Policy presence
University of Pennsylvania has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Philadelphia, United States
University of Pennsylvania has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
University of Pennsylvania has 4 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
University of Pennsylvania has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Pennsylvania has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Pennsylvania has 5 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
University of Pennsylvania has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
University of Pennsylvania has 5 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Pennsylvania has 5 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: required.
University of Pennsylvania has 5 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
University of Pennsylvania has 5 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania
26 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot Chat (Basic)","description":"Generative AI chat client running on ChatGPT with Penn protections when logged into a University account.","howToObtain":"Self-service activation through Penn ISC; users must use a University account.","costToUser":"No additional charge over existing Microsoft 365 agreements.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}
Original evidence
Evidence 1Microsoft Copilot Chat (Basic) | Full-range generative AI chat client running on ChatGPT | No additional charge over existing Microsoft 365 agreements; self-service available | Low, Moderate, and most High Risk Data except SSNs and credit card data.
Localized display only
Microsoft Copilot Chat (Basic) | Full-range generative AI chat client running on ChatGPT | No additional charge over existing Microsoft 365 agreements; self-service available | Low, Moderate, and most High Risk Data except SSNs and credit card data.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot_for_m365","rawToolName":"Microsoft M365 Copilot (Premium)","description":"Premium Microsoft 365 Copilot integrated into Office applications and work search.","howToObtain":"Faculty and staff should contact their IT Support Provider.","costToUser":"$16.50 per month.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}
Original evidence
Evidence 1Microsoft M365 Copilot (Premium) | Integrates OpenAI ChatGPT or Anthropic Claude into Microsoft Office applications | Available for faculty and staff at $16.50 per month; contact IT Support Provider.
Localized display only
Microsoft M365 Copilot (Premium) | Integrates OpenAI ChatGPT or Anthropic Claude into Microsoft Office applications | Available for faculty and staff at $16.50 per month; contact IT Support Provider.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: {"tool":"institutional_ai_service","rawToolName":"Snowflake Data Analytics Platform & Consulting","description":"Data, analytics, and AI platform using LLMs from OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and others.","howToObtain":"Contact ISC Support Provider.","costToUser":"Consumption-based costs.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}
Original evidence
Evidence 1Snowflake Data Analytics Platform & Consulting | Full data, analytics, and AI platform using industry-leading LLMs from OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and others | Costs based on consumption; contact ISC Support Provider.
Localized display only
Snowflake Data Analytics Platform & Consulting | Full data, analytics, and AI platform using industry-leading LLMs from OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, and others | Costs based on consumption; contact ISC Support Provider.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: {"tool":"gemini","rawToolName":"Gemini for Google Workspace","description":"Generative AI integrated into Google Workspace for selected Penn schools.","howToObtain":"Available for some faculty and staff at ASC, SEAS, and Wharton; contact IT Support Provider.","costToUser":"$20 or $30 per month.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}
Original evidence
Evidence 1Gemini for Google Workspace | Integrates generative AI into Google Workspace | Available for some faculty and staff at ASC, SEAS, and Wharton for $20 or $30 per month; contact IT Support Provider.
Localized display only
Gemini for Google Workspace | Integrates generative AI into Google Workspace | Available for some faculty and staff at ASC, SEAS, and Wharton for $20 or $30 per month; contact IT Support Provider.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: {"tool":"notebooklm","rawToolName":"Google NotebookLM","description":"AI research and note-taking assistant focused on uploaded content.","howToObtain":"Available for some faculty and staff at ASC, SEAS, and Wharton; contact IT Support Provider.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}
Original evidence
Evidence 1Google NotebookLM | AI Research Assistant focused on uploaded content | Available for some faculty and staff only at ASC, SEAS, and Wharton; contact IT Support Provider.
Localized display only
Google NotebookLM | AI Research Assistant focused on uploaded content | Available for some faculty and staff only at ASC, SEAS, and Wharton; contact IT Support Provider.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: {"tool":"grammarly","rawToolName":"Grammarly","description":"Writing assistant with AI-assisted outlining, citation, and revision.","howToObtain":"Contact IT Support Provider for Grammarly for Education licenses.","costToUser":"$87/year with annual commitment.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}
Original evidence
Evidence 1Grammarly | Writing-centric tool with AI-assisted outlining, citation, and revision | Beginning January 2026, ISC will offer Grammarly for Education licenses as a paid service to Penn affiliates at $87/year.
Localized display only
Grammarly | Writing-centric tool with AI-assisted outlining, citation, and revision | Beginning January 2026, ISC will offer Grammarly for Education licenses as a paid service to Penn affiliates at $87/year.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: {"tool":"chatgpt","rawToolName":"ChatGPT Edu","description":"Full-range generative AI chat client for text, images, and audio.","howToObtain":"Faculty and staff should contact IT Support Provider; students may have access when required and paid by school, department, or instructor.","costToUser":"$13 per month for faculty and staff.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}
Original evidence
Evidence 1ChatGPT Edu | Full-range generative AI chat client for text, images, audio | Available for faculty and staff at $13 per month; students may have access when required in course or research experience and paid by the school, department, or instructor.
