主题

哪些大学提及 AI 披露?

可见声明或原始证据提及披露、申报、引用、署名、透明度或任务级许可的已发布声明记录。 此页面展示现有的公开声明文本和证据上下文。它不添加新的政策声明,也不推断链接记录中不可见的规则。

主题AI 披露匹配记录711公开 JSON/api/public/v1/universities.json
711

匹配的大学记录

1813

匹配的有据可查声明

1876

证据记录

2864

匹配记录的官方来源

可供引用的摘要

研究人员、记者和 AI 答案引擎的简短回答。

University AI Policy Tracker 目前索引了 711 条公开大学记录s,包含 1813 个有来源支持的声明s,与 AI 披露 相关,并由 1876 条证据记录s 和 2864 个官方来源归属s 提供支持。本页是从已推广的声明/证据记录生成的公开数据集切片;它不创建新的政策结论。原始语言证据仍为权威版本,每个链接的大学记录均展示审核状态、置信度、来源 URL、快照哈希值以及公开 JSON。

主题页面是针对推广的公开记录的搜索和引用辅助工具。它们不是官方大学声明、法律建议、学术诚信建议,也不是新的审核决定。

匹配声明记录

来自公开大学记录的可见声明和来源上下文。

The University of New South Wales (UNSW Sydney)

21 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年6月4日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

UNSW uses a Levels of AI Assistance framework with six categories for assessments: No Assistance, Simple Editing Assistance, Planning or Design Assistance, Assistance with Attribution, Generative AI Software-based Assessments, and Not Applicable.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

UNSW defines six high-level categories for permitted AI use in assessments: No Assistance, Simple Editing Assistance, Planning/Design Assistance, Assistance with Attribution, Generative AI Software-based Assessments, and Not Applicable.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

At UNSW, the unauthorised or unacknowledged use of AI in assessments is classified as cheating and considered student misconduct under the Code of Conduct and Values.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Australian National University (ANU)

14 匹配声明s from 12 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

ANU prohibits using AI to collect, use, store, or disclose personal information without express consent from the individual(s).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Students retain IP ownership of their assignments at ANU; staff may not upload student work to AI platforms without express student consent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

At ANU, using AI-generated content when not permitted and claiming authorship without acknowledgment constitutes a breach of academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Cornell University

14 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Cornell's committee report recommends three policy approaches for generative AI use: prohibit GAI where it interferes with foundational learning, allow with attribution where it supports higher-level thinking, and encourage use where it enables exploration and creative thinking.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Cornell recommends that faculty clearly communicate their generative AI policies in their syllabus, in assignment instructions, and verbally in class to support student learning and reduce academic integrity violations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Cornell's committee report recommends that the Code of Academic Integrity be updated with clear and explicit language on the use of generative AI, indicating that individual faculty have authority to determine when AI use is prohibited, attributed, or encouraged.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Tsing Hua University - NTHU

9 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Primo Research Assistant is listed for National Tsing Hua University - NTHU in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Scopus AI is listed for National Tsing Hua University - NTHU in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Web of Science Research Assistant is listed for National Tsing Hua University - NTHU in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Auckland

9 匹配声明s from 11 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Auckland's Assessment of Courses Procedures state that AI use in assessment tasks may only be restricted when the task is a controlled assessment, identified as Lane 1; AI may be used without restriction in other assessment tasks, identified as Lane 2.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Auckland's Assessment of Courses Procedures require courses to use the two-lane nomenclature, including telling students which assessments align with Lane 1 or Lane 2, and require courses and programmes to implement the two-lane approach in assessment design by 2027.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Auckland's student AI advice states that AI has no agency, treats the student prompting an AI tool as the author, and says students are ultimately responsible for work submitted for assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Pennsylvania

9 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Pennsylvania in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Penn requires all community members (educators, staff, researchers, and students) to be transparent about the use of AI and to disclose when a work product was created wholly or partially using an AI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Users of AI at Penn are accountable for AI-generated content and should validate its accuracy with trusted first-party sources, being wary of misinformation or hallucinations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Dartmouth College

8 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Claude for Education is listed for Dartmouth College in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Dartmouth Chat is listed for Dartmouth College in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot with commercial data protection is listed for Dartmouth College in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Pittsburgh

8 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Claude for Education is listed for University of Pittsburgh in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Gemini is listed for University of Pittsburgh in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

PittGPT is listed for University of Pittsburgh in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Arizona State University

7 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Adobe Express is listed for Arizona State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for Arizona State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Gemini for Education is listed for Arizona State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Stanford University

7 匹配声明s from 15 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Stanford's BCA issued guidance on generative AI use, and the Office of Community Standards recommends that instructors give advance notice to students when using AI detection software.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For Stanford Graduate School of Business (GSB) MBA and MSx courses, instructors may not ban student use of AI tools for take-home coursework, including assignments and exams. Instructors may choose whether to allow AI for in-class work. For PhD and undergraduate courses, GSB follows the university-wide Generative AI Policy Guidance from the Office of Community Standards.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Stanford School of Medicine MD and MSPA programs have a formal AI policy: students may use AI for learning, clarification, and grammar/style editing unless contrary to assignment instructions. AI use for closed-book exams or assignments where internet is restricted is prohibited unless explicitly authorized by faculty. Students are responsible for all AI-generated content they submit, must disclose and cite substantial AI contributions, and violations may result in disciplinary action.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technical University of Denmark

7 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

DALL-E via Microsoft Copilot is listed for Technical University of Denmark in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot for the web is listed for Technical University of Denmark in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Scite AI is listed for Technical University of Denmark in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Berkeley (UCB)

7 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

The UC Berkeley Academic Senate recommends that all faculty include a clear statement on their syllabus about course expectations regarding the use of Google Gemini or any other generative AI tool for course-related work. In the absence of such a statement, students may be more likely to use these technologies inappropriately.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

The UC Berkeley Academic Senate provides three sample syllabus statement frameworks for faculty: 'Full AI' (GenAI required), 'Some AI' (limited permitted use with restrictions), and 'No AI' (all GenAI use prohibited). Faculty should modify these to fit their course requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

The UC Berkeley Academic Senate recommends that for assignments where GenAI is not permitted, instructors should adopt enforcement mechanisms such as in-person proctored exams, an additional oral exam component, or a written statement of academic integrity, since no validated GenAI detection tools exist.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Adelaide University

6 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Adelaide University's Academic Integrity Policy treats inappropriate use of AI that subverts an assignment or gives unfair academic advantage as an example of academic misconduct, including submitting AI-produced work as the student's own or using AI-generated information without acknowledgement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Adelaide University's Authorship Procedure states that generative AI can be used to improve readability and clarity in publications, but must not be considered or listed as an author and its use must be disclosed transparently.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Adelaide University's Graduate Research School guidance says graduate research students' use of generative AI must be transparent and responsible, including discussing use with a supervisor, keeping records, and acknowledging AI use in thesis acknowledgements, presentations, and publications.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Emory University

6 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Emory University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Emory Responsible AI guidance says public-facing AI platforms create disclosure risks for Sensitive Information and directs users to use Emory-approved secure AI tools when handling such information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Emory Responsible AI guidance says students must review course syllabi, program handbooks, and faculty expectations regarding AI use because instructors may specify whether tools such as ChatGPT, Grammarly, or other generative technologies are permitted for assignments and under what conditions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Keio University

6 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Gemini is listed for Keio University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

NotebookLM is listed for Keio University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Keio University says students need to clearly indicate when reports or similar assignments are created using generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

KTH Royal Institute of Technology

6 匹配声明s from 10 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

KTH tells students that generative AI use in graded assignments and exams should follow the course-specific information, and that the teacher's course rule takes precedence over general guidance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

KTH staff guidance says that, according to the Faculty Council recommendation, each course at KTH must include course-specific generative AI information in Canvas and the course memo.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

KTH student guidance says course-specific generative AI information usually follows one of four approaches: no use, only specific assignments, allowed with guidelines, or free use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

McMaster University

6 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for McMaster University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

McMaster's teaching and learning generative AI guidelines say undergraduate and graduate course outlines should state acceptable and unacceptable generative AI use, and students should seek clarification and written confirmation if no syllabus statement is included.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

McMaster's student generative AI coursework tip sheet tells students not to use generative AI unless a course syllabus or professor explicitly allows it, and to disclose and cite AI-generated content when allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Seoul National University

6 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

SNU's AI Guidelines require transparent disclosure of AI use, fact and source verification, copyright/privacy/information security compliance, bias correction, and awareness of accountability.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

SNU Library cites COPE's position that AI tools cannot be listed as authors because they cannot take responsibility for research results and lack legal personality.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

SNU Library cites COPE requiring authors to clearly disclose in their methods section which AI tools were used and how, covering manuscript writing, image creation, and data analysis.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Stockholm University

6 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for Stockholm University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft 365 Copilot is listed for Stockholm University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Stockholm University's AI resources page says employees signed in to Microsoft 365 with a university account have data protection for Copilot, but it also says information at confidentiality level 3 or 4 should not be entered into Copilot.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tel Aviv University

6 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT API is listed for Tel Aviv University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT EDU is listed for Tel Aviv University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Copilot 365 is listed for Tel Aviv University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK)

6 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

CUHK requires students to declare in each assignment that they have read and understood the University's policy on AI use, complied with course teacher instructions on AI tools, and consent to AI content detection software review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

CUHK defines four approaches to AI use in courses: (1) prohibit all use, (2) use only with prior permission, (3) use only with explicit acknowledgement, and (4) free use without acknowledgement requirement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

CUHK penalties for academic dishonesty involving AI tools may include reviewable/permanent demerits, failure grade, suspension, lowering degree classification, and termination of studies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Arizona

6 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

U of A GenAI is listed for The University of Arizona in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Zoom AI Companion is listed for The University of Arizona in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Arizona student AI guidance tells students they can use AI for assignments only if the instructor says it is OK, and says unpermitted use could violate the Code of Academic Integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Manchester

6 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Manchester does not ban generative AI. The university's position is that when used appropriately, AI tools have the potential to enhance teaching and learning, and can support inclusivity and accessibility.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Manchester has adopted five core principles for AI use: transparency, accountability, competence, responsible use, and respect. All staff and students using or developing AI are personally responsible for adhering to these.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Students at Manchester must cite or acknowledge the outputs of generative AI tools when they use them in their work, including quoting, summarising, paraphrasing, editing, translating, data processing, re-writing, and idea generation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Sydney

6 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Sydney Academic Integrity Policy 2022 states students may only use assistance, including automated writing tools, if the unit of study outline expressly permits it, and must acknowledge assistance provided when preparing submitted work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Sydney guidance states that misusing generative AI can breach the Academic Integrity Policy 2022, with examples including using AI in assessments where prohibited, submitting AI-generated work without acknowledgment, and inputting University teaching materials or personal information into AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Sydney states that students who use AI in assessments are required to acknowledge it, including any tools that use generative AI such as translation tools, paraphrasing tools or referencing tools; failing to provide acknowledgement can lead to a breach of the Academic Integrity Policy 2022.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Concepción

6 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The [genIA] ethics guide says practical AI use should clearly define what is allowed, ask for declaration and citation of tool use when appropriate, verify student understanding and original contribution, and avoid entering sensitive information into external services.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UdeC's [genIA] ethics page presents institutional guidelines and interactive tools for deciding how to incorporate generative AI in teaching and research while safeguarding transparency, authorship, privacy, and equity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The [genIA] teacher annex presents three orienting institutional template options for course or assignment instructions: generative AI allowed with conditions, restricted by stages, or prohibited except with explicit authorization.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB)

6 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UCSB-managed AI platform on AWS Bedrock is listed for University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

GitHub Copilot is listed for University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google AI Pro for Education is listed for University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Oxford

6 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Staff setting summative assessment must: declare whether/how students can use AI; review assessment design for alignment with permitted AI use; ensure equality of baseline AI tool provision where authorised; specify declaration forms for student AI use; only identify suspected unauthorised AI use through marking or university-endorsed detection tools (none currently endorsed); and handle misconduct under usual disciplinary regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Oxford requires postgraduate research students to include a statement on their use of generative AI in their final thesis submission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Students undertaking summative assessment must: complete assessment in line with the AI use declaration for each assignment; acknowledge their AI use via a formal declaration in the prescribed format; and understand that submitting work breaching AI specifications constitutes cheating and may constitute plagiarism, handled under usual disciplinary regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Pretoria

6 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

24/7 AI Tutoring App is listed for University of Pretoria in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AI eLearning Support Bot is listed for University of Pretoria in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

clickUP AI Design Assistant is listed for University of Pretoria in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Vermont

6 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UVM's Code of Academic Integrity says course expectations may vary by instructor and students must understand expectations for each assignment and course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UVM's faculty AI guidance says there is not a mandated one-size-fits-all classroom AI approach and tells faculty to clearly communicate how their AI stance shapes course policies and assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UVM's student AI guidance tells students that the key course-context question is what the instructor has said about AI use, and that students should check syllabi and assignment instructions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Wyoming

6 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft 365 Copilot is listed for University of Wyoming in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Wyoming Regulation 2-114 says submissions generated in whole or in part by an Artificial Intelligence-based application without attribution to the application will be treated as plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UW Libraries AI Support guidance says users should cite AI tools and AI-generated outputs when quoting, paraphrasing, or incorporating AI-generated ideas into their own work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Zilina

6 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月26日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Zilina prohibits employees and students from entering sensitive data into publicly available GenAI tools, including non-public university data, non-public study materials, test assignments, intellectual-property-protected materials, personal data without explicit written consent, preliminary research results, and trade-secret data of partners.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For seminar, semester, and final theses, University of Zilina students must clearly state whether and to what extent they used GenAI tools, including the tool name/version, a brief use description, and prompts in an appendix.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Zilina prohibits students from submitting work generated by GenAI in substantial or full scope without their own creative contribution, and requires students to respect instructor restrictions on GenAI use in a course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Utah State University

6 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Business is listed for Utah State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot for Microsoft 365 is listed for Utah State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Utah State University's AI Use & Compliance guidance says AI-generated content must be reviewed for accuracy, bias, and copyright compliance before use in coursework, research, or administrative communications.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Boston University

5 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Boston University student guidance tells students to disclose GenAI use and states that submitting GenAI-generated or GenAI-assisted output without attribution is plagiarism that an instructor will treat as academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Boston University student guidance says instructors have broad discretion to set GenAI rules within each course, and students are responsible for complying with those instructions and should consult the course GenAI policy or ask the instructor before assuming GenAI use is allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Boston University faculty and staff guidance says academic and administrative GenAI users should retain human oversight, evaluate and verify generated content, and disclose GenAI use in materials, documents, or publications.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Case Western Reserve University

5 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine medical students in the University and College Programs, submitted or presented content must be the student's own work and not the product of generative AI or other individuals.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Case Western Reserve University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

CWRU Provost classroom guidance gives faculty members discretion over the extent to which students may use AI tools in their courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Duke University

5 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Duke student-facing AI guidance says whether a student may use AI in coursework depends on instructor permission; unauthorized generative AI use is considered academic misconduct under the Duke Community Standard.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Duke CTL guidance tells instructors to update syllabi with clear guidance on generative AI use and says instructors may define how, if, and when generative AI may be used in their courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Duke CTL assignment-design guidance says AI assignments should be accompanied by course and assignment-specific AI policies, with the primary consideration being whether AI use helps students achieve course learning goals.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Harvard University

5 匹配声明s from 13 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

HGSE (Harvard Graduate School of Education) school-level policy: Unless otherwise specified by the instructor, using generative AI to create all or part of an assignment (e.g., paper, memo, presentation, short response) and submitting it as one's own work violates the HGSE Academic Integrity Policy. Permissible uses include seeking clarification on concepts, brainstorming ideas, or generating scenarios that help contextualize learning.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

HGSE (Harvard Graduate School of Education) school-level policy: For any permitted use of generative AI tools, students must acknowledge and document that use in their assignment submission by explaining what tool(s) were used, prompts provided, and how the output was integrated into the work. Direct citations must use proper citation format.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

HGSE (Harvard Graduate School of Education) school-level policy: It is forbidden to make personal recordings of any course meetings, with or without AI tool integrations. Uploading substantial course content is only allowable through the Harvard-approved AI Sandbox.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

KIT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

KIT's SCC KI-Toolbox is available to KIT employees, KIT students from April 2026, and guests/partners after completing the required self-study course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

KIT's public German guidelines frame generative AI as a responsible and transparent-use decision aid for KIT, while stating that existing internal rules remain unaffected and take precedence.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

KIT ZML says its KI-Policy and form-generator tools are not official or mandatory KIT requirements; final rules for coursework remain with the relevant faculty and instructor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Korea University

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

풀리캠퍼스 다국어 AI 코스웨어 서비스 is listed for Korea University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Korea University tells learners to disclose the AI tool name, timing, and scope of use, distinguish their own work from AI contributions, and cite AI-generated content according to the required format.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Korea University instructs instructors to decide course AI-use policies based on course purpose, teaching method, and assignment nature, and to state the policy in the syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kyushu University

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Kyushu University's basic stance says students should check in advance whether use of generative AI output is permitted for papers or works, and if permitted, should clearly indicate AI use or AI quotation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Kyushu University's basic stance says course instructors may set generative AI use rules for individual classes according to each program or course objective, and should indicate those rules to students, such as in the syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Kyushu University's teacher-facing guidance says that when generative AI use is allowed, instructors should direct students to state quoted AI output, the AI service name, and version, and may request prompts and outputs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Lomonosov Moscow State University

5 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Under the Economics Faculty rules, a student who uses AI tools for work must explicitly declare that use and identify the AI model, the parts of the work where AI was used, and the purposes and methods of use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Economics Faculty rules allow each teacher, within a discipline, to require detailed prompts or restrict AI-tool use up to a full ban, with restrictions recorded in the discipline's rating system and communicated by the first class.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Economics Faculty rules place responsibility on students for correctness of facts, wording, citations, links, and interpretation of AI-assisted results, and treat unchecked use of AI results as an academic-ethics violation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Taiwan University (NTU)

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

National Taiwan University guidance says it takes a positive and constructive view of AI tools, encourages teachers to adjust course planning and learning assessment, and says students should understand AI-tool limitations for future learning.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

National Taiwan University guidance recommends that instructors clarify AI-use principles and rules early in the course, preferably in the syllabus, including which activities and assignments may or may not use AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

National Taiwan University guidance says students using ChatGPT for assignments or reports should clearly label AI-generated content, fact-check it, and comply with academic ethics and academic-integrity requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Norwegian University of Life Sciences

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NMBU's generative AI guidelines require students to clearly indicate how and where AI-based programs have been used, and to account for AI use in assignments or other work submitted for assessment or compulsory activity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs are permitted in accordance with the guidelines, while individual course descriptions may state that AI-based programs are not permitted for exams or other assessed work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

NMBU's generative AI guidelines state that AI-based programs will normally not be permitted in written examinations on campus; for take-home exams, students must follow the AI-use specifications in the exam paper and course description.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pusan National University

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Pusan National University's AI ethics charter/guidelines state that students may use AI as a supplemental learning or research aid, but should not undermine academic integrity and should disclose the source and scope when using generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Pusan National University's AI utilization guideline tells instructors to clearly announce in the syllabus or early in the course whether AI tools may be used, the permitted scope, and evaluation criteria.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Pusan National University's AI utilization guideline says instructors should communicate permitted or prohibited AI use for assessments, and it warns against deciding a student's grade solely from an AI plagiarism or AI-detection tool result.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Queen's University at Kingston

5 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

LibreChat is listed for Queen's University at Kingston in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot with Single Sign-On is listed for Queen's University at Kingston in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Queen's common course policies state that course outlines will include a statement indicating whether generative AI tools are permitted in a course and under what conditions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The Ohio State University

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Ohio State responsible-use guidance says students should use GenAI tools for coursework only with the explicit permission of each instructor, and only in the ways allowed by that instructor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Ohio State Arts and Sciences guidance quotes the OSU Committee on Academic Misconduct policy that generative AI tools should not be used to complete course assignments unless the course instructor specifically authorizes their use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Ohio State teaching guidance recommends that instructors establish expectations for academic integrity and AI use early, include university academic-integrity policies in the syllabus, and communicate course-specific GenAI expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Newcastle, Australia (UON)

5 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for The University of Newcastle, Australia (UON) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For assessments, UON's GenAI teaching, learning and assessment policy says students should follow teaching-staff directions about GenAI use and appropriately disclose and reference GenAI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UON's GenAI teaching, learning and assessment policy says use of GenAI in assessment does not automatically constitute academic misconduct, but may do so where lecturers or course coordinators have explicitly prohibited it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Queensland

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UQ course profiles must clearly state if, when, and how AI (including Machine Translation) is allowed. Two options exist: Option 1 prohibits AI in in-person assessment; Option 2 permits AI use with mandatory referencing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

At UQ, the use of AI outputs without attribution, and contrary to any direction by teaching staff, is a form of plagiarism and constitutes academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UQ says students must acknowledge where they used AI in assessment, including direct quotes or paraphrases of AI-generated content and use of AI tools for summarising, brainstorming, planning, editing, or proofreading.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Sheffield

5 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Student academic-integrity guidance says a full disclosure of GenAI-produced content should always be acknowledged, and passing off that content as one's own work counts as academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The PGR guidance permits students to use generative AI in thesis writing, provided the use is consistent with the guidance and properly declared, and warns that exceeding the guidance risks breaching the Academic Misconduct Policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Assessment guidance says that when GenAI use is allowed, students may be asked to provide full disclosure using an Acknowledge, Describe, Evidence template, while noting that some schools may use a different process.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Tennessee, Knoxville

5 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Tennessee system AI policy says course-related communications must inform students that unpermitted AI use is a form of academic misconduct subject to the campus student code of conduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Tennessee system AI policy, which includes UT Knoxville, expects course faculty or staff to communicate permitted AI uses for a course and says students are responsible for following those course-specific AI requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UTK Writing Center guidance tells students that when an instructor allows GenAI for writing assignments, they should use it to assist rather than replace their writing process and should document and describe the use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA)

5 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

CITEP/UBA presents La Brújul-IA as teaching guidance that offers conceptual keys and concrete strategies for critical, situated integration of AI in higher-education teaching.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The CITEP/UBA guidance frames ethical AI use as distinguishing legitimate support from improper appropriation and includes source attribution and recognition of AI co-creation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The CITEP/UBA guidance says AI use in education should consider personal-data protection and digital security, noting that not all AI tools safeguard entered information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidade Federal de São Paulo

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For final documents submitted for evaluation at Unifesp or sent for publication, the generative-AI guidelines require an explicit declaration about the use of generative AI tools, including how the tool was used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Unifesp's Resolution 17/2025 establishes guidelines for use of generative artificial intelligence in research and postgraduate work, with the stated aim of responsible and transparent use in scientific and academic production.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Unifesp states that researchers are responsible for critically reviewing texts, results, code, or images produced by generative-AI systems for correctness, coherence, originality, citation/reference compliance, and intellectual-property respect.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Basel

5 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Basel AI citation guidelines state that AI tools must always be cited like other tools and sources, and that student papers without complete attribution may be seen as attempted plagiarism or cheating.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OpenAI (ChatGPT with LibreChat) is listed for University of Basel in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Basel AI citation guidelines say AI-supported tools may only be used in a supporting role for work submitted for credit, with students retaining a controlling role and responsibility for their own work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Davis

5 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Rocky in Canvas is listed for University of California, Davis in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The UC Davis School of Medicine policy says medical students may not use generative AI to directly author submitted assignments or generate answers for closed-book assessments unless faculty or course leadership gives written permission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UC Davis guidance tells students to confirm with instructors before using AI in coursework and not to use AI to complete assignments unless explicitly permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Göttingen

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Chat AI (Academic Cloud) is listed for University of Göttingen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Göttingen AI ethics and law guidance tells users not to enter personal data into AI applications unless it has first been securely and completely anonymized, and says students may not be required by lecturers to use or register for such systems in courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For unsupervised examinations, University of Göttingen guidance says AI models should generally be permissible aids, but use of AI tools must be transparent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Maryland, College Park

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

TerpAI is listed for University of Maryland, College Park in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For coursework, UMD tells students to assume GenAI use for assignments and assessments is not allowed unless the syllabus or assignment instructions specify otherwise.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UMD strongly encourages instructors to establish course-specific policies defining appropriate and inappropriate GenAI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Namur

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For students, unless course objectives or explicit instructor authorization allow it, UNamur proscribes delegating reflective analysis to generative AI, submitting work entirely or mostly generated by AI, and using copied, paraphrased, translated, or AI-generated material without indicating the source.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For students, unless course objectives or explicit instructor authorization allow it, UNamur says they cannot introduce non-anonymized or non-pseudonymized personal data into prompts addressed to generative-AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For students, UNamur allows some generative-AI uses without referencing when they are not contrary to course objectives, including brainstorming or organizing ideas without content creation, translation or summarization for comprehension, and short language improvement of text written by the student.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Regina

5 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Regina policy OPS-080-050 says all University use of generative AI must be ethical, reliable, transparent, secure, and compliant with applicable laws and regulations; the policy primarily addresses governance and operations uses by employees.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Regina Provost's message to students says individual instructors may determine whether and to what extent AI is permitted in course work, and warns that improper or unauthorized AI use can constitute academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Regina CTL guidance for faculty and instructors recommends that instructors set clear GenAI rules and syllabus statements, require students to disclose AI use when incorporated into coursework, and protect student privacy and intellectual property in teaching uses of GenAI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Southern California

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Southern California in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Gemini is listed for University of Southern California in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of Southern California in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Szeged

5 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Szeged student guidance says students using AI for assignments or other coursework must disclose the AI tool, purpose, method, and extent of use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Szeged student guidance says AI may be used as an auxiliary tool but cannot replace students' own work; submitting an entirely AI-made work as one's own is treated as a serious academic ethics violation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

University of Szeged has an official 2025 framework for regulated and transparent AI use in education, with guidance published for instructors and students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Vilnius University

5 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Vilnius University AI guidelines treat undisclosed use of a generative AI model in academic work as academic dishonesty.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Vilnius University's AI guidelines state that use of generative AI models in research, written work, applications, and similar work must be clearly indicated.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Vilnius University Business School guidelines allow students to use AI tools in academic works, while requiring disclosure and treating failure to specify AI use and provide a transcript in annexes as academic dishonesty.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

5 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

VU Amsterdam's framework says the lecturer or examiner indicates in the study guide, syllabus, or Canvas whether and how use of generative AI is allowed for a course, with course learning objectives remaining leading.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

VU Amsterdam's research guidance says GenAI use in research must meet scientific-research standards, take existing VU policies on ownership, scientific integrity, privacy, personal data, and knowledge security into account, and be transparent about which parts of research used GenAI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Wageningen University & Research

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Wageningen University Examining Board rules treat AI-created ready-made assignment content as an irregularity that may lead to suspicion of fraud unless AI use is explicitly allowed in the assignment description and adequately documented.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

WUR's student GenAI rules tell students to check the course guide for whether and how GenAI is permitted; if the guide has no information, using GenAI to generate assignment content is not allowed and may be irregularity or fraud, including for theses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

WUR's student GenAI rules say students are never allowed to submit work entirely generated by GenAI as their own or fabricate research data, and they must be transparent about GenAI's role in submitted work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

York University

5 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

GitHub Copilot is listed for York University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

YU AURA is listed for York University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for York University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Aalto University

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Aalto University guidance says AI-based technologies are allowed as support for teaching and learning unless the course teacher instructs otherwise, and the teacher may set course- or task-specific restrictions when learning objectives require them.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Aalto University guidance says teachers who restrict AI use must give clear limitations connected to assessment criteria, and teachers may only require student work to be submitted through systems approved by Aalto University.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Aalto student guidance says students should contact the course teacher if AI use is unclear, mark AI-generated content in their text, and not present AI-generated content as their own.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

ADA University

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ADA University's Honor Code treats violating exam, test, and assignment rules, accepting unauthorized help, and using someone else's intellectual work without proper credit as unacceptable behavior.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ADA University's Student Assessment Regulations say assignments are to be designed and conducted to minimize plagiarism and cheating risk, including contract cheating, and that students are to receive clear instructions on avoiding academic-integrity breaches.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ADA University's Student Assessment Regulations require submitted take-home exams to include a signed and dated academic-integrity declaration confirming the work is the student's own and that all sources used were acknowledged.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ABU's Research Policy is described as university-wide for research practice and defines plagiarism as research ethical misconduct; this is adjacent research-integrity context and not AI-specific guidance.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Official ABU news pages say university leaders discussed updating teaching and learning policy for AI transparency/accountability and later stated that ABU had put strategies in place for use of AI in teaching and learning; the pages do not publish the full strategy or student-use rules.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

An official ABU conference news page reports a keynote statement that tools like ChatGPT can complete assignments instantly and challenge assessment and originality, but it does not state an ABU rule permitting or prohibiting student AI-tool use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bologna citation guidance says substantial GenAI contributions in teaching and research should be acknowledged and declared, with the statement identifying tools or models, date or period of use, modes of use, and where the tool was used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Under the University of Bologna GenAI policy, students are responsible for checking permitted uses, following teaching staff instructions, verifying GenAI output, acknowledging original sources, and being able to explain work produced with GenAI support.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For GenAI use in assessed student work such as dissertation structure, dissertation writing, or programming code, University of Bologna guidance says the uses comply with policy principles only with active supervision, critical thinking, accountability for results, citation where required, and checking with the teacher whether the use is permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

American University

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

American University guidance says students are responsible for course AI policies in syllabi, and misuse of AI or use without permission or disclosure may constitute an Academic Integrity Code violation.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

American University publishes responsible-use guidance for AI tools that applies general principles of transparency, accountability, human oversight, data protection, privacy, teaching, research, staff, and student use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

American University research guidance says researchers should be transparent about AI use, verify AI-generated content against trusted sources, protect data privacy, and not list AI systems as co-authors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

American University of Sharjah

4 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

AUS policy says students are forbidden from using generative AI tools to produce assessment work unless the course instructor explicitly permits that use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

AUS policy says instructors must specify permitted generative AI tools, rationale, allowed assignments or activities, and an academic integrity statement in the course syllabus when AI tools are used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

AUS policy says students must acknowledge generative AI tool use in submitted course-credit material, including the tool name and version number.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

AUTH's GenAI principles say use by members of the academic community should align with existing internal regulations, preserve academic integrity, and be explicitly declared when requested.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

AUTH guidance encourages teaching staff to state clearly the GenAI-use policy adopted for a course, include it in the course outline, and modify it by assignment when needed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AUTH student guidance says course teams define the GenAI policy for each course or assignment, and examples distinguish potentially permitted learning-support uses from uses such as submitting generated content as-is or using GenAI during an exam.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Auburn University

