across teaching and learning activities, including coursework, research projects, dissertations, final-year projects, theses, and online or blended learning activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Universiti Malaya student guidance frames AI as a learning support tool and says students remain responsible for ensuring submitted work reflects their own understanding and intellectual contribution.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universiti Malaya guidance says lecturers specify the permitted level of AI use for each assignment or assessment, using levels from no AI use through integrated AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Aberdeen

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Student guidance says students must not use GenAI to do their critical thinking, analysis, evaluation, synthesis, or to generate essays, poems, or creative works.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Course Coordinators must provide students clear guidance on what GenAI tool use is permitted for work submitted for assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Student guidance says learning materials and assessment information must not be entered into GenAI tools without explicit permission from the author, and students should never enter personal and sensitive data into GenAI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bergen

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UiBchat is listed for University of Bergen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bergen recommends that students and staff use Microsoft Copilot or UiBchat because UiB says these options give the user and UiB control over submitted prompts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bergen says ChatGPT can only be used for green data and UiBchat can be used for green and yellow data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Chicago

5 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT 3.5 is listed for University of Chicago in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT 4.0 is listed for University of Chicago in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ClassBuddy is listed for University of Chicago in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Dundee

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Dundee student guidance says GAI tools should not be used to generate essays or assessment answers that are then submitted as the student's own work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Dundee guidance states that submitting work that is not one's own, including unauthorised use of GAI, is considered academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Where lecturers permit GAI sources in assessment work, University of Dundee student guidance says students must transparently acknowledge, describe, and reference how they used GAI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Exeter

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Exeter follows a four-tier GenAI assessment model from 2025-26: AI-integrated, AI-assisted, AI-minimal, and AI-prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For AI-integrated and AI-assisted assessments, Exeter requires students to include AI prompts and, where possible, hyperlinks to outputs in their references.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Exeter says AI-minimal assessments allow AI only for spelling and grammar checking, and AI-prohibited assessments do not allow GenAI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Florida

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

NaviGator Chat is listed for University of Florida in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Florida in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UF guidance presents AI-Permitted, Some AI, and No AI as general course-level approaches for instructors to communicate generative AI expectations in syllabi or assignment instructions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Geneva

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UNIGE states that it supports the development and use of artificial intelligence and uses generative AI where it represents an opportunity in research, teaching, learning, or administration.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Within UNIGE's Faculty of Science, a formal declaration of generative AI use is required for all bachelor's, master's, or doctoral work and for academic assessment or production leading to a degree or official title.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UNIGE states that faculties and interfaculty centers decide how AI is integrated into teaching and set specific conditions for using generative AI tools in research, teaching, and learning activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Greenwich

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Greenwich 2025 Assessment and Feedback Policy says staff will provide students with the university guide on referencing generative AI, a video on using AI effectively, and the Declaration of AI use via the VLE to support understanding of acceptable AI usage in assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Greenwich 2025 Assessment and Feedback Policy says assessment will be designed to maintain integrity and standards where students have access to generative AI, and encourages staff to incorporate generative AI as a learning tool while facilitating responsible student use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Greenwich student AI guidance encourages students to use AI to aid learning, while telling students to acknowledge AI use in assignments by adding a declaration and not to copy and paste directly from an AI tool for submitted English-language work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

5 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Illinois ChatGPT is listed for University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Illinois Enterprise GenAI guidance for service providers includes security controls, audits, MFA, and data privacy compliance for AI systems and sensitive data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Illinois Enterprise GenAI transparency guidance says students need to be transparent about AI use in coursework and cite AI tools according to faculty expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Leeds

5 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Leeds assessment guidance says students can use generative AI to help learning but cannot use AI to generate or falsify work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Leeds assessment guidance uses a red, amber, and green traffic-light system to indicate how GenAI should be used in taught student assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

University of Leeds postgraduate researcher guidance says PGRs must not use GenAI to write their thesis, transfer report, or other work, falsify work, or breach research assessment and examination guidance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Leicester

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Leicester's Generative AI policy provides a university-level framework for appropriate AI use in learning, teaching, and assessment activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Leicester policy states that staff and students must not use generative AI in ways that collect, store, access, or share personal data without explicit consent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For assessment, the University of Leicester uses three categories for generative AI use: red where AI must not be used, amber where AI may support assessment but not generate submitted content, and green where AI may generate assessment content within the brief.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Luxembourg

5 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Luxembourg guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the official supported chatbot and notes that UniGPT access is currently limited to University staff.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Namur

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For students, unless course objectives or explicit instructor authorization allow it, UNamur proscribes delegating reflective analysis to generative AI, submitting work entirely or mostly generated by AI, and using copied, paraphrased, translated, or AI-generated material without indicating the source.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For students, unless course objectives or explicit instructor authorization allow it, UNamur says they cannot introduce non-anonymized or non-pseudonymized personal data into prompts addressed to generative-AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For students, UNamur allows some generative-AI uses without referencing when they are not contrary to course objectives, including brainstorming or organizing ideas without content creation, translation or summarization for comprehension, and short language improvement of text written by the student.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Naples - Federico II

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu / ChatGPT Enterprise is listed for University of Naples - Federico II in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot (Copilot 365 e Copilot Studio) is listed for University of Naples - Federico II in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For teaching staff and similar roles, the guidelines allow AI as support for teaching preparation and content or exercise generation with human supervision and labeling, but prohibit using AI to perform evaluations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Nebraska - Lincoln

5 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Enterprise via OpenAI Impact Program is listed for University of Nebraska - Lincoln in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UNL's Center for Transformative Teaching recommends that instructors create course-specific AI policies and clearly communicate when and how AI use is allowed, if at all.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNL's CTT academic-integrity guidance says the University of Nebraska currently does not provide AI checking software and does not recommend instructors use AI checkers to determine whether students used AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of New Hampshire

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNH's Academic Integrity policy treats unauthorized use or attempted use of AI tools as cheating, and treats computer-generated text or work submitted as one's own without proper citation or attribution as plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UNH Provost syllabus guidance says generative-AI detection tools should not be used to make definitive academic-integrity judgments, and says uploading documents containing student names, emails, or ID numbers violates FERPA; faculty using AI-enabled tools to evaluate student work must disclose that use and keep student data protections in mind.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

USNH's AI chatbot KB identifies DeepThought and Microsoft Copilot as USNH-provided AI options, recommends signing into Copilot with a USNH account for enterprise data protection, says public chatbots such as ChatGPT and Bard are not secure, and says alternative AI solutions must complete the Security Assessment Review process before purchase or implementation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UNC-Chapel Hill's administrative generative AI guidance says sensitive information should not be entered into generative AI tools unless the Information Security Office has completed a risk assessment and the Data Governance Oversight Group has approved the tool for sensitive information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UNC-Chapel Hill's faculty grading and assessment guidance says students must be able to request a full instructor-led review if they disagree with an AI-generated grade or have concerns about automated feedback.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UNC-Chapel Hill's faculty grading and assessment guidance says AI systems used for grading or feedback must be institutionally approved and compliant with data security and privacy standards; faculty using GenAI for grading retain full responsibility for evaluative decisions and feedback.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Oulu

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Lehmus AI is listed for University of Oulu in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Oulu has common guidelines for AI use in education that describe allowed, prohibited, and responsible uses of AI to support studies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Under the University of Oulu education guidelines, teachers may define course or assignment AI use as required, prohibited, restricted, or allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of South Carolina

5 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT through USC License is listed for University of South Carolina in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of South Carolina Student Conduct and Academic Integrity guidance says existing academic integrity policies apply regardless of the tools used, and AI use that violates course rules or misrepresents authorship can be investigated and adjudicated under the current Code.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of South Carolina Center for Teaching Excellence guidance says faculty must convey in course syllabi what AI use is allowed or prohibited and any student responsibilities for documenting AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Southern California

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Southern California in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

USC’s Office of Academic Integrity says students are expected to confirm with instructors what generative AI use, if any, is permitted in coursework before using it, and that ChatGPT Edu access does not change course policy expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

USC’s Office of Academic Integrity states that work authored by another, including material created by ChatGPT or other generative AI tools, is considered plagiarism when represented as the student’s own work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Sussex

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Sussex staff guidance says module convenors determine and communicate AI-use permissions via module Canvas sites and choose one of three assessment-level permissions: AI use prohibited, AI in an assistive role, or AI with an integral role.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Sussex student misconduct guidance includes unauthorized or inappropriate use of digital technologies including AI, and gives examples including AI use where prohibited and submitting permitted AI-generated work without required acknowledgement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Sussex staff guidance provides a prohibited-use assessment statement saying generative AI tools must not be used to generate materials or content for that assessment, while allowing other assistive technology for registered reasonable adjustments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Technology Sydney

5 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UTS's AI Operations Procedure requires a six-stage identification, assessment, approval, implementation, and management process before developing, deploying, procuring, or activating AI systems or AI capabilities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

UTS's Artificial Intelligence Operations Policy guides the use, procurement, development, and management of AI for teaching, learning, and operations, while directing research use to the separate research guidelines.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UTS Education Express says university misconduct rules apply to AI use in assessments, students must acknowledge AI-tool use, and students should only use AI tools to generate verbatim assessment materials when instructed that this is appropriate.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Texas at San Antonio

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Texas at San Antonio in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UTSA's faculty generative AI guide advises faculty to clearly state in the syllabus and course homepage whether and how AI use is allowed, while recognizing that faculty may choose different course approaches.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

UTSA Academic Affairs maintains an official Teaching, Learning and Artificial Intelligence page that links separate UT San Antonio-created AI resources for students and faculty.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of the Pacific

5 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT is listed for University of the Pacific in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of the Pacific in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Osmosis AI is listed for University of the Pacific in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Washington

5 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Washington in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UW general GenAI guidance says course instructors may allow, prohibit, or set parameters around GenAI use for their courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Teaching@UW guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as the currently UW-supported generative AI tool and points instructors toward Copilot instead of non-UW-supported tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Waterloo

5 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Waterloo's Academic Integrity page says instructors should state whether AI tools such as ChatGPT are allowed for assignments, tests, or exams, and that students who do not follow those instructor rules are subject to Policy 71 academic-misconduct processes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Waterloo IST says review processes assess AI tools used with University data for security, privacy, and contractual risks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Waterloo's graduate-student GenAI guidance says graduate students should not submit GenAI-produced work for course assignments without explicit course-instructor permission or instruction.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Vanderbilt University

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for Vanderbilt University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Amplify is listed for Vanderbilt University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Vanderbilt University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Washington University in St. Louis

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

WashU student-facing AI guidance tells students to check the instructor and syllabus about whether and how AI tools may be used for classwork, and says that if no explicit policy is outlined, it is better to assume AI use is banned.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

WashU CTL student guidance says students should not represent AI-tool output as their own work and should cite AI contributions when using AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for Washington University in St. Louis in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Western Sydney University

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Western Sydney University's Use of Artificial Intelligence Policy guides responsible and ethical AI and generative AI use for learning, teaching, assessment, research, and administrative functions, and applies to all students and staff.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Western Sydney University's Academic Integrity Guidelines say inappropriate use of generative AI in assessment tasks may lead to penalties under the Student Misconduct Rule.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Western Sydney University's student guidance says generative AI rules differ by assessment task and students are responsible for reading Subject Outlines, checking vUWS, or asking the Subject Coordinator rather than assuming the same advice applies across tasks or subjects.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Xiamen University

5 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Xiamen University's AI teaching guideline applies to Xiamen University teachers and students using generative AI services for on-campus course teaching activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Xiamen University's AI teaching guideline says teachers should state in their courses which generative AI services students may use or are prohibited from using.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Xiamen University's AI teaching guideline says students using generative AI services in course learning should actively disclose that use to the teacher and accurately mark the contribution of generative AI when required by the teacher.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

ADA University

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ADA University's Honor Code treats violating exam, test, and assignment rules, accepting unauthorized help, and using someone else's intellectual work without proper credit as unacceptable behavior.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ADA University's Student Assessment Regulations say assignments are to be designed and conducted to minimize plagiarism and cheating risk, including contract cheating, and that students are to receive clear instructions on avoiding academic-integrity breaches.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ADA University's Student Assessment Regulations require submitted take-home exams to include a signed and dated academic-integrity declaration confirming the work is the student's own and that all sources used were acknowledged.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Adelaide University

4 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Adelaide University's Academic Integrity Policy treats inappropriate use of AI that subverts an assignment or gives unfair academic advantage as an example of academic misconduct, including submitting AI-produced work as the student's own or using AI-generated information without acknowledgement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Adelaide University's invigilated online exam rules state that students may use only tools, software, or materials explicitly approved in exam instructions, and list AI tools such as ChatGPT as not permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Adelaide University's Academic Misconduct Procedure lists inappropriate use of Artificial Intelligence with plagiarism in its outcome table, with a standard outcome of mark reduction up to and including zero for the assignment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Arizona State University

4 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for Arizona State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ASU Provost guidance says data for the described generative-AI teaching support is securely maintained within ASU infrastructure, supporting privacy and transparency.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ASU Provost FAQs direct students to confer with their instructor about class policy before using AI tools in coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ashoka University

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Ashoka University's Academic Integrity Policy applies to students doing coursework, research, thesis work, partner-university coursework, study-related internships or placements, and work with University Centers; it expects original work, source acknowledgement, independent assignment completion where applicable, and honesty during examinations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

In the Ashoka University course catalogue entry for Economy, Politics and Society (FC-0412-5), the course-level AI/ML policy discourages use of machine-learning tools such as ChatGPT in that class and asks students who use such a tool to declare its use and specify the extent of use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Ashoka University's AI@Ashoka page is an official AI research-initiative page that describes interdisciplinary AI and machine-learning projects; it is not presented in the extracted text as a student AI-use policy, assessment rule, or approved-tools policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Australian Catholic University

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For ACU coursework students, unauthorized or undisclosed use of generative AI, paraphrasing or translation tools is listed as academic misconduct unless use is authorized in the assessment requirements and properly acknowledged.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Australian Catholic University has an official AI principles policy for teaching, research and research training that applies to University Members, staff and students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ACU's AI principles say AI must supplement rather than replace human decision-making, with humans retaining responsibility, and require privacy risks to be assessed and mitigated for AI-related activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Bilkent University

4 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Bilkent advises students to check course syllabi and instructors for whether and how GenAI tools may be used in specific courses or assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Bilkent's GenAI guideline says students should attribute AI-generated content and should not submit AI-generated content without proper attribution.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Bilkent's GenAI guideline tells students not to use GenAI when a professor has not explicitly allowed it in the course syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Brown University

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Brown OIT guidance says Google Gemini Chat and NotebookLM are accessible at no cost to Brown and can be used with data classified as Risk Level 3, unlike consumer AI services named on the page with which Brown does not have agreements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Brown Provost guidance says any unapproved use of AI to complete assignments would be covered by Brown’s Academic Code and Graduate Student Edition Academic Code.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Brown University Provost guidance says the University is not prescribing specific AI policies, and that faculty should give clear, unambiguous information about what AI use is and is not allowed in their courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Cardiff University

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Cardiff University's public library guidance tells students to check module or course guidance and the University's student AI guidance before using any AI tool to support assessed work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Cardiff University's 2025/26 Academic Regulations and Policies include a teaching, learning and assessment expectation that providers establish communicated approaches to technologies such as Generative Artificial Intelligence and define misuse of those technologies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

A Cardiff Learning and Teaching Academy post says students are encouraged to complete Cardiff's Academic Integrity module and that the module includes generative AI content in the context of academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Carleton University

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

Carleton identifies Microsoft Copilot as its only approved GenAI platform because it offers Enterprise Data Protection and has completed the university's Data Protection Risk Assessment process.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Carleton guidance says using AI tools to generate assignment content and presenting it as one's own work, or copying or paraphrasing AI-produced content without proper citations and instructor consent, is considered a violation of academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Carleton instructor guidance says confidential, sensitive, or institutional data should use only Carleton-approved AI tools, and discourages adopting third-party tools that have not been cleared for privacy and security by the university.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Carnegie Mellon University

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for Carnegie Mellon University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CMU Eberly Center guidance identifies a growing list of CMU-vetted generative AI tools that are FERPA compliant for teaching and learning when used as instructed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

CMU Eberly Center guidance says instructors should clarify whether AI tools count as authorized or unauthorized assistance and how students should cite AI or human assistance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Case Western Reserve University

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine medical students in the University and College Programs, submitted or presented content must be the student's own work and not the product of generative AI or other individuals.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

CWRU Provost classroom guidance gives faculty members discretion over the extent to which students may use AI tools in their courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

CWRU's Writing Program does not recommend AI detection services and prefers classroom expectations, assignment design, and discussion with students when concerns arise.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chiba University

4 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Chiba University's guideline says each course instructor judges whether generative AI use is consistent with class objectives and may prohibit or restrict generative AI use where it would significantly undermine achievement of educational objectives.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Chiba University's teaching-and-learning guideline says the university does not uniformly prohibit generative AI use in teaching and learning and promotes learning about, with, and aside from generative AI according to purpose.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Chiba University's guideline says that when instructors prohibit or restrict generative AI use in a class, they should clearly state that in the syllabus or other course handouts and explain the reason to students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

China Medical University

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

China Medical University's Academic Affairs guidance cautions teachers and students to pay attention to privacy and information security and avoid entering personal or other people's private information into generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

China Medical University's Academic Affairs generative AI teaching guidance asks instructors to communicate with students about course-specific ways and limits for using generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

China Medical University's Academic Affairs guidance tells teachers and students to consider academic-ethics concerns before using generative AI and to avoid plagiarism and copyright violations in assignments, exams, and research papers.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chonnam National University

4 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Chonnam's generative-AI writing assignment guideline tells instructors to state in the syllabus whether generative AI is allowed and, when allowed, to explain scope, misconduct criteria, the ethics pledge, and checklist use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Chonnam's generative-AI writing assignment guideline identifies improper AI uses that can constitute misconduct, including submitting copied AI output without attribution, patchworking AI output without attribution, using AI to create or spread false information or experiences, infringing copyright or intellectual property, and using AI in a class where it is fully prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Chonnam National University announced that it would provide eight generative AI services free of charge to all faculty, staff, and enrolled students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chung-Ang University (CAU)

4 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Chung-Ang University has an official Korean-language generative AI guidance page, established on 2023-04-20 and revised on 2024-04-09, administered by Library & Academic Information Services.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

CAU recommends that instructors choose one of three generative AI use options and state the selected approach in the syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CAU's guidance frames generative AI course use as instructor-selected options: complete ban, use with prior instructor approval or citation, or full permission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chungnam National University

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Chungnam National University's learner guide states that not following syllabus or instructor-agreed generative-AI criteria, or inappropriate AI use, may be regarded as cheating; examples include presenting AI answers as one's own, failing to disclose AI use, or using AI in a class where it is fully prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Chungnam National University's learner guidance says learners should follow instructor-provided generative-AI criteria, use AI as a learning support tool, verify AI outputs against reliable sources, and clearly mark the source, generation method, and scope of AI-generated materials.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Chungnam National University's instructor guidance says that when generative AI is used in class, instructors should state its purpose and scope in the syllabus, explain correct use and standards for cheating or plagiarism, and guide students to cite AI-generated outputs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Czech Technical University in Prague

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For bachelor and follow-up master study at CTU, AI-tool use in fulfilling programme and subject requirements must be clearly defined and described and must comply with the relevant programme, subject, and thesis-ethics rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

CTU's AI framework identifies sharing sensitive research data, personal data, and contractually concealed data with AI tools as significant cyber risks and states that AI cannot keep confidentiality or protect personal data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

CTU's AI framework marks AI use for examinations, tests, and homework as not appropriate for students unless teacher instructions or the assessment design clearly allow it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Edith Cowan University

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ECU's academic-misconduct guidance states that plagiarism includes unacknowledged use of a generative artificial intelligence tool such as ChatGPT.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ECU Library guidance says students who use generative AI as a study or research tool must acknowledge that use in their assessment, and that not giving credit to GenAI tools counts as plagiarism.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Edith Cowan University has a public Artificial Intelligence Framework intended to empower staff and students to use AI productively and ethically, with ethical principles and responsible-use guidance rather than a standalone prohibition.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

EPFL requires students to disclose the use of AI tools in assessment work. EPFL rules (Lex 1.3.3, Article 4) require that all assessment material that is not the student's personal and original contribution must be recognizable as such.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

EPFL recommends that teachers make explicit to students what AI use is not legitimate in a course and what rules accompany AI tool use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

EPFL considers the use of AI-generated content in assignments without proper attribution as AI plagiarism. Tools that detect AI-generated content are not admissible as stand-alone evidence of AI plagiarism due to high risk of false positives.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Georgia Institute of Technology

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OpenAI ChatGPT Edu is listed for Georgia Institute of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Georgia Tech OIT says Institute technology services and tools must undergo comprehensive review, and third-party AI plugins are disabled pending comprehensive risk review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Georgia Tech CTL course-policy guidance advises instructors to tell students how they should collaborate with and cite GenAI use, and to treat GenAI engagement as an extension of collaboration and academic honesty policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Graz University of Technology

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

TU Graz treats AI tools in examinations as unauthorized aids unless they are explicitly permitted, and the public teaching page says unpermitted AI use in assessment can make an examination attempt invalid due to cheating.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

TU Graz says teaching staff decide whether and which AI-supported tools may be used in each course or thesis, with only spell-checking, translation, and stylistic-grammatical improvement generally permitted for students absent broader authorization.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TU Graz guidance requires transparent labelling of AI-supported tool use where applicable and cautions against entering personal, confidential, trade-secret, or NDA-protected data into AI applications.

证据记录: 3。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hokkaido University

4 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

When generative AI is used to assist with grading submitted assignments, Hokkaido University's notes warn faculty not to enter students' personal or private information because entered data may be stored and output to other users.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For student use, Hokkaido University's notes say students preparing reports and other assignments should follow the instructor's guidance and instructions regarding generative AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For faculty use, Hokkaido University's notes say instructors should explain in advance whether generative AI is permitted in class and how it is restricted, and should consider grading fairness when students use it in assignments or practical learning.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hong Kong Baptist University

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

HKBU GenAI Platform is listed for Hong Kong Baptist University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

HKBU describes its Principles for the Use of Generative AI Tools in Teaching and Learning, and Assessment as Senate-approved in June 2023 and effective from AY2023/2024.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

HKBU presents four generative-AI teaching and learning principles: AI-Empowering, AI-Critical, AI-Ethical, and building and sustaining human uniqueness.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Illinois Institute of Technology

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Illinois Tech publishes official Academic Affairs guidance on academic honesty and generative AI, and related Center for Learning Innovation resources for teaching and learning with AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Illinois Tech's Academic Affairs guidance ties permitted use of generative AI or other outside resources to each course's learning objectives and syllabus expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Illinois Tech's Center for Learning Innovation asks faculty to provide clear syllabus expectations for AI use and provides suggested syllabus language for no, some, and significant AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IITM)

4 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For IIT Madras BS Degree program assignments, including any course or OPPE, the Honour Code says students are expected to produce original work based on individual understanding, and using LLMs such as ChatGPT or Gemini to generate any portion of code is considered plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The IIT Madras BS Degree Honour Code says use of LLMs without explicit permission is a violation of the honour code.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The IIT Madras BS Degree Honour Code applies to participation in the IIT Madras BS Degree program and says participants must agree to the Honour Code and any additional course- or program-specific terms posted on study.iitm.ac.in/ds.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indiana University Bloomington

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AI at IU developer toolkits is listed for Indiana University Bloomington in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for Indiana University Bloomington in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Indiana University guidance says students should use generative AI in ways that align with university academic integrity policies and communicate with instructors before using generative AI in coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Institut Polytechnique de Paris

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Institut Polytechnique de Paris's 2025-2026 Master programs academic regulations prohibit the use of generative AI in assessments for those programs unless explicitly authorized by the instructor in written instructions. Unauthorized use constitutes academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Le règlement des études 2025-2026 des masters de l'Institut Polytechnique de Paris interdit l'utilisation de l'intelligence artificielle générative dans les évaluations de ces programmes, sauf autorisation explicite de l'enseignant dans ses consignes écrites. Tout manquement est considéré comme une fraude.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Under Institut Polytechnique de Paris's 2025-2026 Master programs academic regulations, when generative AI use is explicitly permitted by an instructor, students must clearly acknowledge its use in accordance with standard citation practices.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Jouf University

4 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月22日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Jouf University says its University Council approved adding an "Artificial Intelligence" course as a basic course in the study plans for all students, starting in academic year 1447 AH.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Jouf University says the adopted AI course gives special attention to ethical and social aspects, including algorithmic bias, privacy, data protection, and legal and regulatory challenges linked to AI technologies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Jouf University's adopted AI course is described as covering machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, and computer vision through interactive lectures, dynamic discussions, and real case studies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Keio University

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Keio University says students need to clearly indicate when reports or similar assignments are created using generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Keio University says generative AI is not permitted for class assignments or exams when students are required to work independently.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Keio University tells students to use generative AI appropriately under the relevant faculty or instructor policy when a course, faculty, graduate school, or instructor encourages or permits its use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi

4 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT is listed for King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

KMUTT has university-level principles and guidelines for using Artificial Intelligence Tools to create content for teaching, learning, and research.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

KMUTT states that instructors or researchers must use discretion when defining the scope of AI-tool use for content creation in teaching, learning, or research, without affecting teaching objectives, learning outcomes, or research objectives.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kingston University, London

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure defines unacceptable use of generative AI as presenting AI-generated content as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except when the assessment brief explicitly permits it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Kingston University's AG2 guidance says that if generative AI is used as part of the editorial process, the student must acknowledge that use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure says contributions by artificial intelligence tools must be properly acknowledged.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kuwait University

4 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For teaching, Kuwait University's GenAI policy says faculty are free to set classroom GenAI policies and should include an AI-use section in the syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

