University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

Worcester, United States

Worcester Polytechnic Institute

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: 851-900Updated2026年7月19日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

4 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Zoom AI Companion is listed for Worcester Polytechnic Institute in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"zoom_ai_companion","rawToolName":"Zoom AI Companion","description":"Worcester Polytechnic Institute provides or institutionally supports Zoom AI Companion.","howToObtain":"Enable the option in a WPI Zoom account.","costToUser":"No individual price is stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

最后检查时间
2026年7月19日
最后更改时间
2026年7月19日

原始证据

证据 1
Zoom AI Companion options are available to all WPI Zoom accounts

本地化显示 only

Zoom AI Companion options are available to all WPI Zoom accounts

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
d554d042…
已检索
2026年7月19日

Academic Integrity

WPI's academic-integrity page defines cheating to include using unauthorized study aids, materials, information, or assistance in academic activity or assessment, and defines plagiarism to include using another's words, ideas, assertions, data, creative works, or graphics without proper attribution.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: unauthorized_assistance_and_attribution_policy

最后检查时间
2026年5月21日
最后更改时间
2026年5月21日

原始证据

证据 1
Cheating: Attempting to use or intentionally using unauthorized study aids, materials, information, or assistance in any academic activity or assessment. ... Plagiarism: Using words, ideas, assertions, data, creative works, or graphics of another without proper attribution in any academic activity.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
0e702202…
已检索
2026年5月21日
证据定位器
Academic Integrity at WPI definitions

教学

WPI Library guidance says users should be transparent about AI-tool use and cite AI tools when they use them to gather information, write or edit text, generate media, synthesize ideas, or clean or manipulate data.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: transparent_ai_use_and_citation_guidance

最后检查时间
2026年5月21日
最后更改时间
2026年5月21日

原始证据

证据 1
In general, you should always be transparent about your use of AI tools. Since AI tools cannot be considered an author ... they are generally considered a collaborator. Cite AI tools when they are used to: Gather information; Write text or generate media; Edit text; Synthesize ideas or find connections; "Clean" or manipulate data.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
d29c2b88…
已检索
2026年5月21日
证据定位器
Why and How Should I Cite AI? section

Ai Tool Treatment

WPI Library guidance states that WPI professors have broad discretion over whether, how, and when students may use ChatGPT or other generative-AI content in assignments and projects, and students should check with their professor for expectations.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度88%

标准化值: instructor_discretion

最后检查时间
2026年5月21日
最后更改时间
2026年5月21日

原始证据

证据 1
At WPI professors have broad discretion and many valid perspectives on whether, how, and when students can use ChatGPT or other content produced by generative artificial intelligence in assignments and projects.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
2dd8b250…
已检索
2026年5月21日
证据定位器
Generative AI and your class section

Source record

官方来源

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度97%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Worcester Polytechnic Institute AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/worcester-polytechnic-institute

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志