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Auburn student-facing academic-integrity guidance tells students to review the syllabus and ask the instructor before using AI on coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Auburn Graduate School guidance says graduate-student AI use in research and writing must be disclosed and approved by the student's advisory committee.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Auburn guidance says instructional faculty may encourage or restrict student AI use in courses and should give students clear expectations and disciplinary-consequence awareness.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Bilkent University

4 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Bilkent advises students to check course syllabi and instructors for whether and how GenAI tools may be used in specific courses or assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Bilkent's GenAI guideline says students should attribute AI-generated content and should not submit AI-generated content without proper attribution.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Bilkent's GenAI guideline tells students not to use GenAI when a professor has not explicitly allowed it in the course syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

California Institute of Technology (Caltech)

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

In Caltech's Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS) division, students may use generative AI tools only in ways explicitly allowed by the course instructor in the course materials. Any usage not specifically allowed should be assumed to be disallowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Caltech HSS generative AI policy applies to all assignments including major papers, exams, discussion board posts, reflections, and problem sets.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Caltech HSS students are expected to follow specific course guidance for documenting any permitted use of generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Columbia University

4 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Columbia Business School requires students to disclose to faculty their use of generative AI platforms and the manner of use in coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Teachers College provides five example syllabus statements ranging from no AI use permitted to generally permitted with attribution, allowing instructors to choose their stance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Teachers College example syllabus statements require citations or disclosure detailing specific AI tools and models used when AI use is permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Dalhousie University

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Dalhousie's course syllabus guide says syllabi should include a statement about instructor expectations around generative AI and large language models such as ChatGPT.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Dalhousie's CLT course design guidance tells instructors concerned about student generative AI use in coursework to talk with students about what they can and cannot use it for and how to use it appropriately.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

A Dalhousie CLT generative AI teaching handout says current academic integrity policy already covers generative AI use because students complete assignments on their own and must acknowledge sources of information or ideas that are not their own.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

ETH Zurich

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Lecturers determine whether and how GenAI may be used in their courses and for respective assessments. Teaching materials created with GenAI must be subjected to quality control by the lecturer.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Violations of GenAI guidelines such as use of unauthorised aids or non-disclosure of their use are subject to disciplinary action under existing performance assessment rules and the declaration of originality.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Students must refrain from disclosing copyrighted, private, or confidential information to commercial GenAI clients unless expressly permitted, and must respect privacy and copyright of content they work with.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Flinders University

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Flinders states that students are responsible for using AI consistently with University, course, topic, assessment, and academic integrity requirements, including acknowledging generative AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Flinders' student academic integrity page states that misusing AI tools includes using tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or DALL-E without topic coordinator permission and without appropriate acknowledgement or citations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Flinders provides staff with AI assessment scale template instructions that range from no AI permitted through prompted, assisted, task-completion, and full AI use, with acknowledgement expectations attached to permitted use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ghent University

4 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for Ghent University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For assignments completed at home from academic year 2024-2025, Ghent University student guidance permits responsible use of generative AI tools and says individual teachers can still prohibit use for a specific subject.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Ghent University teaching guidance says responsible GenAI use is always permitted unless a lecturer explicitly prohibits it for parts of an assignment that take place in a controlled environment, and it cautions that detection tools are unreliable.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hiroshima University

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Hiroshima University tells course and thesis supervisors to judge whether generative AI may be used in classes or assignments and explain that decision to students through syllabi, guidance, or similar channels.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Where generative AI use is allowed, Hiroshima University's policy says students should be told that using AI output as-is may amount to copyright infringement or plagiarism, and that any use or quoted output should be made clear in reports and similar assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Hiroshima University's basic policy frames student use of generative AI in coursework around students identifying problems and considering solutions themselves, while users understand AI's mechanisms, benefits, risks, and changing literacy requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IITM)

4 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Perplexity Pro is listed for Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IITM) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For IIT Madras BS Degree program assignments, including any course or OPPE, the Honour Code says students are expected to produce original work based on individual understanding, and using LLMs such as ChatGPT or Gemini to generate any portion of code is considered plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The IIT Madras BS Degree Honour Code applies to participation in the IIT Madras BS Degree program and says participants must agree to the Honour Code and any additional course- or program-specific terms posted on study.iitm.ac.in/ds.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Jouf University

4 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月22日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Jouf University says its University Council approved adding an "Artificial Intelligence" course as a basic course in the study plans for all students, starting in academic year 1447 AH.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Jouf University says the adopted AI course gives special attention to ethical and social aspects, including algorithmic bias, privacy, data protection, and legal and regulatory challenges linked to AI technologies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Jouf University's adopted AI course is described as covering machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, and computer vision through interactive lectures, dynamic discussions, and real case studies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Karl-Franzens-Universitaet Graz

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Vice-Rectorate orientation guidelines say teachers are responsible for deciding which text-generating AI systems may be used in what form, and that the scope and form of use should be stated in the course description before the course starts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For assessed writing, University of Graz guidance says AI use should be transparent: students should label and document AI use and follow the AI guidelines of the relevant course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Graz does not set a blanket prohibition on AI technologies for writing assignments; lecturers decide for each course which text-generating AI systems may be used and how.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Khon Kaen University

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Khon Kaen University's Graduate School states that failure to disclose AI use in a thesis or independent study is regarded as a violation of academic ethics and may be subject to penalties under relevant regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Khon Kaen University's Graduate School states that AI is only a supporting tool for thesis or independent study work, and students who use AI must specify the type and content of the AI use in the thesis or independent study report.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Khon Kaen University's Graduate School classifies proofreading, grammar or spelling correction, readability rephrasing without altering core content, and translation for comprehension or cross-language communication as low-risk acceptable AI uses in thesis or independent study preparation, provided the use is disclosed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

KU Leuven

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

KU Leuven student guidance says students remain fully responsible for what they submit and must ensure assignments allow teaching staff to assess their acquired competences.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

KU Leuven student guidance says clear misuse of GenAI, where output is largely generated by GenAI and the student is not transparent about tool use, can be considered an irregularity under Article 84 of the Education and Examination Regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

KU Leuven teaching guidance expects teaching staff to clearly inform students whether GenAI may be used for assignments and expects students to be transparent about GenAI use so assessment can be fair and correct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Lehigh University

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Lehigh's human-subjects research guidance says use of AI to analyze or process data must be disclosed to participants during consent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Lehigh says students are expected to follow instructor-set course rules and university academic integrity rules when using generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Lehigh advises instructors to give students clear guidance on how generative AI tools may be used in coursework and research.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Macquarie University (Sydney, Australia)

4 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Macquarie student guidance categorises assessment tasks as Open or Observed: Open tasks allow generative AI with acknowledgement and student responsibility, while Observed tasks may restrict or prohibit AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Macquarie's research guidance says researchers using generative AI should mitigate sensitive-data risks, keep oversight and control, critically review outputs, and disclose or acknowledge generative AI use in research.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Macquarie Library referencing guidance says students who use generative AI in assessments should clearly state how they used it and fact-check AI responses against reliable sources.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Michigan State University

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

MSU guidelines say students may use generative AI tools for coursework or research activities only when the instructor or research advisor explicitly permits that use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

MSU expects instructors to include course-specific generative AI guidance in every syllabus, including whether AI use is permitted, the contexts in which it may be used, and expected acknowledgment or citation practices.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

MSU guidelines say integration of generative AI into research outputs, manuscripts, artistic endeavors, and grant applications must be disclosed according to relevant guidance or policies, and that intentional and substantial AI uses should be disclosed when no stated guidance exists.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Middlesex University

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Middlesex guidance tells students to consult their module tutor before using AI for studies or assignments and says submitting AI-generated work as their own is a breach of academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Middlesex states that generative AI tools may be used in assessments only as specified by the module leader, and allowed use requires written acknowledgment, extent of use, generation details including prompts, and citation or referencing where generated material is not adapted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Middlesex guidance says assessment criteria should make clear when and how students can use AI for each assessment, and how to acknowledge AI use appropriately.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National University of Singapore (NUS)

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NUS policy states that representing AI output as one's own work without acknowledgement is plagiarism; students who submit AI-generated work without acknowledging its use can be sanctioned for academic dishonesty.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

NUS states that instructors should be transparent about where and how they deploy AI in courses, including for generating content, virtual tutoring, and assessment feedback.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

NUS policy sets the default assumption that AI tool use is permitted for unsupervised (take-home) assessments, provided use is duly acknowledged; assessments forbidding AI must be conducted in-person and instructor-supervised.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Oregon State University

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Oregon State University Student Community Standards states that misuse of GenAI on an assignment could violate the university's Academic Integrity Policy, including plagiarism, cheating, or fabrication.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Oregon State University strongly encourages instructors to include a syllabus statement about whether and how students should engage with GenAI in their course learning and assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Oregon State University tells students that faculty may set course-specific AI expectations and that students must follow the specific expectations for each course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Princeton University

4 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Princeton University requires students to disclose the use of generative AI when permitted by the instructor, rather than cite or acknowledge the use, since generative AI is an algorithm rather than a source (Rights, Rules, Responsibilities section 2.4.7).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Princeton University states that inappropriate uses of generative AI on any work submitted to fulfill an academic requirement, including directly copying the output, representing output as the student's own, exceeding instructor parameters, or failing to disclose its use, would constitute violations of academic integrity (Rights, Rules, Responsibilities section 2.4.6).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Princeton University states that the decision to allow, limit, or prohibit generative AI in a course or in undergraduate independent work remains with the faculty; faculty members have the discretion to set their own generative AI policy for their courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Purdue University

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Scite is listed for Purdue University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should determine and tell students when AI use is authorized or unauthorized; authorization is determined at the course level.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Purdue teaching guidance says instructors should include specific syllabus guidance on allowable AI-tool use, learning-process use, detection approaches, and potential consequences.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Queen's University Belfast

4 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

QUB Chatbot is listed for Queen's University Belfast in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Queen's assessment guidance says students who misuse AI will be subject to the University's academic misconduct regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Queen's responsible AI research guidance expects material AI use in research to be clearly documented and acknowledged, with researchers validating AI-generated content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

RMIT University

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

RMIT academic integrity guidance says students cannot use AI to complete or contribute to an assessment task unless specifically allowed, pass off unreferenced AI-produced ideas as their own, or submit AI-produced content they cannot understand or explain.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

RMIT assessment guidance tells students to review and fact-check AI outputs and acknowledge AI tools when those tools contribute ideas, text, images, or other content to assessment work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

RMIT says whether students may use AI in assessments depends on their course and Course Coordinator instructions, and students should check with the Course Coordinator if unsure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Royal Holloway, University of London

4 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Royal Holloway academic misconduct regulations list requesting or engaging an artificial intelligence tool to write or rewrite work for unfair advantage, and presenting AI-generated content as one’s own unless authorised and acknowledged, as examples of assessment offences.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance for postgraduate researchers says AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose, or other academic content, and that researchers are responsible for every output they submit.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Royal Holloway requires students to include declaration statements for generative AI use or non-use, and says a list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Rutgers University–Newark

4 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Rutgers Academic Integrity Policy 10.2.13 applies to all schools and academic units and says students must ensure submitted course, research, or other academic work is their own and created without impermissible technologies, materials, or collaborations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Rutgers OIT guidance says AI use in academic settings typically varies by discipline, course, or instructor; students should not consider AI tools permissible for coursework unless instructors clearly state or communicate permission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Rutgers teaching guidance recommends clear and transparent course policies around generative AI, class discussion of those policies and rationales, and, when GenAI is permissible, student disclosure and reflection on use plus submission of prompts and outputs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sapienza University of Rome

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Sapienza's final-paper originality declaration requires students who used AI, automatic translators, grammar checkers, or data-analysis software to transparently declare the tool function and specific use, and says AI was not used to generate substantial content or automate any section.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For Sapienza CAD Psychology undergraduate final papers, generative AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini may be used as drafting support only with careful, transparent use and personal critical revision by the student.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For Sapienza CAD Psychology undergraduate final papers, the guidance treats uses such as relying on AI for bibliographic discovery, unverified citations, article summaries, critical analysis, delegated writing, automatic responses to supervisor feedback, data manipulation, fake results, or uncited AI content as illicit.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Shenzhen University

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Shenzhen University guidance says serious violations of instructor AI-use rules, concealment, presenting AI-generated content as original work, or failing required disclosure/marking can affect course grades and may be handled under academic misconduct rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Shenzhen University guidance says course instructors should tell students whether AI technologies are permitted in coursework, papers, assessments, exams, and the permitted scope.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Shenzhen University guidance says researchers using AI technology in research activities should disclose the AI tool name, version, parameter settings, use, and verification process in appropriate parts of the work and follow publisher rules during publication.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Simon Fraser University

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

SFU guidance says AI detectors cannot be used for grading decisions or academic misconduct investigations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

SFU tells students that use of generative AI for coursework depends on instructor permission, and students should not assume it is permitted when guidance is unclear or absent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

When an SFU instructor permits generative AI use, SFU tells students to cite or disclose that use appropriately as part of academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sorbonne University

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

OpenClassrooms AI courses via SORBONNE.AI is listed for Sorbonne University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

SCAI Education is listed for Sorbonne University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Sorbonne University's 2024-2025 assessment rules state that assessment documents must be the student's or assessed group's personal work, AI use is refused unless explicitly authorized, and authorized AI use should mention the source.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Swansea University

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Swansea University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Swansea University's AI assessment policy says staff and students are not permitted to present work completed by AI applications as their own without acknowledgement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Swansea University's student AI guidance says AI-generated work submitted for assessment when not expressly authorised and declared could be investigated for academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tampere University

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Tampere University tells students to openly and transparently acknowledge AI use in assignments, coursework, or theses and to describe how AI was used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Tampere University's academic ethics guideline treats presenting AI-produced work as one's own without proper mention as academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Tampere University generally permits students to use generative AI applications to support learning and assignment completion, while allowing teachers to set course or assignment principles.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technische Universität Wien

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Aqueduct API is listed for Technische Universität Wien in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Open WebUI Chat is listed for Technische Universität Wien in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

TU Wien's student guidance says ChatGPT and other large language models must be documented as aids in written work, AI-used passages must be marked, and undisclosed generative-AI use in student work is treated as equivalent to plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Melbourne

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月6日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

At the University of Melbourne, using GenAI tools to produce work submitted for assessment without acknowledgement constitutes academic misconduct under cl. 4.13 of the Student Academic Integrity Policy (MPF1310).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

University of Melbourne students must appropriately cite any use of GenAI tools in the preparation of assessment submissions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

At the University of Melbourne, generative AI tools can only be used in research outputs where the material generated or substantially altered by these tools is acknowledged according to the University's policy and the Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Warwick

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Warwick's student-facing guidance says students are required to state whether AI was used in the submission process and explain why, where, and how it was used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Warwick's student-facing guidance says students may use AI only within requirements set out in assessment briefs and course handbooks, which may restrict or prohibit AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Warwick's AI in research guidance says researchers are responsible for misconduct-type practices involving AI, including improper handling of information or use of another person's ideas, even if such practices occur inadvertently through an AI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

United Arab Emirates University

4 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UAEU prohibits student use of GenAI in specified assessment contexts unless the course instructor states otherwise.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UAEU tells students that information gained from GenAI should be checked against recognized sources and that those sources should be cited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UAEU states that students must complete a training session as part of orientation to comply with the GenAI policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Università degli Studi di Udine

4 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月26日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline says that if a student used AI tools at any stage of thesis writing, the student is required to explicitly declare the tool, version if available, date, and nature of use in a methodological note.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline says students should not insert automatically generated scientific text into the thesis, replace bibliographic research with AI, or use AI-generated text without critical and personal reworking.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Biotechnology bachelor's thesis guideline says non-compliance with its AI-use indications is treated as comparable to plagiarism and may lead to disciplinary sanctions under the university regulation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat de Barcelona

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

MS Copilot for Education is listed for Universitat de Barcelona in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UB's good-practices document recommends that students clearly declare generative AI use when relevant and frames transparent, responsible AI use as a commitment to academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UB's good-practices document says it is important for instructors to clarify at the beginning of each course what role generative AI may have, where it is permitted or not permitted, and under what conditions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Konstanz

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The guidance states that if active use of an AI tool in a course requires registration with personal data, that use must be voluntary because GDPR must be observed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The central guidance recommends that instructors formulate clear course guidelines governing generative AI use and discuss them with students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Universität Konstanz has public central AI-in-teaching guidance, but the collected official sources should be treated as guidance and resource pages rather than a staged canonical finding of a formal university-wide binding AI policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Grenoble Alpes

4 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UGA's AI reference framework says students using generative AI must mention the use of generative AI and its name, identify the parts generated by or with AI, and cite sources correctly to avoid plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UGA's AI reference framework says use of tools mobilizing AI is prohibited by principle for knowledge assessment unless explicitly authorized, with study regulations and assessment modalities specifying the AI-use framework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UGA's AI reference framework says researchers using generative AI must verify whether generated ideas come from existing sources, add appropriate references, mention the use and name of the generative AI, and identify parts generated by or with AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Lumière Lyon 2

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月26日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Université Lumière Lyon 2's règlement intérieur prohibits using an artificial-intelligence tool in university work without explicit mention, and prohibits presenting AI-generated content as personal human work, under disciplinary proceedings.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Lyon 2 SPS guidance says AI should not do assessed work in place of the student; AI assistance may be possible only when it respects university ethics and the specific instructions for the exam or assignment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Lyon 2 SPS guidance recommends that instructors explicitly state expected conditions for student work, including obligations, permissions, recommendations, prohibitions, whether generative AI may be used, and how any use should be signaled.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University College Dublin

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UCD's Academic Integrity Policy says AI-generated content may not be submitted without explicit permission and attribution, and that generative AI outputs must be used critically, ethically, cited, and acknowledged.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

University College Dublin publishes University Management Team-approved AI Governance Principles for institutional AI use, including human oversight, fairness, transparency, compliance, ethical design, AI literacy, stakeholder engagement, and risk assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UCD Teaching and Learning assessment guidance advises educators to be transparent with students about permitted AI use and to apply more robust approaches for high-stakes graded assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bergen

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UiBchat is listed for University of Bergen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot for web is listed for University of Bergen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bergen states that software, including AI tools, should be referenced when it affects results, analyses, or findings presented in academic work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Calgary

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of Calgary in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For graduate studies, the Faculty of Graduate Studies guidelines say students should obtain written, unambiguous authorization before planned GenAI use in graduate work, and students must disclose GenAI use in graduate study work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Calgary teaching-and-learning guidance supports the use of generative AI in teaching and learning, while saying individual educators and instructors should decide if and how it is incorporated and clearly communicate student expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Riverside

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UCR's student-facing AI announcement says students should discuss generative-AI expectations with professors, use AI to assist or enhance rather than replace original work, avoid generating entire deliverables, and cite AI-generated content or data when used.

证据记录: 3。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UCR XCITE advises instructors to discuss when AI may be used in coursework and how it should be cited, and its sample syllabus language treats uncited AI use as a potential academic-integrity issue.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

UCR's public generative-AI guidance for instructional settings places course-level use decisions with the Instructor of Record rather than setting one universal student-use rule in the evidence reviewed here.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Florida

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

NaviGator Chat is listed for University of Florida in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Florida in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UF guidance presents AI-Permitted, Some AI, and No AI as general course-level approaches for instructors to communicate generative AI expectations in syllabi or assignment instructions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Geneva

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Within UNIGE's Faculty of Science, sensitive data such as personal data must not be disclosed to a public AI tool that does not guarantee confidentiality.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Within UNIGE's Faculty of Science, a formal declaration of generative AI use is required for all bachelor's, master's, or doctoral work and for academic assessment or production leading to a degree or official title.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNIGE formally expects full transparency about AI tool use in academic work through appropriate citation rules, with possible description of the methodology used with AI support.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Glasgow

4 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Regulation 32 says use of websites or generative AI software that generates answers or references is prohibited, while some Schools may allow AI tools for specific purposes and any AI use must be referenced.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Glasgow student guidance says using AI or other computational aids in university work without acknowledging the input counts as academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Glasgow student guidance says the university does not seek to prohibit student AI-tool use generally and instead supports effective, ethical, critical, and transparent use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Gothenburg

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Gothenburg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Gothenburg student guidance says the university does not prohibit generative AI in education; teachers and examiners decide whether, when, and how it may be used in coursework and examinations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Gothenburg student guidance says generative-AI guidelines vary between courses, programmes, departments, and faculties, and that teachers and examiners are responsible for communicating those guidelines to students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Helsinki

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CurreChat is listed for University of Helsinki in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Helsinki student guidance treats prohibited use of large language models, or failing to report their use as instructed, as cheating; the cheating and plagiarism guidance also lists presenting AI-generated text or solutions as one's own as plagiarism.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

University of Helsinki research guidance supports responsible and critical use of GenAI in research, but says researchers are responsible for outputs, should verify them, describe substantial GenAI use, and must not list GenAI as a co-author.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Illinois Chicago (UIC)

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UIC College of Medicine policy states that students are expected to draft submitted assignments on their own; AI may assist with idea generation and editing, but AI directly authoring a response is considered a violation of academic integrity and professionalism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UIC College of Medicine policy prohibits students from generating patient care notes with AI applications except EHR-supported applications explicitly permitted by course leadership, and says protected health information should never be entered into outside generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UIC CATE recommends that instructors develop and include an AI usage policy in their syllabus after sharing their stance on AI writing tools in the course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Luxembourg

4 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Luxembourg guidance says generative AI use should be disclosed according to each course and assessment, with course guidelines serving as the primary point of reference.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Luxembourg guidance lists non-permitted AI practices, including undisclosed submission of AI output as one's own work, using AI to replace the central assessed intellectual contribution, fabricating data or citations, and trying to conceal AI involvement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Luxembourg assessment guidance says chatbot use in assignments should align with academic integrity and scientific judgement, and students should disclose where and how the chatbot influenced the text.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Missouri, Kansas City

4 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

M365 Copilot Premium is listed for University of Missouri, Kansas City in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UMKC recommends that instructors include a policy in all syllabi about the use and misuse of generative AI tools such as ChatGPT.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UMKC Libraries' ChatGPT student guide tells students to check with their instructor before using ChatGPT and provides citation guidance when ChatGPT is allowed in an academic assignment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Rome "Tor Vergata"

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT is listed for University of Rome "Tor Vergata" in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Corporate and Business Strategy course page states that using generative AI, including ChatGPT, without prior professor consent is considered plagiarism in that course context.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Tor Vergata's Economics area library says its staff provides training and assistance for integrating AI tools into research processes while maintaining academic integrity and correct citation; this is an area-library service source, not a university-wide AI policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Science and Technology of China

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For 2026 NSFC applications submitted through USTC, the university notice says applicants who use generative AI to track research trends or collect and organize references must manually verify the truth and accuracy of generated information and references, take responsibility for generated content, and fully and truthfully declare AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For smart-course projects under USTC's 2026 undergraduate teaching-project guide, completion standards include at least two online teaching cycles and mandatory AI learning or teaching support plus knowledge-graph functions, with two additional optional digital or AI functions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

USTC's 2026 undergraduate teaching-project guide encourages new-course projects to integrate AI technologies with core professional competencies and to include AI application techniques, cases, and practical training in lectures and practice teaching.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of St Andrews

4 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of St Andrews in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

St Andrews GenAI information policy says University information classified as internal, confidential, or strictly confidential must not be input into publicly available generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

St Andrews Good Academic Practice policy treats presenting AI output as a student's own work without acknowledgement as unauthorised use of AI, except where an assessment specifically permits or encourages such tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Texas at Austin

4 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

UT Austin AI detection guidance prohibits third-party AI detection software from being used to evaluate student work or assignments unless a university contract or purchase order is in place.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UT Austin CTL teaching-policy guidance says using generative AI tools to create course-assignment responses in a way the instructor does not accept may be considered academic dishonesty by the university.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UT Austin classroom guidance recommends that instructors requiring generative AI understand and abide by UT acceptable-use guidance, identify syllabus policies clearly, and submit specific software requirements through the University Co-Op.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Toledo

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UToledo's Academic dishonesty policy lists representing the words, ideas, or information of an artificial intelligence program as one's own without proper documentation as an example of academic dishonesty, and says faculty are expected to tell students what materials and procedures, including artificial intelligence programs, are authorized.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UToledo's Simple Syllabus guidance says the AI Tool Usage section is required and private, and instructors must select or enter a statement explaining how generative AI tools may be used, limited, or prohibited in the course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Within the University of Toledo College of Law default rule, generative AI may be used for research-like search, grammar correction, and other functions attendant to completing an assignment, but may not compose submitted assignment text and may not be used for any exam purpose unless an instructor deviates in writing with notice.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Toronto

4 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Toronto considers use of generative AI tools on marked assessments without instructor permission to be use of an unauthorized aid under the Code of Behaviour on Academic Matters.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Contact North Teacher’s Assistant Pro is listed for University of Toronto in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Toronto recommends that instructors include a statement on their syllabus that informs students about expectations with respect to the use of AI, and provides sample syllabus statements for instructors to use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Virginia

4 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UVA Provost guidance says that if an assignment involves students uploading original work into a GenAI tool, instructors must provide alternative ways to complete the assignment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UVA guidance says students who use AI in completing an assignment should clearly indicate the tool used, how it was used, prompts used, and, when appropriate, fact-checking efforts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UVA guidance says instructors should make explicit in syllabi and assignment descriptions which GenAI uses are permitted or prohibited, and that using GenAI in ways prohibited by the instructor may violate the Honor Code.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of York

4 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Gemini is listed for University of York in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of York in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google NotebookLM is listed for University of York in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yale University

4 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Yale academic integrity guidance treats inserting AI-generated text into an assignment without proper attribution as an academic integrity violation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Yale expects faculty to give clear instructions on permitted AI use and attribution, and expects students to follow instructor guidelines for coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Yale states that instructors have authority within each course to determine whether and how students may use AI on assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yeshiva University

4 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Yeshiva University's undergraduate academic integrity policy treats unsanctioned use of Generative AI or Assistive AI as a potential academic integrity violation and tells students to assume generative-capable platforms are prohibited unless allowed for the course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Yeshiva University's undergraduate policy permits faculty to allow Generative AI in courses or assessments if they specify in writing how it may be used; content produced using Generative AI must be cited according to the relevant subject conventions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Yeshiva University's faculty and staff AI acceptable use policy says individuals using Generative AI in research must be transparent about its use and researchers must avoid uploading unpublished research data or Internal or Restricted Information into Generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Aarhus University

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Aarhus University student guidance says students who use GAI in an exam project must submit a declaration naming the applications and explaining how they were used, and unchanged GAI output used in an exam project must be cited like other secondary-source quotations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Aarhus University student guidance says the main rule is that students are allowed to use GAI unless their academic regulations or the course catalogue explicitly state that GAI is not allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

AU Educate guidance for teaching staff says that from fall 2024 students are allowed to use GAI in all AU exams unless academic regulations or the course description explicitly state that they may not, and it advises teachers to read those rules for their courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Abo Akademi University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Åbo Akademi University's Open University teacher guidance says teachers cannot require students to use AI to complete an assignment because AI requires registration on an external service.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Åbo Akademi University's research data guidance says researchers are responsible for their own work, should check all AI-produced results, and should be transparent about AI-tool use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Åbo Akademi University's Open University teacher guidance says students in courses should be informed about the principles and disadvantages of AI or language-model use, and teachers should make clear what applies in each specific course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Adam Mickiewicz University has Rector order 426/2023/2024 setting rules for student use of AI systems in education, including theses and coursework/assessment work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For classroom/course work, AMU recommends that the course coordinator choose the appropriate level of AI-use control based on the syllabus, and that the instructor inform students about permission or prohibition at the first class.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

AMU classroom guidance says that, in course contexts where permission or marking is required, use of generative AI tools without permission or without appropriate marking is treated in the same way as plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Open WebUI is listed for Albert-Ludwigs-Universitaet Freiburg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

University of Freiburg research policy says researchers should disclose which AI systems they used and clearly label those systems' contributions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University Library Freiburg guidance tells students that AI tool use in academic contexts should be made transparent, they should ask instructors what extent of AI use is permitted, and AI tool output must be checked consistently.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Amman Arab University

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AAU's AI instructions allow students to use AI tools for self-learning, initial project and research ideas, and text or data analysis, but prohibit submitting AI outputs as-is, generating complete or nearly complete assignment/project answers without being able to explain them, or using tools that lead to cheating or breach academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

AAU's AI instructions require students to document AI use by explicitly identifying the tool used and where and how it was used in assignments, research, and projects, while observing intellectual-property rights.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

AAU's AI instructions allow faculty members to use AI tools for educational content, learning activities, rubrics, and student-performance analysis, while requiring the faculty member to remain the course's primary scientific source and not rely fully on generated outputs without review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ashoka University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Ashoka University's Academic Integrity Policy applies to students doing coursework, research, thesis work, partner-university coursework, study-related internships or placements, and work with University Centers; it expects original work, source acknowledgement, independent assignment completion where applicable, and honesty during examinations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

In the Ashoka University course catalogue entry for Economy, Politics and Society (FC-0412-5), the course-level AI/ML policy discourages use of machine-learning tools such as ChatGPT in that class and asks students who use such a tool to declare its use and specify the extent of use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Ashoka University's public Academic Integrity Policy page gives general academic-integrity and citation guidance, including mandatory academic-integrity workshop language, but the extracted public page text did not contain AI-specific, ChatGPT, or generative-AI rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Australian Catholic University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For ACU coursework students, unauthorized or undisclosed use of generative AI, paraphrasing or translation tools is listed as academic misconduct unless use is authorized in the assessment requirements and properly acknowledged.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

ACU research guidance says HDR candidates should declare GenAI use for thesis copyediting/proofreading, discuss intended research use with supervisors, record and acknowledge tool usage and prompts, and should not input sensitive or confidential information into GenAI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

ACU Library guidance tells students that GenAI may be permitted in some contexts, but assessment use should be clearly authorized and acknowledged, and final work should reflect the student's own analysis and understanding.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Bar-Ilan University

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Bar-Ilan University guidance requires students to declare whether they used generative AI tools in an assignment and to explain the specific contribution made by GenAI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Bar-Ilan University guidance leaves whether and how students may use generative AI tools to instructor discretion; if an instructor has not explicitly prohibited use, use is permitted by default when the student explicitly discloses all use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Bar-Ilan University guidance instructs users not to disclose personal or sensitive information to generative AI platforms and says generative AI tools must adhere to Bar-Ilan data security guidelines.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Beijing Institute of Technology

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

iBIT is listed for Beijing Institute of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

智教通 (Zhijiaotong) is listed for Beijing Institute of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Beijing Institute of Technology Graduate School says 2026 graduate program plans should add public foundational AI courses for all graduate students, with students required to take the appropriate tier according to program training requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Beijing Jiaotong University