When faculty permit student GenAI use, Kuwait University's policy says faculty may require students to identify the GenAI tools used, the assignment parts generated or assisted by GenAI, and the prompt used for each part.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Kuwait University's GenAI policy says faculty may use GenAI to create classroom materials, but should always verify GenAI results when grading projects, homework, or exams because GenAI might not be accurate or fair.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Maynooth University

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Maynooth University student GenAI guidance says using GenAI in an assignment beyond what is permitted is a breach of academic integrity, including plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For Maynooth University assessments, the student GenAI guidance states that if teaching staff or department guidelines do not clearly indicate GenAI use, no GenAI is permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Maynooth University student GenAI guidance says GenAI tools will not be used by staff to grade or provide feedback on students' assessed work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Michigan State University

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OpenAI ChatGPT Edu is listed for Michigan State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

MSU guidelines say students may use generative AI tools for coursework or research activities only when the instructor or research advisor explicitly permits that use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

MSU expects instructors to include course-specific generative AI guidance in every syllabus, including whether AI use is permitted, the contexts in which it may be used, and expected acknowledgment or citation practices.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Missouri University of Science and Technology

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Education is listed for Missouri University of Science and Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Missouri S&T's Dean of Students academic-integrity resource says using AI tools like ChatGPT in coursework requires instructor approval, and unauthorized AI use may violate university regulations and be considered plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Missouri S&T's CAFE GAI Guidelines state that the UM System does not endorse or provide an AI checker and caution faculty against trying to use this type of software because the tools have been shown to be unreliable and biased.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Nagasaki University

4 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月22日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Nagasaki University's student notice prohibits diverting content obtained from generative AI into reports or degree theses, and says instructors may impose strict measures such as a zero grade for violations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Nagasaki University's student notice warns that entering unpublished papers or confidential information, including personal or privacy information, into generative AI may cause unintended information outflow or leakage.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Nagasaki University's student notice tells students to pay careful attention to listed risks and follow the course instructor's instructions for generative AI use in classes and similar settings.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Taipei University of Technology

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Generative AI Application Platform is listed for National Taipei University of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NTUT guidance recommends that course syllabi list rules or limits for generative AI use, and that instructors explain and agree those course-level requirements with enrolled students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

NTUT Academic Affairs guidance says instructors may use generative AI as an auxiliary tool for teaching design and materials preparation, but should carefully review generated content for credibility, correctness, bias, and academic fairness.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT)

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NJIT says that if students have not received explicit instructor authorization to use AI, submitting AI-generated work may constitute a violation of the Code of Student Conduct and Academic Integrity policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

NJIT guidance says instructors have autonomy to develop course-specific AI policies, and students should check the syllabus and ask the instructor when unsure whether generative AI use is permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

NJIT says university-wide licensed AI tools go through a security and data vetting process within Information Services and Technology, and departments or instructors seeking an AI tool are recommended to contact IST for vetting assistance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Norwegian University of Science And Technology

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

GPT NTNU is listed for Norwegian University of Science And Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

GPT NTNU guidance permits use with open and internal data, but says GPT NTNU must not be used to assess, process, or analyze information about people.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

NTNU's staff AI guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot and GPT NTNU as AI chat tools available to NTNU students and employees.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Peking University

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

北大问学 (Beida Wenxue) is listed for Peking University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

小北智学 (Xiaobei Zhixue) is listed for Peking University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Peking University's AI use guidelines apply to faculty, students, researchers, and administrators who use generative AI or other AI-assisted tools in teaching, research, and management activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pennsylvania State University

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月13日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Penn State guidance tells users not to use free personal AI accounts for Penn State-related teaching, learning, research, or work and never to input Level 3 or Level 4 information into any AI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Penn State guidance says AI tools used by multiple people in a class, program, or administrative office require an accessibility review before use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Penn State says instructors need department head and dean approval, or appropriate commonwealth campus academic leadership approval, before requesting AI-assisted grading software.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (UC)

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AyudantIA is listed for Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (UC) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UC's academic-integrity guidance says instructors should clearly and transparently determine permitted and prohibited uses of generative AI, and treats unauthorized AI use in a course as an academic-integrity violation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UC guidance asks instructors to register and publish in Canvas the specific course or discipline agreements and limits for using AI systems and applications.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru (PUCP)

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

PUCP's Estudios Generales Letras says its generative AI manual is intended for its own students, teachers, pre-docents, and authorities to guide use, unify criteria, and orient behavior in the educational context.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

PUCP's Estudios Generales Letras says it needed its own generative AI manual to guide use and orient ethical and critical behavior by students, teachers, pre-docents, and authorities in the unit.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

PUCP's Estudios Generales Letras describes its generative AI manual as an academic first version that will not answer every question or resolve all course situations in EEGGLL.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University

4 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

PNU students must uphold academic integrity when using generative AI, follow instructor guidance, acknowledge allowed AI use, and not claim AI-generated work as their own.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

PNU's Generative AI Use Policy applies across PNU degree programs and to PNU faculty, researchers, students, administrative staff, and teaching, learning, research, training, development, and administrative activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

PNU faculty must disclose whether generative AI may be used in a course, include course-level guidelines on permissible and non-permissible uses, and include assignment disclaimers about appropriate and inappropriate generative AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Purdue University

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should determine and tell students when AI use is authorized or unauthorized; authorization is determined at the course level.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Purdue teaching guidance warns that an AI-detection positive result should not be the sole determining factor for an academic-integrity violation and subsequent consequences.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should commit to never sharing personally identifiable student information with third-party AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Queensland University of Technology (QUT)

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

QUT's Academic Integrity Policy treats unauthorised or inappropriate technology use as a breach when it replaces or obscures a student's own effort, misrepresents authorship or understanding, or undermines assessment validity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

QUT's Assessment and Feedback Procedure requires unit outlines to include a statement about the use of technology such as artificial intelligence tools in assessment-item descriptions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

QUT student guidance says a unit coordinator will tell students whether GenAI can be used in preparing or completing assessment tasks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Royal Holloway, University of London

4 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Royal Holloway academic misconduct regulations list requesting or engaging an artificial intelligence tool to write or rewrite work for unfair advantage, and presenting AI-generated content as one’s own unless authorised and acknowledged, as examples of assessment offences.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Royal Holloway requires students to include declaration statements for generative AI use or non-use, and says a list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Royal Holloway tells Foundation, undergraduate, and postgraduate taught students that module assessment briefs take precedence for AI use; if a brief says AI is not permitted, students must not use it and must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Saarland University

4 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Saarland University guidance says unauthorized use of generative AI in coursework or examinations, or failure to document it when required, is deception and may invalidate coursework or examinations and, in serious cases, lead to loss of examination entitlement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Saarland University guidance says using generative AI as an aid for coursework and examinations is generally allowed, but instructors or examiners may restrict it to certain functions or prohibit it entirely.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Saarland University guidance says generative AI should have the status of an aid and must not replace students' own work; assessment requirements should ensure significant student contribution.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Shanghai University

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Shanghai University's technology ethics notice states that university units and individuals conducting AI, big-data, and related teaching or research activities involving people, animals, or other technology-ethics matters should apply in advance for ethics review related to technology safety, including bioinformation security and data security, and may proceed only after approval.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Shanghai University's Qianxue Baike AI Smart Platform includes an AI teaching page with AI literacy, AI+ course, and AI practice sections and lists generative AI, prompt engineering, LLMOps, AI ethics, and large-model application learning resources.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Shanghai University's academic committee meeting report says the draft temporary generative AI use guide was intended to guide responsible use of generative AI tools in teaching and research, uphold academic integrity, protect data security, and support AI-enabled education reform.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Simon Fraser University

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for Simon Fraser University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

SFU tells students that use of generative AI for coursework depends on instructor permission, and students should not assume it is permitted when guidance is unclear or absent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

SFU guidance for faculty and staff says personal or confidential information should not be entered into AI tools that have not completed an SFU Privacy Impact Assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Southeast University

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Southeast University's Graduate School opened 2026 school-level applications for AI-enabled graduate education projects in three categories: AI+ graduate courses, AI-enabled graduate teaching reform research projects, and AI-enabled graduate education application scenarios.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For AI+ graduate course project applications, the Graduate School notice says proposed course content must comply with national laws, policies, correct orientation requirements, confidentiality restrictions, and intellectual property requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The 2026 Graduate School notice says AI-enabled graduate education application-scenario cases should show AI's value in graduate training and should follow AI-related usage norms to ensure safe application.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Stockholm University

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Stockholm University's AI resources page says employees signed in to Microsoft 365 with a university account have data protection for Copilot, but it also says information at confidentiality level 3 or 4 should not be entered into Copilot.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Stockholm University's central chatbot guidance recommends that teachers and examiners decide what AI-chatbot use is allowed or impermissible, noting that this may differ from course to course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Stockholm Business School says use of generative AI in examinations or mandatory assignments is prohibited unless explicitly allowed in the study guide or examination instructions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Syracuse University

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Syracuse University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For suspected inappropriate generative AI use, Syracuse University's Academic Integrity Policy says an incident report cannot rely only on AI detection results and must explain course- and assignment-specific AI rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Syracuse University's Academic Integrity Policy says permitted AI use may vary by course or assignment, and treats inappropriate AI use as a failure to do one's own work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech)

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

TalTech tells lecturers to explain acceptable AI-based software use in assessment, teaching, learning, and homework, and course-level permission or prohibition should be specified in the extended syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

TalTech says substantive AI output must be cited or described as a method, and learners remain responsible for accuracy, quality, analysis results, and references.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TalTech permits AI technologies in teaching and learning only when they comply with personal data processing, data privacy, and cybersecurity regulations and their use does not violate regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tampere University

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Tampere University tells students to openly and transparently acknowledge AI use in assignments, coursework, or theses and to describe how AI was used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Tampere University generally permits students to use generative AI applications to support learning and assignment completion, while allowing teachers to set course or assignment principles.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Tampere Universities provide Copilot Chat with TUNI ID for staff and students aged 18 or older and distinguish it from less secure free consumer AI chat services.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technische Universität Berlin (TU Berlin)

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

TU Berlin examination guidance states a general documentation duty when AI is used for assignments: students should identify the tools, extent, purpose, marked AI content, prompts, and their own contribution.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

TU Berlin's living AI guidelines say fully automated assessment of study or examination performance is not permissible; AI output may not be adopted one-to-one and digital tools such as AI may serve only as aids.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

TU Berlin's ChatGPT Edu pilot page describes scoped institutional access: the pilot began with Faculty VII, lists EU-server use, TUB-account/pseudo-ID login, and research/teaching/administration use, and says the licenses were extended with all faculties participating and 790 licenses total.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technological University Dublin

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For student assessment, TU Dublin guidance says generative AI can only be used in ways approved in advance by the lecturer, and that failure to follow the guidelines or inappropriate AI use may result in disciplinary action as a breach of academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

TU Dublin recommends using the Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale when designing assessments and communicating with students about how generative AI may be used in a specific assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TU Dublin's GenAI teaching and learning guidance says personal data should not be entered into GenAI systems that are not supported or approved by the University, and that students should not collect, store, or upload personal data to a GenAI system without permission or consent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Texas A&M University

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Texas A&M Technology Services describes TAMU AI Chat as a secure, university-approved platform open to all students and employees, with support for content classified as University-Confidential or lower.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Texas A&M guidance says generative AI users must acknowledge nontrivial AI-generated content and avoid plagiarism, while faculty should provide clear course instructions about permissible AI uses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Texas A&M presents AI Use Categories as a starting point for student-instructor conversation, not as a one-size-fits-all policy or replacement for instructor judgment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tsinghua University

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Tsinghua University prohibits students from directly copying or mechanically paraphrasing AI-generated text, code, or other output and submitting it as academic coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Tsinghua University affirms that AI must remain an auxiliary tool and that teachers and students are the primary agents in teaching and learning (principal responsibility principle).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Tsinghua University advises instructors to determine how AI should be used according to course objectives, clearly explain AI usage norms to students at the start of each course, and remain responsible for AI-generated teaching materials.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Concepción

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UdeC's [genIA] ethics page presents institutional guidelines and interactive tools for deciding how to incorporate generative AI in teaching and research while safeguarding transparency, authorship, privacy, and equity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The [genIA] teacher annex presents three orienting institutional template options for course or assignment instructions: generative AI allowed with conditions, restricted by stages, or prohibited except with explicit authorization.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The [genIA] teacher annex suggests including a 'Declaracion de autoria humana y uso de tecnologias digitales emergentes como la IA Generativa' section in each assignment or academic activity submission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Università degli Studi di Udine

4 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月26日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline says that if a student used AI tools at any stage of thesis writing, the student is required to explicitly declare the tool, version if available, date, and nature of use in a methodological note.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline says students should not insert automatically generated scientific text into the thesis, replace bibliographic research with AI, or use AI-generated text without critical and personal reworking.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline says non-compliance with its AI-use indications is treated as comparable to plagiarism and may lead to disciplinary sanctions under the university regulation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Innsbruck

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Innsbruck OpenAI Chatbot is listed for Universität Innsbruck in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For teaching and examinations, Universität Innsbruck's FAQ says course leaders may decide which AI tools are permitted unless a faculty has its own rules, should communicate rules clearly, and should explicitly identify permitted aids including AI tools for examinations; unnamed aids are prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Universität Innsbruck offers employees with an active employment relationship access to Academic AI in a protected environment, recommends the in-house Academic AI model, and says staff use of Microsoft Copilot is expressly prohibited for data-protection reasons.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Jena

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

HAWKI is listed for Universität Jena in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Universität Jena's exam-law page states that if AI is used in examinations, the examiner must expressly allow AI as an aid and students must state the use of tools such as ChatGPT for the assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For study and teaching contexts, Universität Jena guidance says AI use in scientific work or examinations may be used only as a supporting aid and only after consultation with the examiner.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat Rovira i Virgili

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

URV's student guide treats AI use in coursework as valid and recommended when it supports learning, while telling students to use it with teacher consent, declare its use, cite it, and verify AI-generated information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

URV's assessment guidance warns about academic-fraud concerns from AI but advises evolving assessment design rather than relying on AI-detection tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

URV's curriculum guidance says AI should be integrated into the curriculum to prepare students for professional contexts, including discussion of ethical and social implications such as data protection and academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Laval

4 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Université Laval guidance says AI-use expectations should be stated in the course plan and clarified in assessment instructions when AI use is authorized.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Université Laval guidance says using AI tools is not automatically an academic offence, but unauthorized use may constitute an academic offence under the student disciplinary regulation.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Université Laval publishes five AI principles for teaching and learning that are derived from its mission, vision, and values.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Teknologi Brunei

4 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Where a coursework item has no specified GenAI policy, UTB's guidance treats GenAI content generation as third-party assistance and says the assistance must be explained, declared, and referenced to avoid plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Universiti Teknologi Brunei has a Senate-approved GenAI guidance section for UTB students' usage in module assessments in its Student Report Manual.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For UTB module assessments, the GenAI guidance says the lecturer will specify the permitted level of GenAI usage for each coursework item.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University at Buffalo SUNY

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University at Buffalo SUNY in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UB's Office of Academic Integrity states that UB has no universal policy about student use of artificial intelligence and that instructors have academic freedom to decide which tools students may use for course learning objectives.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Because UB has no universal AI policy for student use, the Office of Academic Integrity says instructors need to tell students what AI use is and is not allowed in the course or on each assessment, including in the syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University College Cork

4 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For UCC taught-programme assessments, academic integrity is breached if students submit GenAI products as their own work without acknowledgement and without authorisation to use GenAI for the task.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UCC's academic integrity policy says the University does not sanction use of GenAI detection software for detecting or investigating alleged academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UCC's Academic Integrity for Examinations and Assessments Policy applies to work presented or submitted by registered students for examination, assessment, or credit in taught programmes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University College Dublin

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UCD's faculty AI guidelines say a module descriptor must clearly state whether student AI use is permissible in the module and under what conditions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UCD guidance directs staff and students toward institutionally supported AI tools that meet University privacy and IT security standards, and warns against entering personal data into external or non-UCD licensed tools.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

University College Dublin publishes University Management Team-approved AI Governance Principles for institutional AI use, including human oversight, fairness, transparency, compliance, ethical design, AI literacy, stakeholder engagement, and risk assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Amsterdam

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Amsterdam has a policy framework for Generative AI in education that provides central guidelines for responsible use of GenAI based on scientific integrity, with room for faculties and programmes to translate the policy into their own educational practice.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

At the UvA, both the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity and the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity apply, which outline the principles and standards for integrity in research and teaching.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Amsterdam is developing its own AI chat environment called UvA AI Chat, which is similar to ChatGPT but is fully self-managed and specifically designed for UvA students, lecturers and staff.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Arkansas Fayetteville

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OpenAI ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Arkansas Fayetteville in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Arkansas Academic Initiatives and Integrity faculty resources page says faculty have discretion over student use of generative AI in their courses and provides approved syllabus statement options for prohibited, restricted, and unrestricted use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

A January 2026 University of Arkansas advisory lists Copilot Chat, Copilot for Microsoft 365, OpenAI ChatGPT Edu, Google Gemini, and Google NotebookLM as approved AI tools available for campus use, with some tools requiring licenses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bayreuth

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Bayreuth in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bayreuth ITS says members can use existing licenses to access ChatGPT and DALL-E through Microsoft Copilot with their University of Bayreuth bt account, and can also use GenAI open-source models through AcademicCloud.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bayreuth points staff toward AI literacy and teaching support, including ZHL training formats for lecturers and ITS-listed online courses connected to the EU AI Act article 4 context.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bristol

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

PGR students at University of Bristol are not permitted to use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to write any text used in their thesis or APM reports, as research degree students must demonstrate ability to write about research in their own words.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bristol considers the use of AI or translation tools to be cheating if used for more than generating the occasional short phrase within a sentence or checking basic grammar and spelling, unless assessment instructions allow more comprehensive use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bristol has published official guidance on generative AI use in taught degree programmes, stating that generative AI should not replace activities that develop intellectual rigour, student agency, and students' capacity to work through complex problems themselves.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Calgary

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For graduate studies, the Faculty of Graduate Studies guidelines say students should obtain written, unambiguous authorization before planned GenAI use in graduate work, and students must disclose GenAI use in graduate study work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Calgary teaching-and-learning guidance supports the use of generative AI in teaching and learning, while saying individual educators and instructors should decide if and how it is incorporated and clearly communicate student expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Calgary teaching-and-learning guidance says student, faculty, and staff use of generative AI should adhere to existing academic integrity policies, and instructors using generative AI must follow privacy laws for student data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月11日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UCLA Academic Senate guidance quotes the Student Conduct Code requirement that submissions must be the student’s own work or clearly acknowledge the source, and says that unless an instructor indicates otherwise, use of ChatGPT or other AI tools for course assignments is akin to receiving assistance from another person.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UCLA DTS guidance says users may not input FERPA-protected student information, HIPPA/HIPAA-protected health data, employee personnel/performance data, unpublished research/IP/grant proposals, or export-controlled or restricted data into AI tools unless explicitly approved in a secure environment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UCLA DTS AI guidance lists a subset of available generative AI tools including Microsoft Copilot and M365 Copilot, Google Gemini, OpenAI ChatGPT Enterprise, Google Notebook LM, AWS Bedrock models, and Zoom AI Companion.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Canberra

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

DALL·E is listed for University of Canberra in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Canberra in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For teaching periods commencing after 1 February 2026, the University of Canberra says its GenAI assessment position uses three assessment-use categories: Permitted, Guided, and Restricted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Cologne

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Anthropic models via KI:Connect is listed for University of Cologne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google models via KI:Connect is listed for University of Cologne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OpenAI commercial models via KI:Connect is listed for University of Cologne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Denver

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Denver University Writing Program says students should review and abide by instructor policies for assignments before using generative AI technology.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For writing assignments, the University of Denver University Writing Program advises faculty to outline clear policies about when and how generative AI can or cannot be used and to include instructions for acknowledging assistance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Denver Office of Teaching and Learning advises faculty to state clear expectations for student work and to consider syllabus statements explaining whether and how AI tools can be used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of East Anglia (UEA)

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UEA's plagiarism and collusion policy permits AI to help students understand material and expression, but says using AI to complete an assessment, or part of it, is plagiarism and may reach contract cheating.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UEA's teaching and learning policy does not prohibit generative AI use, and says each School of Study should meet at least annually to discuss generative AI's impact on assessment design and set School-level expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UEA's research and innovation policy requires a self-assessment process when generative AI will be used, built, or developed in UEA research, subject to listed exceptions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Galway

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Galway's QA220 Academic Integrity Policy identifies submitting all or part of an assessment item produced using artificial intelligence and claiming it as one's own work as an example of academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Galway's Academic Integrity FAQ says students should not present generative AI tool output as their own work in any assignment, while limited preparatory use may be permitted by an instructor if generated outputs are not presented as the student's own work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Galway's Academic Integrity Office guidance for DSS-related literacy software says excessive or irresponsible use of GenAI-powered literacy software may constitute a breach of academic integrity and advises students to use only DSS-approved literacy software versions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Gothenburg

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Gothenburg student guidance says the university does not prohibit generative AI in education; teachers and examiners decide whether, when, and how it may be used in coursework and examinations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Gothenburg student guidance says generative-AI guidelines vary between courses, programmes, departments, and faculties, and that teachers and examiners are responsible for communicating those guidelines to students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Gothenburg student guidance on cheating says generative AI use counts as cheating when it is used to complete an examination task the student is expected to do independently, to present AI-generated material as the student’s own work, or in other ways prohibited in the course or programme.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Helsinki

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CurreChat is listed for University of Helsinki in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Helsinki student guidance treats prohibited use of large language models, or failing to report their use as instructed, as cheating; the cheating and plagiarism guidance also lists presenting AI-generated text or solutions as one's own as plagiarism.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Helsinki guidance says large language models may generally be used in teaching and writing support, while course teachers can restrict or prohibit use on pedagogical grounds and AI cannot be used in maturity tests.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Iceland

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Iceland's 2023 framework says existing rules for sources, aids, and equipment in studies apply to AI use, and that misuse of AI in schoolwork is governed by the same rules as other academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Iceland's AI strategy frames AI as a fundamental tool for study, teaching, research, and work, with an aim for students and staff to become responsible users who understand limitations and apply critical thinking.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Iceland student guidance says AI can support study tasks such as organizing work, shaping ideas, practicing understanding, and preparing assignments, but that AI use should support learning rather than replace it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Illinois Chicago (UIC)

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UIC College of Medicine policy states that students are expected to draft submitted assignments on their own; AI may assist with idea generation and editing, but AI directly authoring a response is considered a violation of academic integrity and professionalism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UIC College of Medicine policy prohibits students from generating patient care notes with AI applications except EHR-supported applications explicitly permitted by course leadership, and says protected health information should never be entered into outside generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UIC CATE recommends that instructors develop and include an AI usage policy in their syllabus after sharing their stance on AI writing tools in the course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Liverpool

4 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Liverpool lists unacceptable uses of generative AI in education, including unreviewed copying of AI-generated content into assessment materials or feedback, using AI for grades or final assessment decisions, uploading protected student or confidential information to public AI platforms without required review, and creating or modifying official policy documents without appropriate review and approval.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Liverpool has a central AI policies and guidance hub that collates generative AI guidance covering golden rules, legal/security/data protection, learning/teaching/assessment, and research.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Liverpool's central GenAI learning, teaching, and assessment page says the University has devised guidance to help academics and students understand its position and make informed decisions on when and how to use GenAI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Macau

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Macau has official guidelines on the use of generative artificial intelligence tools for UM academic staff and students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UM guidance says students should acknowledge GenAI use in assignment submissions and indicate how GenAI was used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UM guidance says academic staff should include a course policy on GenAI use in syllabi, specifying whether GenAI is permitted, permitted only in certain circumstances or with explicit permission, or prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Michigan-Ann Arbor

4 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

U-M GPT is listed for University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

U-M GPT Toolkit is listed for University of Michigan-Ann Arbor in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

U-M requires AI use in teaching and learning to align with principles of honesty, candor, openness, and integrity in scholarship and research, including appropriate disclosure and citation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Milan

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Milan in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For educational activities, the University of Milan permits AI-supported self-assessment when explicit, but does not permit delegating learning assessment to AI tools when the assessment contributes to the final exam grade.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

In educational settings, the University of Milan advises that students must explicitly declare AI use in assessed work and that teachers must explicitly declare AI use in educational activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Minnesota (System)

4 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Provost's GenAI syllabus guidance says instructors may allow or prohibit GenAI in courses, and that coursework use requires written instructor permission and may not occur except as explicitly authorized by the instructor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UMN OIT guidance says University users should safeguard data by uploading only allowed University data into appropriately licensed AI tools, and it distinguishes UMN-licensed tools from an individual ChatGPT license.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UMN Libraries' student guidance says students should check each course syllabus, ask instructors when unsure, keep track of GenAI use, and cite or acknowledge AI-generated material when permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Mississippi

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Mississippi CETL syllabus guidance states that there are currently no university-supported AI detection tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Mississippi CETL syllabus guidance says each instructor may determine, for their own class, what AI uses are permissible and what AI uses constitute academic dishonesty, and advises instructors to be clear about generative AI use in syllabi and class discussion.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Mississippi Libraries guidance tells students to use and cite AI according to the syllabus, assignment description, or other instructor communication, noting that instructor requirements may vary by class.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

4 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Unimore stated that it had purchased ChatGPT Edu licenses under the CRUI-OpenAI agreement and that requested licenses would provide access to the 'Modena e Reggio Emilia EDU' workspace through institutional email.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Pending university AI-use guidelines, Unimore recommended verifying sources, keeping human control by using AI only as assistance, requesting source citations in prompts, protecting sensitive data, and documenting AI use in proceedings.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For ChatGPT Edu licenses, Unimore stated that inserted data would not be used to train models and that users remain owners of inputs and outputs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Nevada - Reno