Localized display only
ChatGPT Edu | Full-range generative AI chat client for text, images, audio | Available for faculty and staff at $13 per month; students may have access when required in course or research experience and paid by the school, department, or instructor.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1Be transparent about the use of AI. Disclose when a work product was created wholly or partially using an AI tool and, if appropriate, how AI was used to create the work product.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1Penn offers access to a number of AI tools. The guidelines for protecting student privacy while using these tools are informed by the data risk classification and the privacy agreements of the tool being used.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1The user of AI should endeavor to validate the accuracy of created content with trusted first party sources and monitor the reliability of that content. Users are accountable for their use of content created by AI and should be wary of misinformation or "hallucinations" by AI tools (e.g., citations to publications or source materials that do not exist or references that otherwise distort the truth).
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1Users of AI should avoid sharing personal or sensitive data with the tool and should not input moderate or high-risk Penn data as defined by the Penn Data Risk Classification, or intellectual property, without: Careful consideration and understanding of the tool's use of Penn data and the service provider's stated rights to the data, including, but not limited to whether the service provider offers the option to opt-out of using customer's data to train the AI; A contract in place to protect Penn data; and Review by Penn's Privacy Office and consultation with the Office of Information Security as coordinated by Procurement when moderate or high-risk data is involved.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1It is not permissible under the Health Information Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) or Penn Medicine policy to share patient or research participant information in connection with open or public AI tools and services, such as ChatGPT. This is because, as currently configured, such open or public tools and services can use and share any data without regard to HIPAA restrictions and other protections. Therefore, individual patient data and patient data sets (even if deidentified) may not be exposed to open or public AI tools or services, absent institutional approval.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1Researchers should adhere to federal or international requirements on obtaining informed consent, and Institutional Review Board approvals should be obtained prior to exposing research participant data to AI tools. Caution should be adopted when research involves the examination of high-risk data, including Personally Identifiable Information (PII) and research participant health information (both identifiable and non-identifiable) exposed to AI.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1Do not enter any information that could identify a student. This includes names, ID numbers, or email addresses, as well as detailed descriptions of student work or engagement in class that could be identifiable to others.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1Do not enter student work (e.g., papers, projects) without the student's permission, even if it is anonymized. This work is part of the student's confidential academic record.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1Do not require students to enter their own work into an unlicensed AI tool or use it in assignments. Unlicensed tools may be used optionally by students at the instructor's discretion but consider using a Penn-licensed tool for mandatory components of coursework to protect student data.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1Individual instructors determine their own policies related to acceptable student use of generative AI in coursework.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1Members of the Penn community should adhere to established principles of respect for intellectual property, particularly copyrights when considering the creation of new data sets for training AI models. Avoid uploading confidential and/or proprietary information to AI platforms prior to seeking patent or copyright protection, as doing so could jeopardize IP rights.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1While automating tasks using AI may improve operational efficiency for University Business processes, oversight and review of the use of AI and verification of its outputs for these University business processes should be in place to ensure reliability, consistency, and accuracy.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1As expectations may vary between classes and instructors, it is important for instructors to provide students with clear guidelines similar to the guidelines on collaboration, on the use of AI within coursework, and when and how the use of AI within a course should be cited. Disclose to students when course materials have been created with the use of AI and when AI detection software will be used in the course.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1In the absence of other guidance, treat the use of AI as you would treat assistance from another person. For example, this means if it is unacceptable to have another person substantially complete a task like writing an essay, it is also unacceptable to have AI to complete the task.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1Consult with your department leadership and your discipline's publishing standards to determine how the use of AI should be accounted for with regard to authorship in publications.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1Using somebody else's work without crediting the source – including generative AI — is plagiarism. Guided by the policies of faculty, instructional teams, and staff, AI-generated work should be cited like any other reference material, including how and where students used AI-generated information.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1Don't use AI for personal reflection or opinion-based tasks. We are interested in hearing your opinions, your stories and your thoughts. Don't rely on AI for group assignments. Using AI to complete your portion of a group project instead of collaborating with your peers is considered academic dishonesty. Don't use AI to cheat on exams or tests.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1Don't directly copy answers from generative AI tools and submit as your own. Don't use AI to paraphrase or rewrite plagiarized content. Don't post AI-generated discussion posts within the course community forum.
Other
Original evidence
Evidence 1At the discretion of faculty, instructional teams and staff, Wharton Academy students may use generative AI tools.
1 machine or needs-review claim
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: {"tool":"zoom_ai_companion","rawToolName":"Zoom AI Companion","description":"AI plug-in administered through Penn Zoom resources.","howToObtain":"Refer to Penn Zoom service resources for plugin details.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}
This claim is held for review because the evidence or classification needs another pass.
Original evidence
Evidence 1Penn notes that ISC administers tools with AI plug-ins such as Box and Zoom AI Companion, and directs users to the base page for that service.
Localized display only
Penn notes that ISC administers tools with AI plug-ins such as Box and Zoom AI Companion, and directs users to the base page for that service.
14 source attribution
academy.wharton.upenn.edu
catalog.upenn.edu
cetli.upenn.edu
almanac.upenn.edu
cetli.upenn.edu
isc.upenn.edu
University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania
University of Pennsylvania
isc.upenn.edu