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Beijing Jiaotong University's 2023-2024 undergraduate teaching quality report says the university opened liberal-arts/science-track AI general courses and aimed for AI course coverage for the 2024 undergraduate cohort, except where programs already include AI courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For the Zhan Tianyou College-related 2024 undergraduate training model described in the report, BJTU required majors in the information ability module to add AI-specialized courses categorized as AI foundation, AI expansion, and AI frontier courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

BJTU's undergraduate teaching quality report says the university developed AI-enabled course pilots using large-model technologies around knowledge graphs, 24-hour intelligent learning companions, AI teaching assistants, and AI mentors, with experience to be promoted across the university.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Bournemouth University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Bournemouth University academic-offences guidance lists using artificial intelligence software to write all or part of an assignment and claiming the work as your own as an example of an academic offence.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Bournemouth University student guidance says using generative AI when writing coursework is not, by itself, an academic offence, while directing students to use the resource responsibly and appropriately.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Bournemouth University's 6H taught-awards policy defines academic offences as attempts to gain unfair advantage in assessment by deception or fraudulent means and frames academic integrity around responsibility for one's own work, acknowledging others' work, honest reporting, and avoiding unfair advantage.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Brno University of Technology

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

VUT requires users to properly state when a result was achieved using generative AI, including the extent of use, and warns that incorrect or undisclosed use may be treated as an ethical violation such as ghost-writing or contract-cheating.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For creative activity, VUT supports generative-AI use by academic and research staff, but says employees must state which tools were used and the extent of use when creating scientific or artistic outputs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For operational-administrative work, VUT supports employee use of generative AI and says employees may use it to perform work duties, while stating which tools were used and the extent of use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Brown University

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Brown Provost guidance says any unapproved use of AI to complete assignments would be covered by Brown’s Academic Code and Graduate Student Edition Academic Code.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Brown University Provost guidance says the University is not prescribing specific AI policies, and that faculty should give clear, unambiguous information about what AI use is and is not allowed in their courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Brown Sheridan Center guidance says instructors should be explicit with students about expectations for generative AI use, including how students should, might, or cannot engage with it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chalmers University of Technology

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For thesis work, Chalmers says AI tools may be permitted, but students are required to take full responsibility and make AI-tool use clear and transparent, including how and to what extent the tools were used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Chalmers Library's student guidance connects AI use to plagiarism or ghostwriting risk and says students need to be fully transparent, describe what they did, and cite the AI tool used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Chalmers Library's student guidance says whether and how AI tools may be used in examinations is decided for each course by the coordinator and examiner, so students should ask at the beginning of each course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chang Gung University

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Chang Gung University student guidance tells students to follow course AI-use rules, clearly mark AI use when permitted, avoid directly copying AI-generated content, and not use AI in exams unless specifically allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Chang Gung University teacher guidance advises instructors to state AI-use rules in syllabi, choose whether AI use is fully open, conditionally open, or prohibited, and explain scope, marking requirements, and grading criteria.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Chang Gung University researcher guidance treats AI as a supporting tool, says core arguments and innovative results should be written by researchers, and calls for clear disclosure and verification of AI-generated content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Charles Darwin University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

CDU requires students and employees to be transparent about and disclose GenAI use, with academic integrity guidance applying to students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

CDU's academic integrity guidance identifies inappropriate or unsanctioned GenAI use as academic misconduct and says CDU will not tolerate misrepresenting AI-generated content as a student's own work or failing to disclose AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For HDR studies, CDU guidance says GenAI may assist but should not replace a candidate's original intellectual contribution, GenAI use should be clearly acknowledged, and supervisors or external examiners should not use GenAI to critique or assess candidate work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

China Medical University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

China Medical University's Academic Affairs generative AI teaching guidance asks instructors to communicate with students about course-specific ways and limits for using generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

China Medical University's Academic Affairs guidance tells teachers and students to consider academic-ethics concerns before using generative AI and to avoid plagiarism and copyright violations in assignments, exams, and research papers.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

China Medical University's R&D reference guidance frames generative AI as a research-assistance tool and says researchers should verify AI-generated content, understand related policies, disclose use where required, and remain responsible for research outputs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chonnam National University

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Chonnam's generative-AI writing assignment guideline tells instructors to state in the syllabus whether generative AI is allowed and, when allowed, to explain scope, misconduct criteria, the ethics pledge, and checklist use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Chonnam's generative-AI writing assignment guideline identifies improper AI uses that can constitute misconduct, including submitting copied AI output without attribution, patchworking AI output without attribution, using AI to create or spread false information or experiences, infringing copyright or intellectual property, and using AI in a class where it is fully prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Chonnam's generative-AI writing assignment guideline cautions learners that information entered into generative AI may be stored on servers and used to improve performance, so they should be careful about security and information leakage.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chulalongkorn University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChulaGENIE is listed for Chulalongkorn University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Chulalongkorn guidance says users who use AI tools in a task should cite and clearly state the scope of use; concealing AI-tool use is treated as an ethical violation that may be penalized under relevant rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For teaching and assessment, Chulalongkorn guidance says instructors should understand selected AI tools, define course-level scope and directions for use, and adjust evaluation when AI use is allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chungnam National University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Chungnam National University's learner guide states that not following syllabus or instructor-agreed generative-AI criteria, or inappropriate AI use, may be regarded as cheating; examples include presenting AI answers as one's own, failing to disclose AI use, or using AI in a class where it is fully prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Chungnam National University's learner guidance says learners should follow instructor-provided generative-AI criteria, use AI as a learning support tool, verify AI outputs against reliable sources, and clearly mark the source, generation method, and scope of AI-generated materials.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Chungnam National University's instructor guidance says that when generative AI is used in class, instructors should state its purpose and scope in the syllabus, explain correct use and standards for cheating or plagiarism, and guide students to cite AI-generated outputs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

City University of New York

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CUNY's Academic Integrity Policy says use of generative AI tools must align with the usage policy for specific assignments as defined in the syllabus or communicated by the instructor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

CUNY's Academic Integrity Policy includes unauthorized use of AI-generated content, including paraphrased AI-generated content without citing AI as the source, as an example of plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

CUNY's AI Academic Hub advises faculty to guide AI use with clarity by establishing responsible AI engagement in coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Comillas Pontifical University

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Comillas states that using AI to create complete works or relevant parts without citing the source or tool, or without express permission in the assignment description, will be considered plagiarism under the university's general regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Comillas permits students to use AI as a reference tool when the use is acknowledged and cited, and directs students to check each course guide and consult the instructor for activity-specific rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Comillas says teachers who incorporate AI tools in their courses should ensure that the conditions for use are clearly established in the course guide.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Concordia University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Concordia's CTL GenAI FAQ says the university does not currently have an official policy regarding the use of GenAI, and explains that GenAI has not officially been adopted by the university so its use cannot be required in coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Concordia CTL encourages faculty to clearly state their position on GenAI use in courses, including in the syllabus and in class, and provides adaptable sample statements for encouraged, limited, or prohibited use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Concordia Student Success guidance tells students not to assume GenAI is allowed if an instructor does not mention it, and says permitted use of generative tools for academic work must be cited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

De La Salle University

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

DLSU's generative AI policy says faculty and students must provide a written disclosure statement when generative AI is used in producing material, presentations, or submissions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Starting Term 1, 2025-2026, DLSU's policy says every course must include a dedicated Generative AI Use Policy section in the syllabus, including usage policy levels for grading components and a concise rationale.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

DLSU's policy treats prohibited generative AI use and failure to disclose generative AI use as generative AI-related academic dishonesty, while also stating that AI detector results cannot be the sole basis for establishing such dishonesty.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Diponegoro University

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy allows authors to use AI tools supportively, but requires substantive AI use to be disclosed in an AI Declaration Statement and states that AI tools may not be listed as authors or co-authors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNDIP Library guidance tells students that submitted assignments remain their own responsibility, and that using AI software without acknowledgement is treated seriously under academic misconduct procedures.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UNDIP Library guidance says AI use in data analysis, writing, or draft preparation should be explicitly disclosed in publications, and AI-generated results should be manually reverified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Durham University

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月7日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Durham Common Awards page says its AI policy requires students to paste a completed AI declaration into summative assignments before submission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Durham Common Awards guidance says some limited uses of generative AI do not count as academic misconduct if work remains the student's own, AI use is acknowledged where required, and caution is demonstrated.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Durham staff may choose whether and how to use GenAI in teaching, but must be open and transparent about this and operate ethically and in compliance with GDPR.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Tübingen presents its generative-AI guideline for teaching and research as representing the university's stance, focused on critical-reflective, transparent, and responsible handling of generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Tübingen guideline says that when generative AI is used in research, study, administration, or science communication, the procedure should be documented and made transparently visible in the relevant format.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Tübingen download area says its model declaration must be adapted before distribution to students, with the faculty, department, or teacher choosing either a no-generative-AI-use option or a marking-duty option when AI use is allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Edith Cowan University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ECU's academic-misconduct guidance states that plagiarism includes unacknowledged use of a generative artificial intelligence tool such as ChatGPT.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ECU Library guidance says students who use generative AI as a study or research tool must acknowledge that use in their assessment, and that not giving credit to GenAI tools counts as plagiarism.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

ECU provides student-facing generative-AI learning support that covers responsible use, learning, academic integrity, prompt strategies, attribution, drop-ins, and workshops.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Effat University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Effat University's library AI guide says using generative-AI text without proper citation is considered plagiarism according to Effat University, while policies for using and crediting AI tools may vary by class.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Effat University's library AI guide warns that generative-AI tools can produce inaccurate or false citations and advises users to verify citations for accuracy and credit the underlying source rather than the AI tool when citing sourced information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Effat University's library AI guide advises users who decide to use ChatGPT or other AI technology for writing to be transparent with teachers and publishers and comply with applicable policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

EPFL – École polytechnique fédérale de Lausanne

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

EPFL requires students to disclose the use of AI tools in assessment work. EPFL rules (Lex 1.3.3, Article 4) require that all assessment material that is not the student's personal and original contribution must be recognizable as such.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

EPFL recommends that teachers make explicit to students what AI use is not legitimate in a course and what rules accompany AI tool use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

EPFL considers the use of AI-generated content in assignments without proper attribution as AI plagiarism. Tools that detect AI-generated content are not admissible as stand-alone evidence of AI plagiarism due to high risk of false positives.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ewha Womans University

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Ewha's class-stage AI-use guidance says course guidance may state that copying generative-AI outputs directly into assignments or exams, fabricating or spreading false information with generative AI, infringing copyright with generative AI, or otherwise harming academic truthfulness and trust may be considered misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Ewha's class-stage AI-use guidance cautions that AI-detection programs can be used to check whether assignments used generative AI, but that such tools are not yet perfect and ethical use should be discussed with students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Ewha's class-stage AI-use guidance presents course-level generative-AI use as something instructors may define by explaining whether and how AI use is allowed and by asking students to disclose how they used generative AI in assignments.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Florida International University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

FIU's Center for the Advancement of Teaching advises instructors to clearly define acceptable AI use in course expectations and syllabus policy, including which tools are permitted and how they may or may not be used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

An official FIU Syllabi sample AI-use PDF includes sample academic integrity language stating that AI-generated content without proper attribution or authorization is another form of plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

FIU Libraries' AI guide tells students who want to use AI in a course to ask their professor for that professor's individual AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

HAWKI is listed for Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

FAU guidance says instructors are responsible for clear AI-use rules in teaching activities, especially exams, and that students must disclose generative AI use according to the relevant course rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

FAU's AI-in-teaching guidance says examiners must individually determine and announce whether and how AI-supported aids may be used, and students must disclose the aids used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

German Jordanian University

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

GJU's AI principles permit AI tools for research support such as data analysis and research model development, require researchers to disclose AI tool use, and prohibit using AI tools to produce complete research papers, fabricate data, generate non-original literature reviews, or create content not based on genuine research effort.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

GJU's AI principles permit students to use AI tools for learning-supportive activities such as preliminary research, analysis, idea generation, writing improvement, and summarizing academic sources, provided that the use is disclosed; the principles prohibit using AI to fully prepare projects or theses without the student's actual contribution.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

GJU's AI principles require disclosure of AI tool use in academic and research tasks and say sensitive data should not be entered into AI tools without consent from the relevant authorities and individuals concerned.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AI-ToolLab Chatbot (LobeChat) is listed for Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AI-ToolLab Transcription (Whisper-WebUI) is listed for Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Goethe University Frankfurt's teacher-facing assessment guidance recommends defining clear rules for AI use, making AI use transparent, and using AI detection software only as supporting evidence rather than as the sole basis for proof.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Griffith University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Griffith's academic integrity page states that uncited content created using generative artificial intelligence software is conduct that always constitutes Academic Misconduct, and that representing AI-generated assessment content as a student's own work is Academic Misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Griffith's student generative AI guidance warns that many open or public tools do not guarantee confidentiality and advises users not to enter personal information, information about others, or course materials such as assessment tasks or marking rubrics.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Griffith's student-facing generative AI guidance says students may use generative AI for self-study without citation, but for assessment tasks they must acknowledge its use and include a short declaration if they use it while completing the task.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Harbin Institute of Technology

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

星火科研助手 (Spark Research Assistant) is listed for Harbin Institute of Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Harbin Institute of Technology's Graduate School continued an AI-enabled graduate education reform and course-construction initiative covering AI integration into graduate teaching models, systems, methods, approaches, evaluation, and student development.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Harbin Institute of Technology's Undergraduate School announced an AI-enabled teaching reform project that encourages AI-supported course scenarios, personalized student learning, and AI-enabled talent cultivation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hokkaido University

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

When generative AI is used to assist with grading submitted assignments, Hokkaido University's notes warn faculty not to enter students' personal or private information because entered data may be stored and output to other users.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For student use, Hokkaido University's notes say students preparing reports and other assignments should follow the instructor's guidance and instructions regarding generative AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For faculty use, Hokkaido University's notes say instructors should explain in advance whether generative AI is permitted in class and how it is restricted, and should consider grading fairness when students use it in assignments or practical learning.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hong Kong Baptist University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

HKBU GenAI Platform is listed for Hong Kong Baptist University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

HKBU student academic-integrity guidance treats copying AI-generated output without acknowledging that use as improper use of generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

HKBU presents four generative-AI teaching and learning principles: AI-Empowering, AI-Critical, AI-Ethical, and building and sustaining human uniqueness.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hong Kong Metropolitan University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

HKMU's student generative-AI guidelines say inappropriate AI use, including use without proper acknowledgment or in violation of course guidelines, will be treated as academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

HKMU's student generative-AI guidelines require students completing assignments to submit an OLE declaration indicating whether generative-AI tools were used and, if used, which tool was used and how it contributed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

HKMU's AI@HKMU position statement frames ChatGPT and similar tools as supplements to coursework and says ChatGPT should not be relied upon solely to complete assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

HSE University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

HSE University requires students to disclose use of generative AI in written academic work, including the parts prepared with AI, the purpose and method of use, model name or source, and an effectiveness evaluation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

HSE University states that there is no university-wide prohibition on student use of AI, and students may use generative models in academic work when they follow disclosure requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

HSE University says an instructor may prohibit the use of generative models during assessment elements if the prohibition is stated in the course syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

IE University

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

IE University's admissions integrity policy welcomes AI such as ChatGPT in the admissions process when candidates clearly identify AI-generated content, use quotation marks, and include sources and details.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

A 2025-26 IE Humanities syllabus states that, for that course, ChatGPT or any other AI platform or tool is strictly prohibited for generating ideas or content, except spelling or grammar checking.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

This crawl found official IE University AI-related sources for admissions, institutional AI positioning, and one course-level syllabus, but did not locate a public central enrolled-student generative-AI policy page in official-domain searches.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Illinois Institute of Technology

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Illinois Tech's Academic Affairs guidance ties permitted use of generative AI or other outside resources to each course's learning objectives and syllabus expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Illinois Tech's Center for Learning Innovation asks faculty to provide clear syllabus expectations for AI use and provides suggested syllabus language for no, some, and significant AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Illinois Tech's suggested AI and assessment syllabus language says AI-assisted grading support should be explicitly stated in assignment instructions when such tools are used, with final grading oversight retained by the instructor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Imperial College London

3 匹配声明s from 15 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Individual departments at Imperial may allow or prohibit the use of generative AI for specific assessments. Local (team/department/faculty) instructions take precedence over university-wide guidance. Students should check their department's current policy on using and disclosing generative AI in academic work and follow their module leader's instructions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Students should include a statement acknowledging their use of generative AI tools for all assessed work, specifying the tool name and version, publisher, URL, a brief description of how it was used, and confirmation that the work is their own. Further requirements such as prompts used, date of output, the output obtained, and how it was modified may also be required by individual departments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Users of Imperial's dAIsy platform must not upload third-party content they are not permitted to share. Reuse of AI outputs must comply with licensing and academic citation norms. When communicating externally, dAIsy outputs must not be presented as Imperial's position without approval.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Institut Polytechnique de Paris

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Institut Polytechnique de Paris's 2025-2026 Master programs academic regulations prohibit the use of generative AI in assessments for those programs unless explicitly authorized by the instructor in written instructions. Unauthorized use constitutes academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Le règlement des études 2025-2026 des masters de l'Institut Polytechnique de Paris interdit l'utilisation de l'intelligence artificielle générative dans les évaluations de ces programmes, sauf autorisation explicite de l'enseignant dans ses consignes écrites. Tout manquement est considéré comme une fraude.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Under Institut Polytechnique de Paris's 2025-2026 Master programs academic regulations, when generative AI use is explicitly permitted by an instructor, students must clearly acknowledge its use in accordance with standard citation practices.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB)

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

FITB guidance says declaration of AI use for coursework outputs is mandatory rather than optional, and undeclared AI use may be considered a serious violation with academic consequences.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

FITB guidance states that, by default, using AI during exams, quizzes, or other evaluations is academic cheating and can be sanctioned unless the instructor allows or recommends AI use for a particular part of a course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

FITB guidance says instructors need to set AI-use policies for their courses and communicate them at the start of the course; when AI use is allowed, permission should be clear and explicit, with boundaries and transparency.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Iowa State University

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Iowa State research guidance warns that users cannot assume GenAI tools comply with HIPAA, FERPA, and similar confidentiality rules, and says uploading information to a public AI tool is equivalent to releasing it publicly.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Iowa State Student Conduct guidance says suspected AI-generated coursework referrals will be reviewed similarly to other forms of academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Iowa State CELT describes AI teaching resources for instructors, including GenAI syllabus considerations and a Canvas page on use of GenAI in Iowa State courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Istanbul University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Istanbul University Press policy says authors should disclose details of any AI used in content creation in the appropriate part of the work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An Istanbul University EBS syllabus for 'Yapay Zeka Araclari Kullanimi' states that the course aims to help students use AI tools consciously, ethically, and effectively.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An Istanbul University EBS syllabus for 'Sahne Sanatlarinda Yapay Zeka Uygulamalari II' includes generative AI, verification, bias, hallucination analysis, copyright, student data/privacy, institutional policy, and risk management as course content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Johannes Gutenberg Universität Mainz

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

JGU library guidance says the university is generally open to AI tools, but instructors or institutes may decide whether tools are allowed for a given assessment, and allowed use should be disclosed as an aid.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

JGU library guidance warns AI-tool users to check legal and privacy conditions, avoid disclosing private or sensitive data, and consider server location, publisher restrictions, rights, and upload permissions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

JGU's digital teaching guidance encourages integrating AI literacy and transparent use of AI into teaching and, where appropriate, assessment design.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

King Saud University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Students may not submit content generated with generative AI as their own without disclosure, and using AI in exams, assignments, or academic assessments is treated as cheating unless the course instructor permits it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Faculty members must state the course AI-use policy in the course description, including whether AI use is allowed for assignments, projects, and activities and how use should be disclosed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

King Saud University's 2025 Student Learning Assessment Policy supports use of generative AI tools in service of the educational process while emphasizing original submitted work, disclosure of AI use, and faculty authority to permit or prohibit generative AI use by assignment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

King's College London

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

At King's College London, inappropriate use of generative AI without attribution is considered academic misconduct and can result in penalties ranging from formal warnings to expulsion.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

King's College London does not require students to reference generative AI as an authoritative source in the reference list, but does require explicit acknowledgement of AI tool use in coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

King's College London permits doctoral students to use generative AI tools in their thesis writing processes for assistive purposes such as clarifying writing, provided use is declared and consistent with guidance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kingston University, London

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure defines unacceptable use of generative AI as presenting AI-generated content as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except when the assessment brief explicitly permits it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Kingston University's AG2 guidance says that if generative AI is used as part of the editorial process, the student must acknowledge that use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure says contributions by artificial intelligence tools must be properly acknowledged.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kyoto University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Kyoto University tells students to follow the generative AI use policy set by the course instructor or research supervisor for coursework, reports, and thesis writing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Kyoto University tells students to record and, when required, disclose how they used generative AI beyond wording revisions, and warns that using AI output in their own work may be judged misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Kyoto University expects instructors to state their generative AI use policy to students and, for courses focused on basic knowledge or skills, to preserve grading fairness through checks such as written or oral examinations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

La Trobe University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

La Trobe University policy says staff, students, contractors, honorary and adjunct staff must not disclose University information into publicly accessible or open-source AI systems.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

La Trobe MyLaTrobe guidance says that when a subject allows AI use in an assessment, students need to submit an AI Acknowledgement, with the LMS indicating whether AI is permitted and what type of use is allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

La Trobe student guidance says AI rules may vary by school, subject, or task, and students should check with lecturers and acknowledge AI-generated content when they use it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Linköping University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For the TDDC93/TDDC88/725G64 courses, the course policy says use of generative AI tools is permitted in 2025, while students remain responsible for submitted content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Linköping University announced a strategic decision to implement an action plan for AI-ready education, including programme review, teacher skills development, AI ambassadors, and examination-design review for unauthorized AI use.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

An official Studieinfo syllabus page states that Linköping University has produced a guide for teachers and students on generative AI in education, and tells students that clarity about where and how generative AI has been used is important.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Maastricht University

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For education, Maastricht University says permitted GenAI uses are clearly defined at activity, course/module, study programme, and faculty levels.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For research output, Maastricht University says substantial GenAI use should be communicated transparently and referenced appropriately by researchers.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For operations, Maastricht University says GenAI tools are never used to process personal or organisation-sensitive data unless transparency and applicable safeguards are in place.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Mahidol University

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Mahidol University states that students must use Generative AI responsibly, avoid uses that may violate academic integrity, and clearly cite information or content derived from Generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Mahidol University's GenAI policy permits researchers to use Generative AI as a research tool, while requiring them to clearly identify the role of Generative AI in the research process and transparently report its use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For Mahidol graduate-level thesis, thematic paper, and independent-study writing, the Faculty of Graduate Studies states that advisors may allow student AI use, but not for generating or drafting main content, analysis, research results, or main conclusions, and both advisor and student must disclose AI usage transparently.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Monash University

3 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

When allowed or required to use AI in an assessment, students must follow all instructions and restrictions on its use, clearly document the type of AI used and how it contributed, and provide written acknowledgment of the use of AI and its extent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Using AI in a way not permitted in an assessment, or failing to acknowledge its use correctly, may breach assessment conditions under the Student Academic Integrity Procedure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Monash's AI responsible use principles include community benefit, education and research excellence, fairness, transparency, integrity and accountability, and data security and privacy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Nanjing University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Nanjing University undergraduate guidance prohibits using generative-AI tools to write key content in papers, assignments, reports, or works.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For listed allowed-use contexts, Nanjing University undergraduate guidance permits generative-AI tool use only after written signed or electronically signed consent from the course instructor or thesis/project supervisor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For undergraduate thesis or project use of AI, Nanjing University guidance requires advance written application and a dedicated AI-use statement page when submitting the work.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Nankai University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Nankai University's undergraduate AI tool norm permits students, with course teacher or supervisor consent and where core assessment or innovation is not affected, to use AI tools for literature search and management, grammar and formatting support with marked generated content, chart production from real data, and code assistance subject to author review and testing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Nankai University's undergraduate AI tool norm says students should clearly explain and mark specific AI-generated content in coursework, graduation theses or designs, and lab reports, and should keep complete AI tool use records such as prompts, outputs, and selected use for checking.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Nankai University's undergraduate AI tool norm states that the university will provide an AIGC detection tool for teaching units to check AI tool use in coursework, graduation theses or designs, and lab reports, with results for teacher and supervisor reference; students who violate the norm may receive lower course or thesis grades, lose defense eligibility, or be handled under academic misconduct rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore)

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月5日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

NTU states that the use of generative AI beyond basic spelling and grammar checks should be acknowledged and cited in research outputs, publications, and presentations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NTU states that not citing or acknowledging the use of generative AI could be considered plagiarism (a form of research misconduct), especially if GenAI was used to generate ideas or for literature reviews.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

NTU requires students to disclose the use of AI tools in their submissions and to always refer to their module's AI use policy for specific expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Central University

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

National Central University stated that, from academic year 112, courses would incorporate ChatGPT, including freshman English, calculus, the AI credit program, cultural technology course groups, and specialized courses across colleges.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

National Central University stated that, to reduce plagiarism and academic-integrity issues from AI tool use, it would continue regulation and education on disclosure, citation, and use of AI tools in thesis or program writing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

National Central University's Computer Center announcement advised that generative AI use should avoid disclosing non-public official information or personal private information and should not completely trust generated information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Sun Yat-sen University

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NSYSU's student generative AI guidance says students may not use generative AI tools for plagiarism or ghostwriting, cheating on exams, or privacy disclosure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NSYSU's student guidance says students using generative AI tools should observe academic ethics and properly cite or explain the motivation, scope, sources, and AI-generated portions when teacher permission allows AI-assisted learning.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NSYSU's student academic integrity guidelines include cheating through unauthorized aids, tools, or electronic devices in coursework, assignments, or examinations when instructor consent has not been given.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Northeastern University

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Northeastern Policy 125 says faculty or staff seeking to use an AI system in University Operations or covered outside professional activities must provide required attribution, check AI outputs for accuracy and appropriateness, and validate anti-bias testing when the system processes personal information or affects legal rights or physical safety.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Northeastern teaching and learning standards say instructors should clearly communicate permitted generative AI uses to students in the syllabus, assignment guidelines, and verbally in class.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Northeastern's student AI guide advises students to check each syllabus, ask professors when an AI policy is unclear, use AI as a study partner rather than a substitute for their own thinking, and avoid using AI when assignment guidelines direct independent work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Northwestern Polytechnical University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Northwestern Polytechnical University reported that its graduate education digital transformation uses AI+ course construction and an AI+ knowledge graph course-learning model.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Northwestern Polytechnical University's Computer School reported a college-level teaching reform seminar on large models and agents, including plans to deepen AI-enabled teaching reform.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

A reviewed official Northwestern Polytechnical University Higher Education Research Center page surfaced ChatGPT and academic-integrity content as research/practice material rather than a central university policy source.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Norwegian University of Science And Technology

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

GPT NTNU is listed for Norwegian University of Science And Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Norwegian University of Science And Technology in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

NTNU provides an official teaching and assessment AI guidance page for instructors, with links to resources on talking with students about AI and exams with AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Oxford Brookes University

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Oxford Brookes student guidance states that students are required to declare which AI tools they used and how they used them in Moodle, then paste the emailed receipt into an appendix at the end of the assignment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Oxford Brookes describes its university-wide position on generative AI in teaching, learning, and assessment as a progressive embrace-and-adapt approach, with module leaders having discretion to advise on AI use in module assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Oxford Brookes guidance for schools, programmes, and modules says GenAI principles can be applied across disciplines and should be discussed at programme, course, and module level, with modules addressing equity and academic rigour and programmes advised to develop GenAI literacy and authentic assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (UC)

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AyudantIA is listed for Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (UC) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UC's academic-integrity guidance says instructors should clearly and transparently determine permitted and prohibited uses of generative AI, and treats unauthorized AI use in a course as an academic-integrity violation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UC guidance asks instructors to register and publish in Canvas the specific course or discipline agreements and limits for using AI systems and applications.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

PUCV's academic-integrity policy states that use of AI tools such as ChatGPT without adequate citation is considered plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

PUCV teaching-development guidance says course syllabi and virtual classrooms should establish correct AI tool use in advance and specify which tools are authorized for the course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

PUCV teaching-development guidance says syllabi and virtual classrooms should establish norms, restrictions, and prohibitions for AI tools during assessment instances.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd university

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

PMU's CCES Journal publication policies permit authors to use AI tools for research assistance, data analysis, language editing, and formatting, while requiring transparent disclosure and keeping authors responsible for the work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

PMU's CCES Journal publication policies state that AI systems or tools may not be listed as authors and that undisclosed or inappropriate AI use may lead to rejection or corrective action.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

PMU's IT policy states that IT resources are primarily for university work and that PMU may monitor IT resource use and disclose necessary information for law, regulation, or government requests.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Rice University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Rice Honor Council's AI policy page says using AI software to generate ideas and passing them off as one's own is plagiarism; it also says course-specific AI policies may supersede the Honor Council's general AI policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Rice University's Responsible AI student guidance says use of AI tools for coursework is allowed only when the instructor explicitly permits it, and students should check the syllabus or ask the professor before using AI on assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Rice Office of the Provost guidance urges faculty to include a syllabus section stating their course stance on AI use and the extent of allowed use; it also notes Honor Council guidance that LLM use must be cited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ruhr-Universität Bochum

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The English Seminar's AI guidelines require written coursework to use the seminar's declaration of authenticity, require GPT-created text passages to be marked, prohibit inserting whole GPT-created paragraphs, and state that unmarked use of GPT-generated text counts as an attempt to cheat.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Geography Institute's AI guidelines say students may use AI-supported tools for topic development and language improvement, but AI-generated subject content, figures, and tables must be marked; otherwise this is treated as an attempt to cheat.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

RUB's ZfW FAQ says generative AI tools can be used at RUB in research, teaching, and study, but that use can be restricted or tied to disclosure requirements in certain contexts such as written examinations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Saarland University

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Saarland University guidance says unauthorized use of generative AI in coursework or examinations, or failure to document it when required, is deception and may invalidate coursework or examinations and, in serious cases, lead to loss of examination entitlement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Saarland University guidance says using generative AI as an aid for coursework and examinations is generally allowed, but instructors or examiners may restrict it to certain functions or prohibit it entirely.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Saarland University guidance says explicit documentation of generative AI use is generally not required beyond the declaration of independent work, but examiners may set transparent written documentation requirements in advance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sabanci University