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNR's Academic Standards policy defines cheating to include unauthorized use of generative AI content generators or generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UNR directs users to initiate an OIT Compliance vendor risk management assessment before integrating an AI tool into daily tasks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNR teaching guidance says AI detection tools are not fully reliable and should not be used as the sole determining factor for deciding whether an AI-related academic standards violation occurred.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Oregon

4 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Oregon Student Conduct Code's plagiarism definition includes submission of material generated by others, including AI content generators and generative AI tools such as ChatGPT.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Oregon teaching guidance says instructors should have a syllabus policy statement explaining what generative AI use is allowed and disallowed in their course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UO Information Services guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot with Data Protection as UO's most secure generative AI option and cautions users because UO lacks enterprise contracts covering ChatGPT, DALL-E, and most other AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Pisa

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Pisa in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Pisa IT system supports centralized acquisition of ChatGPT Education for teachers and researchers who want to use generative AI tools in academic contexts, with an advanced service level and stronger confidentiality guarantees.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Pisa describes Sibylla as an open-source AI chat system developed by the university that can provide information in any language about university regulations and operations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Pretoria

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

clickUP AI Design Assistant is listed for University of Pretoria in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Pretoria Library guidance states that module-level AI rules in the assignment brief and module outline take precedence, and students should ask their lecturer when in doubt.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A University of Pretoria student guide recommends treating generative AI as a supplementary learning aid rather than a replacement for thorough research and academic rigour.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Reading

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for University of Reading in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Reading assessment guidance uses a three-category GenAI framework: Category 1 prohibits GenAI use, Category 2 permits GenAI as a tool to aid development of the assessment, and Category 3 actively encourages and evaluates GenAI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Reading student guidance tells students to assume Category 1 when an assignment brief says nothing about GenAI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Regina

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

For GenAI projects or systems, University of Regina employees are directed to identify, assess, and analyze risks including privacy and security, and University-wide GenAI projects, tools, systems, or intended enterprise-data uses require approval through established IT project approval processes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Regina Provost's message to students says individual instructors may determine whether and to what extent AI is permitted in course work, and warns that improper or unauthorized AI use can constitute academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Rhode Island

4 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

URI ITS preliminary responsible-AI standards direct users to follow URI data classification guidance, avoid entering private or restricted data into public AI tools, and be cautious that data may be transmitted to third-party servers.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

As of July 2025, a Provost syllabus memo stated that URI did not have a university-wide policy governing generative AI use in coursework, while offering optional AI syllabus statements for faculty.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

URI Libraries guidance says generative AI use should be acknowledged or cited, students should check professor expectations before using AI in coursework, and directly used AI output needs a formal citation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Southampton

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT is listed for University of Southampton in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Southampton guidance says students are allowed to use GenAI tools like ChatGPT to develop learning and support studies, but should never submit work created or part-created by GenAI for assessments they claim as their own.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Southampton guidance lists acceptable GenAI uses such as arranged assistive technology, study-buddy support, clearly referencing GenAI use, and summarising complex ideas or academic texts; it lists copying GenAI output into work, asking GenAI to write or rewrite work, asking GenAI to answer an assessment question, and sharing module tutor materials in a GenAI tool as unacceptable uses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Southern Denmark (SDU)

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For the SDU Artificial Intelligence bachelor's programme page, SDU states that students must disclose or clearly mark direct or edited material from generative AI in an assignment, and missing disclosure or marking will be treated as plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For the SDU Artificial Intelligence bachelor's programme page, SDU states that students may use generative AI when preparing written home assignments, including written home assignments with oral defence, bachelor's projects, final projects and theses, provided the use is clearly stated.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For the SDU Artificial Intelligence bachelor's programme page, SDU states that students may not use generative AI for written in-person exams, other supervised exams, or oral exams, unless exceptions appear in the course description.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Strathclyde

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Strathclyde guidance tells students to check module or department guidance to determine whether AI tools may be used in a specific assessment and to what extent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Strathclyde guidance says use of Gen-AI in learning and assessment is not necessarily or automatically academic misconduct; context determines whether misconduct is a concern.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Strathclyde guidance says the only Gen-AI tool students and staff may currently sign up to with University credentials is Microsoft Copilot in Edge, and that staff and students also have access to the in-built Zoom AI Assistant while using Zoom.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Szeged

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Szeged student guidance says students using AI for assignments or other coursework must disclose the AI tool, purpose, method, and extent of use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Szeged student guidance says AI may be used as an auxiliary tool but cannot replace students' own work; submitting an entirely AI-made work as one's own is treated as a serious academic ethics violation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Szeged instructor guidance describes three course models for AI use: full prohibition, partial permission for specified tasks, and full permission with disclosure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of the Free State

4 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月26日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The University of the Free State has a Senate-approved AI Position Statement that covers both generative and assistive AI technologies across teaching and learning, research, and administrative tasks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UFS states that it does not impose a blanket restriction on AI use, while noting that advantages, disadvantages, and implications need to be considered in different UFS spheres.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UFS says AI literacy and skills should be developed as part of digital competencies across all levels of the institution, with students, staff, and stakeholders supported to use AI tools effectively and responsibly.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Toledo

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UToledo's Academic dishonesty policy lists representing the words, ideas, or information of an artificial intelligence program as one's own without proper documentation as an example of academic dishonesty, and says faculty are expected to tell students what materials and procedures, including artificial intelligence programs, are authorized.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UToledo's Simple Syllabus guidance says the AI Tool Usage section is required and private, and instructors must select or enter a statement explaining how generative AI tools may be used, limited, or prohibited in the course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Within the University of Toledo College of Law default rule, generative AI may be used for research-like search, grammar correction, and other functions attendant to completing an assignment, but may not compose submitted assignment text and may not be used for any exam purpose unless an instructor deviates in writing with notice.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Toronto

4 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Toronto considers use of generative AI tools on marked assessments without instructor permission to be use of an unauthorized aid under the Code of Behaviour on Academic Matters.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Toronto teaching guidance says Microsoft Copilot is the recommended generative AI tool to use at U of T and, when signed in with University credentials, conforms to U of T privacy and security standards for use with up to level 3 data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Contact North Teacher’s Assistant Pro is listed for University of Toronto in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Twente

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UT's education PDF requires students to disclose AI use in an appendix when AI is used for an assignment, and states that unconsented and unacknowledged AI use should be considered academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UT's education PDF tells teachers that each assignment or group of assignments should make clear whether students may use AI and whether restrictions apply.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For student assignments and theses, UT's AI dossier says AI tool use depends on the course and on policies set by the programme or lecturer.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Virginia

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UVA Provost guidance says that if an assignment involves students uploading original work into a GenAI tool, instructors must provide alternative ways to complete the assignment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UVA guidance says students who use AI in completing an assignment should clearly indicate the tool used, how it was used, prompts used, and, when appropriate, fact-checking efforts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UVA guidance says instructors should make explicit in syllabi and assignment descriptions which GenAI uses are permitted or prohibited, and that using GenAI in ways prohibited by the instructor may violate the Honor Code.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Wisconsin-Madison

4 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Azure AI Services is listed for University of Wisconsin-Madison in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UW-Madison Student Conduct guidance says students are responsible for knowing their instructor's expectations for AI tools and should ask before using AI if permission is unclear.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UW-Madison's CTLM generative AI teaching guidance says instructors and administrators are responsible for protecting student privacy and intellectual work, securing FERPA-protected data, and following university policies that apply to generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

USI - Università della Svizzera italiana

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

USI's general rule permits use of generative AI tools unless a specific activity explicitly prohibits them, and says use must be correctly acknowledged.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

USI maintains a public generative-AI guidance hub and June 2025 recommendations for both students and teaching staff; the Desk page says those recommendations expand and replace earlier 2023 communications.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

USI teaching-staff recommendations advise teachers to clearly communicate what students should, can, and cannot do with GenAI tools for course learning activities and to include relevant information in the course syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Wageningen University & Research

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Wageningen University Examining Board rules treat AI-created ready-made assignment content as an irregularity that may lead to suspicion of fraud unless AI use is explicitly allowed in the assignment description and adequately documented.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

WUR's student GenAI rules warn that content fed into external GenAI tools may be stored indefinitely and tell students never to put others' personal data, intellectual-property-infringing information, or sensitive or confidential research data into a public GenAI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

WUR's student GenAI rules tell students to check the course guide for whether and how GenAI is permitted; if the guide has no information, using GenAI to generate assignment content is not allowed and may be irregularity or fraud, including for theses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Washington State University

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

WSU Provost guidance expects every instructor to set clear acceptable-AI-use expectations and to state the AI course policy in every class syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

WSU Provost guidance says instructors may allow or prohibit generative AI tools for their courses, with an obligation to communicate the course AI policy clearly to enrolled students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

WSU Provost AI-related policy guidance says Executive Policy 8 prohibits putting legally protected or regulated data, including proprietary, personally identifiable, HIPAA, or FERPA data, into generative AI platform queries.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

West Virginia University

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

WVU Academic Integrity’s AI student FAQ says students can use AI tools for assignments only when instructors allow them, and students should ask the instructor if unsure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

WVU Faculty Senate’s Artificial Intelligence Syllabus Statement says AI tools that create and develop academic content are not allowed unless an instructor gives permission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

WVU Faculty Senate identifies its syllabus statements as optional, and provides additional sample AI statements that can allow or disallow AI use with documentation expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yeshiva University

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Yeshiva University's undergraduate academic integrity policy treats unsanctioned use of Generative AI or Assistive AI as a potential academic integrity violation and tells students to assume generative-capable platforms are prohibited unless allowed for the course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Yeshiva University's undergraduate policy permits faculty to allow Generative AI in courses or assessments if they specify in writing how it may be used; content produced using Generative AI must be cited according to the relevant subject conventions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Yeshiva University's Academic Integrity Resources page gives faculty recommended syllabus language templates for assistive-only AI use, selected Generative AI use, all AI allowed, and no AI allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yokohama National University

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Yokohama National University warns students not to input personal information or confidential off-campus/internal information into generative AI because entered information may be used for AI learning or leak unintentionally.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Yokohama National University tells students to pay sufficient attention to its generative AI precautions and, for course assignments, reports, experiments, and research papers, to strictly follow the scope of use instructed by the responsible or supervising instructor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Yokohama National University warns students not to use generative AI output unchanged as their own outcome, work, or creation, noting copyright and plagiarism risks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Abo Akademi University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Larabot is listed for Abo Akademi University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 3。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Åbo Akademi University's Open University teacher guidance says teachers cannot require students to use AI to complete an assignment because AI requires registration on an external service.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Åbo Akademi University's Open University teacher guidance says students in courses should be informed about the principles and disadvantages of AI or language-model use, and teachers should make clear what applies in each specific course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Adam Mickiewicz University has Rector order 426/2023/2024 setting rules for student use of AI systems in education, including theses and coursework/assessment work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For classroom/course work, AMU recommends that the course coordinator choose the appropriate level of AI-use control based on the syllabus, and that the instructor inform students about permission or prohibition at the first class.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

AMU classroom guidance says that, in course contexts where permission or marking is required, use of generative AI tools without permission or without appropriate marking is treated in the same way as plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Official ABU news pages say university leaders discussed updating teaching and learning policy for AI transparency/accountability and later stated that ABU had put strategies in place for use of AI in teaching and learning; the pages do not publish the full strategy or student-use rules.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

An official ABU conference news page reports a keynote statement that tools like ChatGPT can complete assignments instantly and challenge assessment and originality, but it does not state an ABU rule permitting or prohibiting student AI-tool use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The crawl found official ABU pages discussing AI strategies and teaching/learning context, but did not find a public official ABU generative-AI use policy, approved/prohibited AI tools list, or AI-tool data/security policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

American University

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

American University guidance says students are responsible for course AI policies in syllabi, and misuse of AI or use without permission or disclosure may constitute an Academic Integrity Code violation.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

American University publishes responsible-use guidance for AI tools that applies general principles of transparency, accountability, human oversight, data protection, privacy, teaching, research, staff, and student use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

American University guidance places AI-use expectations at the course level: syllabi should state whether AI use is prohibited or permitted, and the CFE page says AU does not currently regulate faculty and student use of generative AI through a single university-wide rule.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Amman Arab University

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AAU's AI instructions allow students to use AI tools for self-learning, initial project and research ideas, and text or data analysis, but prohibit submitting AI outputs as-is, generating complete or nearly complete assignment/project answers without being able to explain them, or using tools that lead to cheating or breach academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

AAU's AI instructions require students to document AI use by explicitly identifying the tool used and where and how it was used in assignments, research, and projects, while observing intellectual-property rights.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

AAU's AI instructions allow faculty members to use AI tools for educational content, learning activities, rubrics, and student-performance analysis, while requiring the faculty member to remain the course's primary scientific source and not rely fully on generated outputs without review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki has an official Greek GenAI guidance document for the AUTH academic community, first edition November 2025, covering general principles and teaching/student guidelines.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

AUTH guidance encourages teaching staff to state clearly the GenAI-use policy adopted for a course, include it in the course outline, and modify it by assignment when needed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AUTH student guidance says course teams define the GenAI policy for each course or assignment, and examples distinguish potentially permitted learning-support uses from uses such as submitting generated content as-is or using GenAI during an exam.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Auburn University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Auburn student-facing academic-integrity guidance tells students to review the syllabus and ask the instructor before using AI on coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Auburn guidance says instructional faculty may encourage or restrict student AI use in courses and should give students clear expectations and disciplinary-consequence awareness.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Auburn Provost course AI-use guidance is explicitly optional and says it does not constitute official university policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Beijing Institute of Technology

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

智教通 (Zhijiaotong) is listed for Beijing Institute of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Beijing Institute of Technology academic misconduct rules apply to teaching and research staff, management staff, students, and others conducting academic activities under the university name.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Beijing Institute of Technology Graduate School says 2026 graduate program plans should add public foundational AI courses for all graduate students, with students required to take the appropriate tier according to program training requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Beijing Jiaotong University

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Beijing Jiaotong University's 2023-2024 undergraduate teaching quality report says the university opened liberal-arts/science-track AI general courses and aimed for AI course coverage for the 2024 undergraduate cohort, except where programs already include AI courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For the Zhan Tianyou College-related 2024 undergraduate training model described in the report, BJTU required majors in the information ability module to add AI-specialized courses categorized as AI foundation, AI expansion, and AI frontier courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

BJTU's undergraduate teaching quality report says the university developed AI-enabled course pilots using large-model technologies around knowledge graphs, 24-hour intelligent learning companions, AI teaching assistants, and AI mentors, with experience to be promoted across the university.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Birkbeck, University of London

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Birkbeck's student AI guidance states that the AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including assessments where the brief permits no AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Birkbeck's student AI guidance says students should use AI tools, including generative AI, only to the extent outlined in the assessment brief, and should not use them where the brief explicitly does not permit them.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Birkbeck's Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy includes using generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to create assessment content or argument presented as the student's own intellectual work within its description of contract cheating, unless generative AI use is permitted in the assessment brief with guidance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Bournemouth University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Bournemouth University academic-offences guidance lists using artificial intelligence software to write all or part of an assignment and claiming the work as your own as an example of an academic offence.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Bournemouth University student guidance says using generative AI when writing coursework is not, by itself, an academic offence, while directing students to use the resource responsibly and appropriately.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Bournemouth University's 6H taught-awards policy defines academic offences as attempts to gain unfair advantage in assessment by deception or fraudulent means and frames academic integrity around responsibility for one's own work, acknowledging others' work, honest reporting, and avoiding unfair advantage.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Brunel University of London

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Brunel's published principles for generative AI in teaching and learning state that when generative AI is used in assessment, its use must be declared.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Brunel's student-facing guidance says generative AI tools can support learning, but students remain responsible for their work and ideas and should use GenAI as a learning aid rather than a shortcut.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Brunel University Library's generative AI guide states that use of generative AI tools in an assignment is not permitted unless the module leader has explicitly specified that their use is permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chang Gung University

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Chang Gung University guidance encourages faculty and students to use ChatGPT as a teaching and learning aid, while keeping use within a reasonable scope and observing academic integrity and ethics.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Chang Gung University student guidance tells students to follow course AI-use rules, clearly mark AI use when permitted, avoid directly copying AI-generated content, and not use AI in exams unless specifically allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Chang Gung University teacher guidance advises instructors to state AI-use rules in syllabi, choose whether AI use is fully open, conditionally open, or prohibited, and explain scope, marking requirements, and grading criteria.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Comillas Pontifical University

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Comillas states that using AI to create complete works or relevant parts without citing the source or tool, or without express permission in the assignment description, will be considered plagiarism under the university's general regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Comillas permits students to use AI as a reference tool when the use is acknowledged and cited, and directs students to check each course guide and consult the instructor for activity-specific rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Comillas says teachers who incorporate AI tools in their courses should ensure that the conditions for use are clearly established in the course guide.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

De La Salle University

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Starting Term 1, 2025-2026, DLSU's policy says every course must include a dedicated Generative AI Use Policy section in the syllabus, including usage policy levels for grading components and a concise rationale.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

De La Salle University has an official policy document for generative AI use in teaching, learning, and research, and the policy states that it applies only to generative AI rather than AI in general.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

DLSU's policy treats prohibited generative AI use and failure to disclose generative AI use as generative AI-related academic dishonesty, while also stating that AI detector results cannot be the sole basis for establishing such dishonesty.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Dongguk University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The same Dongguk notice says its ChatGPT guideline covers instructor guidance to state use principles in syllabi, inform students, and consider assessment design, and learner guidance to follow instructor-provided ChatGPT principles, analyze and verify ChatGPT answers, check similarity to existing works, cite sources, and avoid overreliance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A Dongguk Advanced Convergence College notice describes ChatGPT guideline objectives that include improving members' understanding of generative AI, improving learning experience through class use of ChatGPT, presenting measures for safe and ethical use, and reducing confusion in academic operations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Dongguk's central notice announced a paid generative AI service and linked a service guide describing an all-in-one generative AI platform with selectable model families such as GPT, Gemini, and Claude, plus custom chatbot features.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

East China University of Science and Technology

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

East China University of Science and Technology reported launching an artificial-intelligence faculty training activity on March 21, 2024, with more than 200 teachers from 21 units attending.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

East China University of Science and Technology stated that it planned in 2024 to fund a group of high-quality 'AI+' graduate courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The ECUST School of Information Science and Engineering reported a May 2025 teaching seminar that covered classroom applications of ChatGPT, Kimi and DeepSeek for generative-AI-driven teaching reform.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Tübingen presents its generative-AI guideline for teaching and research as representing the university's stance, focused on critical-reflective, transparent, and responsible handling of generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Tübingen download area says its model declaration must be adapted before distribution to students, with the faculty, department, or teacher choosing either a no-generative-AI-use option or a marking-duty option when AI use is allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Tübingen public generative-AI hub describes bwGPT/Ask Alma as a data-protection-compliant AI chatbot available through ILIAS for students and teachers, while noting that users should complete a basic generative-AI training module before using AI offerings such as bwGPT/Ask Alma.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

École Normale Supérieure de Lyon

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

ENS Lyon's IFÉ Édurevue n°154 frames AI, especially generative AI, as an education topic involving regulatory reference points, ethical questions, and teacher training; this is an education-watch synthesis, not a binding institution-wide student AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The IFÉ Édurevue n°154 discusses generative AI in relation to plagiarism, cheating, assessment design, and academic integrity; it cites examples of other universities' AI charters but does not establish an ENS Lyon AI-use charter.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The ENS-hosted CultureSciences Physique site has a teaching-resource item on generative AI, teaching, and evaluation that points to external resources; the page is a resource pointer and should not be treated as ENS Lyon institutional policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Effat University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Effat University's library AI guide warns that generative-AI tools can produce inaccurate or false citations and advises users to verify citations for accuracy and credit the underlying source rather than the AI tool when citing sourced information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Effat University's library AI guide advises users who decide to use ChatGPT or other AI technology for writing to be transparent with teachers and publishers and comply with applicable policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Effat University Library provides a generative-AI resources guide that introduces AI concepts, impacts, approaches, and examples such as ChatGPT, Copilot, and Gemini.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Emory University

3 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Emory Responsible AI guidance says students must review course syllabi, program handbooks, and faculty expectations regarding AI use because instructors may specify whether tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, or other generative technologies are permitted for assignments and under what conditions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Emory College Learning Design guidance cites Honor Council language stating that, where AI is not allowed, using an AI program to generate assignment content constitutes plagiarism and an Honor Code violation, and unauthorized AI use may also constitute unauthorized assistance or other Honor Code violations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For the Rollins School of Public Health, the Rollins Teaching & Learning Core page says Rollins provides general generative AI guidance to help faculty and instructors develop their own course policies, and expects course policies to vary by context.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

aiaiapps is listed for EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

EPFL Chatbot is listed for EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft 365 Copilot is listed for EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ewha Womans University

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Ewha's class-stage AI-use guidance says course guidance may state that copying generative-AI outputs directly into assignments or exams, fabricating or spreading false information with generative AI, infringing copyright with generative AI, or otherwise harming academic truthfulness and trust may be considered misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Ewha's class-stage AI-use guidance cautions that AI-detection programs can be used to check whether assignments used generative AI, but that such tools are not yet perfect and ethical use should be discussed with students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Ewha's class-stage AI-use guidance presents course-level generative-AI use as something instructors may define by explaining whether and how AI use is allowed and by asking students to disclose how they used generative AI in assignments.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ghent University

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For assignments completed at home from academic year 2024-2025, Ghent University student guidance permits responsible use of generative AI tools and says individual teachers can still prohibit use for a specific subject.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Ghent University teaching guidance says lecturers and students should protect personal, privacy-sensitive, or copyright-protected data and should never upload personal or confidential information without clear permission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Ghent University teaching guidance says responsible GenAI use is always permitted unless a lecturer explicitly prohibits it for parts of an assignment that take place in a controlled environment, and it cautions that detection tools are unreliable.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Huazhong Agricultural University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月22日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Huazhong Agricultural University's AI agent application norm applies to AI agents developed by school departments and disciplines for teaching, campus management, and teacher/student services across the design, development, deployment, operation, and maintenance lifecycle.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Huazhong Agricultural University's official AI platform describes a Rain Classroom AI workbench that connects to large models such as DeepSeek and provides AI-assisted teaching functions including lesson preparation, classroom assistance, 24-hour learning support, question generation, intelligent grading, and resource retrieval.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Huazhong Agricultural University's Information College describes an AI curriculum structure that includes AI general courses for all undergraduate and graduate students, required AI foundation courses for non-information-major undergraduates, AI core courses, and AI digital-intelligence practice courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK)

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

IITK's 2025-26 academic guide says using AI tools such as ChatGPT or Gemini to do assignments or write project reports is inappropriate.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

IITK's 2025-26 academic guide frames student AI use around whether it helps the student learn better.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

IITK's 2025-26 academic guide discusses writing down assignments from GPTs as a malpractice alongside plagiarism and copying.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IIT-KGP)

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

IIT Kharagpur's B.Tech. in AI curriculum includes a core course titled Responsible and Trustworthy AI covering responsible AI, bias and risk assessment, privacy-aware learning, model safety, and accountability.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

IIT Kharagpur Senate recommended a B.Tech. in Artificial Intelligence from Admission Year 2024, subject to the related departmental approval process.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

IIT Kharagpur's 2025 UG guidance states that studying at least one AI/ML elective will be mandatory for all students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB)

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

FITB guidance says declaration of AI use for coursework outputs is mandatory rather than optional, and undeclared AI use may be considered a serious violation with academic consequences.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

FITB guidance states that, by default, using AI during exams, quizzes, or other evaluations is academic cheating and can be sanctioned unless the instructor allows or recommends AI use for a particular part of a course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

FITB guidance says instructors need to set AI-use policies for their courses and communicate them at the start of the course; when AI use is allowed, permission should be clear and explicit, with boundaries and transparency.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Iowa State University

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Iowa State guidance says confidential data classified as moderate or above may not be entered into any generative AI product unless assessed and approved under ISU data classification and applicable compliance processes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Iowa State Student Conduct guidance says suspected AI-generated coursework referrals will be reviewed similarly to other forms of academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Iowa State CELT describes AI teaching resources for instructors, including GenAI syllabus considerations and a Canvas page on use of GenAI in Iowa State courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Jagiellonian University

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Jagiellonian University students must follow instructor AI-tool rules and clearly mark parts of coursework, theses, or other assignments generated with AI-based tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Jagiellonian University permits students and teaching staff to use AI-based tools in teaching activities, subject to the principles in Rector Ordinance No. 115/2025.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Jagiellonian University teaching staff should define transparent course rules for use of AI-based tools in the syllabus and communicate them at the first class.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

JGU library guidance says the university is generally open to AI tools, but instructors or institutes may decide whether tools are allowed for a given assessment, and allowed use should be disclosed as an aid.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

JGU's digital teaching guidance encourages integrating AI literacy and transparent use of AI into teaching and, where appropriate, assessment design.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

This crawl found official JGU AI recommendations and guidance pages, but did not find a central binding university-wide AI policy page; the main digital teaching source itself frames concrete recommendations as provisional.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Justus-Liebig-University Giessen

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

JLU guidance says that when generative AI use is permitted in an exam task, the use, including prompting, is part of the assessed work and should be documented as good academic practice.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

JLU HRZ guidance says external AI services such as chatgpt.com outside JLU kiChat require review or approval for personal, non-public, or confidential data, and states that chatgpt.com must not be used for personal or non-public information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

JLU presents central AI offers for its members, including HRZ-provided JLU kiChat and API services described as secure and privacy-compliant AI solutions for research, teaching, and administration.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kazan (Volga region) Federal University