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Sabancı University's student academic integrity handbook states that submitting text generated by text-generating AI applications such as ChatGPT in place of assignments students are supposed to write themselves violates the six principles of academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Sabancı University's student academic integrity handbook says students can include text generated by applications such as ChatGPT in assignments if the instructor accepts it and the text is cited and referenced using the APA method for AI-generated text.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Sabancı University Information Center guidance says that if students use generative AI, they need to disclose which tool or tools they used and how they used them.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sejong University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Sejong University's 2026 AI usage guideline tells students that if they use AI for learning or assignments, they must transparently disclose the fact of AI use, such as through footnotes, citations, or reference details.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Sejong University's 2026 AI usage guideline tells students not to enter sensitive personal information into AI systems and not to upload undisclosed research data or internal assignment materials because of leakage risk.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Sejong University's 2026 AI usage guideline says faculty and students should agree in advance on the principles and scope of AI use in classes or assessments, with course-specific rules communicated in the syllabus or first class.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

South China University of Technology

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

SCUT Graduate School announced a trial AI general and practice online course for all 2025 graduate students, including part-time graduate students and international students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

SCUT's 2025 AI-enabled undergraduate teaching pilot call identified course agents, knowledge graphs, 24-hour intelligent learning companions, AI teaching assistants, intelligent grading, resource search, classroom assistants, preparation support, teaching management, digital humans, and internationalization as possible construction scenarios.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The SCUT undergraduate AI-enabled teaching pilot notice says the university would support pilot-course teams with AI technical guidance, teacher training and exchange activities, funding, production fees paid by the university, and priority teaching-assistant allocation during pilot delivery.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Southeast University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Southeast University's Graduate School opened 2026 school-level applications for AI-enabled graduate education projects in three categories: AI+ graduate courses, AI-enabled graduate teaching reform research projects, and AI-enabled graduate education application scenarios.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For AI+ graduate course project applications, the Graduate School notice says proposed course content must comply with national laws, policies, correct orientation requirements, confidentiality restrictions, and intellectual property requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An official Southeast University repost reports that Vice President Jin Shi said the university built an AI-MUST curriculum system covering all majors and revised course syllabi to add AI literacy and technical-support objectives.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Southern University of Science and Technology (SUSTech)

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

SUSTech's CS114 Introduction to Generative Artificial Intelligence course specification is course-level curriculum material that says the course covers generative AI history, principles, deployment, interdisciplinary applications, and ethical, security, and privacy discussions; it is not an institutional AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

SUSTech's CS114 course calendar includes lessons on GAI privacy and security, GAI ethics, AI hallucination in large models, GAI-assisted programming, and AI agent engineering; this is course-level curriculum evidence rather than an institutional AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

A 2026 SUSTech Library embedded AI-literacy teaching page reports that a library session for the Intelligent Ocean Exploration course introduced AI hallucination, algorithmic bias, AI academic writing norms, citation-labeling guidance, and AI academic application boundaries; this is course-session evidence rather than institutional policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Syracuse University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For suspected inappropriate generative AI use, Syracuse University's Academic Integrity Policy says an incident report cannot rely only on AI detection results and must explain course- and assignment-specific AI rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Syracuse University's Academic Integrity Policy says permitted AI use may vary by course or assignment, and treats inappropriate AI use as a failure to do one's own work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Syracuse Academic Affairs tells instructors to choose one of three AI syllabus statements and says suspected AI academic-integrity cases will not be investigated unless the syllabus contains one of those statements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tallinn University of Technology (TalTech)

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

TalTech tells lecturers to explain acceptable AI-based software use in assessment, teaching, learning, and homework, and course-level permission or prohibition should be specified in the extended syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

TalTech says substantive AI output must be cited or described as a method, and learners remain responsible for accuracy, quality, analysis results, and references.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

TalTech researcher guidance says AI-created texts and analyses should be clearly indicated and documented, and AI must not replace the researcher's critical thinking or act as a hidden author.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Texas A&M University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Texas A&M guidance says generative AI users must acknowledge nontrivial AI-generated content and avoid plagiarism, while faculty should provide clear course instructions about permissible AI uses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Texas A&M presents AI Use Categories as a starting point for student-instructor conversation, not as a one-size-fits-all policy or replacement for instructor judgment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Texas A&M CTE syllabus guidance recommends a hybrid approach that establishes clear course or assignment expectations for generative AI use, reinforces that AI use in coursework is governed by the Aggie Honor Code, and provides faculty support guidance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The American University in Cairo

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

AUC's AI statement says community members should clearly acknowledge AI tool use, and that claiming AI material as one's own is plagiarism and violates AUC academic integrity policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

AUC's AI statement says a course instructor may authorize students to use AI tools in coursework, and in that case should provide written context and purpose for the allowed use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

AUC faculty AI resources advise faculty to clarify acceptable and unacceptable AI usage in their courses and discuss AI with students early and before major assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE)

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

LSE states that making generative AI tools available does not endorse unrestricted use, and users should check their specific course, programme, or department policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

LSE requires departments or course convenors to classify authorised generative AI use in assessment as no authorised use, limited authorised use, or full authorised use, and to communicate the position to students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For 2025/26, LSE requested departments to add assessment safeguards, including observed assessment methods, to help assure degree integrity and prevent unfair competitive advantage from generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Tokyo

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月9日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UTokyo states it is unacceptable to present AI-generated text as one's own when submitting class assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UTokyo advises faculty to test their own assignments with generative AI tools to understand how well AI can complete them, and use this understanding to inform assessment design.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UTokyo requires instructors to clearly state their AI stance per class/assignment, and when allowing AI use, to explain risks: information leakage, data concentration, copyright concerns, and potential bias.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Western Australia

3 匹配声明s from 10 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月7日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For UWA coursework assessments, AI tools may only be used where the Unit Coordinator explicitly permits them; permitted use must be cited, referenced, and clearly acknowledged.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UWA askUWA guidance tells students to reference all AI-generated content used in assessments and says they may be asked to show the AI tools and prompts used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UWA research-writing guidance states that AI and other machine-learning language models cannot be authors, and authors should transparently disclose when and how they used them.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tilburg University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Tilly is listed for Tilburg University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences exams, tests, and assignments, Tilburg University states that AI use is not permitted unless a lecturer explicitly states otherwise.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Tilburg University's TSHD fraud guidance includes submitting work that is partially generated by AI without permission among examples of fraud-related conduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech)

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月13日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

In education, Science Tokyo's guideline says the university does not totally restrict learners' use of generative AI; the permitted degree of use, including whether it is banned, is left to course objectives, course content, and instructor teaching and assessment policies, and students should follow instructor instructions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For courses, Science Tokyo's guideline asks instructors to teach students about generative AI limitations, consider assessment methods, and promptly reflect a course AI-use policy in the syllabus when the policy can be clearly stated.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For research papers, Science Tokyo's guideline says journal views on generative AI use differ and individual handling is needed, including cases where the fact of use should be disclosed; it also says researchers are responsible for text and content they use in their papers.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Trinity College Dublin, The University of Dublin

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Trinity Library guidance says GenAI use as a functional tool in academic work must be acknowledged in an Appendix or Methods section, with minimum details including the system name and version, publisher, URL and context of use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Trinity's research guidance says researchers remain responsible for scientific output, should cite GenAI usage in outputs, and should attend to privacy, confidentiality and intellectual-property issues when sharing sensitive information with AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Trinity College Dublin says specific uses of GenAI in an assessment must be disclosed, properly acknowledged, and referenced; students should explain what, when, and how they used GenAI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tsinghua University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Tsinghua University prohibits students from directly copying or mechanically paraphrasing AI-generated text, code, or other output and submitting it as academic coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Tsinghua University requires teachers and students to disclose their use of AI and AI-generated content in accordance with regulations, as part of the 'compliance and integrity' principle.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Tsinghua University advises instructors to determine how AI should be used according to course objectives, clearly explain AI usage norms to students at the start of each course, and remain responsible for AI-generated teaching materials.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M)

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Gemini is listed for Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

NotebookLM is listed for Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Antioquia

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Universidad de Antioquia Political Science undergraduate program guidance states that AI tools must not be used to present automatically generated content as one's own, and that conventional citation systems should be used when referring to that content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Universidad de Antioquia Political Science undergraduate program guidance says AI use in academic products should be explicitly declared, with the declaration placed in the introduction, methodology section, or footnotes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The Universidad de Antioquia Political Science undergraduate program guidance says students and teachers may use AI tools to support academic activities, but those tools should not be used to automatically generate the main writing of assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Chile

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The Faculty of Medicine guide proposes five principles for AI initiatives in that faculty: transparency and traceability, human supervision and non-delegation of critical judgment, equity and technological justice, academic integrity and responsible authorship, and participatory governance with continuous updating.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For health research publications, the Faculty of Medicine guide suggests declaring the type, timing and purpose of AI use, never attributing authorship to an AI tool, and validating AI-assisted production through human authors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The FCFM guidance recommends that course teaching teams build a transparency policy with students around possible generative AI uses, including defining when and how the AI tool used should be cited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de la República (Udelar)

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The Faculty of Engineering guide says AI tool use should be transparent and recognized, including explaining permitted uses and how to declare tool use in submitted work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Faculty of Engineering guide says significant AI-contributed content should be declared, and presenting AI-generated content as one's own may be treated as a violation under the faculty's current regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Faculty of Engineering guide provides non-prescriptive categories for reduced, moderate, and extensive AI use in curricular units and assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de los Andes

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Universidad de los Andes in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The Uniandes guidance recommends informed, responsible, critical, transparent use of generative AI and says users should not present AI-generated material as their own.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For professors, Uniandes says each professor is responsible for communicating in the syllabus and activity instructions how students may use generative AI in the course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Sevilla

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The Universidad de Sevilla Decálogo says AI users should be transparent about where and how they use AI, including details on the tool, prompt, and data provided.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The BUS ethical-use guide tells students to follow teaching-staff recommendations and evaluation limits for AI use, cite and declare AI use, avoid plagiarism, and verify AI-provided sources and biases.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The BUS AI-use declaration guide suggests adding an appendix after the bibliography that identifies the AI tool, purpose, prompts, integration, verification, and ethical limits.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad San Francisco de Quito USFQ

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For manuscripts submitted to the USFQ-hosted Iuris Dictio journal, generative AI use is permitted only as limited formal writing support and has to be explicitly declared.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

USFQ’s “Inteligencia Artificial Generativa para Ciencias Sociales, Economía y Derecho” continuing-education program requires access to AI platform accounts, including premium OpenAI ChatGPT and Claude.ai subscriptions during the program.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

USFQ’s March 2026 generative-AI content course includes a learning outcome on evaluating AI ethics challenges and applying good practices and ethical guidelines for responsible and transparent AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidade de Brasília

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The UnB-hosted Revista de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre as Americas allows generative AI for brainstorming and language improvement, but requires authors to clearly disclose any generative AI use with tool, version, use, and reason information in submission editor notes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The UnB-hosted journal Sociedade e Estado says it does not currently use AI resources in publication evaluation and editing, and tells authors that any material or content generated by an AI application should be reported in the abstract and methods section or equivalent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The UnB-hosted Anuario Antropologico author instructions state that the use and type of generative AI should be made explicit in submitted materials for evaluation when applicable, and recommend mentioning any AI-tool use in manuscript preparation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp)

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Unicamp's generative AI deliberation says AI use in academic works, reports, articles, administrative documents, or any other intellectual production must be explicitly declared, and it assigns the user sole and full responsibility for AI-produced content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Unicamp's generative AI deliberation allows students to use generative AI as support for information seeking, study, and learning, but says assessment activities must observe the limits and conditions defined by the course instructor when assessments exist.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The Unicamp Scientific Electronic Journals Portal AI-use policy says generative AI use in journal submission, assessment, and editing processes must be declared explicitly at manuscript submission and in the manuscript.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Università degli Studi di Perugia

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UniPG says every substantial use of GenAI must be declared and verifiable; for students, when AI use is allowed and substantial, it must be explicitly declared.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UniPG says students may use AI for a first draft or text reformulation if declared, but may not present an entirely AI-produced work as their own without personal contribution and adequate indication.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UniPG says teaching staff who use AI tools should make the mode and intensity of use explicit in the syllabus and communicate GenAI-use limits to students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitas Indonesia

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Trinka Institutional Plan is listed for Universitas Indonesia in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For scientific writing, UI academic community members using Generative AI must acknowledge its use, verify each writing stage including references, paraphrase, run similarity checks to prevent plagiarism, and maintain confidentiality.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The Fasilkom UI ethics committee legal-basis page summarizes GenAI-based research expectations as including open disclosure of GenAI and new technologies in research methodology and providing access for KEP or a supervisory body to review the use process.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Innsbruck

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For teaching and examinations, Universität Innsbruck's FAQ says course leaders may decide which AI tools are permitted unless a faculty has its own rules, should communicate rules clearly, and should explicitly identify permitted aids including AI tools for examinations; unnamed aids are prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For research and scientific work, Universität Innsbruck's FAQ says good scientific practice applies to AI-tool use, AI use must be made transparent with tool name, scope, and purpose, and AI should not be cited as an author.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Universität Innsbruck Faculty of Psychology and Sport Science guidelines say AI programs may be used in study work only as a supplement and support to learning, abusive AI use is a violation of good scientific practice, and generative AI use in written work must be described and cited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Mannheim

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Universität Mannheim assigns users responsibility for the correctness, legal permissibility, and dissemination of AI-generated content, says AI outputs should be checked and critically assessed before further use, and requires transparent disclosure where a notice obligation applies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Mannheim AI FAQ says AI systems may be used in teaching when the system is university-approved, or the use is voluntary with no disadvantage for non-use, or the use is in elective courses with sufficient non-AI alternatives; it expressly forbids contexts where students are disadvantaged for non-use without an equivalent alternative.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universität Mannheim's Zentrum für Lehren und Lernen provides AI-in-teaching orientation, self-learning courses, workshops for teachers, students, and staff, and consultation for instructors, faculties, degree-program management, and departments developing AI strategies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya · BarcelonaTech (UPC)

3 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UPC library guidance tells students not to present AI-generated third-party content as their own, to ask instructors about each course’s AI rules, and to use AI as an assistant rather than as the author of academic work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ESEIAAT allows generative AI use in final-study work writing only under stated conditions and requires a declaration section describing the tools, purpose, affected sections, student review, and responsibility statement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ESEIAAT states that transparency about generative AI use is mandatory, but declaration alone does not make the use appropriate; assessment considers real authorship, critical thinking, and academic-level coherence.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Lorraine

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Universite de Lorraine's 2025 exam charter states that use of tools, including generative artificial intelligence, is fraud when it is not explicitly authorized.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For the Master Urbanisme et Amenagement, parcours Intelligence Territoriale, the SHS Metz AI-use charter requires students to clearly indicate any AI use in submitted work and provide an AI-use declaration in an appendix.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universite de Lorraine DACIP teaching guidance recommends favoring sovereign and secure generative AI, training on ethical issues, and transparency with students in pedagogical and assessment processes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Montréal

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UdeM's teaching-integrity guidance says course plans should explicitly state when generative AI tools are permitted; without explicit authorization, the tools are deemed prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For UdeM graduate directed work, master's theses, doctoral essays, and dissertations, the graduate-studies guidance says generative AI use in research and writing must be transparent, and non-transparent use could be considered a disciplinary offence.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For administrative staff, UdeM Directive 10.70 says generative AI use should be disclosed, and use in a decision-making process should be disclosed to affected persons with consent obtained before use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Laval

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Université Laval guidance says AI-use expectations should be stated in the course plan and clarified in assessment instructions when AI use is authorized.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Université Laval guidance says using AI tools is not automatically an academic offence, but unauthorized use may constitute an academic offence under the student disciplinary regulation.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For Université Laval master's and doctoral theses, FESP says students making an initial deposit from winter 2026 must produce a declaration about their use of generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Paul Sabatier Toulouse III

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For student academic work, the charter directs students to systematically declare generative AI tool use, identify the tool and its contribution, and follow course-specific directives.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The official university site has a page on generative AI use that points readers to a good-use charter and a Moodle course on generative AI uses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For teaching and assessment, the charter encourages teachers to integrate generative AI thoughtfully, adapt assessments, and clarify whether AI use is allowed, prohibited, or partly allowed for particular tasks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Malaya (UM)

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universiti Malaya's AI policy applies to academic staff and students across teaching and learning activities, including coursework, research projects, dissertations, final-year projects, theses, and online or blended learning activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universiti Malaya guidance says lecturers specify the permitted level of AI use for each assignment or assessment, using levels from no AI use through integrated AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Universiti Malaya guidance requires students to declare AI tools used in assignments or assessments and says failure to disclose AI use may be considered academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (UMT)

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UMT announced that, beginning October 2025, its Basic AI Course would become a core university course for all students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UMT's public training platform listed an academic AI-in-education course that guides lecturers on ethics and integrity considerations when addressing negative impacts of AI in education.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UMT's public training platform listed a ChatGPT student assessment course with learning outcomes covering question design, assessment creation, and using ChatGPT to generate questions and assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For postgraduate theses, UPM's generative AI guideline requires students to clearly explain and appropriately attribute where and why generative AI was used, and to identify areas influenced by AI-generated content versus the student's direct contribution.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For UPM postgraduate viva sessions, the guideline says the chairperson must ensure that the student declares AI use in the research, specifies the areas assisted, and affirms that the originality and novelty of the research are the student's own work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UPM's postgraduate thesis AI declaration form has students declare that AI technology used in thesis writing served as an assistive writing tool rather than a substitute for original thinking, analysis, or research, and that generated content was reviewed and modified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Teknologi Brunei

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Where a coursework item has no specified GenAI policy, UTB's guidance treats GenAI content generation as third-party assistance and says the assistance must be explained, declared, and referenced to avoid plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For UTB module assessments, the GenAI guidance says the lecturer will specify the permitted level of GenAI usage for each coursework item.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The UTB coursework declaration in the Student Report Manual asks students to indicate whether they used GenAI and, for generated content, to include prompts and outputs as an appendix and cite the GenAI tool used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UTM requires GAI use in assignments and works to be listed with developer information, tool name, version, access date, and URL when available; undisclosed use can be treated as plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UTM requires academic staff to clearly state GAI use in course assessments, and prioritizes continuous assessments that demonstrate deep mastery.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UTM says GAI services beyond proofreading tools must be explicitly stated, and GAI tools cannot be listed as co-authors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University at Buffalo SUNY

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UB's Office of Academic Integrity states that UB has no universal policy about student use of artificial intelligence and that instructors have academic freedom to decide which tools students may use for course learning objectives.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Because UB has no universal AI policy for student use, the Office of Academic Integrity says instructors need to tell students what AI use is and is not allowed in the course or on each assessment, including in the syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UB CATT encourages faculty to add generative-AI statements to syllabi, avoid vague language, state specific parameters or limits, and distinguish permitted non-generative tools from generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Aberdeen

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Course Coordinators must provide students clear guidance on what GenAI tool use is permitted for work submitted for assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Student guidance says learning materials and assessment information must not be entered into GenAI tools without explicit permission from the author, and students should never enter personal and sensitive data into GenAI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

When GenAI use is permitted for assessment, University guidance says students must acknowledge which tools they used, when they used them, and how they used generated content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Anbar

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Anbar Journal of Languages and Literature requires authors to explicitly disclose AI-tool use in the Acknowledgment or Methodology section, including the tool, version, and purpose.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences prohibits AI use for generating scientific content without human verification, fabricating or manipulating data, obscuring authorship responsibility, or listing AI tools as co-authors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Anbar Journal of Agricultural Sciences requires manuscript AI-use disclosure at submission and bars reviewers from using AI tools to generate review reports while stating that editors must not rely on AI for editorial decisions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bern

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Scite.ai Premium Plan is listed for University of Bern in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Bern Institute of Art History AI teaching guidelines say student work and exams at the institute must remain students' own work and may not be replaced by AI-tool work; AI tools may support independent work, use must be marked with the tool, prompt, scope, and purpose, and incorrect logging, citation, and referencing of AI-tool use in written work is regarded as plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The University Library Bern GenAI step-by-step guide frames responsible GenAI use as a 14-question decision process that includes checking whether GenAI use is allowed for the task, whether confidential data are protected, whether use is documented for transparent disclosure, whether UniBE procurement and data-protection guidance has been read, and whether the user remains responsible for research output.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Brighton

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Brighton PGR admissions guidance requires applicants who use AI to acknowledge how GenAI was used, and says applications may be withdrawn or studies terminated where false information or substantial GenAI fabrication is found.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Brighton guidance says the university has an institutional license for Microsoft Copilot chatbot, while noting that outputs still need to be verified and fact checked.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Brighton student guidance tells students to check whether GenAI is allowed before using it for an assignment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of British Columbia

3 匹配声明s from 13 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Students may only use GenAI for assessed work (assignments, exams, projects, theses) if expressly permitted by their instructor, supervisor, or program.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Graduate students must obtain approval from their supervisor/committee for substantive GenAI use in research and thesis work, and must include a GenAI use statement in their thesis preface.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UBC says educators should tell students when and how to acknowledge GenAI use if GenAI tools are allowed in assessed work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, San Diego (UCSD)

3 匹配声明s from 11 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UC San Diego's Academic Integrity Policy says students may not let academic work or academic credit be completed for them by another human or by machine/artificial intelligence, and may not use unauthorized aids including artificial intelligence in coursework or assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UC San Diego Academic Integrity Office guidance says students authorized to use a GenAI tool should use it only in the way authorized for that assignment, should not assume authorization extends to other assignments or courses, and are advised to save history and acknowledge use to the professor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UC San Diego Library's GenAI academic-integrity guide says students might be cheating if they use a tool that has been prohibited or one that is not explicitly allowed by the course instructor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Cambridge

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

A student using any unacknowledged content generated by artificial intelligence within a summative assessment as though it is their own work constitutes academic misconduct, unless explicitly stated otherwise in the assessment brief.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

All GenAI outputs must be thoroughly evaluated by a human being before they are used. Use of GenAI must be acknowledged if it makes a significant and unrevised contribution to a substantive or impactful piece of work. Staff are responsible for ensuring any use of GenAI is conducted reasonably, lawfully and in conjunction with relevant University policies.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

When using GenAI tools, users should: remain aware of privacy and data implications and not share anything personal or sensitive; understand ethical implications as tools often have limited attribution; acknowledge use of GenAI if it makes a significant contribution to substantive work; and take responsibility for ensuring use is conducted reasonably, lawfully, and in conjunction with relevant University policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Chicago

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

At the University of Chicago, AI-generated content may be misleading or inaccurate, and it is the responsibility of the tool user to review the accuracy and ownership of any AI-generated content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

At the University of Chicago, AI transcription or assistant tools may not be used to secretly record or join meetings, per the Business Conduct Policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

At the University of Chicago, entering sensitive data into AI tools without review and approval by security, privacy, and the appropriate data steward may create an unauthorized data disclosure that may violate University policy, federal and state law, sponsor or contract obligations, and data use agreements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Copenhagen

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Enterprise is listed for University of Copenhagen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

University of Copenhagen PhD guidance says AI-assisted technologies used in a thesis must be clearly disclosed and described, cannot be listed as an author, and leave the PhD student responsible for accuracy, integrity, and originality.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

University of Copenhagen authorship guidelines say AI-assisted technologies used in scholarly work must be clearly stated and declared; chatbots cannot be listed as co-authors, and researchers using AI-assisted technologies must be able to account for the results.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Cyprus (UCY)

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Cyprus maintains official AI Guidelines for course instructors, students, and researchers, and the UCY Guidelines page states that guidelines were adopted by Senate decision 14/2025/SENATE on 11 June 2025.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UCY instructor guidance says instructors should provide clear, specific guidelines for permitted AI-tool use in course syllabi and graded assignment or exam instructions, and explicitly state when AI use is not permitted in graded coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UCY citation guidance says substantial AI-assisted work must be acknowledged or cited properly when permitted, while minimal-risk uses may not need explicit declaration unless a specific context requires it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Denver

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Denver University Writing Program says students should review and abide by instructor policies for assignments before using generative AI technology.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For writing assignments, the University of Denver University Writing Program advises faculty to outline clear policies about when and how generative AI can or cannot be used and to include instructions for acknowledging assistance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Denver Office of Teaching and Learning advises faculty to state clear expectations for student work and to consider syllabus statements explaining whether and how AI tools can be used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Deusto

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Deusto's AI principles state that faculty, students, researchers, and management staff must communicate their use of AI, understand and assume AI-use risks, and respect privacy, confidentiality, and data-protection criteria when using AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For each Deusto course, students are directed to review the course programme and learning guide for AI-use rules; those rules must be followed, including where AI use is prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

A Deusto Library citation guide states that, at the university, there is currently no generic prohibition or generic permission for using generative AI, and points users who use generative AI in research or academic work to citation information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Dundee

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Dundee guidance states that submitting work that is not one's own, including unauthorised use of GAI, is considered academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Where lecturers permit GAI sources in assessment work, University of Dundee student guidance says students must transparently acknowledge, describe, and reference how they used GAI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

University of Dundee student guidance says the University does not impose a blanket restriction on generative AI and instead promotes discerning, transparent, and ethical use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Eastern Finland

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Eastern Finland says students may use AI to support learning and study attainments unless a teacher forbids it, but use of a generative AI application or similar in preparing study attainments must always be mentioned.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Eastern Finland says use of AI against a teacher's instructions, or failing to report AI use, is treated as fraudulent conduct and investigated through the university's fraud process.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Eastern Finland says a thesis must not be completed entirely with an AI application, must include enough independent work to meet thesis learning outcomes, and AI use in a thesis must be reported in writing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Exeter

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Exeter in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Exeter's GenAI referencing guidance requires recording both direct and indirect uses of GenAI outputs, including prompts and hyperlinks used for the assignment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Exeter's central AI guidance says staff, students, and researchers should use the University AI policy when using, developing, or procuring AI tools for University purposes, and the AI Catalogue lists approved tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Greenwich

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Greenwich 2025 Assessment and Feedback Policy says staff will provide students with the university guide on referencing generative AI, a video on using AI effectively, and the Declaration of AI use via the VLE to support understanding of acceptable AI usage in assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Greenwich student AI guidance encourages students to use AI to aid learning, while telling students to acknowledge AI use in assignments by adding a declaration and not to copy and paste directly from an AI tool for submitted English-language work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For students who opt to use Studiosity, University of Greenwich says it processes personal data including name, email, course, student ID, and content of interactions with Studiosity tutors, and that Studiosity is an independent data controller based in Australia.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Groningen

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Vibe (Le Chat) is listed for University of Groningen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Groningen's teaching AI policy says AI tools may be used as aids, GenAI use beyond that must be mentioned, and faculties or courses may add extra rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UG says there are no specific AI guidelines for research, but the general AI guidelines still apply.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Hradec Kralove

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For UHK study obligations, students may use AI tools only to the extent consistent with the obligation's objective and faculty or instructor rules; use must be transparent and the student remains responsible for content, correctness, citations, and originality.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UHK treats undisclosed AI use, AI use beyond what a student declared, or AI use contrary to the conditions for a work, project, or other study obligation as unethical conduct and potentially a disciplinary offense.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For theses, projects, and other written study obligations at UHK, AI use must be disclosed as directed; where no method is set, students should state at least the purpose and scope of use, and for theses/projects also how AI output correctness was verified when relevant.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Iceland

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Iceland states that students and staff are responsible for material submitted in their own name, that AI use should be disclosed according to instructions, and that student breaches of teacher instructions on AI use may lead to sanctions under the cited public-university law provision.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Iceland student guidance says AI can support study tasks such as organizing work, shaping ideas, practicing understanding, and preparing assignments, but that AI use should support learning rather than replace it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Iceland teacher guidance frames AI use in teaching as requiring teachers to decide when AI tools fit, what boundaries apply, and how AI use should be discussed with students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Illinois Enterprise GenAI transparency guidance says students need to be transparent about AI use in coursework and cite AI tools according to faculty expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Illinois CITL teaching guidance says faculty should define boundaries for AI use in student work and teach citation of AI-generated text and ideas.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The Illinois Graduate College frames graduate AI-use discussions as involving disciplinary considerations, ethical use, and best practices for citing AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Johannesburg

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UJ's practice note states that presenting the work of a generative AI tool, in whole or in part, as one's own is academic dishonesty, and says AI use should be acknowledged where used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UJ's student guide says generative AI use depends on course, department, faculty rules and UJ policy, and students should familiarise themselves with those requirements before producing assignments and assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UJ's staff guide frames appropriate generative AI use as including clear communication of institutional, departmental, and course regulations on generative AI, including referencing generated content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Kansas

3 匹配声明s from 10 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

KU guidance tells students that instructors should communicate course-specific GenAI policies and that students are responsible for understanding and following those expectations.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

KU researcher guidance says researchers should comply with sponsor, publisher, institutional, and disciplinary rules when using GenAI and should consider confidentiality, privacy, intellectual property, and disclosure requirements.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

KU instructor guidance suggests communicating GenAI expectations to students and says use of GenAI plagiarism detection tools is not recommended because their accuracy is not guaranteed.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Lausanne

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat Protégé is listed for University of Lausanne in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UNIL's research FAQ says authors should disclose generative-AI use in a statement near the end of a manuscript and should not list AI systems as authors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UNIL's education FAQ says students may use generative AI for academic work only within the limits prescribed by their teacher for AI use or citation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Leeds

3 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Leeds GenAI acknowledgement guidance says students must acknowledge GenAI use in an Acknowledgements or Declarations section when it functionally assisted their academic work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Leeds staff guidance says all material wholly or substantially generated using an AI tool should be declared clearly in the document in which it occurs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Leeds Library guidance says unpermitted GenAI use or failure to correctly acknowledge allowed GenAI use in assessment will be classed as academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Macau

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UM guidance says students should acknowledge GenAI use in assignment submissions and indicate how GenAI was used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UM guidance says academic staff should include a course policy on GenAI use in syllabi, specifying whether GenAI is permitted, permitted only in certain circumstances or with explicit permission, or prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UM CTLE student FAQ guidance says students must declare use of editing aids, including generative AI tools that revise text, to their instructor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Massachusetts Amherst

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UMass GenAI Platform is listed for University of Massachusetts Amherst in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for University of Massachusetts Amherst in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UMass Amherst Provost guidance advises faculty to communicate their AI tool policy to students and, when AI tools are permitted, tell students how use should be documented or disclosed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Miami

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Miami AI at The U guidance says patient, student, regulated, internal, and confidential data are not permitted in public AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Miami PETAL guidance states that AI-use rules and practices may vary by class and discipline, and that students are responsible for staying informed about instructor expectations and asking when in doubt.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Miami Writing Center says its AI support aligns with each professor's class and assignment expectations, and its consultants will not recommend AI tools that violate instructor expectations or academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Milan

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Milan in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

In educational settings, the University of Milan advises that students must explicitly declare AI use in assessed work and that teachers must explicitly declare AI use in educational activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For research, the University of Milan advises research staff to use AI while respecting responsibility, transparency, and respect, and says researchers remain fully responsible for results produced with AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Minnesota (System)

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Provost's GenAI syllabus guidance says instructors may allow or prohibit GenAI in courses, and that coursework use requires written instructor permission and may not occur except as explicitly authorized by the instructor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UMN Libraries' student guidance says students should check each course syllabus, ask instructors when unsure, keep track of GenAI use, and cite or acknowledge AI-generated material when permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

IT@UMN's GenAI FAQ says faculty are encouraged to address GenAI guidelines early in the semester and that one instructor's permission is specific to that instructor's course and assignment expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Nebraska - Lincoln

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UNL's Center for Transformative Teaching recommends that instructors create course-specific AI policies and clearly communicate when and how AI use is allowed, if at all.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNL guidance states that using AI or other technology output as one's own work is an academic-integrity infringement unless the instructor gives explicit permission.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UNL Libraries provides citation guidance for ChatGPT and other AI tools, including APA, MLA, and Chicago examples.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Nevada - Reno

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNR's Academic Standards policy defines cheating to include unauthorized use of generative AI content generators or generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UNR teaching guidance recommends that instructors include an AI statement in the syllabus and discuss with students what AI use is and is not allowed for classes and course assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNR Library's APA guide says AI-generated works must be cited when used as a quoted, paraphrased, or otherwise incorporated source, while process uses such as brainstorming or proofreading should be acknowledged rather than cited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of New England Australia

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月24日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UNE's HDR generative AI guidance says higher degree research candidates are required to consider ethical, critical, and creative uses of generative AI and to ensure proper citation of content generated by AI tools and sources they use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNE's HDR generative AI guidance warns that failure to reference generative AI content may be considered academic or research misconduct, and lists risks including unacknowledged AI output, inaccurate AI-generated references, substantive AI-generated thesis or publication content, peer review or ethics-clearance use, and disclosure of sensitive or confidential material to generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNE's Student Academic Integrity Policy includes artificial intelligence tools in its example of work substantially written by someone else, within the policy's breach framework for undergraduate and postgraduate award and non-award coursework students; the policy states it does not apply to higher degree by research courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of New Hampshire

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNH's Academic Integrity policy treats unauthorized use or attempted use of AI tools as cheating, and treats computer-generated text or work submitted as one's own without proper citation or attribution as plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UNH Provost syllabus guidance says generative-AI detection tools should not be used to make definitive academic-integrity judgments, and says uploading documents containing student names, emails, or ID numbers violates FERPA; faculty using AI-enabled tools to evaluate student work must disclose that use and keep student data protections in mind.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UNH Provost syllabus guidance recommends that instructors explicitly tell students whether automated writing tools and AI tools are allowed in a course, and if allowed, specify how and when they may be used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UNC-Chapel Hill's research guidance treats entering private or confidential information, research data, grant proposals, or analytical results into public generative AI tools as a public disclosure of that information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UNC-Chapel Hill says faculty should clearly explain when and how AI tools are used in assessment evaluation, including what comes from AI and what comes from instructor judgment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UNC-Chapel Hill faculty guidance encourages instructors to state course and assignment AI expectations in the syllabus and tells Carolina students to follow the specific AI guidelines in that syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

UNC Charlotte's Center for Teaching and Learning says its AI syllabus guide provides flexible course-level examples and does not provide or use a university-created AI policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UNC Charlotte Student Accountability & Conflict Resolution recommends that faculty clearly communicate what AI use is permitted in courses, academic exercises, or assessments, and identifies written notice about how and when AI tools may be used as a best practice.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNC Charlotte Student Accountability & Conflict Resolution provides assignment and exam sample language stating that, where AI use is permitted, transparency is required and failure to disclose AI use may be considered a Code of Student Academic Integrity violation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Oklahoma

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

OU teaching guidance says the university does not mandate a single classroom approach to AI; faculty are encouraged to make intentional, discipline-appropriate choices and communicate them clearly to students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Oklahoma maintains a public AI policy hub that points users to AI guidance for students, staff, governance, teaching, and research, while describing OU AI policies as intended to support responsible, ethical, and transparent AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

OU Libraries academic integrity guidance says AI tool use should be disclosed and cited according to the relevant discipline style guide, and it recommends documenting AI-assisted work and verifying AI-generated content before use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Rhode Island

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

As of July 2025, a Provost syllabus memo stated that URI did not have a university-wide policy governing generative AI use in coursework, while offering optional AI syllabus statements for faculty.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

URI Libraries guidance says generative AI use should be acknowledged or cited, students should check professor expectations before using AI in coursework, and directly used AI output needs a formal citation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

URI AI guidance asks educators to incorporate URI guidance into course design, communicate acceptable AI use to students, disclose AI use in course materials, and the Provost memo frames new AI syllabus statements as optional faculty resources.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Salento

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月26日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The Salento University Publishing submissions page for Interdisciplinary Political Studies limits generative-AI use by manuscript authors to readability and language, requires disclosure of AI-assisted tools, and says generative AI must not have been used substantially in the research process.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Salento ethics code reviewed for this crawl provides academic-integrity context on intellectual property and plagiarism, but it is not an AI-specific policy source.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A University of Salento course catalogue page for Digital Accounting e Auditing lists ChatGPT and Power BI as applications of artificial intelligence supporting teaching for that course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Sharjah

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Sharjah requires disclosure of AI use for coursework, thesis proposals, and final thesis submissions through a Declaration of Artificial Intelligence Use form.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

University of Sharjah's AI academic-texts policy applies to master’s and doctoral theses, thesis proposals and research plans, thesis-derived scientific publications, graduate-level courses and programs, and academic texts submitted to Graduate Studies bodies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For the covered graduate context, University of Sharjah strictly forbids AI-based tools in exams and quizzes and treats extensive use of ChatGPT or other generative AI tools to complete assignments as academically dishonest.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Rector Measure R 567 says proven use of AI tools contrary to the measure is treated like plagiarism, as unethical conduct with possible disciplinary consequences, and proven unauthorized or undeclared AI use after a successful defense can lead to proceedings on invalidity of the state examination or defense.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For student work covered by Rector Measure R 567, authors must always declare and specify use of generative AI tools, while other AI tools such as translation, language editing, or publication-analysis tools do not need declaration unless the assignment explicitly and transparently says so.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Under Rector Measure R 567, a thesis supervisor or adviser may prohibit or discourage the use of specified AI tools in a student work, but that prohibition or recommendation must be stated transparently and explicitly in the assignment with a clear justification.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of South Carolina

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of South Carolina Student Conduct and Academic Integrity guidance says existing academic integrity policies apply regardless of the tools used, and AI use that violates course rules or misrepresents authorship can be investigated and adjudicated under the current Code.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of South Carolina Center for Teaching Excellence guidance says faculty must convey in course syllabi what AI use is allowed or prohibited and any student responsibilities for documenting AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of South Carolina Student Conduct and Academic Integrity guidance tells students to ask their course instructor before using AI bots such as ChatGPT for homework, because the professor may restrict the use of artificial intelligence services.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Southern Denmark (SDU)

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For the SDU Artificial Intelligence bachelor's programme page, SDU states that students must disclose or clearly mark direct or edited material from generative AI in an assignment, and missing disclosure or marking will be treated as plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For the SDU Artificial Intelligence bachelor's programme page, SDU states that students may use generative AI when preparing written home assignments, including written home assignments with oral defence, bachelor's projects, final projects and theses, provided the use is clearly stated.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For the SDU Artificial Intelligence bachelor's programme page, SDU states that students may not use generative AI for written in-person exams, other supervised exams, or oral exams, unless exceptions appear in the course description.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Sussex

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Sussex in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Sussex student misconduct guidance includes unauthorized or inappropriate use of digital technologies including AI, and gives examples including AI use where prohibited and submitting permitted AI-generated work without required acknowledgement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Sussex staff guidance suggests telling students that AI detection tools are fallible and cannot be relied upon.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Tartu

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tartu guidance treats submitting work created partly or entirely with AI under one's own name, without mentioning and describing AI use, as inconsistent with academic integrity and as academic misconduct under the Study Regulations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tartu guidance states that lecturers have the right to decide how artificial intelligence is used in their course and, if necessary, to limit or prohibit its use, with instructions given in the course version information or assignment guidance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Tartu guidance encourages the use of artificial intelligence, including text robots, in teaching, and frames that use around purposeful, ethical, critical, and transparent practice.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of the Basque Country

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

EHU says generative AI use is not prohibited, but it must be transparent, ethical, responsible, and consistent with institutional academic-integrity principles.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

EHU guidance says generative AI use must be explicitly declared in generated works and especially in final-degree projects, master's theses, and doctoral theses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

EHU guidance lists prohibited generative AI uses including presenting AI-generated content as one's own, using AI-generated content in work without declaring it, entering student or research-subject personal data, and uploading confidential or sensitive personal or institutional information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Tromsø The Arctic University of Norway

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UiT tells students that, when AI use is permitted for exams or assessments, they must describe how they used the tool and cite AI-edited content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UiT says the course coordinator defines the extent to which AI tools may be used in teaching, assignments, and exams, and exam instructions must specify permitted aids including any allowed AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UiT describes four AI levels for exams and assessments, ranging from human-only work to advanced AI collaboration, with corresponding documentation expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Tsukuba

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tsukuba instructs generative AI users not to include confidential work information or nonpublic research plans and results in prompts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For assignments and examinations, University of Tsukuba's student guidelines tell students to follow faculty instructions on generative AI use and distinguish their own ideas from AI-generated ideas in report assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tsukuba's student guidelines say each educational organization or instructor should establish classroom policies for generative AI, and use should be based on those policies when permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Twente

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UT's education PDF requires students to disclose AI use in an appendix when AI is used for an assignment, and states that unconsented and unacknowledged AI use should be considered academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UT's education PDF tells teachers that each assignment or group of assignments should make clear whether students may use AI and whether restrictions apply.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For student assignments and theses, UT's AI dossier says AI tool use depends on the course and on policies set by the programme or lecturer.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Waterloo

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Waterloo's Academic Integrity page says instructors should state whether AI tools such as ChatGPT are allowed for assignments, tests, or exams, and that students who do not follow those instructor rules are subject to Policy 71 academic-misconduct processes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Waterloo's graduate-student GenAI guidance says graduate students should not submit GenAI-produced work for course assignments without explicit course-instructor permission or instruction.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Waterloo's AVPA course-outline suggestions include sample language for instructors who permit GenAI use, specifying that such use may be allowed for assignments with proper documentation, citation, and acknowledgement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Westminster

3 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Westminster student guidance says students must disclose any use of GenAI for assessed coursework and remain responsible for the originality, accuracy, and integrity of their work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Westminster's student GenAI rules identify using AI to write essays, reports, or code on a student's behalf, using AI to carry out analysis or arguments, and submitting AI-generated content without declaring it as not permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Westminster doctoral researcher guidance says doctoral assessments and research outputs must be the researcher's own original work, and that using GenAI to generate doctoral research content without agreement and disclosure is academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Wollongong

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UOW's Academic Integrity Policy lists misuse of generative artificial intelligence technology as academic misconduct when work is generated by an unauthorised AI tool without subject coordinator permission, or when permitted AI-generated work lacks appropriate acknowledgement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UOW tells students to check the Subject Outline or subject Moodle site before using GenAI in an assessment task, because those sources specify the permitted extent of GenAI use and acknowledgement instructions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Wollongong tells students to acknowledge generative AI use where appropriate.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Zurich

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UZH guiding principles say members are transparent about AI-tool use, users bear sole responsibility for AI-assisted content and products, and AI tools must be used in accordance with statutory provisions including data protection and copyright law.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UZH recommendations say a declaration of authenticity can address generative-AI tools, that the person completing it should confirm only permitted aids or tools were used, and that any generative-AI use must always be indicated.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For the University of Zurich Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, teaching staff determine for each module the extent to which AI is permitted for assessments; use of tools or generative AI without explicit consent and disclosure is punished as academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Uppsala University

3 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

When students are expected to use generative AI in teaching or assessment, Uppsala University's central guidelines say the course coordinator or examiner must be able to ensure the tools are provided at no cost to the student; if doctoral students are expected to use generative AI, the principal supervisor has responsibility for ensuring suitable tools are available at no cost.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For courses offered by Uppsala University's Faculty of Law from the spring term of 2026, the Faculty guidelines say AI-generated material is not permitted in assessment components unless course documentation explicitly states otherwise; AI-based proofreading tools may be used without reporting, but not for generating new content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Uppsala University's student guidance says students with questions about generative AI use in a course should contact their teacher; it also says prohibited generative AI use can be reported to the university disciplinary board and may lead to sanctions such as suspension.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Vanderbilt University

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Vanderbilt Academic Affairs guidance says AI users must abide by applicable laws and policies, should disclose AI use appropriately, and are responsible for content produced with AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Vanderbilt guidance says instructors establish course AI-use policies within the Honor Code and should communicate expectations to students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Vanderbilt student guidance says that if no instructor AI policy can be found, students may use generative AI but must clearly disclose that use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Vytautas Magnus University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

VMU guidance requires clear indication of what part of student work used GAI and for what purpose, and states that students are responsible for generated content they submit.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

VMU Study Regulations allow artificial-intelligence tools in courses, written work, and independent assignments when use follows university provisions, unit procedures, course-description purposes, and academic-integrity rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

VMU guidance says the extent and conditions for generative AI use may be set at course, study-program committee, or academic-unit level.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Washington State University

3 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

WSU Provost guidance expects every instructor to set clear acceptable-AI-use expectations and to state the AI course policy in every class syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

WSU Provost guidance says instructors may allow or prohibit generative AI tools for their courses, with an obligation to communicate the course AI policy clearly to enrolled students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

WSU Provost guidance states that students are expected to provide accurate and transparent attribution of AI use in classroom assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Washington University in St. Louis

3 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

WashU CTL student guidance says students should not represent AI-tool output as their own work and should cite AI contributions when using AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

WashU CTL course-policy guidance presents multiple possible GenAI policy categories for instructors, including allowed without restriction, allowed with citations, partially restricted, and completely restricted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The WashU+AI hub tells students that responsible generative-AI use includes reviewing course expectations for authorized use and seeking clarification from instructors before using generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Worcester Polytechnic Institute

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

WPI's academic-integrity page defines cheating to include using unauthorized study aids, materials, information, or assistance in academic activity or assessment, and defines plagiarism to include using another's words, ideas, assertions, data, creative works, or graphics without proper attribution.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

WPI Library guidance says users should be transparent about AI-tool use and cite AI tools when they use them to gather information, write or edit text, generate media, synthesize ideas, or clean or manipulate data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

WPI Library guidance states that WPI professors have broad discretion over whether, how, and when students may use ChatGPT or other generative-AI content in assignments and projects, and students should check with their professor for expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Wuhan University

3 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

武汉大学AI通识课程平台 is listed for Wuhan University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Wuhan University Library maintains an AI resource navigation page that groups AI-related teaching and research reference resources into sections such as AI MOOCs, AI usage guides and norms, AI policies, AI laws, declarations, literacy frameworks, conferences, and organizations; the page says the navigation is for teaching and research reference and asks readers to judge accuracy themselves.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Wuhan University Library's national AI MOOC page curates AI-related MOOCs from Xuexi Qiangguo, the National Digital Literacy and Skills Improvement Platform, and the National Higher Education Smart Education Platform, and it lists a Wuhan University course titled '人工智能' taught by Xie Rong on the National Higher Education Smart Education Platform.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Xiamen University

3 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Xiamen University's AI teaching guideline applies to Xiamen University teachers and students using generative AI services for on-campus course teaching activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Xiamen University's AI teaching guideline says teachers should state in their courses which generative AI services students may use or are prohibited from using.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Xiamen University's AI teaching guideline says students using generative AI services in course learning should actively disclose that use to the teacher and accurately mark the contribution of generative AI when required by the teacher.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yarmouk University

3 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Yarmouk allows generative AI tools in academic or scientific research work across stages such as research, design, planning, drafting, analysis, writing, audiovisual content production, or editing, provided the use is announced, pre-approved, and transparent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Yarmouk requires faculty members, researchers, and students to disclose their use of generative AI tools and applications in academic and research work clearly and transparently.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Yarmouk's announced policy says the permitted percentage of disclosed generative AI-generated content is based on the university's academic integrity standards and does not exceed 30%, with adaptation possible for departments, faculties, and centers.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yonsei University

3 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Yonsei University Research Ethics Center guidance says students using generative AI in academic work must provide clear and accurate citations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Yonsei University Research Ethics Center guidance says generative AI use in courses should be based on clear agreement between instructors and learners, with instructors giving minimum guidance when use is permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Yonsei University Research Ethics Center guidance tells students that generative AI may be permitted or restricted depending on the course and that students should consult the syllabus and course policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The ZUJ Journal of Legal Studies AI-tool policy sets an AI-generated-content limit of 35%, a similarity-index limit of 30%, requires authors to disclose AI use and assume responsibility for AI errors or plagiarism, and says the journal uses Turnitin AI Detector with possible sanctions including rejection, author bans, notifying the author's institution, or retraction.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The Al-Zaytoonah University Journal of Business ethics page requires authors to disclose AI-tool use in manuscript preparation and says AI-generated content should be reviewed and verified by the authors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

American University in Dubai

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

AUD's 2025-2026 Student Handbook includes material, text, images, or designs from generative artificial intelligence tools within its plagiarism definition when the work is used without proper acknowledgement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

AUD's 2025-2026 Student Handbook lists penalties for academic integrity violations that can range from zero on the graded work to an F grade, suspension, or dismissal depending on the offense.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Beirut Arab University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Beirut Arab University states that plagiarism is a serious matter, that instructors or supervisors report student plagiarism incidents to the Faculty Dean, and that investigated penalties may include rewriting work, Dean or President warnings, course withdrawal, or preventing thesis defense.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Beirut Arab University Libraries describe Turnitin as a tool for checking plagiarism percentages in scholarly papers and assignments, and say students use a BAU email plus a class ID and enrollment key from the instructor to create an account and submit work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ben-Gurion University of The Negev

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

BGU Library AI guidance tells students that not every field, assignment, course, or instructor may permit AI tools and places responsibility on the student to verify permitted use with the instructor in advance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

BGU Library academic-integrity guidance says sources must be clearly attributed and that presenting others' ideas or texts without appropriate attribution is a serious breach of academic ethics.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

BRAC University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

BRAC University's plagiarism policy says students should properly cite and give credit when using another person's ideas, information not generated by the student, quotations, paraphrases, words, phrases, or citations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

In the official public-source search completed on 2026-06-12, BRAC University's reviewed policies-and-procedures page did not provide AI-specific, ChatGPT, or generative-AI rules; AI-related official hits were news, training, seminar, research, or repository items rather than policy evidence.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Brunel University of London

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Brunel's published principles for generative AI in teaching and learning state that when generative AI is used in assessment, its use must be declared.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Brunel University Library's generative AI guide states that use of generative AI tools in an assignment is not permitted unless the module leader has explicitly specified that their use is permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Carleton University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Carleton guidance says using AI tools to generate assignment content and presenting it as one's own work, or copying or paraphrasing AI-produced content without proper citations and instructor consent, is considered a violation of academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Carleton instructor guidance recommends syllabus and assignment instructions that specify how AI tools should be used, including clear parameters for how a tool may and may not be used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Carnegie Mellon University

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

CMU Eberly Center guidance says instructors should clarify whether AI tools count as authorized or unauthorized assistance and how students should cite AI or human assistance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

CMU academic-integrity policy requires instructor authorization for collaboration or assistance on graded work and requires citation of all sources.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Charles University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Charles University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Copilot for Microsoft 365 is listed for Charles University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chiba University

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Chiba University's guideline says each course instructor judges whether generative AI use is consistent with class objectives and may prohibit or restrict generative AI use where it would significantly undermine achievement of educational objectives.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Chiba University's guideline says that when instructors prohibit or restrict generative AI use in a class, they should clearly state that in the syllabus or other course handouts and explain the reason to students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chongqing University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Chongqing University's Undergraduate School reported official AI education course-building activity, including 13 municipal-level AI-plus course selections and 58 school-level AI-enabled undergraduate course projects.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Chongqing University's Undergraduate School announced 2026 AI-enabled course-platform training for teachers and teaching administrators, with online and offline participation options.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chung-Ang University (CAU)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

CAU's guidance frames generative AI course use as instructor-selected options: complete ban, use with prior instructor approval or citation, or full permission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

CAU's guidance says generative AI use can be considered academic misconduct when used in a class where AI is completely banned or when students fail to follow syllabus or instructor guidance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Colorado School of Mines

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Mines sample syllabus language says students who include AI-generated ideas, text, code, or images in submitted work must document and credit the source, and that failure to properly cite AI tools would be considered academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Mines guidance expects faculty to state course GenAI expectations explicitly and in writing, including permitted and prohibited uses, and encourages instructors to design assignments that reduce unethical GenAI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Cyprus University of Technology

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The CUT AI guide says students must submit their own work and disclose any use of AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The CUT AI and Academic Integrity guide warns that uncited AI-generated text can be plagiarism and that false citations generated by AI can violate academic integrity standards.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Deakin University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Deakin research guidance says HDR thesis use of generative AI is limited to copyediting and proofreading, with generated images allowed only where part of an approved methodology and fully disclosed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Deakin guidance says students should acknowledge genAI use where it contributed to developing assessment work and should include tool, access date, prompts, output, and where it was used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Dhofar University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Dhofar University's Centre for Preparatory Studies citation guide includes AI-generated work as a source category for APA-style citation and identifies fields such as AI company, AI tool, access details, format type, and human contributor role.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Dhofar University's faculty academic-honesty guide treats cheating as unauthorized assistance or use of forbidden material and includes unauthorized exam-period access to course subject matter on electronic devices among cheating examples.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Dublin City University

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

DCU Graduate Studies guidance says that, from September 2025, research-degree regulations will require declarations on which generative AI tools were used and how.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

DCU's AI position statement tells staff to act legally, ethically and transparently, disclose generative AI use for university-related work, and avoid sharing personal, confidential, institutional or strategic data with AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Duy Tan University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Duy Tan University's Graduate School thesis/project/dissertation presentation standards instruct authors to cite sources used in academic work and describe citation as part of avoiding plagiarism and preserving research integrity; this source is not AI-specific.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

This official-source crawl found Duy Tan University AI curriculum/training material and general citation/plagiarism guidance, but did not verify a central public university-wide policy governing student or staff use of generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

East China Normal University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ECNU's graduate academic morality regulation applies to degree-seeking graduate students and requires them to follow academic norms, cite sources, and avoid fabrication, plagiarism, and other academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The ECNU-published student AIGC guide says teachers may permit or not permit AIGC tools according to course nature, and students should follow course requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

East China University of Science and Technology

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

East China University of Science and Technology stated that it planned in 2024 to fund a group of high-quality 'AI+' graduate courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The ECUST School of Information Science and Engineering reported a May 2025 teaching seminar that covered classroom applications of ChatGPT, Kimi and DeepSeek for generative-AI-driven teaching reform.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Edinburgh Napier University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Edinburgh Napier University's Assessment Policy says every assessment will use the Assessment Declaration Cover Sheet for students to declare that the submission is their own work and acknowledge other-source contributions, including Generative AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Edinburgh Napier University's generative AI position says undergraduate and taught postgraduate students who use Gen AI tools in learning or assessments must follow university guidance and acknowledge AI-generated content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

El Colegio de México, A.C.

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The Anuario Asia Pacifico El Colegio de Mexico requires authors to declare whether they used AI tools in any research phase and, if so, identify the tools, versions, and specific tasks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For Anuario Asia Pacifico submissions, the Editorial Committee evaluates whether disclosed AI use is admissible before considering texts for evaluation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Erasmus University Rotterdam

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

EUR's central GenAI guidelines tell staff, faculty, and students to use GenAI as a supplementary tool, remain responsible for delivered work, and be transparent when GenAI has been used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

EUR's teacher-facing GenAI guidance says instructors need to communicate whether and how GenAI is allowed for a course or assignment, and it frames unpermitted student GenAI use as comparable to ghostwriting.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Far Eastern Federal University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Far Eastern Federal University's official continuing education site lists a professional-development program for teachers on artificial intelligence in teaching, with topics covering AI in education, AI tools for course and content design, AI as a research-work tool, and ethics and risks including countering academic fraud using AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Far Eastern Federal University's official continuing education site lists a 2025 artificial-intelligence course available only to FEFU staff and students, with topics including large language models, ChatGPT/Qwen/YandexGPT comparison, prompting, AI ethics and policy of AI use, hallucinations, AI-generated text identification, and local language models.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UFMG's AI recommendations suggest that course syllabi should be transparent about what AI-tool use is authorized and what is not permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For research, UFMG's AI recommendations include identifying in articles and technical reports the stages of the research process carried out with AI assistance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Free University of Bozen-Bolzano

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The MSc Accounting and Finance master thesis guidelines allow AI tools in writing a master's thesis but require disclosure of advanced AI tools used, while stating that basic proofreading, grammar-checking, and translation tools do not need to be reported.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The Faculty of Economics and Management bachelor thesis guidelines allow AI tools in writing a bachelor's thesis, but require students who use them to disclose the tools, purposes, and thesis sections in a table after the references.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Gazi Üniversitesi

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Gazi Üniversitesi's generative AI guide says that if generative AI tools or systems are used in work such as assignments, reports, projects, or theses, that use is declared appropriately in the documents.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Gazi Üniversitesi's generative AI guide recommends that users not enter personal and important institutional data into generative AI systems because data disclosure may occur.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Gdańsk University of Technology

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Gdańsk University of Technology's education-process GenAI guidance says students may use advanced GenAI tools during coursework when the use is documented.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For GenAI tools with a potentially high degree of interference, Gdańsk University of Technology's education guidelines provide a student statement identifying the tools and work excerpts and confirming critical analysis and verification of generated content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Georgetown University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Gemini is listed for Georgetown University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Georgetown CNDLS advises that instructors should provide clear course or assignment policies about whether and how students may use AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Georgia Institute of Technology

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Georgia Tech CTL course-policy guidance advises instructors to tell students how they should collaborate with and cite GenAI use, and to treat GenAI engagement as an extension of collaboration and academic honesty policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Georgia Tech OIT academic guidance says courses that wish to embed assessment integrations with AI should directly consult CTL.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Georgia State University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Georgia State CETLOE guidance says instructors set boundaries for student use of generative AI tools in a course and should provide assignment-specific guidance because AI expectations may vary by graded item.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Georgia State CETLOE's suggested syllabus language says unauthorized use or insufficient attribution of generative AI may constitute academic misconduct under the university's Policy on Academic Honesty.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Graz University of Technology

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

TU Graz says teaching staff decide whether and which AI-supported tools may be used in each course or thesis, with only spell-checking, translation, and stylistic-grammatical improvement generally permitted for students absent broader authorization.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

TU Graz guidance requires transparent labelling of AI-supported tool use where applicable and cautions against entering personal, confidential, trade-secret, or NDA-protected data into AI applications.