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

KFU's Digital Departments page describes multiple student training programs that include using generative AI or AI services in education, content creation, analysis, prompts, APIs, and chatbot development.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Official-source discovery for Kazan Federal University found AI-related news, institute discussion, events, and training descriptions, but did not identify a central binding university-wide generative AI policy or AI-specific academic-integrity rule.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An official KFU ITIS article reports a teaching-oriented view that basic programming instruction may benefit from temporarily avoiding code-generation tools while later balancing AI use for workplace competitiveness.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Keele University

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Keele's Student Academic Misconduct Code of Practice classifies inappropriate GenAI use in assessment as academic misconduct when a student presents work as their own without proper attribution or uses GenAI where it is explicitly prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Keele University's Generative AI in Education Framework says AI in education should be used responsibly, ethically, and equitably within Keele, and that staff and students should be supported to be AI-literate and use AI ethically.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Keele's framework says students must be advised on how AI can be used in assessments and that this must be clearly stated; it also says staff should remind students to disclose AI-tool use and cite it properly.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

KFUPM

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月13日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

KFUPM's AI+X page describes AI+X as an initiative designed to equip every undergraduate student with essential AI skills and says students begin with foundational AI coursework before their selected academic programs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

KFUPM's AI+X page says all undergraduate students are required to complete AI-focused coursework and states an institutional goal to graduate 10,000 AI-skilled professionals by 2030.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

KFUPM's AI+X page states that KFUPM launched ChatGPT Edu in partnership with OpenAI and describes the initiative as integrating AI tools into classrooms and research environments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kobe University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Kobe University tells students that using text created by generative AI unchanged as part or all of a report or similar work may be regarded as plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Kobe University tells students that some classes may restrict or prohibit the use of generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Kobe University warns students that entering highly confidential information or personal information into generative AI may lead to information leakage or disclosure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Konkuk University

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Konkuk University's Center for Teaching and Learning ChatGPT guide cautions that users should verify factuality and objectivity when using ChatGPT and defines hallucination as a plausible-answer error.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Konkuk University's Center for Teaching and Learning ChatGPT guide describes ChatGPT as usable for student course questions, assignment help, individualized learning support, and learning-material generation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Konkuk University's Center for Teaching and Learning ChatGPT guide gives instructors examples of using ChatGPT in teaching work, including requesting exam-question generation based on learning content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

KU Leuven

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

KU Leuven permits and encourages responsible, critical use of generative AI in teaching and research, framing it as a complement to critical thinking and professional expertise rather than a replacement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

KU Leuven student guidance says students remain fully responsible for what they submit and must ensure assignments allow teaching staff to assess their acquired competences.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

KU Leuven teaching guidance expects teaching staff to clearly inform students whether GenAI may be used for assignments and expects students to be transparent about GenAI use so assessment can be fair and correct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kyoto University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Kyoto University tells students to follow the generative AI use policy set by the course instructor or research supervisor for coursework, reports, and thesis writing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Kyoto University has adopted an education and learning AI initiative intended to support responsible generative AI use by faculty, staff, and students while minimizing learning risks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Kyoto University expects instructors to state their generative AI use policy to students and, for courses focused on basic knowledge or skills, to preserve grading fairness through checks such as written or oral examinations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Lanzhou University

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Lanzhou University's Teaching Affairs Office notice addresses management of 2025 undergraduate theses and designs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For 2025 undergraduate thesis work, Lanzhou University's Teaching Affairs Office notice supports teaching units in conducting AI-generated content detection and in guiding students to avoid over-reliance on AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For 2025 undergraduate thesis work, Lanzhou University's Teaching Affairs Office notice links thesis checks with preventing academic misconduct and ensuring thesis independence and originality.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Leiden University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Leiden University states that ChatGPT is not supported because data security and privacy are not guaranteed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Leiden University's assessment guidance describes a five-level scale for AI integration in assessments, ranging from no AI to AI task completion with human evaluation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Leiden University's general AI in education page says the university offers a learning environment where AI may be used to support education when lecturers and students use tools responsibly.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Linköping University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For the TDDC93/TDDC88/725G64 courses, the course policy says use of generative AI tools is permitted in 2025, while students remain responsible for submitted content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Linköping University announced a strategic decision to implement an action plan for AI-ready education, including programme review, teacher skills development, AI ambassadors, and examination-design review for unauthorized AI use.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

An official Studieinfo syllabus page states that Linköping University has produced a guide for teachers and students on generative AI in education, and tells students that clarity about where and how generative AI has been used is important.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Lomonosov Moscow State University

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Economics Faculty rules allow each teacher, within a discipline, to require detailed prompts or restrict AI-tool use up to a full ban, with restrictions recorded in the discipline's rating system and communicated by the first class.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The Economics Faculty rules say AI-tool use is permitted by default and that the faculty supports effective, ethical, and transparent AI use for course work, term papers, and final qualification works.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Economics Faculty rules require teachers who use AI tools when creating materials or other work to explicitly declare that use, including the AI model, work parts, and purposes and methods of use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

LMU IfKW student guidance says AI may be used in assessments only with explicit teacher permission; if no explicit permission is given, students must assume AI use is not allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

LMU IfKW guidance treats verbatim or minimally changed AI-generated text without proper attribution as plagiarism, and says significant unattributed AI-generated text in assessed work can receive grade 5 (failed).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

LMU teaching guidance recommends adapting e-exam questions for ChatGPT-era assessment, including tasks that require critical reflection on ChatGPT limitations rather than simple knowledge or comprehension questions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

MLU guidance prohibits automated grading or assessment of student examination work by AI; assessment remains the responsibility of examiners.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

When students use generative AI for study or assessment work, MLU's guideline says the systems and purposes or types of use are to be named and documented.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

MLU's AI guideline says generative AI use in study and teaching is generally permissible, with course-specific requirements to be set by responsible instructors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Masaryk University

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Masaryk University's AI-in-teaching statement says AI use must be transparent and consistent with academic and personal moral integrity, and compares unacknowledged AI use to ghostwriting as a form of plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Masaryk University's AI-in-teaching statement advises teachers to state openly when AI-tool use is appropriate in studies, homework, or written work, and to explain decisions not to recommend or to prohibit AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

This run found Masaryk University central AI-in-teaching materials framed as a basic statement and voluntary education recommendations, not as a central binding AI policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore)

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月5日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

NTU states that generative AI should not be listed as an author of any paper with NTU affiliation, or as a Principal Investigator, Co-PI, or collaborator in research proposals.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

NTU guidelines state that AI detector tools should be used with caution due to frequent false positives and negatives, ease of bypass, and bias against non-native English writing patterns.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

NTU requires students to disclose the use of AI tools in their submissions and to always refer to their module's AI use policy for specific expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Central University

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

National Central University stated in a 2023 official news item that it had established basic operating principles and did not prohibit students from using ChatGPT 3/4, Copilot, and similar AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

National Central University stated that, from academic year 112, courses would incorporate ChatGPT, including freshman English, calculus, the AI credit program, cultural technology course groups, and specialized courses across colleges.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

National Central University stated that, to reduce plagiarism and academic-integrity issues from AI tool use, it would continue regulation and education on disclosure, citation, and use of AI tools in thesis or program writing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NITT's 2024 PG Regulations classify possession of mobile phones, carrying unauthorized notes, communicating with other students, or copying during an assessment as punishable academic dishonesty, with zero marks for offenders.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

NITT's 2024 PG Regulations say each course faculty prepares a course plan and that the course plan outlines assessment components, attendance requirements, academic integrity guidelines, and study material information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

In a 2025 official Parliament QA PDF, NITT described ChatGPT-like generative AI use in higher education and said related policies were being evolved, including Turnitin checks for plagiarism and auto-generated content and plagiarism validation for code.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Sun Yat-sen University

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

NSYSU's teacher guidance says teachers should clearly explain generative AI tool rules and precautions in class, note them in the syllabus, and guide students in correct AI tool use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NSYSU's student academic integrity guidelines include cheating through unauthorized aids, tools, or electronic devices in coursework, assignments, or examinations when instructor consent has not been given.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

National Sun Yat-sen University's Office of Academic Affairs publishes generative AI tool reference guidance for students and teachers; discovery did not identify a stronger central binding generative-AI policy in the checked official sources.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech)

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT is listed for National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Copilot is listed for National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Taiwan Tech's Center for Teaching and Learning Development recommends that instructors introduce generative AI before class and state in the syllabus which tools students may use, which tools are restricted, and the reasons for restrictions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Northeastern University

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Northeastern teaching and learning standards state that using generative AI to grade open-ended student responses requires AI Review Committee review because it could affect student legal rights and may involve sensitive personal information and risk of illegal bias or discrimination.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Northeastern teaching and learning standards say instructors should clearly communicate permitted generative AI uses to students in the syllabus, assignment guidelines, and verbally in class.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Northeastern's student AI guide advises students to check each syllabus, ask professors when an AI policy is unclear, use AI as a study partner rather than a substitute for their own thinking, and avoid using AI when assignment guidelines direct independent work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Northwestern Polytechnical University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Northwestern Polytechnical University reported that its graduate education digital transformation uses AI+ course construction and an AI+ knowledge graph course-learning model.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Northwestern Polytechnical University's Computer School reported a college-level teaching reform seminar on large models and agents, including plans to deepen AI-enabled teaching reform.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

A reviewed official Northwestern Polytechnical University Higher Education Research Center page surfaced ChatGPT and academic-integrity content as research/practice material rather than a central university policy source.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Paris Lodron University of Salzburg

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Salzburg guide says teachers and thesis supervisors set, for each course, assessment, exam, or supervised thesis, whether and to what extent AI technologies may or should be used, and that these requirements for assessed work should be communicated transparently and in writing in advance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The guide recommends specifying AI use along three levels: unrestricted use, use within a defined framework, or a general ban as an unauthorized aid.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Senate recommendation says curriculum commissions may identify exams to be taken in secure environments or by analog means to prevent AI use, and may identify exams where AI instruments are useful or desired, especially using the university-licensed Academic AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Philipps-Universität Marburg

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OpenAI ChatGPT via Chat-AI is listed for Philipps-Universität Marburg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Philipps-Universität Marburg's central teaching-and-AI orientation says the university does not prohibit generative AI and frames the guidance around exploring productive use in teaching and teaching organization.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The central teaching-and-AI orientation recommends that, for written work, AI-generated text parts be marked as such as a matter of good scientific practice.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Politecnico di Torino

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Politecnico di Torino announced IA4Teach@Polito as an annual initiative for reflection, training, and sharing about artificial intelligence and teaching.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Politecnico di Torino reported that its survey respondents strongly requested specific training, practical support, and clear guidelines for conscious integration of AI in teaching.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An official Politecnico di Torino article says university actions include recommendations on AI use and guidelines concerning theses, exams, assessment, and responsible use of generative tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pusan National University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Pusan National University's AI utilization guideline tells instructors to clearly announce in the syllabus or early in the course whether AI tools may be used, the permitted scope, and evaluation criteria.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Pusan National University's AI utilization guideline says instructors should communicate permitted or prohibited AI use for assessments, and it warns against deciding a student's grade solely from an AI plagiarism or AI-detection tool result.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Pusan National University's student AI utilization guideline tells students to first check and follow the instructor's AI-use instructions for exams and assignments, and to identify the tool, purpose, and scope when AI use is allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Radboud University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Radboud University says students may use ChatGPT or other AI tools during their studies only with lecturer approval and when they mention that they used it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Radboud University says free tools such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini are not recommended because they pose privacy and security risks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Radboud University's lecturer guidance says lecturers have responsibility to help students use tools such as ChatGPT responsibly and point out risks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For Bonner Zentrum für Lehrer*innenbildung written work, the page says use of AI applications such as ChatGPT is prohibited unless explicitly allowed by examiners, and otherwise is an unauthorized aid.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The central VND teaching-funding page says the University of Bonn supports university-wide teaching projects and lists FALKO as an AI-supported learning companion for teacher education.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For the FALKO teaching project, the central VND page says model training and implementation are to be data-protection-compliant under the EU AI Act.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Rice University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Rice Honor Council's AI policy page says using AI software to generate ideas and passing them off as one's own is plagiarism; it also says course-specific AI policies may supersede the Honor Council's general AI policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Rice University's Responsible AI student guidance says use of AI tools for coursework is allowed only when the instructor explicitly permits it, and students should check the syllabus or ask the professor before using AI on assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Rice Office of the Provost guidance urges faculty to include a syllabus section stating their course stance on AI use and the extent of allowed use; it also notes Honor Council guidance that LLM use must be cited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Rutgers University–New Brunswick

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for Rutgers University–New Brunswick in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Rutgers states that AI tools should not be considered permissible for coursework unless instructors clearly state or communicate that use is allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Rutgers says faculty should consider giving students guidance on AI use to support learning and coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sabanci University

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Sabancı University's student academic integrity handbook states that submitting text generated by text-generating AI applications such as ChatGPT in place of assignments students are supposed to write themselves violates the six principles of academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Sabancı University's student academic integrity handbook says students can include text generated by applications such as ChatGPT in assignments if the instructor accepts it and the text is cited and referenced using the APA method for AI-generated text.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Sabancı University Information Center guidance says that if students use generative AI, they need to disclose which tool or tools they used and how they used them.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Saint Petersburg State University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

SPbU's online course for teachers frames AI as affecting teaching, learning, and research and covers practical use of neural networks, prompt work, AI limitations, copyright, academic integrity, and SPbU's approach to legal and ethical restrictions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The SPbU AI and Data Science Center offers continuing-education programs that include large language models, generative AI, prompt engineering, work with LLM-based tools, AI project management, and legal regulation of digital technologies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

An official SPbU news item reports that SPbU researchers co-authored a methodology and structured scale for evaluating university teachers' generative-AI literacy across teaching, research, organizational-methodological work, educational-material development, professional development, and consulting.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Seoul National University

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

SNU requires instructors to communicate AI tool usage policies (permitted/prohibited scope and reporting methods) through syllabi, and students must comply.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

SNU Library warns that uploading subscribed e-resources to ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or similar AI services, or performing bulk downloads, may exceed publisher license terms and could result in access being blocked for the entire university.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

SNU Library advises researchers to check target journal editorial policies from the planning stage, as policies vary on whether LLMs can be listed as authors and whether AI-generated text is permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Shenzhen University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Shenzhen University guidance says serious violations of instructor AI-use rules, concealment, presenting AI-generated content as original work, or failing required disclosure/marking can affect course grades and may be handled under academic misconduct rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Shenzhen University guidance says course instructors should tell students whether AI technologies are permitted in coursework, papers, assessments, exams, and the permitted scope.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

A public official Shenzhen University Graduate School page was found with the full text of the university academic ethics committee guidance on regulating AI technology use in teaching and research; a separate older board link redirects to identity authentication.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

South China University of Technology

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

SCUT Graduate School announced a trial AI general and practice online course for all 2025 graduate students, including part-time graduate students and international students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

SCUT's 2025 AI-enabled undergraduate teaching pilot call identified course agents, knowledge graphs, 24-hour intelligent learning companions, AI teaching assistants, intelligent grading, resource search, classroom assistants, preparation support, teaching management, digital humans, and internationalization as possible construction scenarios.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The SCUT undergraduate AI-enabled teaching pilot notice says the university would support pilot-course teams with AI technical guidance, teacher training and exchange activities, funding, production fees paid by the university, and priority teaching-assistant allocation during pilot delivery.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech)

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

SUSTech's CS114 Introduction to Generative Artificial Intelligence course specification is course-level curriculum material that says the course covers generative AI history, principles, deployment, interdisciplinary applications, and ethical, security, and privacy discussions; it is not an institutional AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

SUSTech's CS114 course calendar includes lessons on GAI privacy and security, GAI ethics, AI hallucination in large models, GAI-assisted programming, and AI agent engineering; this is course-level curriculum evidence rather than an institutional AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

A 2026 SUSTech Library embedded AI-literacy teaching page reports that a library session for the Intelligent Ocean Exploration course introduced AI hallucination, algorithmic bias, AI academic writing norms, citation-labeling guidance, and AI academic application boundaries; this is course-session evidence rather than institutional policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Stellenbosch University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Stellenbosch University requires postgraduate students to declare any use of AI tools and provides internal and examination declaration processes for postgraduate research work.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Stellenbosch University's Senate-approved AI position statement provides governing principles for ethical AI use in research and teaching-learning-assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For assessment, Stellenbosch guidance says AI-generated content may not form a substantial part of an assessment unless permitted, and interim guidelines advise that students should know whether AI use is allowed for each assessment task.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Stevens Institute of Technology

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Stevens guidance identifies certain AI use cases, including grading or assessment of student work, recruitment, personnel or disciplinary decision-making, legal analysis, facial recognition security tools, and non-public uses of non-licensed AI tools with click-through agreements, as requiring additional review and consideration before AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Stevens teaching guidance tells instructors to establish a clear course policy on whether and how students may use AI tools, and to communicate expectations and guidelines in the syllabus when generative AI is permitted in certain areas.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Stevens teaching guidance cautions that AI detection tools are not 100 percent accurate and says instructors should not use AI detection tools as a definitive way to gauge misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Stony Brook University, State University of New York

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Stony Brook guidance says generative AI use in coursework can be prohibited, allowed, or required depending on the course or assignment, and students should consult course policies or instructors when unsure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Stony Brook CELT guidance advises instructors to discuss AI usage policies clearly, include AI statements in syllabi, and outline which assignments allow or do not allow AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Stony Brook CELT guidance says users should review AI-generated content for accuracy because AI tools can produce biased, illogical, false, or nonexistent-source outputs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sultan Qaboos University

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Centre for Preparatory Studies guide states that incorrect use of AI tools is considered academic misconduct and that suspected incorrect AI use for an assignment is handled under the SQU Academic Misconduct Policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Sultan Qaboos University's Centre for Preparatory Studies guidance says students may use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT to enhance learning, but they remain expected to produce original work and should check with their teacher before using generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Centre for Preparatory Studies guide tells students who use generative AI to carefully check its facts and claims and to read, understand, and critically evaluate AI-generated content before using it for ideas, information, structure, or language.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sunway University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

A Sunway University Explore teaching article says academics should prioritise ethical considerations when integrating AI, including safeguarding student data privacy, mitigating algorithmic bias, and ensuring transparency and accountability.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A Sunway University Explore teaching article advises that AI should complement traditional teaching methods and that students should question and analyse AI-generated content and outcomes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A Sunway University Explore article says responsible classroom use of ChatGPT may involve AI-usage guidelines, educator professional development, and accountability; it also reports that the Academic Enhancement Division has offered ChatGPT workshops and seminars for educators.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technische Universität Wien

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

TU Wien's student guidance says ChatGPT and other large language models must be documented as aids in written work, AI-used passages must be marked, and undisclosed generative-AI use in student work is treated as equivalent to plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

TU Wien's teacher handout says reliable technical identification of AI-tool use is hardly possible and recommends adapting exam formats so they cannot be solved exclusively by AI outputs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

TU Wien's generative-AI teaching guidance says instructors decide whether to use AI systems in courses; if they do, the rules must be clearly defined and the handling of those technologies must be made central.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The American University in Cairo

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

AUC's AI statement says a course instructor may authorize students to use AI tools in coursework, and in that case should provide written context and purpose for the allowed use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

AUC faculty AI resources advise faculty to clarify acceptable and unacceptable AI usage in their courses and discuss AI with students early and before major assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

AUC student AI resources warn that ChatGPT or similar AI tools may produce unreliable content and may infringe on privacy, so students should use them with caution when permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Teaching and Learning Unit recommends that instructors present students with a clear policy on whether AI use is allowed and for what purposes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Hebrew University Teaching and Learning Unit frames its guidance goal as adapting teaching and assessment for AI use rather than banning AI use outright.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A Hebrew University Teaching and Learning Unit workshop page says students make broad and frequent use of AI for assignments and academic writing, and frames excessive or unreflective use as a risk to learning goals.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

HKUST allows faculty members the flexibility to set their own course-level policies for GenAI integration in teaching and learning.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

HKUST provides approved generative AI tools including OpenWebUI, HKUST GenAI Platform, Google Gemini Enterprise, Microsoft Copilot Chat, and Microsoft 365 Copilot.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

HKUST assessment policies require course syllabi to clearly present policies on the use of Generative AI tools and academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

LSE states that making generative AI tools available does not endorse unrestricted use, and users should check their specific course, programme, or department policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

LSE requires departments or course convenors to classify authorised generative AI use in assessment as no authorised use, limited authorised use, or full authorised use, and to communicate the position to students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For 2025/26, LSE requested departments to add assessment safeguards, including observed assessment methods, to help assure degree integrity and prevent unfair competitive advantage from generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Edinburgh

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

At the University of Edinburgh, presenting AI outputs as your own original work, submitting AI-generated text without acknowledgment, and using AI agents within university learning platforms constitute academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Edinburgh says using an AI agent within Learn or any university learning or assessment platform requiring login is not permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Edinburgh encourages students to use ELM over external AI platforms because it provides privacy protections and institutional access.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech)

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月13日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Science Tokyo's guideline says users should not enter required-confidential information, personal information, or similar data into terms-of-service external generative AI services; it states that entering required-confidential or personal information into free external generative AI services is prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

In education, Science Tokyo's guideline says the university does not totally restrict learners' use of generative AI; the permitted degree of use, including whether it is banned, is left to course objectives, course content, and instructor teaching and assessment policies, and students should follow instructor instructions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For courses, Science Tokyo's guideline asks instructors to teach students about generative AI limitations, consider assessment methods, and promptly reflect a course AI-use policy in the syllabus when the policy can be clearly stated.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tufts University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Research Chatbot is listed for Tufts University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Tufts' generative AI usage guidelines state that community members must be transparent about AI use and that instructors and units are strongly encouraged to clarify permitted AI use and disclosure expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Tufts CELT guidance says clear, course-specific AI guidance helps students understand what is permitted, what is not permitted, and why those boundaries matter for learning.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST)

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNIST Library provides Turnitin to UNIST members for similarity checking of writings such as journal manuscripts, theses, dissertations, and assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UNIST announced a generative AI utilization guide that presents practical approaches for teachers, researchers, and students to use generative AI such as ChatGPT, rather than simply prohibiting its use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UNIST Library describes Turnitin's AI Writing Detection as a tool that can help instructors see how much of a student's submission is authentic human writing versus AI-generated text from ChatGPT or other tools; the AI indicator is visible only to instructor accounts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ulster University

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Ulster University's Student Guide identifies inappropriate use of generative AI tools as academic misconduct when the tools are deployed for assessment without authorisation or beyond what assessment instructions permit.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Ulster University's student guidance tells students to be very careful about what they upload to GenAI tools and says never to input personal information, confidential or sensitive data, placement, patient or client scenarios, draft assignments or reflective work, unpublished research data, or copyrighted material.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Ulster University's staff guidance says its GenAI advice applies to all taught modules and forms of assessed or submitted work across the university, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education programmes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Umea University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Umeå University's UPL has initiated a three-year AI for learning initiative intended to build a university-wide platform for knowledge development, exchange of experience, and collegial learning.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Umeå University's UPL academic-writing work area frames generative AI as both a possible support for students' writing and a source of challenges around metacognition, dependence on language models, and academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Umeå University's UPL AI and teaching page says the work area focuses on teachers' didactic choices and professional judgment, including how AI is understood, valued, used, or deliberately not used in relation to teaching purposes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

United Arab Emirates University

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UAEU prohibits student use of GenAI in specified assessment contexts unless the course instructor states otherwise.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UAEU states that students must complete a training session as part of orientation to comply with the GenAI policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UAEU permits student use of GenAI in an assistive role when the tutor specifies the permitted processes within the assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Central de Venezuela

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UCV Noticias reports that Universidad Central de Venezuela established a cooperation agreement with UNESCO/ICHEI to integrate AI tools into UCV distance higher education, with an environment and sustainability focus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UCV Noticias reports that UCV's AI microcertification project began with teacher training, including an initial group of approximately 250 professors linked to SED-UCV.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

SADPRO-UCV offered a practical teacher workshop whose stated purpose was to empower university teachers through critical and ethical appropriation of AI for instructional design and learning personalization.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

CITEP/UBA presents La Brújul-IA as teaching guidance that offers conceptual keys and concrete strategies for critical, situated integration of AI in higher-education teaching.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The CITEP/UBA guidance recommends making precise classroom rules for AI use explicit and lists possible agreement contents such as permitted uses, restricted/prohibited uses, transparency, and declarations of use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For evaluation contexts, the CITEP/UBA guidance suggests designing activities that assess understanding, argumentation, and application of knowledge, not only technical AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UNAM's 2025 education recommendations advise faculty using generative AI in teaching to avoid entering personal or sensitive information into AI platforms and to orient students and colleagues about data privacy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For assessment, UNAM's 2025 recommendations advise faculty to define the level of generative-AI incorporation and, when AI use is allowed, ask students to provide the prompts/instructions and generated responses for review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNAM's 2023 teaching recommendations suggest that faculty clearly specify acceptable and unacceptable ChatGPT use, require recognition and documentation of AI-tool use, and emphasize user responsibility for submitted academic products.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidade de São Paulo

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A FDUSP generative AI governance report recommends mitigation measures including training and disclosure, review of generated content, transparency about use, and avoiding prompts containing personal data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

An IEA-USP report says a USP seminar initiated debates for proposals to be sent to the USP Rector's Office so it could define guidelines and norms for appropriate and ethical use of tools such as ChatGPT in teaching and research.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

An ABCD-USP article says USP's direction includes ethics and integrity formation, writing development, and broader use of plagiarism/similarity platforms such as Turnitin and Crossref Similarity Check iThenticate, which the article says USP has subscribed to since 2016 through ABCD-USP.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Università di Padova