证据记录: 3。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hanyang University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Hanyang University's AI@Hanyang guidance frames generative AI as a tool to support rather than replace learning, and says learners should follow instructor-provided AI guidelines and transparently disclose whether and how they used AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Hanyang University's AI@Hanyang guidance says users need to check original sources and verify facts when using AI-provided information because generative AI can create false sources, biased information, or inaccurate citations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hunan University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The Yue Lu Public Governance editorial office states that its journal does not accept manuscripts with generative AI tools as authors, limits generative AI use in submissions to auxiliary research tasks, rejects manuscripts with AI-generated core content or concealed tool use, and requires authors who used generative AI assistance to submit an AIGC tool-use disclosure statement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For Hunan University's 2026 National Natural Science Foundation application notice, applicants who use generative AI to track research, collect literature, or organize references are instructed to verify AI-generated information and references, take responsibility for generated content, truthfully declare use, label relevant content under cited national rules, and not use directly AI-generated or unverified generated application content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (IAU)

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

IAU allows students to use AI tools for academic-process tasks only when the responsible-use rules in the policy are followed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

IAU requires researchers to disclose AI-tool use in research and cite AI tools when used in scientific research.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indian Institute of Science

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The IISc committee report recommends full, precise, and transparent disclosure of generative AI use in research publications, theses, and other Institute documents, with details depending on how the tools were used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An IISc committee report recommends 'allowed with attribution' as the default institutional policy for AI tool use in courses, while allowing instructors, departments, divisions, or programmes to tailor the baseline policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy requires explicit prior permission from the instructor or supervisor for AI use, except for basic grammar and spell-check functions, and says grammar and spell-checking tools must be acknowledged.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The HSS IIT Bombay AI policy says permissible AI use should be acknowledged with proper citation in teaching materials and research outputs, including prompts, AI tools used, and clear demarcation of AI-generated or AI-aided content; HSS dissertations and research reports submitted for evaluation must include an AI use or non-use declaration.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur (IITK)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

IITK's 2025-26 academic guide says using AI tools such as ChatGPT or Gemini to do assignments or write project reports is inappropriate.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

IITK's 2025-26 academic guide discusses writing down assignments from GPTs as a malpractice alongside plagiarism and copying.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IITR)

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

IIT Roorkee's Academic Ethics Policy states that plagiarism is unacceptable, that the institute observes zero tolerance against plagiarism, and that students must check reports, papers, and theses for plagiarism using dedicated software before submission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Official IITR AI-related discovery found public Generative AI and large-language-model course/training content, but this source is course content rather than an institutional AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

IIUM permits AI tools to support learning and research when use is declared and ethically compliant, and treats undisclosed or unapproved AI-generated assignments, theses, or exam responses as academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

IIUM's AI policy says research involving AI requires prior ethics approval, AI-generated publication content must be acknowledged, and AI research must comply with IIUM ethics, data, and IP policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

IPB guidance says AI use must consider IPB security and confidentiality rules; AI use must not disclose or store personal information of students, lecturers, or education staff without permission, and must protect academic data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

IPB has a central Indonesian-language AI guidance document for Tridarma use, intended as an IPB guide for lecturers, students, education staff, and units, and it cites IPB Academic Senate Regulation No. 47 of 2023 as a basis.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Jagiellonian University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Jagiellonian University students must follow instructor AI-tool rules and clearly mark parts of coursework, theses, or other assignments generated with AI-based tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Jagiellonian University teaching staff should define transparent course rules for use of AI-based tools in the syllabus and communicate them at the first class.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Jilin University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Official JLU News articles report university-leader statements that teachers and students should follow academic norms, truth-seeking scientific spirit, disclose use of AI tools when using AI-generated content, and retain user responsibility.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

This crawl did not verify a standalone central Jilin University generative-AI policy page; the accessible official sources found were JLU News articles discussing AI-era teaching, academic norms, disclosure, and user responsibility.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kansas State University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

K-State's Teaching and Learning Center sample syllabus language ties unattributed AI-generated assignment content to a violation of the K-State Honor Pledge.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

K-State's sample AI syllabus language says course AI policies may vary and includes examples where students are expected to be transparent about AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kaohsiung Medical University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Kaohsiung Medical University's student generative AI guidance says students should cite or explain AI use when permitted by instructors and should critically check AI-generated information before using it in assignments or reports.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Kaohsiung Medical University's Library and Information Services AI academic ethics page advises that research use of AI should be disclosed in papers, AI should not be listed as an author or co-author, and humans remain responsible for reviewing and editing AI-assisted outputs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Keele University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Keele's Student Academic Misconduct Code of Practice classifies inappropriate GenAI use in assessment as academic misconduct when a student presents work as their own without proper attribution or uses GenAI where it is explicitly prohibited.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Keele's framework says students must be advised on how AI can be used in assessments and that this must be clearly stated; it also says staff should remind students to disclose AI-tool use and cite it properly.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

KFUPM

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月13日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

KFUPM's AI+X page describes AI+X as an initiative designed to equip every undergraduate student with essential AI skills and says students begin with foundational AI coursework before their selected academic programs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

KFUPM's AI+X page says all undergraduate students are required to complete AI-focused coursework and states an institutional goal to graduate 10,000 AI-skilled professionals by 2030.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kuwait University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

When faculty permit student GenAI use, Kuwait University's policy says faculty may require students to identify the GenAI tools used, the assignment parts generated or assisted by GenAI, and the prompt used for each part.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For research, Kuwait University's GenAI policy says GenAI tools may assist research, but they do not replace human intellectual effort, their use should be indicated, and they cannot be relied on as a source or reference.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kyung Hee University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Kyung Hee's ChatGPT guideline says students should follow instructor guidance and recognize that undisclosed or direct submission of ChatGPT output can constitute misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Kyung Hee's ChatGPT guideline tells instructors to decide ChatGPT use standards for a course and state the applicable guidance in the syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology LUT

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The eLUT AI tools guideline says teachers can require students to use Copilot in course assignments and can also prohibit AI use in course assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The LUT citation guide gives citation formats for large language model outputs and AI-generated images, including AI developer, year, prompt or task, tool and version if known, citation date, and URL.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Leibniz University Hannover

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

LUH offers AI competence training, and teachers who use AI systems in a course are required to integrate training materials or provide corresponding training for users.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

LUH student guidance says students should clarify with instructors how AI tools may be used for coursework or exams and remain responsible for lawful, responsible, and transparent use or non-use of AI tools; the ZQS page itself is explicitly non-binding.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Leiden University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

JSTOR Semantic Results is listed for Leiden University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Leiden Law School's research guidance says its researchers are responsible for correct genAI use, must review genAI-generated output, and must use genAI responsibly and transparently.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

LMU IfKW guidance treats verbatim or minimally changed AI-generated text without proper attribution as plagiarism, and says significant unattributed AI-generated text in assessed work can receive grade 5 (failed).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

LMU Medical Faculty dissertation guidance says doctoral authors must disclose when, where, and to what extent AI was used, name AI as an aid in the affidavit, and mark sections where AI was used for creation or editing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Lund University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Lund University's student guidance says students who want to use GenAI for a compulsory assignment or examination must check whether it is permitted and how to report its use; presenting GenAI-generated work as one's own may be treated as cheating.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Lund University's GenAI Q&A says generative AI tools are permissible in education when teachers believe they contribute to or facilitate learning, with teachers responsible for informing students about course or programme rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Use of generative AI tools at MIT must comply with all applicable federal and state laws and orders (including FERPA, HIPAA, Massachusetts Data Protection Standards, export control laws, and the Executive Order on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of AI), Institute policies (including 10.1 Academic and Research Misconduct, 11.0 Privacy and Disclosure of Personal Information, and 13.0 Information Policies), Information Protection guidelines, and the Institute's Written Information Security Program (WISP), plus any additional policies established by the user's department, lab, center, or institute (DLCI).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

MIT advises community members to disclose the use of generative AI tools for all academic, educational, and research-related uses, and not to publish research results relying on AI-generated content without disclosing the nature of such use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Maynooth University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Maynooth University student GenAI guidance says using GenAI in an assignment beyond what is permitted is a breach of academic integrity, including plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Maynooth University student GenAI guidance says GenAI may support learning and assessment when used appropriately and with permission from department lecturers; students should consult department staff about allowed use for each assignment or task.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

McGill University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

McGill's Provost-endorsed principles state that instructors remain responsible for comporting themselves according to the highest standards of academic integrity in their use of generative AI tools. Instructors must be explicit in course outlines about the expectations for use of generative AI tools and may set limits on their use in assessment tasks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

McGill recommends that instructors explain to students in their course outline what the appropriate use or non-use is of generative AI tools in the context of that course. The use or non-use of these tools should align with the learning outcomes associated with the course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Memorial University of Newfoundland

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Memorial Libraries' AI academic work guide says students must acknowledge any AI-generated content used in academic work and are not permitted to present work created through unauthorized generative AI tools as their own original work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Memorial's Centre for Innovation in Teaching and Learning presents GenAI as a teaching and learning support area and offers instructor consultations and department-level presentations on appropriate GenAI use in course development.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Michigan Technological University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Michigan Tech Policy 1.20 requires AI tool use to be disclosed when the use represents a significant component of the final product or deliverable, defined by the policy as more than 25%.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Michigan Tech Academic Affairs provides AI Working Group syllabus templates for instructors, organized into General Permission, Conditional Permission, and Prohibition tiers for course-level generative AI use policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Missouri University of Science and Technology

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Missouri S&T's Dean of Students academic-integrity resource says using AI tools like ChatGPT in coursework requires instructor approval, and unauthorized AI use may violate university regulations and be considered plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Missouri S&T's CAFE GAI Guidelines say a faculty task force developed criteria for course policies on student GAI use, recommend that faculty include a written policy, and state that instructors set acceptable levels of GAI use in their classrooms.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Cheng Kung University (NCKU)

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NCKU academic-integrity guidance says faculty, students, and researchers should verify generative-AI outputs, and that using generative AI for plagiarism, fabrication, or falsification breaches academic integrity; students should follow course rules and should not submit AI-generated content as their own without permission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

NCKU guidance says faculty, students, and researchers using generative AI in research should work to ensure reproducibility and stability of research results and appropriately disclose the AI tool name, version, date, and method of use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Chengchi University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For students, NCCU's generative AI principles say generative AI tools may be used within instructor rules and academic ethics, and that report content produced with generative tools should be rigorously cited to meet academic ethics requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

National Chengchi University's generative AI principles advise instructors to state course-specific generative AI tool rules in the syllabus, with reference options including full permission, conditional permission, prohibition with a management mechanism, or no AI use in the course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Taipei University of Technology

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NTUT guidance recommends that course syllabi list rules or limits for generative AI use, and that instructors explain and agree those course-level requirements with enrolled students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NTUT guidance advises students not to over-rely on AI tools, to evaluate AI output, to label AI-generated results when used, and not to submit generated output directly as their own reports or assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Taiwan Normal University (NTNU)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NTNU's guideline says users should appropriately disclose GAI use in reports, academic works, music, art, or image creation, including the tool name, use method, and AI role.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Discovery found a central NTNU reference guideline for generative-AI learning applications, but not a separate formal binding university-wide AI policy; the central page encourages academic units to create discipline-specific GAI guidelines.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Taiwan University of Science and Technology (Taiwan Tech)

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Taiwan Tech's Computer Center tells teachers and staff not to provide generative AI tools with official confidential information, personal information, or information not approved by the university for public disclosure, and not to ask AI questions that may involve confidential business or personal data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Taiwan Tech's Center for Teaching and Learning Development recommends that instructors introduce generative AI before class and state in the syllabus which tools students may use, which tools are restricted, and the reasons for restrictions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Technical University of Athens

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For the NTUA Civil Engineering course 'Σχεδίαση Τεχνικών Έργων με Η/Υ' in-person exam scheduled for February 2, 2026, the course announcement strictly prohibits use of large language models such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude during the exam.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

NTUA states that its new Artificial Intelligence course includes ethical issues and social impacts of artificial intelligence among covered topics; this is course-offering evidence, not an institutional AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (NYCU Taiwan)

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

NYCU's teacher guidance recommends that course syllabi state GenAI use rules so students know whether AI may be used as a learning or assignment-completion aid and how that use affects grading.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

NYCU's research-use reference guidelines tell researchers not to over-rely on or fully accept GenAI output, to verify AI-generated arguments, and to disclose GenAI assistance when required by research, funder, journal, or conference policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

New Jersey Institute of Technology (NJIT)

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

NJIT says that if students have not received explicit instructor authorization to use AI, submitting AI-generated work may constitute a violation of the Code of Student Conduct and Academic Integrity policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

NJIT guidance says instructors have autonomy to develop course-specific AI policies, and students should check the syllabus and ask the instructor when unsure whether generative AI use is permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Northwestern University

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Northwestern provides instructors with three course-level AI policy options: Open (GAI permitted), Conditional (GAI permitted when explicitly authorized), and Closed (GAI prohibited).

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

EndNote 2025 is listed for Northwestern University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Novosibirsk State University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT is listed for Novosibirsk State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For final qualification work and other assignments covered by the Department of Cytology and Genetics page, students are obliged to verify generated content and disclose generative-model use in a methods section or declaration.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Osaka Metropolitan University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月22日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Osaka Metropolitan University's student generative-AI guideline recommends using generative AI to deepen learning or research and improve efficiency, while following any restrictions or prohibitions given by course or research supervisors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Osaka Metropolitan University's faculty guide says instructors need to judge and explain to students the permitted scope of AI-tool use for assignments such as reports.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Peking University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

北大问学 (Beida Wenxue) is listed for Peking University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

小北智学 (Xiaobei Zhixue) is listed for Peking University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pennsylvania State University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月13日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Penn State's Academic Integrity page makes student use of content-generating AI tools course- and assignment-specific and warns that improper use can be an academic integrity violation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Penn State ORP guidance says researchers using generative AI must document process inputs, outputs, and prompts, verify AI-generated content, data, and references, and disclose use transparently in proposals, manuscripts, and publications.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pohang University of Science And Technology (POSTECH)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

AI-based Paper Search (Primo Research Assistant) is listed for Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Statista Research AI (Beta) is listed for Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru (PUCP)

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

PUCP's Estudios Generales Letras describes its generative AI manual as an academic first version that will not answer every question or resolve all course situations in EEGGLL.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

PUCP's Profesorado portal presents IDU specialist guidance recommending that teachers orient students toward ethical AI use, including transparent use and appropriate citation of information obtained with AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana's CAE+E guidance suggests that instructors consider class agreements for generative AI use, including specific situations of use, type of use, human and AI roles, and citation of AI-produced or AI-collaborative texts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Pontificia Universidad Javeriana's CAE+E guidance frames generative AI in education as support, not a replacement, and says teaching plans still depend on teacher expertise and disciplinary teaching knowledge.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

PNU students must uphold academic integrity when using generative AI, follow instructor guidance, acknowledge allowed AI use, and not claim AI-generated work as their own.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

PNU faculty must disclose whether generative AI may be used in a course, include course-level guidelines on permissible and non-permissible uses, and include assignment disclaimers about appropriate and inappropriate generative AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Qatar University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Qatar University instructs users to refrain from relying on generative AI to write research papers, assignments, or theses on behalf of students or researchers.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Qatar University instructs users to disclose any generative AI use in academic, research, or administrative outputs and to clarify its scope and extent, including contribution level.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Radboud University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for Radboud University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Radboud University says students may use ChatGPT or other AI tools during their studies only with lecturer approval and when they mention that they used it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Riga Technical University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The RTU-hosted Scriptus Manet journal policy requires transparent disclosure of AI-tool use in manuscript preparation, prohibits AI tools from generating scholarly content such as ideas, arguments, interpretations, data, or conclusions, and allows auxiliary technical uses such as editing, translation, corpus analysis, and visualization.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The RTU-hosted Scriptus Manet journal policy states that authors remain accountable for accuracy, originality, integrity, plagiarism, data validity, and research transparency regardless of AI usage.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

RUDN University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The RUDN Journal of Informatization in Education editorial AI policy requires authors to disclose AI-tool use during manuscript preparation, including text generation, data work, translation or editing, literature-search or reference-list work, and creation or processing of media.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A RUDN Digital Literacy course program for the Ecology and Natural Resource Management bachelor's program includes generative AI tools, responsible AI use, authorship and originality, academic honesty, and practice with large language models as course topics.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Rutgers University–New Brunswick

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Rutgers states that AI tools should not be considered permissible for coursework unless instructors clearly state or communicate that use is allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Rutgers says faculty should consider giving students guidance on AI use to support learning and coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sciences Po

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Sciences Po's academic integrity explainer says students must be transparent about generative AI use by indicating the solution name and version, specifying the type of use, reproducing the script, and checking generated answers because hallucinations, errors, and plagiarism are attributed to them.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Sciences Po's official teachers' resources page says its framework for generative AI use by teachers will apply from the September 2026 intake and covers guiding principles, transparency toward students, and AI integration in teaching activities and assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Shanghai University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Shanghai University's Qianxue Baike AI Smart Platform includes an AI teaching page with AI literacy, AI+ course, and AI practice sections and lists generative AI, prompt engineering, LLMOps, AI ethics, and large-model application learning resources.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Shanghai University's Academic Affairs Department held a generative AI teaching report that discussed course-specific AI-enabled teaching uses such as AI teaching assistants, AI-assisted personalized case analysis, online-course construction, intelligent learning companions, agent collaboration, and literature reading comprehension.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Stony Brook University, State University of New York

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Stony Brook guidance says generative AI use in coursework can be prohibited, allowed, or required depending on the course or assignment, and students should consult course policies or instructors when unsure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Stony Brook CELT guidance advises instructors to discuss AI usage policies clearly, include AI statements in syllabi, and outline which assignments allow or do not allow AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sultan Qaboos University

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Centre for Preparatory Studies guide states that incorrect use of AI tools is considered academic misconduct and that suspected incorrect AI use for an assignment is handled under the SQU Academic Misconduct Policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Centre for Preparatory Studies guide tells students who intend to use generative AI in their work to discuss this with their teacher and cite the use of AI tools in the work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU)

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

SKKU student guidance cautions against relying solely on AI detection software when ChatGPT abuse is suspected and says professors should consider class participation, previous assignments, interviews, or real-time re-evaluations to prevent unfairness.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

SKKU instructor guidance says AI cannot replace roles such as guiding discussion direction, providing personalized answers to student questions, and understanding learning level by assessing assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Sunway University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

A Sunway University Explore teaching article says academics should prioritise ethical considerations when integrating AI, including safeguarding student data privacy, mitigating algorithmic bias, and ensuring transparency and accountability.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

A Sunway Online article advises postgraduate students to critically evaluate AI-generated information and to take care to attribute AI-generated work, understand content risks, and consider privacy and intellectual-property laws.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Where KNU educational components allow generative AI under levels 2 or 3, the regulation requires students to declare the fact and manner of generative AI use in submitted artifacts for assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

KNU's regulation treats violations of generative AI use rules as academic-integrity violations and lists non-declaration, presenting generated content as one's own result, and using generative AI for unfair advantage among possible violations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technical University of Darmstadt

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

TU Darmstadt provides a generative AI handreichung as orientation for students and lecturers, covering reflected, transparent use, good scientific practice, and context-specific rules for examinations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

TU Darmstadt's Computer Science department treats AI tools as examination aids under APB section 22(7), says they must be listed in written work when used, and warns that undisclosed or prohibited use can trigger suspected deception under APB section 38.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technion - Israel Institute of Technology

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Technion Library guidance says that using AI-generated text as-is, without rephrasing and without verifying information reliability, is considered plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Technion Library guidance recommends that users follow links supplied by AI tools and verify that the citation appears in the source and that the source is academically valid.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technische Universität Berlin (TU Berlin)

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

TU Berlin examination guidance states a general documentation duty when AI is used for assignments: students should identify the tools, extent, purpose, marked AI content, prompts, and their own contribution.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

TU Berlin's living AI guidelines say that if AI results are adopted in scientific work, they must be checked for content, revised, and labeled; uses without relevance to learning or epistemic work, such as grammar, style, spelling, or translation, usually do not need to be declared.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Thapar's B.E. CSE scheme includes an Ethics and Risk Mitigation in AI course covering responsible AI principles, data privacy and governance, AI governance frameworks, and AI policy case-resolution exercises.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Thapar's B.E. CSE scheme includes a Generative AI course focused on large language models, hands-on generative tasks, tools for text, image, video, audio and code generation, and prompt engineering.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

HKUST allows faculty members the flexibility to set their own course-level policies for GenAI integration in teaching and learning.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

HKUST assessment policies require course syllabi to clearly present policies on the use of Generative AI tools and academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The Ohio State University

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google Gemini is listed for The Ohio State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot Chat is listed for The Ohio State University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: not specified.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Edinburgh

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

At the University of Edinburgh, presenting AI outputs as your own original work, submitting AI-generated text without acknowledgment, and using AI agents within university learning platforms constitute academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

At the University of Edinburgh, staff presenting AI-generated content as their own original work, uploading personal data or confidential information to external AI tools, and relying on AI detection tools are listed as unacceptable uses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tohoku University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Tohoku University's student-facing Online Class Guide says students need to confirm generative AI use, including whether it is allowed, with the instructor for each class.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The same student guidance says some classes may prohibit or limit generative AI use and that students should follow the instructor's instructions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tongji University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatTJ is listed for Tongji University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Tongji University Library guidance summarizes AI-generated content labeling as a traceable and verifiable explicit-plus-implicit labeling system, and frames clear disclosure of where and how AI was used, and who bears responsibility, as the way to make AI a reliable research and learning assistant.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tufts University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Tufts' generative AI usage guidelines state that community members must be transparent about AI use and that instructors and units are strongly encouraged to clarify permitted AI use and disclosure expectations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Tufts CELT guidance says clear, course-specific AI guidance helps students understand what is permitted, what is not permitted, and why those boundaries matter for learning.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tulane University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Tulane guidance says Level 2 Internal, Level 3 Confidential, and Level 4 Restricted data should not be entered into publicly available generative AI tools, and the IT guide separately warns against entering Medium or High Risk Tulane information into public tools not covered by university licensing.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Tulane teaching guidance says each instructor can set clear course or project AI guidelines and encourages students to describe how AI tools were used when AI is permitted; the Library academic-integrity guide tells students to review the syllabus or ask the professor about AI-tool tolerance, limitations, and citation.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

UCSI University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UCSI University's 2025 thesis and dissertation guidelines require postgraduate candidates to disclose use of generative AI tools in preparing a thesis or dissertation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UCSI's Tan Sri Musa Mohamad Library provides Turnitin as an academic tool for plagiarism detection, citation practices, and encouraging authentic student work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ulster University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Ulster University's student guidance tells students to be very careful about what they upload to GenAI tools and says never to input personal information, confidential or sensitive data, placement, patient or client scenarios, draft assignments or reflective work, unpublished research data, or copyrighted material.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Ulster University's student guidance says the University does not ban generative AI tools, but students who use them are expected to do so thoughtfully, transparently, and in line with module requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Umea University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Umeå University's student cheating and plagiarism page warns that using AI or similar services in examination to produce text and submitting it as one's own without openly disclosing how the material was created can amount to attempted misleading.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Umeå University's AI and examination work area is developing principles, examples, and working methods for sustainable examination practice, including transparent and responsible use of AI as a learning tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M)

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UC3M guidance recommends that teaching staff explicitly define at the start of a course how GenAI tools may be used and how far that use may go.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UC3M guidance suggests that assessable work can require students to state explicitly what use they made of GenAI tools, including prompts and adaptation of responses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM)

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNAM's 2025 recommendations advise designing strategies for undeclared generative-AI use and caution against indiscriminate use of AI detectors because their effectiveness is questioned and they raise privacy concerns.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The 2025 UNAM DGTIC ethics diagnostic frames transparency in AI-mediated research as clearly stating whether AI tools were used in questions, hypotheses, experimental design, calculations, data analysis, or research-report writing.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Nacional de Colombia

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogotá guidance for research recommends transparent documentation and declaration of AI use, clear limits that do not attribute authorship to AI, prevention of plagiarism, respect for intellectual property, avoidance of indiscriminate use or AI as a ghost author, and human supervision rather than excessive automated dependence.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Sede Bogotá guidance recommends AI literacy, ethical and responsible use, reflective integration, clear disclosure of AI use, redesign of tasks and assessments, human supervision, critical reflection, transparency about consequences of misuse, and attention to data security and privacy for teaching activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Nacional de La Plata (UNLP)

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

A Faculty of Psychology UNLP guide tells students that transparency in generative-AI use is tied to production and scientific integrity, that AI is not a coauthor, and suggests a transparency statement where the author accepts responsibility for the final content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Faculty of Legal and Social Sciences advertised a UNLP Aula Cavila course for teachers on ChatGPT in education, including objectives to use AI tools for designing and evaluating educational activities and to reflect on ethical and pedagogical implications and misuse prevention.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidade de São Paulo

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A FDUSP generative AI governance report recommends mitigation measures including training and disclosure, review of generated content, transparency about use, and avoiding prompts containing personal data.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The FDUSP report says lack of transparency about student use of generative AI in faculty academic work points to a need for faculty actions promoting awareness and rules or guidelines for transparent and ethical use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universit de Bretagne Occidentale

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UBO's generative AI charter says that when generative AI has been used to produce or help produce academic or professional content, this use must be mentioned in the final document with the tool name/version, date, purpose, and level of human supervision or validation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UBO's anti-plagiarism charter says students and staff commit to cite works they use or partially reproduce, including when they use an artificial intelligence program.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Università di Padova

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The guidance does not allow GenAI-generated content for assessments or theses without explicit disclosure and authorization by the responsible teacher.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The guidance assigns teaching staff responsibility to clearly indicate permitted and non-permitted GenAI uses in the syllabus and at the start of each course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitas Airlangga

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UNAIR's Jurnal Hubungan Internasional author guidance requires manuscripts to include an artificial-intelligence tool usage declaration in the acknowledgments section and says authors must identify either use or non-use of AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UNAIR's JPUA editorial policy allows responsible generative-AI use to improve language quality and readability with mandatory human supervision, but it does not recognize LLMs or other AI tools as authors or co-authors and requires disclosure when AI tools are used in manuscript preparation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitas Brawijaya

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The UB-hosted JITeCS GenAI policy permits authors to use generative AI for language and writing assistance with author oversight, while requiring disclosure of GenAI use in the manuscript.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A UB Library article recommends clear institutional AI-use policies, including limits for AI tools in assignments and exams, guidance for assessing originality, and sanctions for academic-ethics violations involving AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The UAB Publications Service AI policy for articles says AI cannot be listed as an author or co-author, AI-generated scientific content requires author supervision and validation, and any AI use must be explicitly disclosed in the article.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UAB Libraries' AI authorship and attribution guidance says AI cannot have academic or legal authorship; the person using AI remains intellectually responsible and the AI tool should be indicated as a source, not as an author.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat de Valencia

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Universitat de Valencia's UVdocencia integrity-focused GenAI course frames GenAI use in relation to academic and research integrity, including guidance on assessment activities, regulation of GenAI use in teaching instruments, and detection of inappropriate student use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Universitat de Valencia's UVdocencia ChatGPT course introduces generative AI tools, including ChatGPT, for producing content and creating materials and tasks in education and scientific research.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Duisburg-Essen

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UDE guidance says instructors should clearly state in their courses how they view the use of AI tools and what that means for learning objectives and assessment situations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UDE advises ChatGPT and related integration users to consider that interactions with ChatGPT may be logged and used in the referenced court process; it also notes OpenAI models are available in UDE Chat AI and logs are stored by Microsoft for 30 days.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Hamburg

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UHHGPT is listed for Universität Hamburg in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: self hosted system.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Where generative AI is permitted in an assessment, the UHH orientation framework says AI use must be transparent; AI text takeovers must be marked and documented, and AI tools used to process one's own text or data must be listed with the purpose of use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Heidelberg

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For study work, Heidelberg University requires students to submit an independence and AI-use declaration that discloses AI tool use and includes an overview of the tools used and their purposes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For doctoral dissertations, Heidelberg Graduate Academy guidance requires AI tool use to be disclosed with when, where, why, and to what extent it was used, and treats AI tools as assistive instruments rather than substitutes for independent intellectual work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Jena

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Universität Jena's exam-law page states that if AI is used in examinations, the examiner must expressly allow AI as an aid and students must state the use of tools such as ChatGPT for the assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

In its written-work self-declaration guidance, Universität Jena's exam-law page states that where there is no AI release declaration, AI use is impermissible by inference from the listed release options.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat Politecnica de Valencia

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The UPV-hosted PoliPapers journal policy says improper, undeclared, or deceptive AI use may be treated as an ethical violation leading to clarification requests, manuscript rejection, or article retraction.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The UPV-hosted PoliPapers journal policy permits authors to use generative AI for technical support tasks, but says authors should declare AI use and that AI tools cannot be listed as authors or coauthors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain)

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UCLouvain's student guidance frames generative AI use in academic work around responsibility, authenticity, and transparency, while telling students to check course-specific rules before using AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UCLouvain's 2024 working-group note recommends that teachers be explicit about whether generative AI is allowed or prohibited in learning activities and advises against using AI detectors to determine precisely whether a text was generated by AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Copilot Chat is listed for Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Wooflash is listed for Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Liège

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

ULiège has an official student charter setting a framework for generative AI use in academic contexts such as courses, assignments, exams, reports, and other learning activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The ULiège charter says students should be able to account transparently for their own contribution, and that work incorporating AI responses should reference the AI according to applicable bibliographic standards.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Lille

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universite de Lille's SIAG charter says teachers should specify SIAG-use instructions in their courses, inform students how SIAG use is or is not integrated into learning situations and assessments, and cannot require students to use SIAG tools that need personal data or payment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Universite de Lille has an official 2025 charter of good practices for generative AI systems in pedagogical work; an official university page says the charter was finalized in March 2025 and aims to frame SIAG uses responsibly and transparently.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universite libre de Bruxelles

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

ULB's 2025-2026 general study regulations tell students not to disclose to AI personal or confidential data other than their own, and not to implicitly grant AI use rights over copyrighted or confidential productions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ULB's 2024 AI-in-teaching note says that students may not use generative AI to perform the task or demonstrate the competence being assessed unless the teacher explicitly authorizes it.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne AI FAQ states that presenting as one's own a submitted university assignment that one did not write oneself is fraud, whether the writer is a human third party or an AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne guidance says students may use conversational AI tools in an academic setting, while correcting and completing outputs with their own knowledge, consolidating with academic sources, disclosing AI use, and critically verifying responses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universite Paris-Pantheon-Assas

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The M1 curriculum for Universite Paris-Pantheon-Assas's Master Marketing and Communication lists a course item on responsible use of generative-AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universite Paris-Pantheon-Assas describes its Master Marketing and Communication as including advanced coursework in digital, law, and data and AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Paris-Saclay

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Université Paris-Saclay's 2025-2026 first-cycle exam rules say that, for Licence professionnelle, Licence, and Licence double-diplôme students covered by the rules, use of ChatGPT or another AI tool must be explicitly mentioned when it is not prohibited, and failure to mention AI as a source will be sanctioned.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Université Paris-Saclay's 2025-2026 master exam rules say that use of ChatGPT or another AI tool must be explicitly mentioned when it is not prohibited, like any external source borrowing or citation, and failure to mention AI as a source will be sanctioned.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université PSL

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月11日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Université PSL academic regulations state that, when an instructor authorizes the use of AI-based tools such as ChatGPT, that use must be explicitly disclosed like a source citation; failure to disclose AI use is considered plagiarism and sanctioned as such.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

PSL-affiliated guidance recommends researchers be transparent about AI use by indicating the tool used, its version, and the context of use, and notes that the prompt and result can also be documented.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Toulouse 1 Capitole

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For Toulouse Law School teaching, training, and assessment activities, the AI guidelines say AI use by a student or teacher must be declared when it contributes to work that is submitted, published, or evaluated.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

An official Toulouse Law School page and PDF publish AI guidelines for law teaching; the source scopes the institutional AI-use framework to activities of teaching, training, and assessment within the Ecole de Droit de Toulouse, not to all Universite Toulouse Capitole programs.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM)

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UTHM's Digital Teaching and Learning Policy permits the use of generative artificial intelligence in teaching and learning processes, including learning content, activity implementation, and assessment, subject to suitability, assessment effectiveness, compliance with applicable guidelines, laws and regulations, and good principles, values, and ethics in the course field.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UTHM's Digital Teaching and Learning Policy says assessment should be designed to be contextual, fair, transparent, and personalized while taking into account the risk of generative AI misuse in written assignments, and that continuous assessment involving presentations, question-and-answer, and viva voce should be prioritized to assess students' actual mastery.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University College Cork

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For UCC taught-programme assessments, academic integrity is breached if students submit GenAI products as their own work without acknowledgement and without authorisation to use GenAI for the task.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UCC's GenAI academic integrity toolkit says acknowledging when and how GenAI is used is important for transparency about one's own work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Alabama at Birmingham

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

ChatGPT Edu is listed for University of Alabama at Birmingham in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UAB Graduate School guidance for graduate capstone projects, theses, and dissertations says AI use must be disclosed by the graduate student and approved by the capstone, thesis, or dissertation committee and program director.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Alberta

2 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Alberta teaching guidance says instructors or programs determine whether students may use AI in coursework and for what purposes, rather than applying a blanket university-wide yes/no rule.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Alberta student-facing academic-integrity guidance tells students that AI rules may vary by instructor, program, course, or assignment and that they should check instructions before submitting work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Antwerp

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

University of Antwerp research AI guidelines state that researchers who use AI tools in their research must acknowledge that use, while AI tools cannot be listed as authors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Antwerp Dutch ECHO teaching guidance describes AI-proofing as creating teaching situations where students cannot use AI, or are detected if they use it when not allowed, and presents assignment-product changes, process changes, or both as options.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Arkansas Fayetteville

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Arkansas Academic Initiatives and Integrity faculty resources page says faculty have discretion over student use of generative AI in their courses and provides approved syllabus statement options for prohibited, restricted, and unrestricted use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Arkansas Libraries AI and Academic Integrity guide says students are expected to cite anything that is not their original work, including text generated by artificial intelligence.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Balamand

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Balamand students are responsible for the integrity of submitted coursework; the Academic Integrity and Copyright Policy says students must do their own work unless the instructor asks otherwise, may collaborate on graded work only if instructed to do so, and must follow course requirements specified in the syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Balamand Academic Integrity and Copyright Policy treats plagiarism as passing off another person's work as one's own and lists examples including undocumented text, quotations without quotation marks, undocumented paraphrase or summary, untranslated text without citation, and packaged online information or completed papers submitted without acknowledgment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bari

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bari lists a transversal digital-skills course, "AI-Gen e pensiero critico: dal prompt all'impatto," that covers generative AI and machine-learning fundamentals, model limitations such as bias and hallucinations, prompt/evaluation techniques, and verification workflows.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bari lists a transversal course, "Intelligenza artificiale, mercati, diritti," that teaches AI's effects on society, economy, fundamental rights, privacy, personal-data protection, non-discrimination, algorithmic transparency, GDPR, and the European AI Regulation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bath

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Bath Academic Integrity Statement requires students submitting assessment to confirm they have not presented content created by generative AI tools as though it were their own work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For the 2025/26 transition year, University of Bath teaching guidance says course documentation should keep ABC labels and add a short AI-use statement to B and C coursework briefs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bayreuth

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bayreuth ITS advises that official Copilot login provides commercial data protection and no model-training assurance, but Copilot for Web/Edge is not recommended for personal or confidential data and prompts should not contain personal data or disclose confidential content.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bayreuth points staff toward AI literacy and teaching support, including ZHL training formats for lecturers and ITS-listed online courses connected to the EU AI Act article 4 context.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Belgrade

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

The Faculty of Organizational Sciences journal AI policy requires authors to disclose generative AI use in both the cover letter and a manuscript statement, forbids authors from including personal, confidential, or proprietary material in prompts, and says GAI must not be used to generate peer-review reports.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Belgrade Faculty of Organizational Sciences has general guidelines that frame responsible generative AI use for students, teaching staff, and non-teaching staff, aiming to improve academic integrity, transparency, and ethical conduct in research, teaching, professional work, and administration.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Birmingham

2 匹配声明s from 11 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For assessments and assignments, students should assume generative AI use is not permitted unless the assessment or assignment explicitly states otherwise.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Academic staff are expected to state whether and how generative AI tools are permitted in assessments or assignments, including in course outlines, briefs, Canvas pages, and handbooks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Calcutta

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Calcutta IP Policy says the university is not responsible for copyright/IP violations when generative AI is used to generate content for publication, thesis, dissertation, or course material, and says faculty members, students, researchers, and staff will be held accountable for AI authorship associated with LLMs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Calcutta IP Policy says generative AI may be used responsibly and ethically, if at all, for fine-tuning, analyzing, or summarizing content, and says that use needs to be disclosed with the model name, version, source, description, and usage.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Irvine

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UCI's Office of Academic Integrity and Student Conduct lists using work created by ChatGPT without appropriate citation and representing artificially produced text as one's own language as examples of plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UC Irvine DTEI states that undergraduate course syllabi now need a clear statement addressing generative AI tools, and that graduate course syllabi need a course policy on student use of generative AI effective February 12, 2026; it also states there is no single campuswide policy governing student use of generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA)

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月11日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UCLA Academic Senate guidance quotes the Student Conduct Code requirement that submissions must be the student’s own work or clearly acknowledge the source, and says that unless an instructor indicates otherwise, use of ChatGPT or other AI tools for course assignments is akin to receiving assistance from another person.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UCLA DTS guidance says users may not input FERPA-protected student information, HIPPA/HIPAA-protected health data, employee personnel/performance data, unpublished research/IP/grant proposals, or export-controlled or restricted data into AI tools unless explicitly approved in a secure environment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of California, Santa Cruz

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

UC Santa Cruz's campus AI FAQ states that student AI use in coursework is governed at the individual course or assignment level, rather than by a single campus-wide student AI-use rule in that FAQ.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The UCSC Teaching and Learning Center advises instructors to integrate a clear generative AI-use policy into the syllabus, including permitted and prohibited uses, attribution norms, and misuse consequences.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Cologne

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For term papers, theses, take-home exams, papers, and similar work, the University of Cologne Justitiariat says AI use is generally possible if independent work remains, and examiners may require disclosure of both the AI use and the related prompts depending on the use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

On its central teaching page, the University of Cologne says its current teaching-and-learning guidelines for generative AI are to address and explore AI-supported writing proactively and to use AI systems with maximum transparency.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Colombo

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Colombo says AI use in assessments is not permitted unless instructions explicitly authorize it, and unauthorized AI use in summative assessment is considered cheating and an examination offence.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For student work, University of Colombo says AI uses beyond citation/reference generation and accessibility support must be explicitly acknowledged, and that the original intellectual work, analysis, interpretation, and synthesis must be the student's own.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Crete

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Official University of Crete ethics pages state that, if a course instructor has not given a clear statement, use of or consultation with generative AI is treated analogously to assistance from another person, and using generative AI tools to substantially complete an assignment or exam is not permitted.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Official University of Crete ethics pages state that individual course instructors may set their own policies regulating generative AI tools in their courses, including allowing or disallowing some or all uses, and should communicate those policies to students in course syllabi.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of East London

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UEL's GenAI usage policy frames responsible use around transparency, ethical considerations, responsible data usage, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

UEL's GenAI usage policy says AI systems must prioritize user safety and ethical standards, provide clear documentation, and implement robust security protocols, while human checks should monitor impactful AI decisions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Florence

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Florence guidance says students may use AI only for purposes and modes explicitly indicated by the instructor for the course activity; if the instructor gives no indication, AI use for the required course activity is not permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Under the University of Florence AI teaching/study guidance, instructors may set course-level policies authorizing or prohibiting AI tool use, while remaining within the general principles in the guidance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Galway

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Galway's Academic Integrity FAQ says students should not present generative AI tool output as their own work in any assignment, while limited preparatory use may be permitted by an instructor if generated outputs are not presented as the student's own work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

University of Galway Library's AI for Research guide says users who choose to use ChatGPT or another AI technology for assistance should be transparent about it, work within university policies, and follow citation-style recommendations for citing generative AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Granada

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UGR guidance recommends that students declare AI use in work, take responsibility for the content, avoid plagiarism, and use AI as learning support rather than a substitute for personal effort.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UGR research guidance recommends declaring AI use with technical and methodological details, verifying and supervising AI outputs, assuming authorship responsibility, and protecting data privacy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Guelph

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For University of Guelph courses, acceptable student use of AI is determined by the course instructor and may vary by discipline, program, and assessment type.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Guelph library student guide tells students to check the syllabus or ask the instructor before using generative AI for coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Hohenheim

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

When generative AI tools are permitted for written work, University of Hohenheim materials say students submit an AI-use declaration in addition to the usual declaration of originality, with the exact contents determined by the examiner.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型安全审查审核: 智能体已审核

The GPTalk guide tells students not to use GPTalk as their sole source, to enter no personal data, to remain responsible for the content as authors, and to make AI use transparent; it also says lecturers may not use GPTalk to correct or assess student work.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Hyderabad

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Hyderabad Teaching Policy says use of GenAI to create whole assignments and projects is not acceptable, while GenAI may be permitted for research and conceptualization in limited course-specific circumstances.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Hyderabad Teaching Policy directs students to refer to course-level instructions before using GenAI tools and frames academic dishonesty violations as subject to academic-unit scrutiny and possible consequences.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Idaho

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Idaho Center for Teaching and Learning syllabus language presents three course-level AI options: prohibiting AI use, allowing AI only with prior instructor permission, or allowing AI with documentation and citation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Idaho's OIT and AI Execution Group memo advises faculty to provide clear guidance on AI use in their syllabi in Canvas.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Jyväskylä

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

JYU instructs students that if generative AI applications are used in assignments or theses, the work must mention which application was used and how it was used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

JYU's reporting page tells students to follow course-specific reporting guidelines when present and otherwise report the AI tool, version/date, purpose, verification, and their own contribution.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Kent

2 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Kent's Academic Integrity and Misconduct policy defines unauthorised AI use as using generative AI beyond the scope permitted for a specific assessment, or failing to acknowledge permitted use appropriately.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Kent's public Microsoft Copilot guidance says Copilot Chat is available to all students and staff using a Kent IT account, while warning users to double-check outputs and consult module convenors before using generative AI tools in assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Kentucky

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UK ADVANCE provides instructional generative AI guidance that includes creating and clearly communicating course policies, responding to misuse, and designing learning experiences aligned with those policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Kentucky CELT guidance frames student generative AI use as a course-level instructor decision and recommends communicating allowed uses, tool restrictions, citation or acknowledgement expectations, and alternatives where privacy concerns exist.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Latvia

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Latvia's 2026 AI regulations require students to clearly indicate AI use in their work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Latvia teaching staff can permit or prohibit AI-tool use in a study course depending on course goals and intended study results.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Liverpool

2 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Liverpool's research guidance says the University supports responsible and ethical GAI use in research, while expecting researchers and professional services colleagues to apply critical judgement, maintain transparency, prioritize integrity, and remain accountable for research outputs and related materials.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

Liverpool's golden rules frame GenAI as a support tool rather than a substitute, and include expectations to acknowledge AI use where required, protect personal and sensitive data, and verify facts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Malta

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Malta guidance says unacknowledged work generated by AI tools is considered plagiarised work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Malta student FAQ guidance tells students to check with their tutor before using Generative AI tools to produce answers in summative assessments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Messina (UniME)

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UniME published a 2025 technical-administrative staff training course on privacy, GDPR, and artificial intelligence that references responsible and transparent AI use, privacy protection, the AI Act, and AgID guidelines.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UniME published a 2025 technical-administrative staff training course on artificial intelligence in workplace contexts, focused on conscious, secure, ethical use and compliance with privacy, security, and responsibility rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Michigan-Ann Arbor

2 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

U-M requires AI use in teaching and learning to align with principles of honesty, candor, openness, and integrity in scholarship and research, including appropriate disclosure and citation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

U-M leaves GenAI policy to individual instructors, who may allow, restrict, or forbid AI use in their courses. Course policies should be clearly articulated in syllabi.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Münster

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

University of Munster central guidance says it orients itself to the DFG statement on generative models for text and image creation in research, including disclosure of whether, which, why, and how extensively generative models were used when results are made publicly accessible.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For Faculty 06, the dean's office recommends that generative AI content in examination work be clearly cited, that an explanation of tool use be added, and that full prompts and AI responses be appended; instructors may adapt or reduce these documentation and citation duties for individual exams or courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Murcia

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月24日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Murcia library AI page gives AI citation guidance, including describing AI use in methodology, including the prompt and relevant response fragment, citing reliable sources, and checking the citation style.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The official University of Murcia library AI page lists AI tools of interest to the university community by category, but the located source does not label the listed tools as university-approved or prohibited tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of New Mexico

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNM Student Rights and Responsibilities lists using generative AI where it is not allowed, and submitting AI-generated content without acknowledgment when originality is required, as improper use of AI or technology in academic integrity guidance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UNM student-facing AI guidance tells students to check with their instructor about permitted AI uses before using AI for an assignment and to provide citations for AI-generated content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Nizwa

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Nizwa's plagiarism guidance describes unattributed use of another person's work in academic or professional assignments as inappropriate behavior and academic misconduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Nizwa's Privacy Policy states that the university collects personal information through website/service interactions and uses collected information for purposes such as personalization, website improvement, customer service, transactions, site features, and periodic emails.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Notre Dame

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Notre Dame's student generative AI policy treats representing AI-generated or materially AI-modified work as one's own as academic dishonesty, and treats generative AI use that violates an instructor's stated policy or is not expressly permitted for coursework as an Honor Code violation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Notre Dame guidance asks instructors to be explicit with students about expectations for ChatGPT and related AI tools in assignments, exams, and class, and says unauthorized generative AI use will be considered an Honor Code violation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Nottingham

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Nottingham student guidance says AI use for assessed work is assessment-specific: module or assessment information should say whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited, and students should not assume permission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For assessments where AI use is essential or optional, University of Nottingham guidance says acknowledgement expectations should come from module or assessment information and that students should keep records or chat logs of AI interactions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Oslo

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UiO's student guidance presents AI as support rather than a replacement for the student's own work and tells students to show clearly when and how they used AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UiO tells students that permitted AI use varies between subjects and assignments, and that they should ask their teacher if they are unsure what is allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Ottawa

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Ottawa academic integrity FAQ tells students to cite the specific AI tool as a source and explain how it was used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Ottawa student-facing academic integrity guidance says permission to use artificial intelligence tools can vary by course and assessment, and students should check the syllabus or ask the professor when unsure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Oulu

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Under the University of Oulu education guidelines, teachers may define course or assignment AI use as required, prohibited, restricted, or allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

The Oulu University Library AI tools guide advises students to discuss whether AI applications are allowed for information retrieval in their work with the course teacher or thesis instructor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Pecs

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Pecs AI guideline is scoped to educational and research activities needed to meet study requirements and applies to university citizens when they use AI systems in connection with setting, meeting, or evaluating course and training requirements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For student work, the University of Pecs guideline advises students who use AI-generated text to check its content and cite it as AI-produced text according to TVSZ Annex 14 and the citation form recommended in the guideline.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Porto

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Porto Ethics Code says AI or similar resources may be used as support tools in research and academic work if their use is explicitly disclosed and does not replace critical thinking, creativity, and human authorship.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Porto Ethics Code identifies improper use of AI or similar tools, without indicating their contributions to research activities or academic work, as improper conduct.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Reading

2 匹配声明s from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for University of Reading in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Reading student guidance tells students to assume Category 1 when an assignment brief says nothing about GenAI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Rochester

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Rochester Provost guidance says instructors should create written course GenAI policies stating when students must, may, or cannot use GenAI and how use should be verified, disclosed, documented, and attributed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

University of Rochester research guidance frames responsible GenAI use in research around data protection, verification, and transparency, including only considering low-risk data generally suitable for GenAI and using appropriate internal review for medium- or high-risk data.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Saskatchewan

2 匹配声明s from 11 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

USask educator AI guidance says educators should discuss AI-use expectations with learners and remain responsible for assessing student work, feedback quality, and grades.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

USask research AI guidance says researchers are accountable for output integrity and should consider tool security, protect confidential or sensitive information, and be transparent about AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Siena

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Siena's guidelines say authors of publications, degree and doctoral theses, term papers, or other writings requiring contribution attribution must clearly and specifically indicate whether and how much they used AI technologies such as ChatGPT or other LLMs.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

University of Siena's guidelines tell university community members using AI technologies such as ChatGPT or other LLMs for lawful purposes to pay particular attention when processing personal data so that outputs do not give a distorted image of the data subject.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of South Florida

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

USF states that use of generative AI tools within university coursework is at the discretion of the instructor, and students are expected to follow course-specific policies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

USF faculty guidance says instructors should establish and communicate clear generative AI course policies, and provides sample syllabus frameworks for either acceptable or restricted generative AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Strathclyde

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Strathclyde guidance tells students to check module or department guidance to determine whether AI tools may be used in a specific assessment and to what extent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Strathclyde guidance says use of Gen-AI in learning and assessment is not necessarily or automatically academic misconduct; context determines whether misconduct is a concern.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Surrey

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

My AI Surrey is listed for University of Surrey in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

University of Surrey's CAQDAS guidance for qualitative data analysis says researchers intending to use Generative AI for any aspect of qualitative data analysis must be upfront with participants and seek their consent for using their data in that way.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Technology Sydney

2 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UTS Education Express says university misconduct rules apply to AI use in assessments, students must acknowledge AI-tool use, and students should only use AI tools to generate verbatim assessment materials when instructed that this is appropriate.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

UTS Library's GenAI guide tells students that if GenAI use has not been allowed by the subject coordinator it is academic misconduct, allowed GenAI content must be referenced or acknowledged, and students should not enter personal details, confidential data, assignment text, or research text into GenAI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Texas at Dallas

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UT Dallas policy says faculty must explain and communicate appropriate generative AI use before academic work begins for a given semester, and should include detailed statements in assignment descriptions and syllabi.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

When generative AI use is permitted, UT Dallas policy says students should document and attribute generative AI use as appropriate and must validate or verify generative AI output.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Texas at San Antonio

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UTSA's faculty generative AI guide advises faculty to clearly state in the syllabus and course homepage whether and how AI use is allowed, while recognizing that faculty may choose different course approaches.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UTSA Libraries' Artificial Intelligence guide says AI-generated information should be fact-checked and that AI used as a source or content generator needs to be cited in submitted work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Trieste

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For the UniTS 2025/2026 PROGRAMMAZIONE [160IN] course, students must explicitly declare any use of Large Language Model tools such as ChatGPT in exam-related content, including partial use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For the UniTS 2025/2026 PROGRAMMAZIONE [160IN] course, the teacher reserves the right to use an oral exam to further investigate a student's actual contribution to any produced content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Tulsa

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tulsa's McFarlin Library Generative AI guide points students to AI citation guidance, explains why disclosure is encouraged, and says best practice is to check with the professor before using generative-AI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tulsa's McFarlin Library Generative AI guide advises users that they remain responsible for fact checking AI outputs and frames coursework use with a tutor-comparison question before using generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Turku

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Turku states in an official Vice Rector perspective that AI use in learning is allowed, that its use must be reported, and that course teachers may encourage, instruct, restrict, or prohibit AI use when justified by learning objectives.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Turku's Vice Rector states that teachers retain authority and responsibility for coursework evaluation and that AI cannot be the decision-maker in assessing academic performance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Ulsan

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

For the 2026-1 Sports Digital Literacy course, University of Ulsan's Sports Science Division lists the AI-use category as fully permitted and includes generative AI such as ChatGPT among the course's practice-centered elements.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Ulsan's Sports Science Division describes ChatGPT as a learning support tool for the division and says students remain responsible for final assignment outputs and should follow division and school AI-use guidance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Victoria (UVic)

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UVic's GenAI position statement says there is no general ban on GenAI tools including ChatGPT in learning and teaching, supports appropriate course-level integration, and says instructors are encouraged to provide clear course-outline instructions, but instructors are not permitted to use GenAI tools to grade student work at this time.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UVic's OVPRI research guidelines endorse following the Tri-agency AI guidance for research grant proposal development and review, and tell researchers to be transparent about GenAI use while avoiding upload of personal information or private or confidential research data except in few exceptions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Vienna

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Vienna says students must transparently and understandably disclose whether and how they used AI, and that undisclosed use violates good scientific practice.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

u:ai is listed for University of Vienna in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Waikato

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Waikato assessment guidance says students cannot use an AI tool such as ChatGPT to generate or rewrite assignment or test answers and submit them as their own unless assignment instructions specifically permit or require that use; the page states this exception does not apply to Studiosity, which it identifies as an approved AI tool.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Waikato academic-integrity guidance tells students to acknowledge their use of generative AI tools for assessment tasks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月26日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UWM-hosted Acta Neophilologica author guidance permits GenAI use for grammar, language, or style improvement, requires manuscript disclosure of any GenAI use with tool and purpose, and says reviewers and editors should not share confidential manuscript content with public GenAI tools.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UWM-hosted Studia Prawnoustrojowe publication-ethics guidance requires authors to declare that no part of the work was fully generated by AI unless methodologically justified, with AI-generated fragments clearly marked and the purpose of AI use given; it also states illustrations in the article are not generated by AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Washington

2 匹配声明s from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UW general GenAI guidance says course instructors may allow, prohibit, or set parameters around GenAI use for their courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Teaching@UW guidance advises instructors to establish and communicate a course policy for generative AI use through the syllabus or assignment prompts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Wisconsin-Madison

2 匹配声明s from 9 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UW-Madison Student Conduct guidance says students are responsible for knowing their instructor's expectations for AI tools and should ask before using AI if permission is unclear.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UW-Madison CTLM encourages instructors to communicate expectations for students' use of generative AI tools early and throughout a course, including through syllabi, Canvas, and course discussion.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Wroclaw

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Under the University of Wrocław academic-integrity standards, instructors may permit AI tools for class work on specified terms, and students must acknowledge the AI use in the text or code when such use is allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The 2026 ZWA recommendations say authors are responsible for the final text and should disclose the scope of AI-tool use in their work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

USI - Università della Svizzera italiana

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

USI's general rule permits use of generative AI tools unless a specific activity explicitly prohibits them, and says use must be correctly acknowledged.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

USI teaching-staff recommendations advise teachers to clearly communicate what students should, can, and cannot do with GenAI tools for course learning activities and to include relevant information in the course syllabus.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The Radio Physics and Electronics journal AI usage policy requires authors to declare AI tool use and says concealing AI use is considered a violation of academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Karazin University's Academic Integrity Code employee declaration includes a commitment to use artificial intelligence technologies responsibly while following academic integrity, objectivity, and scientific ethics principles.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Victoria University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Victoria University's Academic Integrity Policy lists submitting work derived from a generative AI model without permission or correct acknowledgement as a breach of academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Victoria University's Academic Integrity Guidelines say assessment tasks may explicitly allow or disallow text-generating tools, and staff course teams decide and communicate expectations to students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Vietnam National University, Hanoi

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Vietnam National University, Hanoi announced that regular undergraduate students from the 2025 intake are to take the VNU1001 course, Introduction to Digital Technology and Applications of Artificial Intelligence.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The VNU1001 Digital Technology and AI course is described as covering foundations of digital technology and AI, use of common digital and AI tools for study and research, and awareness of ethics, academic integrity, digital safety, and responsibility when applying AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

VILNIUS TECH (Vilnius Gediminas Technical University)

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

VILNIUS TECH students who use AI tools in papers must declare the tool name, usage date, and exact places where the tools were used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

VILNIUS TECH tells community members to use university-acquired or verified AI tools where possible and requires uploaded data to be anonymized and free of confidential, non-disclosure, or third-party information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

2 匹配声明s from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Virginia Tech TLOS recommends that faculty establish carefully considered, course-specific generative AI policies for pedagogically sound use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Virginia Tech research guidance says faculty, students, and research staff should apply AI transparently and in compliance with university and sponsor requirements, with documentation and data protection.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Warsaw University of Life Sciences SGGW (WULS-SGGW)

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

SGGW requires learners using generative AI in their work to openly indicate the form and scope of use and mark generated text fragments or objects; content generated with AI but not indicated is not recognized as content created by the learner.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

SGGW requires course tutors to establish and communicate rules for using generative AI tools in courses, including interim and final work used to verify learning outcomes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Waseda University

2 匹配声明s from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Waseda University's university-wide April 2023 statement warns students that submitting a paper created by generative AI as-is is treated as misconduct similar to cheating, and that plagiarism, inappropriate citation, or fabrication in submitted work can expose the student to disciplinary action.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For students in Waseda University's School of Commerce and Graduate School of Commerce, the July 2023 school-level notice says generative AI tools are not uniformly prohibited, each course instructor decides whether they may be used, and students are not permitted to entrust all submitted work to generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

West Virginia University

2 匹配声明s from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

WVU Academic Integrity’s AI student FAQ says students can use AI tools for assignments only when instructors allow them, and students should ask the instructor if unsure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型其他审核: 智能体已审核

WVU Libraries’ ChatGPT guide has a Citation Styles and Policy page that points users to MLA, APA, and Chicago resources for citing generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Xi'an Jiaotong Liverpool University

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For the XIPU AI platform, XJTLU's strategic framework sets an objective to establish ethical-use guidelines focusing on data privacy, bias mitigation, and transparency.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

XJTLU Library's GenAI citation guide advises that information provided by generative AI should always be checked and verified because it can be false, biased, out of date, or hallucinated.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yildiz Technical University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Yıldız Technical University's generative AI guide states that YTU academic personnel must disclose generative AI use beyond basic spelling and grammar checking in research, publication, thesis or academic assignment contexts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Yıldız Journal of Educational Research requires submitting authors to disclose whether AI-assisted technologies were used and to describe how they were used in the cover letter and submitted work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yokohama City University

2 匹配声明s from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Except for basic uses such as grammar and spelling checks, Yokohama City University tells students to disclose use of generative AI when using it as a tool in part of a submission, or cite it when quoting AI-generated text.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Yokohama City University notes that some classes may restrict or prohibit generative AI use, and tells students to follow instructions given in class or through YCU-Board.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yuan Ze University

2 匹配声明s from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Yuan Ze University's guidance says teachers should clearly explain in course syllabi the role, permitted uses, restricted uses, and ethical rules for generative AI tools in the course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Yuan Ze University's guidance says that when research outputs use AI assistance, the scope of use should be clearly disclosed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW)

2 匹配声明s from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For ZHAW graded assignments, generative AI systems that shape the assignment's content are subject to a declaration obligation so that the AI contribution is recognizable.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ZHAW's declaration annex requires incorporated generative-AI output to be cited, requires listed tools and purposes for text creation or editing uses, and generally requires a method-section description of AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Abu Dhabi University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

ADU's Academic Integrity Policy treats using AI software to support writing without a clear declaration in the student's paper as a plagiarism example.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Aix-Marseille University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For AI use that is expressly authorized in evaluated student work, the AMU-hosted M3C note says the use should be explicitly mentioned like any borrowing or citation from an external source.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Alfaisal University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Alfaisal University's College of Business MBA Handbook says AI-generated content is permitted for MBA students only when it is clearly identified, properly cited, and used to supplement rather than replace original student work; misuse of AI tools may be treated as plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Altai State University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Altai State University's official UЦОТ advisory says AI assistants are available to teachers for online-course content, course/test generation, and related educational-material workflows.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

American University of Central Asia

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

AUCA permits instructors to set course-level policies regulating generative AI and other tools when those policies are clear and communicated in course syllabi.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Anna University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Anna University's Centre for Research plagiarism policy defines plagiarism as unacknowledged use of another person's work and includes copying from the internet or another online source without proper reference or citation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Aston University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Aston University's AI code of conduct guidance says use of AI tools should be disclosed, especially when applied in the generation of content, and appropriate uses should be clearly specified for learners and researchers.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ataturk University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Ataturk University's journal AI policy permits authors to use generative AI for language editing, spelling checks, or technical improvement, but says AI use must be declared and authors remain responsible for the scientific content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Baku Engineering University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Baku Engineering University's 2024-2029 strategic development plan includes integrating artificial intelligence technologies into teaching as part of its digital transformation timeline, with a measurable objective to digitize 50 courses by 2025.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

BUET Registrar Office describes its mission as including security and privacy for the university's academic records, including advice and training for faculty and staff on privacy issues.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Bauman Moscow State Technical University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Bauman Moscow State Technical University's Antiplagiat help page describes a student submission workflow in which students upload work to a teacher through a special assignment code, and final versions are automatically added to the organization's internal collection and EBSO.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Beihang University (former BUAA)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Beihang's official 2025 annual-news summary reports that the university offered Introduction to Artificial Intelligence as a general compulsory course for all undergraduate students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Beijing Normal University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For undergraduate theses and designs, Beijing Normal University says use of generative artificial intelligence tools must be clearly and prominently marked or declared.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Belarusian State University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

A BSU library-hosted seminar PDF frames AI use in academic work as an ethics issue, presenting AI as a tool rather than an author and naming transparency and role disclosure as acceptable-use practices; the source is training material, not a binding BSU policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Birkbeck, University of London

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Birkbeck's student AI guidance states that the AI Declaration must be submitted with all assessments submitted to, or completed on, Moodle, including assessments where the brief permits no AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Bogaziçi Üniversitesi

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Bogaziçi University's accessible official ethics source provides general institutional ethics principles, including learning and teaching freedom, protection of confidential information, and careful use of institutional resources; this staged run did not locate an accessible official AI-specific use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Brandeis University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Brandeis guidance says instructors should include a course policy in syllabi regarding use and misuse of generative AI, with course-specific expectations discussed in class.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ca' Foscari University of Venice

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Ca' Foscari's research AI guidelines support responsible use of AI in research and advise researchers to be transparent about AI tool use, including tools, versions, and prompts where relevant.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Cairo University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University's Artificial Intelligence Unit says it seeks to help the faculty community use AI responsibly through policy-guided implementation, capacity building, technical support, and continuous evaluation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Canadian University Dubai

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Canadian University Dubai's Learning Resource Centre guide includes guidance that generative AI tools should be cited when AI-created content is paraphrased, quoted, or incorporated into a user's work, and that functional uses such as editing or translation should be acknowledged.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Cardiff University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Cardiff University's public library guidance tells students to check module or course guidance and the University's student AI guidance before using any AI tool to support assessed work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Chandigarh University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Chandigarh University's Student Code of Conduct tells students to submit original work, avoid plagiarism, cheating, and misrepresentation, be transparent in assessments, and seek assistance ethically.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

China Agricultural University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

For graduate theses or degree-application practice成果, China Agricultural University's Graduate School says generative AI used for literature retrieval or language normalization should be a nationally filed service tool, checked for truthfulness, accuracy, and reliability, and disclosed with tool name, version, date, and use process in notes, acknowledgements, references, or appendices.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

China University of Mining and Technology

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An official China University of Mining and Technology news article says the 2024 undergraduate training plan explores an "intelligent +" professional training model, includes a required computing thinking and artificial intelligence foundation course, and supports digital teaching resources such as knowledge-graph-based AI courses and a smart education platform.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Colorado State University

1 匹配声明 from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

CSU's Student Resolution Center defines cheating to include unauthorized sources or assistance and instructor-prohibited behavior, and defines plagiarism as representing another's language, structure, images, ideas, or thoughts as one's own without proper acknowledgment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Comenius University Bratislava

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

An official Comenius-hosted appendix recommends that work using artificial intelligence tools begin with an originality declaration indicating that AI tools were used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Czech Technical University in Prague

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

CTU's graduation-thesis ethics guideline treats failure to acknowledge and document AI-tool text or other AI outcomes in a thesis, while presenting them as one's own, as plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For FAPPZ CZU final theses, the 2026 dean's instruction requires students to state whether AI tools were used and to list the specific tools if AI materially affects thesis content or wording.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Dongguk University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The same Dongguk notice says its ChatGPT guideline covers instructor guidance to state use principles in syllabi, inform students, and consider assessment design, and learner guidance to follow instructor-provided ChatGPT principles, analyze and verify ChatGPT answers, check similarity to existing works, cite sources, and avoid overreliance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Doshisha University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft 365 Copilot is listed for Doshisha University in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

École Normale Supérieure de Lyon

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The IFÉ Édurevue n°154 discusses generative AI in relation to plagiarism, cheating, assessment design, and academic integrity; it cites examples of other universities' AI charters but does not establish an ENS Lyon AI-use charter.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Essex, University of

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Essex student guidance states that AI-generated work should not be presented as a student's own assignment work and that using AI or other automated technology to produce material submitted as one's own original work is an academic offence.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Freie Universitaet Berlin

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月13日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

When AI tools are used in teaching and student use is planned, FU's Eckpunkte say the AI use must be clearly communicated and students must be informed about the tools' function and risks.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Fudan University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

复旦大学学生工作部公开页面援引《复旦大学关于在本科毕业论文(设计)中使用 AI 工具的规定(试行)》称,本科毕业论文写作中使用 AI 工具辅助需经老师同意并披露使用情况,数据收集、核心观点提炼等创新工作不可依赖 AI,涉密和隐私内容禁止使用 AI。