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The guidance does not allow GenAI-generated content for assessments or theses without explicit disclosure and authorization by the responsible teacher.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Università di Padova has an Ateneo-level guidance document intended to orient GenAI use in teaching, learning, and research.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The guidance assigns teaching staff responsibility to clearly indicate permitted and non-permitted GenAI uses in the syllabus and at the start of each course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat de Barcelona

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UB's good-practices document says it is important for instructors to clarify at the beginning of each course what role generative AI may have, where it is permitted or not permitted, and under what conditions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UB's teaching document lists Wooclap, H5P with generative AI, Zoom UB with generative AI, and Copilot as tools available to the community via CRAI/UB, while warning that content generated by generative AI applications should always be reviewed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UB's teaching document recommends assessment designs that emphasize the process leading to an answer, set conditions under which AI-generated work may not pass, and use portfolios or reflective journals where students can declare which generative AI resources they used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat de Valencia

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Universitat de Valencia's UVdocencia integrity-focused GenAI course frames GenAI use in relation to academic and research integrity, including guidance on assessment activities, regulation of GenAI use in teaching instruments, and detection of inappropriate student use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universitat de Valencia's UVdocencia staff training includes GenAI uses for teaching support, including preparation of teaching materials, solved exercises, questionnaires, support images, plagiarism identification, and ethical GenAI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Universitat de Valencia's UVdocencia ChatGPT course introduces generative AI tools, including ChatGPT, for producing content and creating materials and tasks in education and scientific research.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya · BarcelonaTech (UPC)

3 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UPC library guidance tells students not to present AI-generated third-party content as their own, to ask instructors about each course’s AI rules, and to use AI as an assistant rather than as the author of academic work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

UPC frames its institutional AI governance around LEIA principles that guide daily practice in teaching, research, and university management.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ESEIAAT states that transparency about generative AI use is mandatory, but declaration alone does not make the use appropriate; assessment considers real authorship, critical thinking, and academic-level coherence.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat Politecnica de Valencia

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

PoliGPT is listed for Universitat Politecnica de Valencia in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UPV's VPEC described 2026 training sessions on generative AI applied to university teaching, including prompt engineering, persistent agents, and AI-supported teaching-guide generation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The VPEC source says the sessions analyzed use of AI to align learning outcomes with ANECA standards and university regulations when generating university teaching guides.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Stuttgart

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universität Stuttgart guidance for teachers says examiners decide whether AI is allowed for a given assessment, choose one option for each assessment, document it in the syllabus or ILIAS, and communicate it early and consistently.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Universität Stuttgart's AI-tool whitelist permits RAI with GWDG models for C1, C2, and C3 information with documented C3 approval, and permits RAI with OpenAI models over Azure only for C1 and C2 information.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Universität Stuttgart's AI-tool whitelist says unreviewed public AI systems such as ChatGPT Free or Grammarly Free may be used only for public C1 information and must not receive internal, personal, or confidential information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Montpellier

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UM's AI-in-training principles say student AI use should respect university regulations, rules for each teaching activity, and assessment-specific instructions; expectations should be clarified in course and assessment materials.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UM's AI-in-training principles say decisions to use or address AI in training activities rest with teaching staff and should align with learning objectives.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UM's official AI hub says it offers multiple pathways to help teachers, researchers, staff, and students discover and appropriate AI uses, including AI tools/platforms, resources, self-training, and student acculturation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universite Paris-Pantheon-Assas

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The M1 curriculum for Universite Paris-Pantheon-Assas's Master Marketing and Communication lists a course item on responsible use of generative-AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The M2 curriculum for Universite Paris-Pantheon-Assas's Master Marketing and Communication lists a Data Marketing Intelligence module that includes Marketing and AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universite Paris-Pantheon-Assas describes its Master Marketing and Communication as including advanced coursework in digital, law, and data and AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For student academic work, the charter directs students to systematically declare generative AI tool use, identify the tool and its contribution, and follow course-specific directives.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The official university site has a page on generative AI use that points readers to a good-use charter and a Moodle course on generative AI uses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For teaching and assessment, the charter encourages teachers to integrate generative AI thoughtfully, adapt assessments, and clarify whether AI use is allowed, prohibited, or partly allowed for particular tasks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (UMT)

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UMT announced that, beginning October 2025, its Basic AI Course would become a core university course for all students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UMT's public training platform listed an academic AI-in-education course that guides lecturers on ethics and integrity considerations when addressing negative impacts of AI in education.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UMT's public training platform listed a ChatGPT student assessment course with learning outcomes covering question design, assessment creation, and using ChatGPT to generate questions and assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

UTM CDex lists both Malay and English versions of the generative AI teaching-and-learning guideline on its policy/handbook/procedure/guidelines page.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UTM requires GAI use in assignments and works to be listed with developer information, tool name, version, access date, and URL when available; undisclosed use can be treated as plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UTM requires academic staff to clearly state GAI use in course assessments, and prioritizes continuous assessments that demonstrate deep mastery.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM)

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UUM's online and take-home assessment guideline states that, for closed-book online final exams, students are not allowed to collaborate, must sign an honour form, and submissions may be checked via Turnitin.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UUM's assessment handbook says it provides guidance for instructors in undergraduate and postgraduate programmes on closed-book, open-book, and 100% coursework assessment options.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

This crawl verified an official UUM Research Management Centre ChatGPT for Academic Writing workshop notice; the notice is event/workshop material, not central university-wide AI policy evidence.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Alberta

3 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Alberta's responsible-use AI framework provides guidelines for responsible AI use in learning, teaching, research, administration, and other university-related work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Alberta teaching guidance says instructors or programs determine whether students may use AI in coursework and for what purposes, rather than applying a blanket university-wide yes/no rule.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Alberta student-facing academic-integrity guidance tells students that AI rules may vary by instructor, program, course, or assignment and that they should check instructions before submitting work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Aveiro

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Aveiro's AcademIA objectives include promoting UA teachers' capacity for pedagogical and ethical use of artificial-intelligence tools, critical reflection, practice sharing, and AI-based educational transformation projects.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Aveiro's AcademIA page describes a training proposal for UA teachers to understand generative AI's transformative potential and apply it responsibly in real teaching and learning contexts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Aveiro's AcademIA page says the University promoted pedagogical-training actions on AI and created the 'IA, vamos conversar?' community of practice for teachers interested in reflecting on and sharing experiences about the topic.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bordeaux

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bordeaux's 2024 exam charter says unmentioned use of any AI tool such as ChatGPT is prohibited for written or oral work, except for teacher-supervised pedagogical use, and may be treated as fraud.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bordeaux provides a public teaching-support page with generative AI resources for its teaching community.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A University of Bordeaux MAPI teaching resource frames generative AI use across three teaching scenarios: discourage use, tolerate use, or deliberately integrate use in a pedagogical setting.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Brighton

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Brighton in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Brighton student guidance tells students to check whether GenAI is allowed before using it for an assignment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Brighton GenAI ethics guidance frames ethical considerations as a starting point for students to see AI in context, think critically, and make informed decisions about how and when to use it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Santa Cruz

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

UC Santa Cruz's campus AI FAQ states that student AI use in coursework is governed at the individual course or assignment level, rather than by a single campus-wide student AI-use rule in that FAQ.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The UCSC Teaching and Learning Center, in partnership with the Academic Integrity Office, provides instructor guidance for recognizing and responding to suspected generative AI misuse, including documentation, student meetings, and possible academic misconduct reporting.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The UCSC Teaching and Learning Center advises instructors to integrate a clear generative AI-use policy into the syllabus, including permitted and prohibited uses, attribution norms, and misuse consequences.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Cape Town

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UCT has published an AI in Education Framework for teaching, learning, and assessment, endorsed by the Senate Teaching and Learning Committee in June 2025, and it frames AI literacies, assessment integrity, and AI-enabled innovation as its roadmap.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Before procuring generative AI tools, UCT staff or departments should consult ICTS and the tools must undergo information security and privacy risk assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UCT CILT publishes open-access AI guides for staff, students, and researchers, and also offers interactive AI guides on Amathuba for UCT staff and students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Colorado Boulder

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Colorado Boulder in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

CU Boulder Center for Teaching & Learning identifies generative AI as raising teaching questions about assessment design, classroom AI-use expectations, AI literacy, and ethical awareness.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

CU Boulder Center for Teaching & Learning provides instructor-facing guidance on how generative AI complicates academic integrity and how instructors can address misconduct while supporting learning, fairness, and trust.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Cyprus (UCY)

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Cyprus maintains official AI Guidelines for course instructors, students, and researchers, and the UCY Guidelines page states that guidelines were adopted by Senate decision 14/2025/SENATE on 11 June 2025.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UCY's recommended syllabus statement says students are required to comply with the UCY AI Guidelines and academic-integrity principles, and that improper AI-tool use may result in disciplinary and other consequences.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UCY instructor guidance says instructors should provide clear, specific guidelines for permitted AI-tool use in course syllabi and graded assignment or exam instructions, and explicitly state when AI use is not permitted in graded coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Göttingen

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Chat AI (Academic Cloud) is listed for University of Göttingen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Göttingen AI ethics and law guidance tells users not to enter personal data into AI applications unless it has first been securely and completely anonymized, and says students may not be required by lecturers to use or register for such systems in courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Göttingen guidance says students need clarity about AI-use rules in courses, and that those rules should be discussed at the beginning of each semester in all courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Granada

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Gemini is listed for University of Granada in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

NotebookLM is listed for University of Granada in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Granada in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Groningen

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Groningen's teaching AI policy says AI tools may be used as aids, GenAI use beyond that must be mentioned, and faculties or courses may add extra rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UG guidance says unauthorized student AI use that hinders assessment can be fraud, and AI detection scores do not prove cheating.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UG says there are no specific AI guidelines for research, but the general AI guidelines still apply.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Haifa

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Haifa's e-learning unit provides lecturers with a Hebrew resource introducing digital tools for online learning and assessment and AI-based tools for teaching and learning aids.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The e-learning unit's AI tools resource includes ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Claude, and Gemini in a section on platforms for information analysis, with brief capability notes for each tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Haifa Education Technologies master's program page says the program addresses relationships between AI-era technologies and learning, teaching, and assessment, and presents technology and AI as means for human, attentive, socially responsible pedagogy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Hohenheim

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Hohenheim guidance says generative AI systems are generally permitted as aids in unsupervised written exams such as term papers, seminar papers, and theses when their use does not conflict with the exam purpose; the examiner or module supervisor decides for the specific assessment.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Hohenheim KIM describes GPTalk as a university-internal AI chat service for university members that provides browser-based access to modern language models, including OpenAI ChatGPT and open-source models, without requiring an external account.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

The GPTalk guide tells students not to use GPTalk as their sole source, to enter no personal data, to remain responsible for the content as authors, and to make AI use transparent; it also says lecturers may not use GPTalk to correct or assess student work.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Idaho

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Idaho's OIT and AI Execution Group memo tells university employees not to put identifiable student, employee, or regulated data into public AI models like ChatGPT and to remain vigilant about FERPA, HIPAA, GLBA, and other compliance requirements when using AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Idaho Center for Teaching and Learning syllabus language presents three course-level AI options: prohibiting AI use, allowing AI only with prior instructor permission, or allowing AI with documentation and citation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Idaho's OIT and AI Execution Group memo advises faculty to provide clear guidance on AI use in their syllabi in Canvas.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Johannesburg

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UJ's practice note states that presenting the work of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one's own is academic dishonesty, and says AI use should be acknowledged where used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UJ's student guide says generative AI use depends on course, department, faculty rules and UJ policy, and students should familiarise themselves with those requirements before producing assignments and assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UJ's staff guide frames appropriate generative AI use as including clear communication of institutional, departmental, and course regulations on generative AI, including referencing generated content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Jyväskylä

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Jyväskylä in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

JYU instructs students that if generative AI applications are used in assignments or theses, the work must mention which application was used and how it was used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

JYU's reporting page tells students to follow course-specific reporting guidelines when present and otherwise report the AI tool, version/date, purpose, verification, and their own contribution.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Kansas

3 匹配声明s from 10 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

KU official guidance states that the university does not currently have a university-wide policy specific to the use of generative artificial intelligence in teaching and learning.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

KU guidance tells students that instructors should communicate course-specific GenAI policies and that students are responsible for understanding and following those expectations.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

KU instructor guidance suggests communicating GenAI expectations to students and says use of GenAI plagiarism detection tools is not recommended because their accuracy is not guaranteed.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Latvia

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Latvia's 2026 AI regulations require students to clearly indicate AI use in their work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Latvia's 2026 AI regulations prohibit students and teaching staff from uploading restricted-access information or study materials to AI tools without a UL-purchased licence or official university implementation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Latvia teaching staff can permit or prohibit AI-tool use in a study course depending on course goals and intended study results.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Limerick

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Limerick assessment guidance states that use of AI in an unauthorized manner is a breach of academic integrity, and that use not permitted by the module leader is a breach of academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Limerick guidance says GenAI use in assessment beyond the specifications of the module lead or programme lead is considered academic misconduct and related concerns should be managed under the procedures for academic misconduct allegations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Limerick guidance says legitimate AI use in academia is a local decision, with module coordinators, programme leads, or Heads of Department setting limits within module or programme design.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Louisville

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Louisville Delphi Center says current AI detection tools are unreliable, raise data privacy, FERPA, and student-consent risks, and should never be the sole basis for an academic integrity decision.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Louisville Delphi Center frames generative and agentic AI as a teaching and assessment-design issue, advising instructors to design assessments so authentic engagement is more valuable than AI substitution rather than focusing on policing student behavior.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Louisville Delphi Center provides sample syllabus statements for three generative AI approaches: not permitted, permitted with prior instructor permission and appropriate attribution and citation, or allowed without restrictions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Massachusetts Amherst

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UMass GenAI Platform is listed for University of Massachusetts Amherst in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UMass Amherst guidance says students cannot use generative AI to complete academic work without instructor permission, and should assume use is not allowed when explicit permission has not been given.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UMass Amherst Provost guidance advises faculty to communicate their AI tool policy to students and, when AI tools are permitted, tell students how use should be documented or disclosed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of New Mexico

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNM Student Rights and Responsibilities lists using generative AI where it is not allowed, and submitting AI-generated content without acknowledgment when originality is required, as improper use of AI or technology in academic integrity guidance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UNM AI Resources guidance directs users to contact their office or department IT Officer before using identifiable FERPA data in AI platforms so a risk assessment can be initiated.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UNM student-facing AI guidance tells students to check with their instructor about permitted AI uses before using AI for an assignment and to provide citations for AI-generated content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

UNC Charlotte's Center for Teaching and Learning says its AI syllabus guide provides flexible course-level examples and does not provide or use a university-created AI policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UNC Charlotte Student Accountability & Conflict Resolution recommends that faculty clearly communicate what AI use is permitted in courses, academic exercises, or assessments, and identifies written notice about how and when AI tools may be used as a best practice.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNC Charlotte Student Accountability & Conflict Resolution provides assignment and exam sample language stating that, where AI use is permitted, transparency is required and failure to disclose AI use may be considered a Code of Student Academic Integrity violation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Notre Dame

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT EDU is listed for University of Notre Dame in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Notre Dame's student generative AI policy treats representing AI-generated or materially AI-modified work as one's own as academic dishonesty, and treats generative AI use that violates an instructor's stated policy or is not expressly permitted for coursework as an Honor Code violation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Notre Dame guidance asks instructors to be explicit with students about expectations for ChatGPT and related AI tools in assignments, exams, and class, and says unauthorized generative AI use will be considered an Honor Code violation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Oklahoma

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

OU teaching guidance says the university does not mandate a single classroom approach to AI; faculty are encouraged to make intentional, discipline-appropriate choices and communicate them clearly to students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OU identifies Microsoft Copilot with organizational data protection as available for faculty and staff and describes it as the recommended way to use generative AI within the OU environment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Oklahoma maintains a public AI policy hub that points users to AI guidance for students, staff, governance, teaching, and research, while describing OU AI policies as intended to support responsible, ethical, and transparent AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Plymouth

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Plymouth Faculty of Science and Engineering guidance says AI tools such as ChatGPT should generally not be used to generate the final version of assessed work, unless the coursework briefing clearly states an exception.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Plymouth Faculty of Science and Engineering guidance states that using ChatGPT or similar AI tools to generate assessed work for submission is considered plagiarism and a breach of the university's academic offences regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Plymouth Faculty of Science and Engineering guidance describes limited AI uses such as brainstorming, planning, structuring work, proofreading, checking typos, generating example code, and exploring how code works.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Science and Technology of China

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For smart-course projects under USTC's 2026 undergraduate teaching-project guide, completion standards include at least two online teaching cycles and mandatory AI learning or teaching support plus knowledge-graph functions, with two additional optional digital or AI functions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

USTC's 2026 undergraduate teaching-project guide encourages new-course projects to integrate AI technologies with core professional competencies and to include AI application techniques, cases, and practical training in lectures and practice teaching.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

USTC's 2026 undergraduate teaching-project guide says AI plus virtual-simulation experiment teaching-course projects must have an AI technical specialist and implement at least two AI-enabled functions from the listed categories.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Sharjah

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Sharjah requires disclosure of AI use for coursework, thesis proposals, and final thesis submissions through a Declaration of Artificial Intelligence Use form.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

University of Sharjah's AI academic-texts policy applies to master’s and doctoral theses, thesis proposals and research plans, thesis-derived scientific publications, graduate-level courses and programs, and academic texts submitted to Graduate Studies bodies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For the covered graduate context, University of Sharjah strictly forbids AI-based tools in exams and quizzes and treats extensive use of ChatGPT or other generative AI tools to complete assignments as academically dishonest.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of South Florida

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of South Florida in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

USF states that use of generative AI tools within university coursework is at the discretion of the instructor, and students are expected to follow course-specific policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

USF faculty guidance says instructors should establish and communicate clear generative AI course policies, and provides sample syllabus frameworks for either acceptable or restricted generative AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of St Andrews

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of St Andrews in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

St Andrews Good Academic Practice policy treats presenting AI output as a student's own work without acknowledgement as unauthorised use of AI, except where an assessment specifically permits or encourages such tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

St Andrews student guidance says students should not use generative AI for assessed work unless the module coordinator explicitly authorises it, and any AI use should be declared on an assessment coversheet.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Surrey

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

My AI Surrey is listed for University of Surrey in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Surrey's GenAI procedure says all users must read and understand the procedure before using any form of GenAI during University work, and frames GenAI use as supporting teaching, research, and operations while protecting information and integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Surrey's MySurrey Help page advises students considering generative AI tools in their work to read the student GenAI guidance and to check assessment briefs or module leaders for the level of AI use permitted in a specific assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Tartu

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tartu guidance states that lecturers have the right to decide how artificial intelligence is used in their course and, if necessary, to limit or prohibit its use, with instructions given in the course version information or assignment guidance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Tartu guidance encourages the use of artificial intelligence, including text robots, in teaching, and frames that use around purposeful, ethical, critical, and transparent practice.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Tartu IT wiki states that the university has signed a one-year agreement with OpenAI for ChatGPT Education from 5 December 2025 to 5 December 2026, and that at the current stage licenses are offered primarily to employees.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Tasmania

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tasmania guidance says unapproved, inappropriate, or unacknowledged use of generative AI may be considered dishonest or unfair behaviour and therefore a breach of academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tasmania guidance says whether AI is encouraged or not allowed can vary by assessment, and students should check assessment instructions or confirm with the Unit Coordinator if unsure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tasmania guidance says generative AI tools should only be used to support learning and assist with assessment completion, while submitted work must be the student's own and follow the assessment task instructions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Texas at Dallas

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CometAI is listed for University of Texas at Dallas in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted or university platform.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UT Dallas policy says faculty must explain and communicate appropriate generative AI use before academic work begins for a given semester, and should include detailed statements in assignment descriptions and syllabi.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

UT Dallas OIT maintains a GenAI tools page that describes CometAI, M365 Copilot, Copilot Chat, Teams Premium, Azure OpenAI Services, AWS, and Amazon Bedrock as available AI resources or tool links.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Trieste

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For the UniTS 2025/2026 PROGRAMMAZIONE [160IN] course, students must explicitly declare any use of Large Language Model tools such as ChatGPT in exam-related content, including partial use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For the UniTS 2025/2026 PROGRAMMAZIONE [160IN] course, the teacher reserves the right to use an oral exam to further investigate a student's actual contribution to any produced content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Trieste Department of Humanities page on AI describes several AI tools as useful for preparing learning units, lessons, assessments, and teaching materials, and says ChatGPT can support lesson planning, tests, rubrics, quizzes, and BES/DSA content adaptation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Tsukuba

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tsukuba instructs generative AI users not to include confidential work information or nonpublic research plans and results in prompts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For assignments and examinations, University of Tsukuba's student guidelines tell students to follow faculty instructions on generative AI use and distinguish their own ideas from AI-generated ideas in report assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tsukuba's student guidelines say each educational organization or instructor should establish classroom policies for generative AI, and use should be based on those policies when permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Waikato

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Waikato assessment guidance says students cannot use an AI tool such as ChatGPT to generate or rewrite assignment or test answers and submit them as their own unless assignment instructions specifically permit or require that use; the page states this exception does not apply to Studiosity, which it identifies as an approved AI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Waikato academic-integrity guidance tells students to acknowledge their use of generative AI tools for assessment tasks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Waikato Library guide states that Microsoft Copilot with GPT-5 is available to all University of Waikato staff and students as a secure and reliable generative AI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Wyoming

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UW Libraries AI Support student guidance advises students to use generative AI chatbots as supplementary tools, avoid copy-pasting chatbot responses into work, and check with instructors before using AI chatbots for assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UW Libraries AI Support faculty guidance points faculty to University of Wyoming Artificial Intelligence Committee syllabus-language recommendations and provides AI-related assignment design considerations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

University of Wyoming Academic Affairs maintains an Artificial Intelligence Committee page with current AI resources and updates, including links to syllabus recommendations, AI use guidance, and UW Libraries AI Support.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Victoria University

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Victoria University's Academic Integrity Policy lists submitting work derived from a generative AI model without permission or correct acknowledgement as a breach of academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Victoria University says users who want to use alternative AI tools must assess them using the AI Risk Classification Model, follow AI Steering Committee guidance, and register AI tools in the planned AI Registry.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Victoria University's Academic Integrity Guidelines say assessment tasks may explicitly allow or disallow text-generating tools, and staff course teams decide and communicate expectations to students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Viet Nam National University Ho Chi Minh City (VNU-HCM)

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

VNU-HCM's 2025 research-integrity regulation lists technical tools, including software that assesses text overlap and checks the percentage of AI assistance, as possible ways to detect research-integrity violations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A 2023 official VNU-HCM research page reports that VNU-HCM held a workshop on undergraduate teaching and assessment in the context of ChatGPT and identified risks including inaccurate information, learner overuse, difficulty detecting machine-written text, and assessment challenges.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

A November 2025 official VNU-HCM news page describes VNU-HCM's AI policy work as ongoing, with discussions about limits on AI use, academic-integrity safeguards, study-regulation updates, and faculty/student capacity building for teaching and learning with AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Virginia Tech's Division of Information Technology asks community members not to share personal, sensitive, or high-risk university data in publicly available AI platforms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Virginia Tech's Office of Undergraduate Academic Integrity encourages faculty to include clear generative AI policies in each class syllabus, with examples ranging from permitted to prohibited use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Virginia Tech TLOS recommends that faculty establish carefully considered, course-specific generative AI policies for pedagogically sound use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Vytautas Magnus University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

VMU guidance requires clear indication of what part of student work used GAI and for what purpose, and states that students are responsible for generated content they submit.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

VMU Study Regulations allow artificial-intelligence tools in courses, written work, and independent assignments when use follows university provisions, unit procedures, course-description purposes, and academic-integrity rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

VMU guidance says the extent and conditions for generative AI use may be set at course, study-program committee, or academic-unit level.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Wayne State University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT is listed for Wayne State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

WarriorGPT is listed for Wayne State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for Wayne State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Worcester Polytechnic Institute

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

WPI's academic-integrity page defines cheating to include using unauthorized study aids, materials, information, or assistance in academic activity or assessment, and defines plagiarism to include using another's words, ideas, assertions, data, creative works, or graphics without proper attribution.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

WPI Library guidance says users should be transparent about AI-tool use and cite AI tools when they use them to gather information, write or edit text, generate media, synthesize ideas, or clean or manipulate data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

WPI Library guidance states that WPI professors have broad discretion over whether, how, and when students may use ChatGPT or other generative-AI content in assignments and projects, and students should check with their professor for expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Wuhan University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

武汉大学AI通识课程平台 is listed for Wuhan University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Wuhan University Library maintains an AI resource navigation page that groups AI-related teaching and research reference resources into sections such as AI MOOCs, AI usage guides and norms, AI policies, AI laws, declarations, literacy frameworks, conferences, and organizations; the page says the navigation is for teaching and research reference and asks readers to judge accuracy themselves.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Wuhan University Library's national AI MOOC page curates AI-related MOOCs from Xuexi Qiangguo, the National Digital Literacy and Skills Improvement Platform, and the National Higher Education Smart Education Platform, and it lists a Wuhan University course titled '人工智能' taught by Xie Rong on the National Higher Education Smart Education Platform.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

York University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

York UIT states that York University data must not be entered into public AI platforms such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, or similar services.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

York University's administrative and operational use guidelines state that staff GenAI use is subject to management approval and that use cases requiring oversight should be reviewed before use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

York's faculty GenAI teaching guidance says York does not currently recommend GenAI detection tools and notes it is not recommended to upload student work to an external GenAI or detector.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW)

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

ZHAW has a public university guideline, valid from 1 March 2025, on the use of generative AI systems in assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For ZHAW graded assignments, generative AI systems that shape the assignment's content are subject to a declaration obligation so that the AI contribution is recognizable.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For evaluating assessments, ZHAW says teaching staff may use generative AI only as an aid for open-ended task formats and should refrain from using software to detect AI-generated text for assessment purposes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

AGH University of Krakow

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

AGH University of Krakow's Center of Excellence in Artificial Intelligence is participating in the V4AI initiative, whose stated aim is to promote responsible and effective AI use by students, academic staff, and researchers.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The V4AI project page says the consortium partners plan to develop guidelines and best practices for AI use in higher education and research; this is a project deliverable statement, not a binding AGH policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ahlia University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Ahlia University's student academic integrity policy includes use of AI-generated text from tools such as ChatGPT, when used for rephrasing with the intent of circumventing detection, among its listed academic misconduct categories.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Ahlia University's policy says students may use AI for informal learning and verification of specific information, while text, design, programming, or analysis generated as part of assessment should be the students' original work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Aix-Marseille University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Aix-Marseille University is reported by an AMU-hosted ObsiaFormation page as having integrated a 2024/2025 M3C note treating student use of AI tools such as ChatGPT in evaluated personal or group work as fraud unless expressly authorized.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Aix-Marseille University's ObsiaFormation guide describes the observatory as supporting appropriation of AI uses in teaching and learning.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

American University of Central Asia

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

AUCA requires every academic program syllabus to include an AI-policy statement and a link to the Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities, and Conduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

AUCA permits instructors to set course-level policies regulating generative AI and other tools when those policies are clear and communicated in course syllabi.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Beirut Arab University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Beirut Arab University states that plagiarism is a serious matter, that instructors or supervisors report student plagiarism incidents to the Faculty Dean, and that investigated penalties may include rewriting work, Dean or President warnings, course withdrawal, or preventing thesis defense.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Beirut Arab University Libraries describe Turnitin as a tool for checking plagiarism percentages in scholarly papers and assignments, and say students use a BAU email plus a class ID and enrollment key from the instructor to create an account and submit work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ben-Gurion University of The Negev

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

BGUsearch AI Assistant is listed for Ben-Gurion University of The Negev in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

BGU Library AI guidance tells students that not every field, assignment, course, or instructor may permit AI tools and places responsibility on the student to verify permitted use with the instructor in advance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Brno University of Technology

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For education, VUT says copying generative-AI outputs and submitting them as student work is not permitted and will be treated similarly to contract-cheating, while assistant use for information search is permitted when the student independently assesses and uses the information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

VUT says teachers may use generative AI tools to prepare teaching materials, but must state which tools were used and the extent of use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ca' Foscari University of Venice

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Ca' Foscari University of Venice maintains an official AI guidance hub linking guidelines for research, teaching and learning, and administrative services.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Ca' Foscari's teaching and learning AI guidelines address faculty and students and frame generative AI as a responsible, constructive aid rather than a replacement for intellectual work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Cairo University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Cairo University's 2025-2030 strategic plan says the AI strategy focuses on integrating AI into curricula and training students and researchers, while also addressing ethical and legal dimensions of AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University's Artificial Intelligence Unit says it seeks to help the faculty community use AI responsibly through policy-guided implementation, capacity building, technical support, and continuous evaluation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chalmers University of Technology

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Chalmers Library's student guidance says whether and how AI tools may be used in examinations is decided for each course by the coordinator and examiner, so students should ask at the beginning of each course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Chalmers Library's teacher guidance says all Chalmers students and employees have access to Microsoft Copilot, while Chalmers does not currently have a license for ChatGPT.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chongqing University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Chongqing University's Undergraduate School reported official AI education course-building activity, including 13 municipal-level AI-plus course selections and 58 school-level AI-enabled undergraduate course projects.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Chongqing University's Undergraduate School announced 2026 AI-enabled course-platform training for teachers and teaching administrators, with online and offline participation options.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chulalongkorn University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChulaGENIE is listed for Chulalongkorn University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For teaching and assessment, Chulalongkorn guidance says instructors should understand selected AI tools, define course-level scope and directions for use, and adjust evaluation when AI use is allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

City University of Hong Kong (CityUHK)

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CityUHK Chatbot GPT-5.2 (ChatGPT) is listed for City University of Hong Kong (CityUHK) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutional ai service.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot for Microsoft 365 is listed for City University of Hong Kong (CityUHK) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

City University of New York

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CUNY's Academic Integrity Policy says use of generative AI tools must align with the usage policy for specific assignments as defined in the syllabus or communicated by the instructor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

CUNY's AI Academic Hub advises faculty to guide AI use with clarity by establishing responsible AI engagement in coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Colorado School of Mines

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Mines sample syllabus language says students who include AI-generated ideas, text, code, or images in submitted work must document and credit the source, and that failure to properly cite AI tools would be considered academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Mines guidance expects faculty to state course GenAI expectations explicitly and in writing, including permitted and prohibited uses, and encourages instructors to design assignments that reduce unethical GenAI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Comenius University Bratislava

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The same official advisory source states that ChatGPT does not replace the full writing process and that the student remains responsible for the final submitted work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An official Comenius University news interview presents ChatGPT as a study aid that should be taught for reasonable, critical use rather than treated as something to ban outright.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Dhofar University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Dhofar University's Centre for Preparatory Studies citation guide includes AI-generated work as a source category for APA-style citation and identifies fields such as AI company, AI tool, access details, format type, and human contributor role.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Dhofar University's faculty academic-honesty guide treats cheating as unauthorized assistance or use of forbidden material and includes unauthorized exam-period access to course subject matter on electronic devices among cheating examples.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Duy Tan University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Duy Tan University announced mandatory Artificial Intelligence skills training for undergraduate students beginning with the K-31 cohort in academic year 2025-2026, including three mandatory AI credits and integration of AI tools and ethics considerations into lessons.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

This official-source crawl found Duy Tan University AI curriculum/training material and general citation/plagiarism guidance, but did not verify a central public university-wide policy governing student or staff use of generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

East China Normal University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatECNU is listed for East China Normal University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The ECNU-published student AIGC guide says teachers may permit or not permit AIGC tools according to course nature, and students should follow course requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Essex, University of

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Essex student guidance states that AI-generated work should not be presented as a student's own assignment work and that using AI or other automated technology to produce material submitted as one's own original work is an academic offence.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Essex encourages students to explore and use generative AI tools responsibly, with attention to data safety, copyright, and academic honesty.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Far Eastern Federal University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Far Eastern Federal University's official continuing education site lists a professional-development program for teachers on artificial intelligence in teaching, with topics covering AI in education, AI tools for course and content design, AI as a research-work tool, and ethics and risks including countering academic fraud using AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Far Eastern Federal University's official continuing education site lists a 2025 artificial-intelligence course available only to FEFU staff and students, with topics including large language models, ChatGPT/Qwen/YandexGPT comparison, prompting, AI ethics and policy of AI use, hallucinations, AI-generated text identification, and local language models.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UFMG's AI recommendations suggest that course syllabi should be transparent about what AI-tool use is authorized and what is not permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UFMG's AI recommendations include seminars, events, training, and AI-literacy activities for UFMG audiences.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Gazi Üniversitesi

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Gazi Üniversitesi's generative AI guide says that if generative AI tools or systems are used in work such as assignments, reports, projects, or theses, that use is declared appropriately in the documents.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Gazi Üniversitesi's generative AI guide says generative AI tools or systems may be used as an additional source for generating and developing ideas and understanding, but not as a replacement for assessment or original work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Gdańsk University of Technology

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Gdańsk University of Technology's education-process GenAI guidance says students may use advanced GenAI tools during coursework when the use is documented.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Gdańsk University of Technology's education-process GenAI guidance says opinions and arguments in work submitted for assessment must reflect the student's own knowledge, and teachers have the right to verify independence through an additional interview.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Georgia State University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Georgia State CETLOE guidance says instructors set boundaries for student use of generative AI tools in a course and should provide assignment-specific guidance because AI expectations may vary by graded item.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Georgia State CETLOE's suggested syllabus language says unauthorized use or insufficient attribution of generative AI may constitute academic misconduct under the university's Policy on Academic Honesty.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hacettepe University

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Hacettepe University has a university-wide Turkish policy/guide for including generative AI in education and teaching within a legal, ethical, conscious, and responsible-use framework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Hacettepe's guidance says students should use generative AI models legally, ethically, and responsibly, consistently with the university's learning, assessment, and academic integrity policies and with provider terms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Harbin Institute of Technology

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Harbin Institute of Technology's Graduate School continued an AI-enabled graduate education reform and course-construction initiative covering AI integration into graduate teaching models, systems, methods, approaches, evaluation, and student development.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Harbin Institute of Technology's Undergraduate School announced an AI-enabled teaching reform project that encourages AI-supported course scenarios, personalized student learning, and AI-enabled talent cultivation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Huazhong University of Science and Technology

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Huazhong University of Science and Technology's Undergraduate School notice for revising 2025 undergraduate training plans says AI education is to be fully included in the 2025 undergraduate professional training plans, including two required public AI courses in the general education foundation curriculum.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Huazhong University of Science and Technology's Graduate School announced a 2025 summer AI training class for enrolled graduate students, with content covering AI fundamentals, AI safety and ethics, machine learning, deep learning, and large-model technology principles and applied practice.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Inha University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Inha University's official ICAC 2026 recruitment notice says Inha undergraduate participants in that AI challenge may freely use generative-AI services such as Upstage Document Parse, Solar Pro3, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude to solve the event's campus-document problems.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Inha University's 2025 academic guide says students disciplined for exam misconduct receive grade invalidation consequences ranging from an F in the affected course to F grades for all courses in the semester, depending on the disciplinary sanction.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For INSA Lyon academic evaluations, the generative AI charter says use of generative AI is prohibited unless the teacher gives express instructions, and any violation is treated as fraud and sanctioned under the study regulations and education code.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

INSA Lyon's generative AI charter encourages teachers to specify, for each pedagogical activity, whether generative AI use is authorized, tolerated with conditions, or forbidden; if no teacher instruction is provided, the general charter applies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

ITAM's EPIC Lab describes professor-focused sessions intended to develop teaching competencies for integrating generative AI tools into the design, delivery, and follow-up of student-centered classes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The EPIC Lab ITAM event page lists classroom uses of generative-AI tools, including designing a GPT as a learning assistant or virtual tutor, using NotebookLM to summarize and compare professor documents, and generating class summaries with Notion AI and Elicit.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

IIUM permits AI tools to support learning and research when use is declared and ethically compliant, and treats undisclosed or unapproved AI-generated assignments, theses, or exam responses as academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

IIUM's AI policy makes responsible-AI professional development mandatory for academic and administrative staff involved in AI-related activities or using AI, and requires AI-related agreements to be vetted by the IIUM Legal Office.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Istanbul University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An Istanbul University EBS syllabus for 'Yapay Zeka Araclari Kullanimi' states that the course aims to help students use AI tools consciously, ethically, and effectively.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An Istanbul University EBS syllabus for 'Sahne Sanatlarinda Yapay Zeka Uygulamalari II' includes generative AI, verification, bias, hallucination analysis, copyright, student data/privacy, institutional policy, and risk management as course content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Jilin University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

In a 2025 undergraduate education meeting article, Jilin University reported a university-leader statement that AI use in teaching should be boundary-managed, with students guided to understand AI as an auxiliary tool and management systems clarifying specific AI-tool use norms for teachers and students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

This crawl did not verify a standalone central Jilin University generative-AI policy page; the accessible official sources found were JLU News articles discussing AI-era teaching, academic norms, disclosure, and user responsibility.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Johannes Kepler University Linz

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

JKU's Center for Higher Education Didactics and AI-competent Higher Education provides a German AI-tools overview intended to help university instructors understand and integrate AI tools into teaching and work routines.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

This staged crawl found official JKU AI guidance and agreement documents, but not a single central public all-university AI policy page; claims are therefore scoped to the retrieved JKU teaching overview and scientific-work agreement.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Johns Hopkins University

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for Johns Hopkins University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

HopGPT is listed for Johns Hopkins University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

JMU teaching guidance says AI system results should be critically evaluated because generative AI may reproduce bias and can be helpful, faulty, or misleading depending on context.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Public official sources reviewed for JMU Würzburg showed central AI guidance pages and a July 2025 working draft guideline, but no final central binding AI policy was identified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kansas State University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

K-State's Teaching and Learning Center sample syllabus language ties unattributed AI-generated assignment content to a violation of the K-State Honor Pledge.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

K-State's sample AI syllabus language says course AI policies may vary and includes examples where students are expected to be transparent about AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Khon Kaen University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Plus is listed for Khon Kaen University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Khon Kaen University's Education and Digital Division describes an AI literacy framework for undergraduate success that includes technical proficiency, critical thinking, creative problem-solving, ethical awareness, and inclusive participation, with strategic implementation areas including educational integration, faculty development, and an ethical framework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kyung Hee University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Kyung Hee's ChatGPT guideline says students should follow instructor guidance and recognize that undisclosed or direct submission of ChatGPT output can constitute misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Kyung Hee's ChatGPT guideline tells instructors to decide ChatGPT use standards for a course and state the applicable guidance in the syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

La Trobe University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

La Trobe University policy requires an AI Adoption Risk Assessment for procurement or acquisition of all new AI systems/tools and for new use cases of existing university-approved AI systems/tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

La Trobe MyLaTrobe guidance says that when a subject allows AI use in an assessment, students need to submit an AI Acknowledgement, with the LMS indicating whether AI is permitted and what type of use is allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Maastricht University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For education, Maastricht University says permitted GenAI uses are clearly defined at activity, course/module, study programme, and faculty levels.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Maastricht University says AI systems for marking/evaluating assessments and selection/admission may be used only under certain mandatory conditions that must be investigated before use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Mahidol University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Plus is listed for Mahidol University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Mahidol University has established a university-wide framework and practical guidelines for appropriate and constructive use of Generative AI by staff, students, and official collaborators.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

McGill University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

McGill's Provost-endorsed principles state that instructors remain responsible for comporting themselves according to the highest standards of academic integrity in their use of generative AI tools. Instructors must be explicit in course outlines about the expectations for use of generative AI tools and may set limits on their use in assessment tasks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

McGill recommends that instructors explain to students in their course outline what the appropriate use or non-use is of generative AI tools in the context of that course. The use or non-use of these tools should align with the learning outcomes associated with the course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Middle East Technical University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For METU's GENE 433 term project reports, the course manual says AI usage is encouraged but the written report must respect a Turnitin AI detection limit, with AI similarity at or below 25 percent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

A METU Computing Center FAQ lists ChatGPT Free Version as a free alternative grammar and spell-checking tool for improving clarity and readability of texts with artificial intelligence tools in writing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Murdoch University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Murdoch University Library says AI functionality in its databases and systems is tested by a Library Generative AI working group against criteria that include functionality, accessibility, technical requirements, privacy, data protection, rights, and ethics.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Murdoch University Library guidance identifies Microsoft Copilot as covered by a Murdoch licensing agreement and instructs users to sign in with their Murdoch account and look for the protected Enterprise data protection indicator.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Nanjing University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Nanjing University undergraduate guidance prohibits using generative-AI tools to write key content in papers, assignments, reports, or works.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For listed allowed-use contexts, Nanjing University undergraduate guidance permits generative-AI tool use only after written signed or electronically signed consent from the course instructor or thesis/project supervisor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

MEPhI lists a 2026 professional-development programme for school teachers and education administrators on AI tools, lesson-material creation, checking assignments, detecting signs of AI use, and legal foundations of AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

In an official April 2026 MEPhI news item, Rector Vladimir Shevchenko framed generative AI as a challenge to text- and code-based assessment and pointed to personal professor-student communication as a response; this is rector commentary, not a binding university policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Technical University of Athens

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For the NTUA Civil Engineering course 'Σχεδίαση Τεχνικών Έργων με Η/Υ' in-person exam scheduled for February 2, 2026, the course announcement strictly prohibits use of large language models such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude during the exam.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

NTUA states that its new Artificial Intelligence course includes ethical issues and social impacts of artificial intelligence among covered topics; this is course-offering evidence, not an institutional AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Novosibirsk State University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT is listed for Novosibirsk State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For final qualification work and other assignments covered by the Department of Cytology and Genetics page, students are obliged to verify generated content and disclose generative-model use in a methods section or declaration.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Osaka Metropolitan University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月22日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Osaka Metropolitan University's student generative-AI guideline recommends using generative AI to deepen learning or research and improve efficiency, while following any restrictions or prohibitions given by course or research supervisors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Osaka Metropolitan University's faculty guide says instructors need to judge and explain to students the permitted scope of AI-tool use for assignments such as reports.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Palacký University Olomouc

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UP's generative AI recommendations state that AI systems at Palacky University Olomouc must be used in compliance with UP ethical principles and as tools to improve knowledge, skills, teaching, research, management, administration, or editing rather than as a full replacement for creative activity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UP's recommendations say that if an educator uses AI in any form of assessment of student activities, such as evaluating written work, the assessment should include the educator's own assessment and not be made solely by AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana's CAE+E guidance suggests that instructors consider class agreements for generative AI use, including specific situations of use, type of use, human and AI roles, and citation of AI-produced or AI-collaborative texts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana's CAE+E guidance frames generative AI in education as support, not a replacement, and says teaching plans still depend on teacher expertise and disciplinary teaching knowledge.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Qatar University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Qatar University instructs users to refrain from relying on generative AI to write research papers, assignments, or theses on behalf of students or researchers.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Qatar University's generative AI instructions apply to university affiliates across teaching, research, administrative work, technical services, student services, and other uses within the university's scope or name.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Queen Mary University of London

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Queen Mary staff guidance says open-access GenAI tools are not secure for institutional data, and directs staff to use institutional Microsoft Copilot for sensitive, confidential, or internal-use-only information while not sharing internal-use Queen Mary data with external AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Queen Mary’s Academic Integrity and Misconduct Policy applies to all Queen Mary students and says actions undermining academic integrity may be misconduct in assessment or learning activities, including formative assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ritsumeikan University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Ritsumeikan University's student-facing generative-AI guidance tells students to follow instructions when a course gives directions about generative-AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Ritsumeikan University's student-facing teaching division guidance says it is not realistic to completely prohibit generative AI itself and frames use through education and learning cautions for students and faculty.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sciences Po

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Where Sciences Po assessment formats explicitly integrate AI use, the AI doctrine says students must document that use by detailing their work steps, naming the tools used, and adopting a reflective approach.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Sciences Po's official teachers' resources page says its framework for generative AI use by teachers will apply from the September 2026 intake and covers guiding principles, transparency toward students, and AI integration in teaching activities and assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Shanghai Jiao Tong University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

上海交通大学规定教师是 AI+ 教学设计的第一责任人,应在遵守教育教学相关规章制度前提下合理、合规、有效使用人工智能技术产品或服务,并围绕场景应用、风险提示、应急预案等环节设置具体规范。

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

上海交通大学规定学生应了解并遵守各课程的人工智能使用规范,在课堂学习、作业反馈等环节遵循教学计划、知识产权法律法规和学术诚信要求;未经授权使用在线学习支持平台等行为被列为学术不端的一类。

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sichuan University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

大川智问 is listed for Sichuan University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For the 2026 undergraduate thesis detection process, Sichuan University's Academic Affairs Office notice says violations arising during AI tool use are handled according to 四川大学本科教育教学人工智能工具应用规范(试行)(川大教〔2025〕28号).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Soochow University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Soochow University's Future Science and Engineering College described an X+ai general-education lecture where students practiced with named AI tools including DeepSeek, iFlytek Zhwen, and Wenxin Yige.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An official Soochow University page says the university opened an AI general required course for all majors in September 2025 and frames it as part of a complete AI education ecosystem.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Taipei Medical University (TMU)

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Taipei Medical University's Fall 2026 teaching notice says TMU encourages faculty members to use generative AI such as ChatGPT to enhance teaching quality and develop innovative teaching methods, and points faculty to Curriculum Section guidance and Teaching Resource Center guidelines.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

Taipei Medical University's Office of Academic Affairs announced a Spring 2026 generative AI tool account subsidy program for eligible faculty and student uses, including faculty who introduce generative AI tools into courses and specified student research, self-learning, competition, club, and project-research uses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Where KNU educational components allow generative AI under levels 2 or 3, the regulation requires students to declare the fact and manner of generative AI use in submitted artifacts for assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For assessed educational work, KNU's regulation uses defined permission levels for generative AI; level 1 prohibits generative AI for assessed tasks, while levels 2 and 3 allow use only within the conditions set for the educational component.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technical University of Darmstadt

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

TU Darmstadt provides a generative AI handreichung as orientation for students and lecturers, covering reflected, transparent use, good scientific practice, and context-specific rules for examinations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TU Darmstadt's data protection page says personal data may be used in AI-related teaching only under data protection rules and identifies prompt submitters as responsible for AI-generated data protection violations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

TU Bergakademie Freiberg's URZ states that TU members can use GWDG ChatAI through Academic Cloud/Federated Login with central university credentials.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

A TU Freiberg PDF guide for the Professur für Rohstoffabbau und Spezialverfahren unter Tage states that AI-tool use in student and scientific documents must be clearly identified; unmarked AI use is evaluated as attempted fraud.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Texas Tech University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Texas Tech's recommended AI syllabus language says AI-generated content should not be submitted as a student's own work and may constitute an academic integrity violation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Texas Tech TLPDC encourages faculty to include clear syllabus statements describing permitted or prohibited generative AI use, with examples that can be adapted to course objectives.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Thapar's B.E. CSE scheme includes an Ethics and Risk Mitigation in AI course covering responsible AI principles, data privacy and governance, AI governance frameworks, and AI policy case-resolution exercises.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Thapar's B.E. CSE scheme includes a Generative AI course focused on large language models, hands-on generative tasks, tools for text, image, video, audio and code generation, and prompt engineering.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK)

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CUHK AI Chatbot for Learning Support is listed for The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CUHK AI Chatbot for Teaching Support is listed for The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Hong Kong

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT in HKU GenAI App is listed for The University of Hong Kong in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

GPT Image in HKU GenAI App is listed for The University of Hong Kong in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Warwick

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Warwick's student-facing guidance says students may use AI only within requirements set out in assessment briefs and course handbooks, which may restrict or prohibit AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Warwick's assessment-design guidance says generative AI use in student submissions needs thoughtful support so responsible use and clear demonstration of human achievement are maintained.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tilburg University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Tilly is listed for Tilburg University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences exams, tests, and assignments, Tilburg University states that AI use is not permitted unless a lecturer explicitly states otherwise.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tomsk State University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

TSU's official announcement says the AI-use policy is addressed to participants in the educational process, including students, teaching staff, administrative staff, and third parties connected with the university's educational activity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Official TSU pages describe teacher-facing generative AI activity, including a professional-development program for educators and related research on student and teacher use of large language models.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tulane University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

Tulane says procured generative AI tools or systems using generative AI require a security and risk review by the Information Security Office, and the IT guide says high-risk activities such as hiring, student assessments, or legal matters should not use generative AI without first consulting Tulane IT and Information Security.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Tulane teaching guidance says each instructor can set clear course or project AI guidelines and encourages students to describe how AI tools were used when AI is permitted; the Library academic-integrity guide tells students to review the syllabus or ask the professor about AI-tool tolerance, limitations, and citation.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Umm Al-Qura University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Umm Al-Qura University journals state that AI tools, including ChatGPT, GPT-4, Google Bard, Claude, and other large language models, cannot be listed as authors in submissions; human authors must disclose any AI use in creating article content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Umm Al-Qura University's IT and E-Learning Deanship defines academic integrity in digital education and identifies cheating, plagiarism, improper collaboration, impersonation, assistance, and falsification as forms of academic dishonesty; it says students are expected to recognize plagiarism and ensure submitted assessments are their own work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

UNESP

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

UNESP has a central official AI-use resolution, Resolution 13/2025, establishing principles, guidelines, and procedures for AI use in teaching, research, extension, management, and innovation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UNESP announced asynchronous training to orient the university community on responsible generative AI use in academic and administrative activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UAM provides a basic guide for teachers and students with recommendations for appropriate use of generative AI in university education.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UAM's guide frames generative AI recommendations as suggestions that do not replace the capacity, creativity, or autonomous work of teachers and students, and are not sufficient by themselves for class preparation or assessment tasks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M)

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UC3M guidance says the university does not intend to prohibit generative AI tools, while emphasizing appropriate use for learning and assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UC3M guidance recommends that teaching staff explicitly define at the start of a course how GenAI tools may be used and how far that use may go.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Chile

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The FCFM guidance recommends that course teaching teams build a transparency policy with students around possible generative AI uses, including defining when and how the AI tool used should be cited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The FCFM guidance warns teaching teams that inadequate use of generative AI can create ethics risks such as plagiarism and copyright issues, and security/privacy risks such as insufficient data protection or data use without consent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de la República (Udelar)

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Faculty of Engineering guide provides non-prescriptive categories for reduced, moderate, and extensive AI use in curricular units and assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Faculty of Engineering guide warns that AI-detection tools have very limited effectiveness and identifies manual review and technical interviews as effective methods for checking understanding and authorship.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Sevilla

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universidad de Sevilla's Decálogo for generative AI in teaching frames generative AI as a high-potential tool and recommends fostering its use across the university community.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The BUS ethical-use guide tells students to follow teaching-staff recommendations and evaluation limits for AI use, cite and declare AI use, avoid plagiarism, and verify AI-provided sources and biases.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Nacional de Colombia

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogotá guidance recommends AI literacy, ethical and responsible use, reflective integration, clear disclosure of AI use, redesign of tasks and assessments, human supervision, critical reflection, transparency about consequences of misuse, and attention to data security and privacy for teaching activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogotá AI-use guidance flags data security and privacy for teaching activities and management of sensitive data and privacy for research activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

USFQ’s “Inteligencia Artificial Generativa para Ciencias Sociales, Economía y Derecho” continuing-education program requires access to AI platform accounts, including premium OpenAI ChatGPT and Claude.ai subscriptions during the program.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