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

For the NRF-scoped guidance relayed by GIST, the listed recommendations include not uploading evaluation materials to AI tools, indicating AI tool use, verifying reliability and validity, and caution about research-data leakage.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hamad Bin Khalifa University (HBKU)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

HBKU's Code of Honor requires students to follow university policies and regulations and frames academic misconduct to include plagiarism and dishonest use or supply of course or research material.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Hasselt University

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UHasselt's research guidance for generative AI tells researchers to remain responsible, use GenAI transparently, pay attention to IPR and privacy, respect existing regulations, and avoid GenAI for sensitive activities such as peer review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Heriot-Watt University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Heriot-Watt's student AI guidance for AY23-24 says generative AI use is permitted when the use is clearly identified and referenced, while students should check whether and how it is permitted on each course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Holy Spirit University of Kaslik

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For the Arab Economic and Business Journal, authors are required to disclose use of AI and AI-assisted technologies during manuscript submission.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Huazhong Agricultural University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月22日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Huazhong Agricultural University's Information College describes an AI curriculum structure that includes AI general courses for all undergraduate and graduate students, required AI foundation courses for non-information-major undergraduates, AI core courses, and AI digital-intelligence practice courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Huazhong University of Science and Technology

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Huazhong University of Science and Technology's Undergraduate School notice for revising 2025 undergraduate training plans says AI education is to be fully included in the 2025 undergraduate professional training plans, including two required public AI courses in the general education foundation curriculum.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

HUFS - Hankuk (Korea) University of Foreign Studies

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

HUFS describes its AI Data Convergence curriculum as including AI ethics and philosophy, and the broader AI Data Convergence program page also names privacy, security, and AI ethics lecture areas.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati (IITG)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

IIT Guwahati's Students' Affairs Code of Conduct pledge is an official general academic-integrity source covering unfair means, unpermitted aid, and plagiarism, including internet-sourced work; it is not an AI-specific institutional policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad (IITH)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

IIT Hyderabad's academic handbook expects students to do academic work with integrity and to properly acknowledge material included from other sources.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IIT-KGP)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

IIT Kharagpur's B.Tech. in AI curriculum includes a core course titled Responsible and Trustworthy AI covering responsible AI, bias and risk assessment, privacy-aware learning, model safety, and accountability.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Indiana University Bloomington

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Indiana University guidance says students should use generative AI in ways that align with university academic integrity policies and communicate with instructors before using generative AI in coursework.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Inha University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Inha University's 2025 academic guide says students disciplined for exam misconduct receive grade invalidation consequences ranging from an F in the affected course to F grades for all courses in the semester, depending on the disciplinary sanction.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de Lyon (INSA)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

INSA Lyon's generative AI charter says any use of generative AI for productions such as academic work, scientific publications, notes, and administrative documents must be documented transparently with the model/version, date, context, prompts, and purposes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Isfahan University of Technology

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Isfahan University of Technology's Educational Monitoring and Evaluation office announced a faculty development course on AI and augmented reality in education and research, including ethical dimensions and responsible use of new technologies.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Jadavpur University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Jadavpur University's thesis Statement of Originality form asks a doctoral candidate to declare that the thesis contains original research, that non-original materials and results have been fully cited, and that the thesis was checked under the university's Anti Plagiarism Policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Johns Hopkins University

1 匹配声明 from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月10日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Johns Hopkins guidance describes potential instructional uses of generative AI tools, including course-material generation and adaptive personalized feedback.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

JMU's July 2025 working draft AI guideline says generative AI contributions may be used but must be clearly marked, included in the independence declaration, and documented so students' own work remains visible.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kaunas University of Technology

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

KTU describes academic honesty as regulated by its Code of Academic Ethics and says students commit to honestly prepare written, oral, project, and research assignments; the same source describes penalties for academic dishonesty and plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kazan (Volga region) Federal University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Official-source discovery for Kazan Federal University found AI-related news, institute discussion, events, and training descriptions, but did not identify a central binding university-wide generative AI policy or AI-specific academic-integrity rule.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Khalifa University

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Khalifa University Library's Medical AI Research Guide warns that ChatGPT can fail on article identifiers and citations, and says tools such as RefWorks or EndNote are still needed for collecting, managing, and formatting citations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

When students, learners, or personnel use AI tools to create content, KMUTT requires them to cite and clearly state the scope of that use; concealing such use is treated as an ethical violation that may be penalized under relevant rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Kobe University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

Kobe University warns students that entering highly confidential information or personal information into generative AI may lead to information leakage or disclosure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Konkuk University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Konkuk University's Center for Teaching and Learning ChatGPT guide describes ChatGPT as usable for student course questions, assignment help, individualized learning support, and learning-material generation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Lincoln University College

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Lincoln University College has official AI-related academic programme pages, but this run did not verify a central university AI-use policy or guidance source from the official sources found.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Lovely Professional University (LPU)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月22日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

LPU's Scholarly Writing and Research Analytics skill-development course says it integrates publication skills with responsible and ethical use of Artificial Intelligence tools and includes ethical use of AI tools in Week 1.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Manchester Metropolitan University.

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Manchester Metropolitan University library guidance says some generative AI uses do not need citation, but documented AI-assisted search strategies, approved research-project AI use, AI-generated media in submitted assessments, and AI-generated code or Excel formulas must be cited or referenced.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

MLU's AI guideline says generative AI use in study and teaching is generally permissible, with course-specific requirements to be set by responsible instructors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Masaryk University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Masaryk University's AI-in-teaching statement says AI use must be transparent and consistent with academic and personal moral integrity, and compares unacknowledged AI use to ghostwriting as a form of plagiarism.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Middle East Technical University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For METU's GENE 433 term project reports, the course manual says AI usage is encouraged but the written report must respect a Turnitin AI detection limit, with AI similarity at or below 25 percent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Nagasaki University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月22日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Nagasaki University's student notice tells students to pay careful attention to listed risks and follow the course instructor's instructions for generative AI use in classes and similar settings.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

NTU AI Learning Assistant (NALA) is listed for Nanyang Technological University, Singapore (NTU Singapore) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

A UOA-hosted Department of Psychology faculty guide states that it is not a Department of Psychology regulation and applies to students taking the author's courses or supervised work; within that scope, it says AI use in academic work should be explicitly declared.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Chung Hsing University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

National Chung Hsing University's Office of Academic Affairs publishes an AI curriculum information page that includes AI literacy, AI ethics, and generative-AI course entries.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

NITT's 2024 PG Regulations say each course faculty prepares a course plan and that the course plan outlines assessment components, attendance requirements, academic integrity guidelines, and study material information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

MEPhI lists a 2026 professional-development programme for school teachers and education administrators on AI tools, lesson-material creation, checking assignments, detecting signs of AI use, and legal foundations of AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

KPI's AI policy says academic and educational participants should acknowledge and record the use of generative AI, and that instructors may set course-specific AI-use restrictions in the syllabus when needed for learning outcomes.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

National University of Sciences & Technology (NUST) Islamabad

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For NUST Journal of Natural Sciences submissions, GenAI use is restricted to readability and linguistic-quality improvements; authors remain responsible for accuracy and originality and must disclose AI-assisted tool use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

North Carolina State University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

NC State DELTA teaching guidance advises instructors to specify course- and assignment-level AI expectations, and states that as of July 2025 there is no official university policy regarding AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

When students use AI tools to assist undergraduate thesis or design work, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry University requires them to disclose the tool name, version, and specific purpose in relevant thesis sections and keep pre- and post-AI-use original materials as appendix materials for review; the school will randomly select some theses or designs for AI-generated-content detection.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ocean University of China

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Ocean University of China's Undergraduate Affairs Office reported that, for the 2024 autumn term, the university would launch seven AI smart shared courses combining knowledge graphs and AI assistants.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Osaka University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Osaka University's TLSC assessment guidance advises instructors to tell students that inappropriate generative AI use may be treated as academic misconduct, AI use should be limited to learning support, and AI use for analysis should be clearly stated.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences (PIEAS)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

PIEAS states on its website privacy policy that it collects the least personally identifiable information required for its duties or transactions and intends to take reasonable steps against unauthorized access or disclosure.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Palacký University Olomouc

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UP's recommendations state that generative AI use in professional texts and other creative work must be declared, and that staff and students may not claim authorship of texts or other creative outputs generated using AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Panjab University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Panjab University's plagiarism policy lists preventive measures including originality declarations for relevant submissions, electronic-file submission for plagiarism checks, plagiarism-detection software, and plagiarism-check certificates for dissertations and theses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Paris Lodron University of Salzburg

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Salzburg guide says teachers and thesis supervisors set, for each course, assessment, exam, or supervised thesis, whether and to what extent AI technologies may or should be used, and that these requirements for assessed work should be communicated transparently and in writing in advance.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The SPbPU recommendations say employees, faculty, and students must identify results of their work where generative AI technologies were used and indicate the nature and scope of the AI-assisted work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Philipps-Universität Marburg

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型隐私审核: 智能体已审核

The HRZ AI services page says the university offers generative AI services via GWDG KI-Cloud and lists usage rules including no prompt/file input of personal, confidential, or security-relevant data and transparent disclosure when the service is used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Plekhanov Russian University of Economics reports an educational approach in which students may use an already trained model in transfer-learning courses or assignments, with creation of a specialized dataset described as a required condition for that model use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Politecnico di Milano

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

My Learning Talk @Polimi is listed for Politecnico di Milano in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Quaid-i-Azam University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The official QAU Department of Computer Sciences BS page lists Artificial Intelligence as a focus area and includes AI Assisted Programming among elective courses; this is curriculum evidence, not a university-wide AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Queen Mary University of London

1 匹配声明 from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Queen Mary Doctoral College guidance tells postgraduate researchers to decide with supervisors which GenAI systems to use and why, keep detailed records of inputs and outputs, and reference and declare GenAI use in their work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ritsumeikan University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Ritsumeikan University's student-facing generative-AI guidance tells students to follow instructions when a course gives directions about generative-AI use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

RWTH Aachen University

1 匹配声明 from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

RWTH's scenario catalog says external AI systems may be used for university tasks only with attention to legal conditions, and that deployment or procurement of external services requires data-protection and other legal clarifications plus staff co-determination where employee services are involved.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Saint Joseph University of Beirut (USJ)

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

USJ's AI guiding principles frame academic integrity as appropriately incorporating AI-altered or manipulated digital content and citing it accordingly.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Saint Petersburg State University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

SPbU's online course for teachers frames AI as affecting teaching, learning, and research and covers practical use of neural networks, prompt work, AI limitations, copyright, academic integrity, and SPbU's approach to legal and ethical restrictions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Saveetha Institute of Medical And Technical Sciences (SIMATS)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

SIMATS's research promotion policy is an official general research-ethics source that aims to support transparent, socially responsible, and ethical research; this checked source is not an AI-specific policy or generative-AI guidance source.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Shanghai Jiao Tong University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

上海交通大学规定学生应了解并遵守各课程的人工智能使用规范,在课堂学习、作业反馈等环节遵循教学计划、知识产权法律法规和学术诚信要求;未经授权使用在线学习支持平台等行为被列为学术不端的一类。

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Soochow University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

An official Soochow University page says the university opened an AI general required course for all majors in September 2025 and frames it as part of a complete AI education ecosystem.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Stellenbosch University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Stellenbosch University requires postgraduate students to declare any use of AI tools and provides internal and examination declaration processes for postgraduate research work.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Stevens Institute of Technology

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Stevens teaching guidance tells instructors to establish a clear course policy on whether and how students may use AI tools, and to communicate expectations and guidelines in the syllabus when generative AI is permitted in certain areas.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Swinburne University of Technology

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Swinburne's academic integrity guidance says students may use genAI where permitted by unit teaching staff and with acknowledgement, and treats AI-produced assessment work without permission or approved acknowledgement as a breach type.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Taipei Medical University (TMU)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型采购审核: 智能体已审核

Taipei Medical University's Office of Academic Affairs announced a Spring 2026 generative AI tool account subsidy program for eligible faculty and student uses, including faculty who introduce generative AI tools into courses and specified student research, self-learning, competition, club, and project-research uses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technical University of Munich

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

TUM ProLehre guidance says instructors at TUM have broad discretion when deciding whether and how AI is used in teaching, and that related rules should be didactically grounded and communicated transparently to students.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

A TU Freiberg PDF guide for the Professur für Rohstoffabbau und Spezialverfahren unter Tage states that AI-tool use in student and scientific documents must be clearly identified; unmarked AI use is evaluated as attempted fraud.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Technische Universität Dresden

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

TU Dresden's public AI-use guidance says unlabeled or unauthorized use of aids, including answers or results generated with AI-supported text-generation tools such as ChatGPT, constitutes deception under examination law.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Texas Tech University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Texas Tech TLPDC encourages faculty to include clear syllabus statements describing permitted or prohibited generative AI use, with examples that can be adapted to course objectives.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The Catholic University of Korea (CUK)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

CUK's General Graduate School warns that using generative AI information without source verification, concealing AI use, or presenting AI-generated text/materials as one's own can be treated as research misconduct in thesis review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The Hebrew University of Jerusalem

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A Hebrew University Teaching and Learning Unit workshop page says students make broad and frequent use of AI for assignments and academic writing, and frames excessive or unreflective use as a risk to learning goals.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

The University of Hong Kong

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月5日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

HKU states that researchers should clearly disclose generative AI tool usage in research outputs, publications, and presentations, including the type of GenAI used, data sources, and potential limitations.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Microsoft Copilot is listed for Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech) in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: not mentioned. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ton Duc Thang University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

TDTU Library's responsible AI guide tells AI Corner users to use AI responsibly, observe academic integrity, avoid plagiarism, acknowledge AI contributions where relevant, verify AI-generated information, and not submit wholly AI-generated work as their own.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Toronto Metropolitan University (formerly Ryerson University)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

TMU guidance states that, unless a course instructor explicitly communicates otherwise, GenAI use for coursework is not permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

TU Dortmund University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

TU Dortmund's ChatGPT handout states that existing declarations of independent work can be supplemented by subject-specific statements on whether and under what conditions AI tools may be used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

UCL

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UCL uses a 3-category assessment framework for GenAI: Category 1 requires own work only; Category 2 permits GenAI with acknowledgement; Category 3 includes essential GenAI use as part of the assessment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (UNIST)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UNIST Library provides Turnitin to UNIST members for similarity checking of writings such as journal manuscripts, theses, dissertations, and assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Umm Al-Qura University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Umm Al-Qura University journals state that AI tools, including ChatGPT, GPT-4, Google Bard, Claude, and other large language models, cannot be listed as authors in submissions; human authors must disclose any AI use in creating article content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For graded work, UAM's guide recommends that teachers specify which tools are permitted and ask students to reference any assistive technologies they used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Central de Venezuela

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UCV Noticias reports that UCV's AI microcertification project began with teacher training, including an initial group of approximately 250 professors linked to SED-UCV.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Costa Rica

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

UCR's Rectoría declared the ethical, critical, and humanistic adoption of AI and emerging technologies to be of institutional interest on an indefinite basis.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Montevideo (UM)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Universidad de Montevideo's official CDID page lists 2026 Club de Profesores teacher-development sessions on course design in the AI era and evaluative creativity in relation to AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad de Santiago de Chile (USACH)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The USACH Libraries announcement says the AI LibGuide covers academic integrity, copyright, appropriate citation use, and practical orientations for research and teaching.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

A 2025 UPM institutional-repository good-practice guide suggests a template for course guides to state whether generative AI tools are permitted, restricted, or not permitted; the guide itself says it is a recommendation or author opinion and not an official UPM recommendation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidade Católica Portuguesa

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

UCP guidance says professors, students, and researchers are obliged to be transparent about their use of generative AI in academic materials, including materials used for assessment and academic progression.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UFSC's resolution characterizes as academic misconduct the improper presentation of a work made wholly or partly with generative AI or equivalent technology when original authorship is required or such tools are expressly prohibited, and also characterizes nondisclosure of generative AI use as misconduct where disclosure is expressly required.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

CRIA/UFRJ recommends that instructors define acceptable and unacceptable generative AI uses in their course teaching plans.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Universita Cattolica del Sacro Cuore's official sources describe AI literacy as part of the strategic plan and present an AI course for all students focused on critical, conscious, and responsible use of AI.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Università degli Studi di Pavia

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UniPV offers an internal course for university language experts on integrating generative-AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini into language teaching.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Official UniSR discovery found AI-related public-engagement and course-offering material, but did not locate a central AI-specific student, teaching, assessment, privacy, or research policy in the searched official sources.

证据记录: 3。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universita' Politecnica delle Marche

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UNIVPM's Research Integrity Charter states that UNIVPM defines and implements clear and transparent policies and procedures for good research practices, suspected research, and research-integrity violations, and provides infrastructure for research data and material generation, management, and protection.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UPF's instruction says students who include AI-generated text, code, images, or similar fragments must identify them and cite the source used to generate them.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universität Potsdam

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The 2026 AI-and-examinations handbook advises examiners to state early and in writing whether and how AI may be used in a course and assessment, and to use transparency rules when AI is allowed or cannot be explicitly excluded.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat Ramon Llull

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

URL's AI recommendations tell users to clearly indicate sources and references and to explicitly state when AI-based tools are used and how the information was used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universitat Rovira i Virgili

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

URV's student guide treats AI use in coursework as valid and recommended when it supports learning, while telling students to use it with teacher consent, declare its use, cite it, and verify AI-generated information.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

BU Lyon 1's introductory generative AI workshop states that it gives participants pointers for combining AI use with respect for academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Fribourg

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

When generative AI use is authorized in academic work, UniFR expects full transparency through a specific declaration and field-appropriate citation norms; undeclared use is treated as a violation of scientific integrity rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Montpellier

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UM's AI-in-training principles say student AI use should respect university regulations, rules for each teaching activity, and assessment-specific instructions; expectations should be clarified in course and assessment materials.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Rennes

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

In assessments where generative AI use is authorized, Université de Rennes' AI charter says students must declare the use of generative AI in the relevant passages and prohibits submitting AI-generated output without saying so in place of the requested work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Strasbourg

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Unistra's AI guidelines say authors should indicate when content was partially or fully produced by AI and identify AI-generated passages unambiguously like any borrowed material or external-source citation.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université de Tunis El Manar

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月18日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Université de Tunis El Manar states that it makes a similarity-detection platform available to its teacher-researchers for plagiarism prevention and detection, including analysis of digital student submissions to identify uncited similar paragraphs from online texts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université du Québec

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Université du Québec's principles state that significant use of generative AI should be explicitly mentioned, including how and to what extent it was used.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Université Paris Cité

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The official Université Paris Cité GEN-IAS course catalogue states that the DIU covers generative AI in health, including organizational, regulatory, economic and ethical aspects, and targets competencies such as preventing risks, respecting the legal and regulatory environment, ethics, and human guarantee.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Brunei Darussalam (UBD)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The UBD-hosted AJSTD journal policy requires authors to openly disclose the use of AI and AI-assisted technologies in manuscripts.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (UNIMAS)

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The UNIMAS Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities 2025/2026 student handbook says AI does not replace lecturers, lecture notes, or main academic references, and warns students not to copy directly from AI answers, submit AI answers as their own work without citation, or use AI to cheat in exams or assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月14日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

IJAPS, a Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia journal, requires manuscript authors to note AI software use such as ChatGPT in Materials and Methods or Acknowledgments and not list AI as an author.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP)

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UTP's Bachelor of Information Systems page lists Generative AI and Responsible AI as field elective courses in the Intelligent Information System group.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UUM's assessment handbook says it provides guidance for instructors in undergraduate and postgraduate programmes on closed-book, open-book, and 100% coursework assessment options.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Algarve

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月26日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

An official University of Algarve 2024-25 Market Studies course sheet states that, for that course, fraud, plagiarism, or improper use of Artificial Intelligence is handled under paragraph 15 of UAlg's Assessment Regulations, and the instructor may require an additional test if there is doubt. This is course-level assessment-integrity evidence, not a general AI policy for all UAlg courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Alicante

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Alicante's ICE offered a teaching-staff course analyzing ChatGPT's implications for university teaching, including applications, opportunities, plagiarism, evaluation difficulties, and strategies for participants' courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Amsterdam

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

The UvA and VU task force on AI in education has produced criteria for software to ensure academic integrity, and expects students to be transparent about how they have applied generative AI in their own learning and work.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Bordeaux

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Bordeaux's 2024 exam charter says unmentioned use of any AI tool such as ChatGPT is prohibited for written or oral work, except for teacher-supervised pedagogical use, and may be treated as fraud.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Brescia

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Brescia announced a high-training course on artificial intelligence for public administration that includes technical, organizational, ethical, Large Language Model, ChatGPT, and Copilot topics.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Cape Town

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

UCT's EiRC research guideline says researchers should use generative AI tools in the context of UCT policies and disclose AI use with a disclaimer or explanatory note describing where and how it was used.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Chemistry and Technology, Prague

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For final theses, VŠCHT Prague says students who use assistance tools should mention in an appropriate part of the thesis which tools were used and to what extent.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Cincinnati

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Cincinnati teaching guidance tells instructors to include clear syllabus policies explaining how or whether students may use generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Delhi

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

A University of Delhi College of Vocational Studies curriculum appendix includes an Artificial Intelligence Tools for Office Management course objective about understanding AI tools for day-to-day office work; this is course-level curriculum evidence and not a university-wide AI tool-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Dhaka

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Dhaka describes rules for preventing plagiarism in research work, including detection, declaration, penalties, and review procedures.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of East Anglia (UEA)

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For Norwich Medical School written assessments, UEA's FOI appendix says generative AI is not permitted in writing submissions unless a module leader explicitly permits it, while early ideation and later grammar or clarity support are allowed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Hawaii at Hilo

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Google AI Pro for Education is listed for University of Hawaii at Hilo in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Ibadan

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

University of Ibadan's official Information Technology and Media Policy includes an eLearning section that expects lecturers to deploy part of coursework online and use Moodle-based tools for learning activities and online continuous assessment; this is source context and not an AI-specific policy claim.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Isfahan

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Authors submitting to New Educational Approaches must transparently disclose use of AI tools such as large language models or chatbots for generating or editing part of an article in a separate AI-use statement before the references.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Jordan

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Jordan has an official School of Engineering course syllabus for 'Application of Artificial Intelligence in Chemical Engineering' that includes a Course Policies section with a heading for honesty policy regarding cheating, plagiarism, and misbehavior; this source is course-level syllabus material and not a university-wide AI policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Limerick

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Limerick guidance says legitimate AI use in academia is a local decision, with module coordinators, programme leads, or Heads of Department setting limits within module or programme design.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Lisbon

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月15日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

At Instituto Superior Técnico, the reported deliberation called for assessment methods to make explicit whether AI tools are permitted.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Louisville

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Louisville Delphi Center provides sample syllabus statements for three generative AI approaches: not permitted, permitted with prior instructor permission and appropriate attribution and citation, or allowed without restrictions.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Manitoba

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Manitoba students may use AI and Generative AI tools for coursework only when their instructor has explicitly permitted that use, and expectations can vary by course and assignment.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Maryland, Baltimore County

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

UMBC's Academic and Instructional AI guidance advises instructors to set clear expectations for generative AI use, including citation or reference expectations if AI is permitted, and says students who use AI should have prompts available to explain their process.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Mississippi

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Mississippi Libraries guidance tells students to use and cite AI according to the syllabus, assignment description, or other instructor communication, noting that instructor requirements may vary by class.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Modena and Reggio Emilia

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Pending university AI-use guidelines, Unimore recommended verifying sources, keeping human control by using AI only as assistance, requesting source citations in prompts, protecting sensitive data, and documenting AI use in proceedings.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Mons

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UMONS states that when submitted work incorporates AI-generated elements, those elements must be cited according to appropriate bibliographic standards.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Mumbai

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

A University of Mumbai digital-ethics syllabus includes responsible use of Artificial Intelligence in research alongside data privacy, digital plagiarism, plagiarism-check tools, and reliability of digital information; this is course-level teaching content, not a university-wide AI-use rule.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Naples - Federico II

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For students and similar figures, the guidelines say AI may be used only as support for study and learning, and AI-generated content for assessments or theses is not permitted without explicit declaration and authorization from the responsible teacher.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Naples Parthenope

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月24日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型源状态审核: 智能体已审核

Official discovery for University of Naples Parthenope found general student disciplinary provisions in the General University Regulation, but did not identify a university AI-tool, generative-AI assessment, or AI citation rule in the official sources reviewed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Navarra

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For student use of generative AI tools, University of Navarra's AI policy asks teachers to follow the university's generative-AI and academic-integrity guide and communicate clear expectations to students for their courses.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Oregon

1 匹配声明 from 8 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Oregon teaching guidance says instructors should have a syllabus policy statement explaining what generative AI use is allowed and disallowed in their course.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Parma

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月25日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For academic materials, the guidelines say use of generative AI must be explicitly declared with the tool, version, and purpose; not declaring AI use is described as a violation of academic integrity rules.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Plymouth

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Plymouth Faculty of Science and Engineering guidance says AI tools such as ChatGPT should generally not be used to generate the final version of assessed work, unless the coursework briefing clearly states an exception.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Salerno

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月20日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Salerno has an official 2024/2025 course page for a master's course titled International Law, Cybersecurity and Ethics of Artificial Intelligence; the course objectives describe AI, cybersecurity, governance, data protection, and trustworthy AI topics. This is course-level teaching evidence, not a university-wide AI-use policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Science and Technology Beijing

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

For the 2026 Beijing Xi Jinping Thought Research Center project application process announced by USTB's research office, applicants are told to use generative AI in a standardized way, ensure truthfulness and accuracy when using it for research tracking or reference collection, declare and label such use, and not submit an application directly generated by generative AI.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Southampton

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

University of Southampton guidance tells students to talk to their module tutor about how to use GenAI; the permitted extent and ways of use depend on the task, learning, and capabilities expected, and some activities may require a GenAI declaration statement.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Tasmania

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tasmania guidance says unapproved, inappropriate, or unacknowledged use of generative AI may be considered dishonest or unfair behaviour and therefore a breach of academic integrity.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Tehran

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

University of Tehran's Journal of Entrepreneurship Development states that AI tools are supportive aids, manuscripts are independently evaluated by expert human reviewers with final decisions made by humans, and AI use in writing or analyzing manuscripts must be disclosed in the article or submission documents.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Trento

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

UniTrento states that use of generative-AI tools must be explicitly declared in research, teaching, and administrative activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University Of Tuebingen

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

bwGPT is listed for Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Turin

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

The University of Turin Teaching and Learning Center announced a generative-AI training course for teaching staff, covering production of educational resources with AI and educational innovation with AI, including prompting, course redesign, assessment, academic integrity, and virtual tutors.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Warsaw

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For University of Warsaw American Studies Center students, ASC academic-integrity guidance says using generative AI tools to generate content and submitting it as one's own work is prohibited, and students should follow the course syllabus or ask instructors about permitted use.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

University of Witwatersrand

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Wits University's AI Framework says individual scholars or human teams remain responsible for originality, accuracy, and integrity, and that AI use should be transparently disclosed and appropriately acknowledged in line with university policy.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Utrecht University

1 匹配声明 from 7 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月23日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Utrecht University uses an AI index for students as a five-level scale for how AI may be used, with teachers able to choose levels for a course or specific assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Verona University

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月21日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Verona University's AI guidelines say AI use must be explicitly declared, including the tool used, for exams, research, administrative documents, or other content.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月16日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

VUB's research AI guidelines say researchers must provide the greatest possible degree of transparency on AI tool use in scientific activities.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

VSB - Technical University of Ostrava

1 匹配声明 from 3 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月31日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

For education, creative activity, and research, VSB-TUO's AI rules say users must properly state when a result was achieved using AI, including the scope of use; presenting AI-generated outputs as one's own work is considered fraud.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Wake Forest University

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Wake Forest's academic generative AI guidance says course materials should communicate when and how generative AI tools may be used and acknowledged.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Warsaw University of Technology

1 匹配声明 from 5 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

WUT recommendations advise instructors to consider adding information to course regulations on whether and how GenAI systems may be used, and state that instructors or supervisors may directly prohibit GenAI use for work such as tests, exams, or expert opinions.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Western Sydney University

1 匹配声明 from 6 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Western Sydney University's research-integrity AI training material recommends that researchers not rely fully on generative AI for literature reviews, acknowledge generative AI use, take responsibility for content, cross-check references, and use generative AI only for a first draft or editing/proofreading of ethics applications.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Xi’an Jiaotong University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Xi'an Jiaotong University's Teacher Teaching Development Center listed an October 2024 workshop on large language models and intelligent learning, with content points including ChatGPT use in research, office work, and teaching, domestic AI models, vertical-domain AI, GPT risk warnings, and strategies for responding to student assignments.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Yokohama National University

1 匹配声明 from 4 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年6月12日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型学术诚信审核: 智能体已审核

Yokohama National University tells students to pay sufficient attention to its generative AI precautions and, for course assignments, reports, experiments, and research papers, to strictly follow the scope of use instructed by the responsible or supervising instructor.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Zayed University

1 匹配声明 from 1 官方来源.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型教学审核: 智能体已审核

Zayed University said it was undertaking a university-wide faculty training initiative to help faculty embed AI into course design and teaching practices.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Zhejiang University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年7月19日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型研究审核: 智能体已审核

Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE policy says AI or large language models cannot be listed as manuscript authors or co-authors, authors remain responsible for AI-assisted content, and substantive generative AI use in manuscript preparation must be disclosed explicitly and in detail.

证据记录: 2。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

Zhengzhou University

1 匹配声明 from 2 官方来源s.

最后检查时间2026年5月17日审核: 智能体已审核公开 JSON
声明类型AI 工具处理方式审核: 智能体已审核

Zhengzhou University said implementation of the AI literacy standards would include an AI general compulsory course, AI plus major course clusters, a university-level AI experiment platform, AI cultural activities, innovation competitions, and incentive links to teaching evaluation and professional-title review.

证据记录: 1。原始证据在链接的大学记录和公共 JSON 中保持权威性。

数据与建议边界

主题页面展示索引切片,而非新结论。

  • 公开页面与公开 JSON 应保持一致,因为二者均基于已推广的公开发布数据集构建。
  • 原始语言证据为标准版本。翻译和显示摘要为辅助内容。
  • 置信度独立于 reviewState;reviewState 描述工作流状态。
  • Tracker metadata is open licensed. Official source documents, page text, PDFs, and other source materials retain their original rights and terms.
  • This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
  • 主题匹配基于可见的公开声明和证据文本;它并非新的审核决定。

浏览所有记录于 /universities 或在以下位置查看数据集 /api/public/v1/universities.json.