USFQ’s March 2026 generative-AI content course includes a learning outcome on evaluating AI ethics challenges and applying good practices and ethical guidelines for responsible and transparent AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidade Católica Portuguesa

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UCP guidance says professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including materials used for assessment and academic progression.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

In teaching contexts, UCP guidance says students should explain, in an appendix to written work, the process that produced AI-induced elements or reasoning; if that is not possible in the text, an oral discussion is recommended as a complementary assessment element.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp)

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Unicamp's generative AI deliberation allows students to use generative AI as support for information seeking, study, and learning, but says assessment activities must observe the limits and conditions defined by the course instructor when assessments exist.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The Unicamp Scientific Electronic Journals Portal AI-use policy says generative AI use in journal submission, assessment, and editing processes must be declared explicitly at manuscript submission and in the manuscript.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

UFRJ publicly announced preliminary documents on academic integrity and AI-use recommendations for the academic community.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

CRIA/UFRJ recommends that instructors define acceptable and unacceptable generative AI uses in their course teaching plans.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore's 2026-2028 strategic-plan page says the university intends to elaborate and adopt an AI policy and guidelines for students, faculty, and technical-administrative staff across teaching, scientific, and administrative processes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore's official sources describe AI literacy as part of the strategic plan and present an AI course for all students focused on critical, conscious, and responsible use of AI.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Università degli Studi di Pavia

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UniPV offers an internal course for university language experts on integrating generative-AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini into language teaching.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

A July 2025 UniPV performance-revision document lists adoption of generative-AI technologies as a teaching objective and refers to drafting university guidelines, but this run did not locate a published central binding AI policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Università degli Studi di Perugia

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UniPG states that its GenAI policy applies to students, teaching staff, researchers, language experts, tutors, technical-administrative staff, and library staff, and that GenAI should support rather than replace human critical judgment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UniPG says teaching staff who use AI tools should make the mode and intensity of use explicit in the syllabus and communicate GenAI-use limits to students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universita' Politecnica delle Marche

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UNIVPM's Research Ethics Committee regulation says the committee provides opinions, assessments, and checks on request for university research projects and governing bodies, and that the committee's opinions are binding for the requester.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

UNIVPM has official statutes/regulations sources for ethics, conduct, and research integrity; this run did not verify a separate university-wide generative-AI teaching, assessment, or student-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UAB Libraries publishes a UAB positioning page on AI use in teaching that describes the document as a provisional, living document intended to support reflection on AI in university teaching rather than an exhaustive regulation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

In its AI-in-teaching positioning guidance, UAB argues that ChatGPT and similar tools require rethinking assessment evidence and that tasks a machine can do quickly and well should not form part of an assessment proposal because they would evaluate artificial production.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Duisburg-Essen

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UDE guidance says instructors should clearly state in their courses how they view the use of AI tools and what that means for learning objectives and assessment situations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UDE advises ChatGPT and related integration users to consider that interactions with ChatGPT may be logged and used in the referenced court process; it also notes OpenAI models are available in UDE Chat AI and logs are stored by Microsoft for 30 days.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Heidelberg

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For study and teaching at Heidelberg University, AI and language models such as ChatGPT or DeepL are generally allowed only within rules set by examiners or instructors, and the independent character of the student's work must be preserved.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Heidelberg AI guideline says instructors are asked to design AI use according to learning goals and inform students about permitted and prohibited AI applications.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat Ramon Llull

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universitat Ramon Llull publishes AI-use recommendations developed by a Working Group on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence Tools Applied to Teaching-URL.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

This official-source pass found public URL AI recommendations and related PDFs, but did not identify a publicly accessible central binding AI policy for Universitat Ramon Llull.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain)

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UCLouvain's student guidance frames generative AI use in academic work around responsibility, authenticity, and transparency, while telling students to check course-specific rules before using AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UCLouvain's 2024 working-group note recommends that teachers be explicit about whether generative AI is allowed or prohibited in learning activities and advises against using AI detectors to determine precisely whether a text was generated by AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Liège

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The ULiège charter prohibits presenting AI-produced text, image, code, music, or similar output as one's own or as a fellow student's work, and says students who entrust all or part of personal work to ChatGPT or other AI may face sanctions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

ULiège has an official student charter setting a framework for generative AI use in academic contexts such as courses, assignments, exams, reports, and other learning activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Montréal

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance says course plans should explicitly state when generative AI tools are permitted; without explicit authorization, the tools are deemed prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance cautions teaching staff that AI-generated-content detection tools can vary in reliability and their results should be considered carefully.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Rennes

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

In assessments where generative AI use is authorized, Université de Rennes' AI charter says students must declare the use of generative AI in the relevant passages and prohibits submitting AI-generated output without saying so in place of the requested work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For teaching missions, Université de Rennes' AI charter says AI must not substitute for a teacher's act without supervision and verification, and AI tasks affecting student assessment or admission must be human verified in a demonstrable way.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Grenoble Alpes

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UGA's AI reference framework says use of tools mobilizing AI is prohibited by principle for knowledge assessment unless explicitly authorized, with study regulations and assessment modalities specifying the AI-use framework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Outside knowledge assessment, UGA's AI reference framework leaves AI-use instructions to the teacher and teaching team, while stating that an AI tool must not substitute for the student's exercise of the skills used in the assignment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universite libre de Bruxelles

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

ULB describes Academ·IA as its institutional plan to train, sensitize, and equip students, teachers, administrative staff, and researchers around responsible and ethical AI culture.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ULB's 2024 AI-in-teaching note says that students may not use generative AI to perform the task or demonstrate the competence being assessed unless the teacher explicitly authorizes it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Lumière Lyon 2

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月26日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Lyon 2 SPS guidance says AI should not do assessed work in place of the student; AI assistance may be possible only when it respects university ethics and the specific instructions for the exam or assignment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Lyon 2 SPS guidance recommends that instructors explicitly state expected conditions for student work, including obligations, permissions, recommendations, prohibitions, whether generative AI may be used, and how any use should be signaled.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne AI FAQ states that presenting as one's own a submitted university assignment that one did not write oneself is fraud, whether the writer is a human third party or an AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne AI FAQ advises never to entrust personal data, especially sensitive data, to a third party AI service, noting data appropriation risks and that ChatGPT retains submitted information on U.S. servers for an officially stated 30 days.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Paris Cité

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The official Université Paris Cité GEN-IAS course catalogue states that the DIU covers generative AI in health, including organizational, regulatory, economic and ethical aspects, and targets competencies such as preventing risks, respecting the legal and regulatory environment, ethics, and human guarantee.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An official Université Paris Cité innovation-pedagogy announcement describes the IA-QUEST project as studying an LLM-assisted assessment workflow for medical ECOS, with local open-source LLM deployment framed as enabling RGPD-compliant use for sensitive ECOS data.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The UNIMAS Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities 2025/2026 student handbook says AI does not replace lecturers, lecture notes, or main academic references, and warns students not to copy directly from AI answers, submit AI answers as their own work without citation, or use AI to cheat in exams or assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The UNIMAS Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities 2025/2026 student handbook frames good AI practice as using AI as a support tool, checking AI responses against academic sources, using AI to sharpen critical thinking, and recognizing that AI responses may be inaccurate or unsuitable.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM)

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

IJAPS, a Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia journal, requires manuscript authors to note AI software use such as ChatGPT in Materials and Methods or Acknowledgments and not list AI as an author.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A CDAE-hosted higher-education GenAI guideline advises higher education providers to prepare policies and rules for GenAI use in teaching and learning, research, and scholarly writing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM)

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UTHM's Digital Teaching and Learning Policy permits the use of generative artificial intelligence in teaching and learning processes, including learning content, activity implementation, and assessment, subject to suitability, assessment effectiveness, compliance with applicable guidelines, laws and regulations, and good principles, values, and ethics in the course field.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UTHM's Digital Teaching and Learning Policy says assessment should be designed to be contextual, fair, transparent, and personalized while taking into account the risk of generative AI misuse in written assignments, and that continuous assessment involving presentations, question-and-answer, and viva voce should be prioritized to assess students' actual mastery.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Algarve

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月26日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

An official University of Algarve 2024-25 Market Studies course sheet states that, for that course, fraud, plagiarism, or improper use of Artificial Intelligence is handled under paragraph 15 of UAlg's Assessment Regulations, and the instructor may require an additional test if there is doubt. This is course-level assessment-integrity evidence, not a general AI policy for all UAlg courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

University of Algarve's official pedagogical-innovation page identifies a working group that supports AI-related digital pedagogy and prepares guiding documents for the use of AI and other digital tools in UAlg academic contexts. This is source-status evidence of an AI guidance workstream, not a published binding university-wide AI policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Alicante

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Alicante's Institute of Education Sciences maintains an official Spanish-language generative-AI resources page that links teaching guidance and academic-policy resources.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Alicante's ICE offered a teaching-staff course analyzing ChatGPT's implications for university teaching, including applications, opportunities, plagiarism, evaluation difficulties, and strategies for participants' courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Antwerp

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Antwerp Dutch ECHO teaching guidance describes AI-proofing as creating teaching situations where students cannot use AI, or are detected if they use it when not allowed, and presents assignment-product changes, process changes, or both as options.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Antwerp ECHO teaching guidance says lecturers can balance AI-tool use in open-book exams with deep understanding and fair assessment by designing sufficiently complex questions and clarifying whether and how students may use AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bari

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bari lists a transversal digital-skills course, "AI-Gen e pensiero critico: dal prompt all'impatto," that covers generative AI and machine-learning fundamentals, model limitations such as bias and hallucinations, prompt/evaluation techniques, and verification workflows.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bari lists a transversal course, "Intelligenza artificiale, mercati, diritti," that teaches AI's effects on society, economy, fundamental rights, privacy, personal-data protection, non-discrimination, algorithmic transparency, GDPR, and the European AI Regulation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Brescia

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Brescia announced a high-training course on artificial intelligence for public administration that includes technical, organizational, ethical, Large Language Model, ChatGPT, and Copilot topics.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A University of Brescia-hosted Edvance faculty-training flyer includes a session on generative AI in university teaching, covering pedagogical, epistemological, ethical, assessment, and prompting considerations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Cincinnati

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Cincinnati teaching guidance tells instructors to include clear syllabus policies explaining how or whether students may use generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Cincinnati teaching guidance cautions instructors not to over-rely on generative AI detection tools because they can produce false positives and false negatives.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Colombo

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Colombo says AI use in assessments is not permitted unless instructions explicitly authorize it, and unauthorized AI use in summative assessment is considered cheating and an examination offence.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For teaching, University of Colombo says AI tools must not be used to mark or grade student work, generate evaluative feedback, or contribute to summative assessment decisions unless institutional review, validation, quality assurance, and meaningful human oversight are in place.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Crete

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Official University of Crete ethics pages state that, if a course instructor has not given a clear statement, use of or consultation with generative AI is treated analogously to assistance from another person, and using generative AI tools to substantially complete an assignment or exam is not permitted.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Official University of Crete ethics pages state that individual course instructors may set their own policies regulating generative AI tools in their courses, including allowing or disallowing some or all uses, and should communicate those policies to students in course syllabi.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Eastern Finland

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Eastern Finland says use of AI against a teacher's instructions, or failing to report AI use, is treated as fraudulent conduct and investigated through the university's fraud process.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

University of Eastern Finland states that its AI guidelines apply as a general guideline for the university's use of these services in research and teaching/studies, while faculties may provide specifying instructions within the general guidelines and legislation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Hyderabad

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Hyderabad Teaching Policy says use of GenAI to create whole assignments and projects is not acceptable, while GenAI may be permitted for research and conceptualization in limited course-specific circumstances.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Hyderabad Teaching Policy directs students to refer to course-level instructions before using GenAI tools and frames academic dishonesty violations as subject to academic-unit scrutiny and possible consequences.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Kentucky

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UK ADVANCE provides instructional generative AI guidance that includes creating and clearly communicating course policies, responding to misuse, and designing learning experiences aligned with those policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Kentucky CELT guidance frames student generative AI use as a course-level instructor decision and recommends communicating allowed uses, tool restrictions, citation or acknowledgement expectations, and alternatives where privacy concerns exist.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Lausanne

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UNIL provides institutional access to Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat and to AI features in Wooclap and Wooflash, while warning that permitted teaching and research uses are governed by each faculty or school's guidelines.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UNIL's education FAQ says students may use generative AI for academic work only within the limits prescribed by their teacher for AI use or citation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Lisbon

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

At Instituto Superior Técnico, a Pedagogical Council deliberation was reported as saying there should not be a general prohibition on AI tools in teaching processes or assessment methods.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

At Instituto Superior Técnico, the reported deliberation called for assessment methods to make explicit whether AI tools are permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Maryland, Baltimore County

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UMBC's Academic and Instructional AI page says UMBC does not license any AI detection tools at this time and describes reliability concerns with AI-detection tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UMBC's Academic and Instructional AI guidance advises instructors to set clear expectations for generative AI use, including citation or reference expectations if AI is permitted, and says students who use AI should have prompts available to explain their process.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Messina (UniME)

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UniME published a 2025 technical-administrative staff training course on privacy, GDPR, and artificial intelligence that references responsible and transparent AI use, privacy protection, the AI Act, and AgID guidelines.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UniME published a 2025 technical-administrative staff training course on artificial intelligence in workplace contexts, focused on conscious, secure, ethical use and compliance with privacy, security, and responsibility rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Miami

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Miami PETAL guidance states that AI-use rules and practices may vary by class and discipline, and that students are responsible for staying informed about instructor expectations and asking when in doubt.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Miami Writing Center says its AI support aligns with each professor's class and assignment expectations, and its consultants will not recommend AI tools that violate instructor expectations or academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Mumbai

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

An official University of Mumbai Vice Chancellor profile says the VC plans to draft an AI policy for the University of Mumbai covering teaching-learning, assessment, and academic integrity or plagiarism handling; this is evidence of a planned policy effort, not a published university-wide AI policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A University of Mumbai digital-ethics syllabus includes responsible use of Artificial Intelligence in research alongside data privacy, digital plagiarism, plagiarism-check tools, and reliability of digital information; this is course-level teaching content, not a university-wide AI-use rule.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Navarra

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

EurekAI self-diagnostic is listed for University of Navarra in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For student use of generative AI tools, University of Navarra's AI policy asks teachers to follow the university's generative-AI and academic-integrity guide and communicate clear expectations to students for their courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of New England Australia

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月24日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNE's Student Academic Integrity Policy includes artificial intelligence tools in its example of work substantially written by someone else, within the policy's breach framework for undergraduate and postgraduate award and non-award coursework students; the policy states it does not apply to higher degree by research courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

A UNE School of Education public myLearn information page tells students that computer programs, artificial intelligence tools, or other tools should not be used to write or produce any part of an assessment response unless explicitly referenced and in line with unit coordinator advice for the assessment task.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Nizwa

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Nizwa's plagiarism guidance describes unattributed use of another person's work in academic or professional assignments as inappropriate behavior and academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Nizwa publishes an AI Tool Directory that lists selected AI tools with fields, descriptions, links, and free or paid labels.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Ottawa

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Ottawa student-facing academic integrity guidance says permission to use artificial intelligence tools can vary by course and assessment, and students should check the syllabus or ask the professor when unsure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Ottawa Teaching and Learning Support Service maintains a public AI teaching-and-learning hub with resources and activities for instructors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Palermo

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

University of Palermo's 2025 TLC-CIMDU activity report records a 'Nuove tecnologie e Intelligenza Artificiale' training path totaling 22 hours and 996 participants.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Palermo's TLC-CIMDU maintains an official teacher-facing 'Nuove tecnologie e AI' page listing AI-for-teaching seminars and related registration or slide links.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Parma

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

University of Parma has official 2025 guidelines for responsible use of generative AI in teaching and research, approved by the Academic Senate and Board of Directors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The guidelines treat generative AI as support for teaching, learning, and research, not a replacement for human work; AI-generated content should be examined, approved, modified, and supervised by a human author.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Pecs

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For student performance assessment, the University of Pecs guideline says the university does not recommend using automated decision-making systems or large language models for substantive qualifying evaluation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Pecs AI guideline is scoped to educational and research activities needed to meet study requirements and applies to university citizens when they use AI systems in connection with setting, meeting, or evaluating course and training requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Rochester

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Rochester Provost guidance says instructors should create written course GenAI policies stating when students must, may, or cannot use GenAI and how use should be verified, disclosed, documented, and attributed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The SAS/Hajim Academic Honesty Policy lists use of AI-generated material not allowed by the instructor as an example of plagiarism under that school-scoped policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Rome "Tor Vergata"

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT is listed for University of Rome "Tor Vergata" in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Corporate and Business Strategy course page states that using generative AI, including ChatGPT, without prior professor consent is considered plagiarism in that course context.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Salerno

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Salerno has an official 2024/2025 course page for a master's course titled International Law, Cybersecurity and Ethics of Artificial Intelligence; the course objectives describe AI, cybersecurity, governance, data protection, and trustworthy AI topics. This is course-level teaching evidence, not a university-wide AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

University of Salerno's official funded-project listing includes an active DIEM project on generative AI and university mathematics teaching, funded by university funds. This supports a research/teaching source-status claim only, not binding student or staff AI policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Saskatchewan

2 匹配声明s from 11 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

USask LTE Toolkit guidance says instructors planning student GenAI use should use approved or reviewed tools when accounts are required and says using GenAI to determine final grades is strongly discouraged.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

USask educator AI guidance says educators should discuss AI-use expectations with learners and remain responsible for assessing student work, feedback quality, and grades.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For student work covered by Rector Measure R 567, authors must always declare and specify use of generative AI tools, while other AI tools such as translation, language editing, or publication-analysis tools do not need declaration unless the assignment explicitly and transparently says so.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Under Rector Measure R 567, a thesis supervisor or adviser may prohibit or discourage the use of specified AI tools in a student work, but that prohibition or recommendation must be stated transparently and explicitly in the assignment with a clear justification.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Tulsa

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tulsa's McFarlin Library Generative AI guide points students to AI citation guidance, explains why disclosure is encouraged, and says best practice is to check with the professor before using generative-AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tulsa's McFarlin Library Generative AI guide advises users that they remain responsible for fact checking AI outputs and frames coursework use with a tutor-comparison question before using generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Turin

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Turin says it has started a structured, participatory experimentation on the use of artificial intelligence in teaching, research, third mission, and administrative processes, with dedicated tools distributed to a selected group of users and accompanied by training, guidelines, and feedback collection.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Turin Teaching and Learning Center announced a generative-AI training course for teaching staff, covering production of educational resources with AI and educational innovation with AI, including prompting, course redesign, assessment, academic integrity, and virtual tutors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Turku

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Turku states in an official Vice Rector perspective that AI use in learning is allowed, that its use must be reported, and that course teachers may encourage, instruct, restrict, or prohibit AI use when justified by learning objectives.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Turku's Vice Rector states that teachers retain authority and responsibility for coursework evaluation and that AI cannot be the decision-maker in assessing academic performance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Ulsan

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For the 2026-1 Sports Digital Literacy course, University of Ulsan's Sports Science Division lists the AI-use category as fully permitted and includes generative AI such as ChatGPT among the course's practice-centered elements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Ulsan's Sports Science Division describes ChatGPT as a learning support tool for the division and says students remain responsible for final assignment outputs and should follow division and school AI-use guidance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Victoria (UVic)

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UVic's GenAI position statement says there is no general ban on GenAI tools including ChatGPT in learning and teaching, supports appropriate course-level integration, and says instructors are encouraged to provide clear course-outline instructions, but instructors are not permitted to use GenAI tools to grade student work at this time.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For UVic administrative or operational work, University Systems states that Microsoft Copilot is the GenAI tool approved for use with UVic Data, while publicly available tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity are not approved for highly confidential, confidential, or internal UVic Data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Vienna

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

u:ai is listed for University of Vienna in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Vienna says students remain fully responsible for every submitted performance even when they used AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Warsaw

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Warsaw URK guidance recommends that academic teachers and other instructors consider using AI systems in education and encourages training on AI-system use in academic teaching.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For University of Warsaw American Studies Center students, ASC academic-integrity guidance says using generative AI tools to generate content and submitting it as one's own work is prohibited, and students should follow the course syllabus or ask instructors about permitted use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Westminster

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Westminster student guidance says students must disclose any use of GenAI for assessed coursework and remain responsible for the originality, accuracy, and integrity of their work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Westminster doctoral researcher guidance says doctoral assessments and research outputs must be the researcher's own original work, and that using GenAI to generate doctoral research content without agreement and disclosure is academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of York

2 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of York student assessment guidance says false authorship is considered an academic misconduct offence under University policy and is treated very seriously.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For taught teaching and assessment, York staff guidance recommends keeping students informed of expectations at module and assessment level.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Zilina

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月26日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Zilina prohibits employees and students from entering sensitive data into publicly available GenAI tools, including non-public university data, non-public study materials, test assignments, intellectual-property-protected materials, personal data without explicit written consent, preliminary research results, and trade-secret data of partners.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Zilina prohibits students from submitting work generated by GenAI in substantial or full scope without their own creative contribution, and requires students to respect instructor restrictions on GenAI use in a course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Van Lang University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An official Van Lang University news page reports that the Faculty of Foreign Languages held a 2025 seminar on applying AI in language teaching and research, including faculty discussion of AI use in teaching, learning-outcome assessment, output quality control, academic integrity, and technology misuse risk.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

An official Van Lang University English news page reports that the Faculty of Tourism presented a 2025 seminar titled "AI Ethics in Learning, Teaching & Research," with topics including ethical frameworks, AI hazards in education, implementation challenges, and responsible adaptation to Vietnamese higher education contexts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Vietnam National University, Hanoi

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Vietnam National University, Hanoi announced that regular undergraduate students from the 2025 intake are to take the VNU1001 course, Introduction to Digital Technology and Applications of Artificial Intelligence.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The VNU1001 Digital Technology and AI course is described as covering foundations of digital technology and AI, use of common digital and AI tools for study and research, and awareness of ethics, academic integrity, digital safety, and responsibility when applying AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

VILNIUS TECH (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

VILNIUS TECH students are not allowed to use AI tools during assessments unless the subject specifically requires AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

VILNIUS TECH academic staff must inform or remind students about the university AI rules and subject-specific AI use at the beginning of the semester, and must consider AI-use risks when creating assessment tasks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Vilnius University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Vilnius University's AI guidelines state that lecturers should not use generative AI models to prepare reviews of final theses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Vilnius University Faculty of Communication recommendations allow AI use in assignments as specified by teaching staff, require acknowledgment, and set a 5% character-count limit for AI-generated text in assessed written assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Xi’an Jiaotong University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Xi'an Jiaotong University's Teacher Teaching Development Center listed an October 2024 workshop on large language models and intelligent learning, with content points including ChatGPT use in research, office work, and teaching, domestic AI models, vertical-domain AI, GPT risk warnings, and strategies for responding to student assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Xi'an Jiaotong University's Teacher Teaching Development Center listed a December 2023 teaching seminar on generative AI and ChatGPT effects on university educational testing and assessment; the notice framed the content as discussion of learning, innovation, global generative AI policies, education quality, academic integrity, current assessment practices, and future trends.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yonsei University

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Yonsei University Research Ethics Center guidance says generative AI use in courses should be based on clear agreement between instructors and learners, with instructors giving minimum guidance when use is permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Yonsei University Research Ethics Center guidance tells students that generative AI may be permitted or restricted depending on the course and that students should consult the syllabus and course policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Zayed University

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Zayed University said it was undertaking a university-wide faculty training initiative to help faculty embed AI into course design and teaching practices.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Zayed University announced that, starting in summer 2025, it would roll out Digital Education Council initiatives including a Certificate in AI for Higher Education for faculty and leadership and an AI Literacy for Students program.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Zhengzhou University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Zhengzhou University announced undergraduate and teacher artificial-intelligence literacy standards that frame student competencies and teacher development around AI awareness, application, teaching design, evaluation, ethics, safety, and responsibility.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Zhengzhou University said implementation of the AI literacy standards would include an AI general compulsory course, AI plus major course clusters, a university-level AI experiment platform, AI cultural activities, innovation competitions, and incentive links to teaching evaluation and professional-title review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Abu Dhabi University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

ADU announced ChatGPT guidelines for students and faculty, describing responsible and ethical use, revision of generated content, avoiding plagiarism, and faculty training.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Freiburg Rechenzentrum describes Open WebUI as a web interface that lets all university members use LLMs in administration, study, teaching, and research.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Alexandria University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Alexandria University's Council for Postgraduate Studies and Research emphasized limiting use of AI tools such as ChatGPT and using them responsibly and ethically when writing scientific papers before submission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Altai State University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Altai State University's official UЦОТ advisory says AI assistants are available to teachers for online-course content, course/test generation, and related educational-material workflows.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

American University in Dubai

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

AUD's 2025-2026 Student Handbook lists penalties for academic integrity violations that can range from zero on the graded work to an F grade, suspension, or dismissal depending on the offense.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

American University of Beirut (AUB)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

AUB has issued initial guidelines on responsible use of generative AI in research, not a general student or teaching policy in this staged evidence set.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Baku Engineering University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Baku Engineering University's 2024-2029 strategic development plan includes integrating artificial intelligence technologies into teaching as part of its digital transformation timeline, with a measurable objective to digitize 50 courses by 2025.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

BUET Registrar Office describes its mission as including security and privacy for the university's academic records, including advice and training for faculty and staff on privacy issues.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Bar-Ilan University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Bar-Ilan University guidance requires students to declare whether they used generative AI tools in an assignment and to explain the specific contribution made by GenAI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Bauman Moscow State Technical University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Bauman Moscow State Technical University's Antiplagiat help page describes a student submission workflow in which students upload work to a teacher through a special assignment code, and final versions are automatically added to the organization's internal collection and EBSO.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Beihang University (former BUAA)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Beihang's official 2025 annual-news summary reports that the university offered Introduction to Artificial Intelligence as a general compulsory course for all undergraduate students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Beijing Normal University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For 2026 undergraduate theses and designs, Beijing Normal University says it will conduct comprehensive plagiarism detection and AIGC detection through the undergraduate thesis module of its teaching administration service platform.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Belarusian State University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An official BSU news article describes AI and chatbots as being studied for educational-process support and advises students who use neural networks to be cautious and verify information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

BITS Pilani's Data Privacy Policy says AI tools such as ChatGPT or CoPilot should not be used wherever personal, sensitive, or confidential data is involved without explicit approval from the relevant Institute information security team or the BITS Pilani IT team.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Bogaziçi Üniversitesi

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Bogaziçi University's accessible official ethics source provides general institutional ethics principles, including learning and teaching freedom, protection of confidential information, and careful use of institutional resources; this staged run did not locate an accessible official AI-specific use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

BRAC University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

In the official public-source search completed on 2026-06-12, BRAC University's reviewed policies-and-procedures page did not provide AI-specific, ChatGPT, or generative-AI rules; AI-related official hits were news, training, seminar, research, or repository items rather than policy evidence.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Brandeis University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Brandeis guidance says instructors should include a course policy in syllabi regarding use and misuse of generative AI, with course-specific expectations discussed in class.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

California Polytechnic State University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for California Polytechnic State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Catania University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Catania University's Department of Mathematics and Computer Science hosts an AI-and-teaching section for projects, experiments, and materials on conscious AI use in university teaching and learning.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chandigarh University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Chandigarh University's Student Code of Conduct tells students to submit original work, avoid plagiarism, cheating, and misrepresentation, be transparent in assessments, and seek assistance ethically.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Charles Darwin University

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For HDR studies, CDU guidance says GenAI may assist but should not replace a candidate's original intellectual contribution, GenAI use should be clearly acknowledged, and supervisors or external examiners should not use GenAI to critique or assess candidate work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

China University of Mining and Technology

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An official China University of Mining and Technology news article says the 2024 undergraduate training plan explores an "intelligent +" professional training model, includes a required computing thinking and artificial intelligence foundation course, and supports digital teaching resources such as knowledge-graph-based AI courses and a smart education platform.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

China University of Petroleum, Beijing

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

China University of Petroleum, Beijing Library announced a time-limited trial of the ChatLibrary AI intelligent service platform through September 24, 2024.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

City St George’s, University of London

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

City St George's states that, for assessment, its default position is that students must not use generative AI tools unless instructed to do so by a module tutor or programme director.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

City University of Hong Kong (CityUHK)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

CityUHK has an official guideline index for the use of generative AI tools in teaching and learning, effective from Semester A 2025/26, with separate staff and student guideline links.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Columbia University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Education is listed for Columbia University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Dalian University of Technology

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Official-source discovery for Dalian University of Technology found AI education and teacher-training material, but did not locate a central university-wide generative-AI use policy, student ChatGPT/AIGC academic-integrity rule, or approved-tool policy in the checked official sources.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Delft University of Technology

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

TU Delft teaching guidance says Microsoft Copilot Chat, after login with NetID, is currently the only generative AI tool permitted for use at TU Delft for education.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Diponegoro University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNDIP Library guidance tells students that submitted assignments remain their own responsibility, and that using AI software without acknowledgement is treated seriously under academic misconduct procedures.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Dublin City University

1 匹配声明 from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

DCU's Teaching Enhancement Unit asks staff to consider assessment design for GenAI by designing tools in or redesigning assessment to avoid possible academic integrity breaches, and says DCU is not employing GenAI detectors for student assessments at this time.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Eötvös Loránd University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

ELTE's rector instruction says the university will provide mandatory basic AI training for every student from the first semester of the 2026/2027 academic year.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Erasmus University Rotterdam

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

EUR's teacher-facing GenAI guidance says instructors need to communicate whether and how GenAI is allowed for a course or assignment, and it frames unpermitted student GenAI use as comparable to ghostwriting.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Freie Universitat Berlin

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

KI.Assist@FU is listed for Freie Universität Berlin in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Georgetown University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Georgetown CNDLS advises that instructors should provide clear course or assignment policies about whether and how students may use AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

German Jordanian University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

GJU's AI principles permit students to use AI tools for learning-supportive activities such as preliminary research, analysis, idea generation, writing improvement, and summarizing academic sources, provided that the use is disclosed; the principles prohibit using AI to fully prepare projects or theses without the student's actual contribution.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Government College University, Faisalabad

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For the ISC Expo 2026 Mini AI Model Training and Deployment Challenge, the GCUF-hosted rules allow AI tools such as ChatGPT and GitHub Copilot, while prohibiting copying complete projects or pre-trained solutions without modification.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hamad Bin Khalifa University (HBKU)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

HBKU's Code of Honor requires students to follow university policies and regulations and frames academic misconduct to include plagiarism and dishonest use or supply of course or research material.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hanyang University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Hanyang University's AI@Hanyang guide describes generative AI tool categories for academic and research support and lists text-generation examples including ChatGPT, Google Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and Microsoft Copilot.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Heriot-Watt University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Heriot-Watt's student AI guidance for AY23-24 says generative AI use is permitted when the use is clearly identified and referenced, while students should check whether and how it is permitted on each course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

HSE University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

HSE University says an instructor may prohibit the use of generative models during assessment elements if the prohibition is stated in the course syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

HUFS - Hankuk (Korea) University of Foreign Studies

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

HUFS describes its AI Data Convergence curriculum as including AI ethics and philosophy, and the broader AI Data Convergence program page also names privacy, security, and AI ethics lecture areas.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IAU)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

IAU allows students to use AI tools for academic-process tasks only when the responsible-use rules in the policy are followed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indian Institute of Science

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An IISc committee report recommends 'allowed with attribution' as the default institutional policy for AI tool use in courses, while allowing instructors, departments, divisions, or programmes to tailor the baseline policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IITG)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

IIT Guwahati's Students' Affairs Code of Conduct pledge is an official general academic-integrity source covering unfair means, unpermitted aid, and plagiarism, including internet-sourced work; it is not an AI-specific institutional policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Official IITR AI-related discovery found public Generative AI and large-language-model course/training content, but this source is course content rather than an institutional AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

INTI International University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An official INTI article reports that educators were advised to use ChatGPT with caution as a supplementary resource rather than depending exclusively on its outputs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For education, IPB guidance says GenAI use should be human-centered, pedagogically appropriate, ethical, human-controlled, aligned with learning objectives, and accountable for AI-content accuracy and impact.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Iran University of Science and Technology

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Iran University of Science and Technology has an official AI-system page; this crawl did not verify a publicly accessible central AI policy, academic-integrity AI rule, or assessment-guidance source.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Isfahan University of Technology

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Isfahan University of Technology's Educational Monitoring and Evaluation office announced a faculty development course on AI and augmented reality in education and research, including ethical dimensions and responsible use of new technologies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kaohsiung Medical University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Kaohsiung Medical University's student generative AI guidance says students should cite or explain AI use when permitted by instructors and should critically check AI-generated information before using it in assignments or reports.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Karlsruhe Institute Of Technology Kit

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OpenAI GPT via KI-Toolbox is listed for Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kaunas University of Technology

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

KTU describes academic honesty as regulated by its Code of Academic Ethics and says students commit to honestly prepare written, oral, project, and research assignments; the same source describes penalties for academic dishonesty and plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Khalifa University

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Khalifa University Library's Medical AI Research Guide warns that ChatGPT can fail on article identifiers and citations, and says tools such as RefWorks or EndNote are still needed for collecting, managing, and formatting citations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The eLUT AI tools guideline says teachers can require students to use Copilot in course assignments and can also prohibit AI use in course assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Lincoln University College

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Lincoln University College has official AI-related academic programme pages, but this run did not verify a central university AI-use policy or guidance source from the official sources found.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Lovely Professional University (LPU)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月22日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

LPU's Scholarly Writing and Research Analytics skill-development course says it integrates publication skills with responsible and ethical use of Artificial Intelligence tools and includes ethical use of AI tools in Week 1.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet Muenchen

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Memorial University of Newfoundland

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Memorial's Centre for Innovation in Teaching and Learning presents GenAI as a teaching and learning support area and offers instructor consultations and department-level presentations on appropriate GenAI use in course development.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

MGIMO University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

MGIMO reported a faculty professional-development program on large language models in education; this supports a narrow teaching/training claim and does not establish a university-wide student AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Michigan Technological University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Michigan Tech Academic Affairs provides AI Working Group syllabus templates for instructors, organized into General Permission, Conditional Permission, and Prohibition tiers for course-level generative AI use policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

NTU AI Learning Assistant (NALA) is listed for Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

A UOA-hosted Department of Psychology faculty guide states that it is not a Department of Psychology regulation and applies to students taking the author's courses or supervised work; within that scope, it says AI use in academic work should be explicitly declared.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Cheng Kung University (NCKU)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NCKU academic-integrity guidance says faculty, students, and researchers should verify generative-AI outputs, and that using generative AI for plagiarism, fabrication, or falsification breaches academic integrity; students should follow course rules and should not submit AI-generated content as their own without permission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Chengchi University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

National Chengchi University's generative AI principles advise instructors to state course-specific generative AI tool rules in the syllabus, with reference options including full permission, conditional permission, prohibition with a management mechanism, or no AI use in the course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Chung Hsing University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

National Chung Hsing University's Office of Academic Affairs publishes an AI curriculum information page that includes AI literacy, AI ethics, and generative-AI course entries.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Research Tomsk Polytechnic University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

TPU has an official continuing education program page titled Artificial Intelligence in Pedagogical Activity that describes teacher training in AI-supported lesson design, educational-data analysis, and evaluation of AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For assessment design, NTNU's guideline advises instructors to consider new AI-suited standards and methods and to reach consensus with students when traditional assessments can be quickly completed or replaced by GAI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

KPI's AI policy says academic and educational participants should acknowledge and record the use of generative AI, and that instructors may set course-specific AI-use restrictions in the syllabus when needed for learning outcomes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

New York University (NYU)

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

NYU offers access and support for Google's Gemini and NotebookLM to faculty, staff, and students through institutional accounts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

North Carolina State University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

NC State DELTA teaching guidance advises instructors to specify course- and assignment-level AI expectations, and states that as of July 2025 there is no official university policy regarding AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University's Academic Affairs Office and Teaching Development Center issued a notice for all colleges on regulating AI use in undergraduate theses and designs, effective from the 2025 graduating undergraduate thesis/design work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ocean University of China

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Ocean University of China's Undergraduate Affairs Office reported that, for the 2024 autumn term, the university would launch seven AI smart shared courses combining knowledge graphs and AI assistants.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Panjab University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Panjab University's plagiarism policy lists preventive measures including originality declarations for relevant submissions, electronic-file submission for plagiarism checks, plagiarism-detection software, and plagiarism-check certificates for dissertations and theses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

SPbPU's 2025 AI-in-education recommendations state that they apply to employees and students in bachelor's, specialist, and master's programs, and that the contained requirements are mandatory for university institutes, higher schools, and other structural units.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Plekhanov Russian University of Economics reports an educational approach in which students may use an already trained model in transfer-learning courses or assignments, with creation of a specialized dataset described as a required condition for that model use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pohang University of Science And Technology (POSTECH)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

POSTECH describes POSTECH AI as a multi-LLM generative AI service for members that includes ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude, and says entered user data is designed not to be used for external model retraining.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Politecnico di Milano

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

My Learning Talk @Polimi is listed for Politecnico di Milano in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

PUC-Rio has an official PUC-Behring Artificial Intelligence Institute page that frames AI work around teaching, research and development, community formation, and responsible technology.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Quaid-i-Azam University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The official QAU Department of Computer Sciences BS page lists Artificial Intelligence as a focus area and includes AI Assisted Programming among elective courses; this is curriculum evidence, not a university-wide AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

RUDN University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A RUDN Digital Literacy course program for the Ecology and Natural Resource Management bachelor's program includes generative AI tools, responsible AI use, authorship and originality, academic honesty, and practice with large language models as course topics.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sapienza University of Rome

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For Sapienza CAD Psychology undergraduate final papers, generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini may be used as drafting support only with careful, transparent use and personal critical revision by the student.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Seoul National University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for Seoul National University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Shoolini University's perspective plan treats AI and big data analytics as strategic teaching and learning infrastructure context, including personalization of education and AI-driven tutoring platforms; this does not establish a student AI-use rule.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski"

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For Sofia University's Faculty of Philosophy professional area 3.5 strategy, planned activities include updating specialized software for research and teaching, including generative AI, and providing opportunities for staff training in AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Swinburne University of Technology

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Swinburne's academic integrity guidance says students may use genAI where permitted by unit teaching staff and with acknowledgement, and treats AI-produced assessment work without permission or approved acknowledgement as a breach type.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Taif University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Taif University's Deanship of Graduate Studies and Scientific Research page describes the Council of University Affairs 2025 AI guiding manual as intended to direct higher education institutions toward responsible and ethical use of AI in educational, academic, and research processes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Taylor's University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Taylor's University tells students it will leverage generative AI, including ChatGPT, to support learning, while framing academic integrity as a shared staff-and-student responsibility.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technische Universitaet Berlin

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for Technische Universität Berlin (TU Berlin) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Texas A M University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

TAMU AI Chat is listed for Texas A&M University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AI Chatbot for HKUST Drupal Platform is listed for The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The National University of Science and Technology MISIS

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

MISIS describes a professional-development program for university employees on using AI in professional activity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Melbourne

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AILA is listed for The University of Melbourne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Sydney

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for The University of Sydney in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tianjin University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Tianjin University's 2021 work plan says the university would use big data, artificial intelligence, and deep learning techniques to study learning patterns and improve education and teaching models.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ton Duc Thang University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

TDTU Library's AI Corner page presents an AI Tools Collection for learning and research that includes ChatGPT, Gemini, Grammarly, Scinito, SciSpace, Consensus, Canva, Runway, IBM SPSS, and AI Hay.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tongji University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Tongji University Library's 2025 fall information-literacy lecture plan includes an artificial-intelligence-literacy series for students and staff, covering AI-assisted academic research, AIGC-era research integrity, DeepSeek use, AI-assisted patents, and AIGC-assisted research graphics.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez's AI-for-academia page says UAI faculty are using generative AI to personalize teaching, design more effective activities, and evaluate intelligently.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Antioquia

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The Universidad de Antioquia Political Science undergraduate program guidance says students and teachers may use AI tools to support academic activities, but those tools should not be used to automatically generate the main writing of assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Costa Rica

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Universidad de Costa Rica has an official institutional framework page and linked framework document for AI governance and management.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de los Andes

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For professors, Uniandes says each professor is responsible for communicating in the syllabus and activity instructions how students may use generative AI in the course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Montevideo (UM)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Universidad de Montevideo's official CDID page lists 2026 Club de Profesores teacher-development sessions on course design in the AI era and evaluative creativity in relation to AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The USACH Libraries announcement says the AI LibGuide covers academic integrity, copyright, appropriate citation use, and practical orientations for research and teaching.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Zaragoza

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universidad de Zaragoza's ADD guidance frames AI applications as teaching tools for personalized learning and support for teachers creating teaching materials, while noting that students also use them and need to be shown correct use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Faculty of Legal and Social Sciences advertised a UNLP Aula Cavila course for teachers on ChatGPT in education, including objectives to use AI tools for designing and evaluating educational activities and to reflect on ethical and pedagogical implications and misuse prevention.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

A 2025 UPM institutional-repository good-practice guide suggests a template for course guides to state whether generative AI tools are permitted, restricted, or not permitted; the guide itself says it is a recommendation or author opinion and not an official UPM recommendation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (USC)'s PFID catalogue includes 2026 teaching-development activities on conversational AI for teaching and research and on digital AI tools for university teaching.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universit de Bretagne Occidentale

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UBO's generative AI charter says that, unless teaching staff communicate otherwise, student work for assessment should not be produced by generative AI tools in replacement of the expected reflective and intellectual process; otherwise it would constitute established cheating and could be sanctioned.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Official UniSR discovery found AI-related public-engagement and course-offering material, but did not locate a central AI-specific student, teaching, assessment, privacy, or research policy in the searched official sources.

证据记录: 3。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitaet Stuttgart

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

RAI with OpenAI models via Azure is listed for Universität Stuttgart in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitas Airlangga

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UNAIR's JPUA editorial policy allows responsible generative-AI use to improve language quality and readability with mandatory human supervision, but it does not recognize LLMs or other AI tools as authors or co-authors and requires disclosure when AI tools are used in manuscript preparation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitas Brawijaya

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A UB Library article recommends clear institutional AI-use policies, including limits for AI tools in assignments and exams, guidance for assessing originality, and sanctions for academic-ethics violations involving AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UPF's Library/CRAI guide gives recommendations and examples for using generative AI tools in teaching and in the preparation of academic work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Wooflash is listed for Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Lyon 1 iCAP lists a workshop for UCBL teachers on using generative AI to convert H5P activities and Moodle quiz questions, including prompts, procedures, recommendations, and limitations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Fribourg

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For generative AI in teaching, the Rectorate sets a common framework, while faculties, departments, centres and institutes define more precise conditions of use; rules for academic work and assessment are to be communicated to students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Lille

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universite de Lille's SIAG charter says teachers should specify SIAG-use instructions in their courses, inform students how SIAG use is or is not integrated into learning situations and assessments, and cannot require students to use SIAG tools that need personal data or payment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Lorraine

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universite de Lorraine DACIP teaching guidance recommends favoring sovereign and secure generative AI, training on ethical issues, and transparency with students in pedagogical and assessment processes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université du Québec

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Université du Québec's principles state that when generative AI is used in formation or research, the university member remains responsible for work quality and consequences, and AI must not replace human judgment and responsibility.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université PSL

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月11日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Université PSL academic regulations state that, when an instructor authorizes the use of AI-based tools such as ChatGPT, that use must be explicitly disclosed like a source citation; failure to disclose AI use is considered plagiarism and sanctioned as such.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Brunei Darussalam (UBD)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

UBD official news states that UBD had a "Policy & Guidelines on Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI)" book and describes it as giving educators and students clear guidelines on using AI for teaching and learning.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah (UMPSA)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UMPSA's generative AI guideline says generative AI technology is not permitted in any examination or equivalent assessment, whether in person or online.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UTP's Bachelor of Information Systems page lists Generative AI and Responsible AI as field elective courses in the Intelligent Information System group.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Alabama at Birmingham

1 匹配声明 from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Alabama at Birmingham in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Anbar

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Anbar Journal of Languages and Literature requires authors to explicitly disclose AI-tool use in the Acknowledgment or Methodology section, including the tool, version, and purpose.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Balamand

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Balamand students are responsible for the integrity of submitted coursework; the Academic Integrity and Copyright Policy says students must do their own work unless the instructor asks otherwise, may collaborate on graded work only if instructed to do so, and must follow course requirements specified in the syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Belgrade

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Belgrade Faculty of Organizational Sciences has general guidelines that frame responsible generative AI use for students, teaching staff, and non-teaching staff, aiming to improve academic integrity, transparency, and ethical conduct in research, teaching, professional work, and administration.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bern

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Bern Institute of Art History AI teaching guidelines say student work and exams at the institute must remain students' own work and may not be replaced by AI-tool work; AI tools may support independent work, use must be marked with the tool, prompt, scope, and purpose, and incorrect logging, citation, and referencing of AI-tool use in written work is regarded as plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bucharest

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The first AI4UB stage listed general online workshops on using AI in academia, practical AI for scientific writing, and AI for data analysis.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Calcutta

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Calcutta IP Policy says the university is not responsible for copyright/IP violations when generative AI is used to generate content for publication, thesis, dissertation, or course material, and says faculty members, students, researchers, and staff will be held accountable for AI authorship associated with LLMs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OpenAI ChatGPT Enterprise is listed for University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For final theses, VŠCHT Prague says use of assistance tools for text creation is not prohibited, including tools ranging from spelling or grammar checkers to complex AI such as ChatGPT.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Copenhagen

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Copenhagen guidance says the Copilot Enterprise-only guideline means employees must avoid using ChatGPT or other non-licensed generative AI in their work for UCPH.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Delhi

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

A University of Delhi College of Vocational Studies curriculum appendix includes an Artificial Intelligence Tools for Office Management course objective about understanding AI tools for day-to-day office work; this is course-level curriculum evidence and not a university-wide AI tool-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Deusto

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For each Deusto course, students are directed to review the course programme and learning guide for AI-use rules; those rules must be followed, including where AI use is prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Dhaka

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A University of Dhaka IQAC teacher professional development programme lists a special evening module titled "AI and Teaching in the 21st century."

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of East London

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UEL's academic misconduct rules define Generative AI misuse as using tools such as ChatGPT, Bing Chat, or DALL-E to gain an unfair advantage by producing content submitted as the student's own original work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Ibadan

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

University of Ibadan's official Information Technology and Media Policy includes an eLearning section that expects lecturers to deploy part of coursework online and use Moodle-based tools for learning activities and online continuous assessment; this is source context and not an AI-specific policy claim.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Jordan

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Jordan has an official School of Engineering course syllabus for 'Application of Artificial Intelligence in Chemical Engineering' that includes a Course Policies section with a heading for honesty policy regarding cheating, plagiarism, and misbehavior; this source is course-level syllabus material and not a university-wide AI policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Maryland, Baltimore

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

UMB's AI Governance Policy applies to UMB faculty, staff, students, and affiliates who develop, use, or are impacted by AI technologies in research, teaching, operations, and service.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Minho

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

IAedu is listed for University of Minho in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Missouri Saint Louis

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Education is listed for University of Missouri Saint Louis in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Mons

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UMONS warns that students who use AI systems to complete all or part of their academic work may be exposed to sanctions identified in the university's General Study Regulations and jury and assessment rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Murcia

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月24日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The official University of Murcia library AI page lists AI tools of interest to the university community by category, but the located source does not label the listed tools as university-approved or prohibited tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Naples Parthenope

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月24日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Official discovery for University of Naples Parthenope found general student disciplinary provisions in the General University Regulation, but did not identify a university AI-tool, generative-AI assessment, or AI citation rule in the official sources reviewed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Porto

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Porto Ethics Code lists, among teachers' duties in teaching and assessment, discussing the use or non-use of AI or similar resources with students and giving clear guidance on good use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Salento

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月26日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A University of Salento course catalogue page for Digital Accounting e Auditing lists ChatGPT and Power BI as applications of artificial intelligence supporting teaching for that course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of the Philippines

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For education, UP's AI principles state that decisions on AI use in teaching should start with learner needs and that UP shall adopt AI systems that promote learner-centered pedagogy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Trento

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UniTrento states that use of generative-AI tools must be explicitly declared in research, teaching, and administrative activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University Of Tuebingen

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

bwGPT is listed for Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月26日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UWM-hosted Acta Neophilologica author guidance permits GenAI use for grammar, language, or style improvement, requires manuscript disclosure of any GenAI use with tool and purpose, and says reviewers and editors should not share confidential manuscript content with public GenAI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Witwatersrand

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A Wits CLTD guidelines document describes generative AI guidance for learning, teaching, and research, with an intended audience that includes academic staff, students, researchers, administrators, and policy makers.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Wroclaw

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Under the University of Wrocław academic-integrity standards, instructors may permit AI tools for class work on specified terms, and students must acknowledge the AI use in the text or code when such use is allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Karazin University's official April 2026 news page says a University Policy on the Use of AI was presented to academic staff and describes it as defining ethical boundaries and regulatory requirements for working with AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

VSB - Technical University of Ostrava

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For teachers, VSB-TUO's AI rules list impermissible uses including automated grading of professional papers, essays, projects, and qualification theses, correcting tests, and entering students' personal data such as names, results, or health status into AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Wake Forest University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Wake Forest's academic generative AI guidance says course materials should communicate when and how generative AI tools may be used and acknowledged.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Warsaw University of Life Sciences SGGW (WULS-SGGW)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

SGGW requires course tutors to establish and communicate rules for using generative AI tools in courses, including interim and final work used to verify learning outcomes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Warsaw University of Technology

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

WUT recommendations advise instructors to consider adding information to course regulations on whether and how GenAI systems may be used, and state that instructors or supervisors may directly prohibit GenAI use for work such as tests, exams, or expert opinions.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Waseda University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For students in Waseda University's School of Commerce and Graduate School of Commerce, the July 2023 school-level notice says generative AI tools are not uniformly prohibited, each course instructor decides whether they may be used, and students are not permitted to entrust all submitted work to generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

XJTLU's official teaching resource on AI chatbots identifies reliability and accuracy problems, data privacy, potential bias, and academic integrity risk as challenges that need to be addressed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yildiz Technical University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Yıldız Technical University's generative AI guide states that YTU academic personnel must disclose generative AI use beyond basic spelling and grammar checking in research, publication, thesis or academic assignment contexts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yokohama City University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Yokohama City University notes that some classes may restrict or prohibit generative AI use, and tells students to follow instructions given in class or through YCU-Board.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yuan Ze University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Yuan Ze University's guidance says teachers should clearly explain in course syllabi the role, permitted uses, restricted uses, and ethical rules for generative AI tools in the course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Zhejiang University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

浙大先生智能体平台 is listed for Zhejiang University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

数据与建议边界

主题页面展示索引切片,而非新结论。

  • 公开页面与公开 JSON 应保持一致,因为二者均基于已推广的公开发布数据集构建。
  • 原始语言证据为标准版本。翻译和显示摘要为辅助内容。
  • 置信度独立于 reviewState;reviewState 描述工作流状态。
  • Tracker metadata is open licensed. Official source documents, page text, PDFs, and other source materials retain their original rights and terms.
  • This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
  • 主题匹配基于可见的公开声明和证据文本;它并非新的审核决定。

浏览所有记录于 /universities 或在以下位置查看数据集 /api/public/v1/universities.json.