Policy presence
Worcester Polytechnic Institute has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Worcester, United States
Worcester Polytechnic Institute has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute has 1 source-backed public claim for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Worcester Polytechnic Institute has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
3 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
Normalized value: unauthorized_assistance_and_attribution_policy
Original evidence
Evidence 1Cheating: Attempting to use or intentionally using unauthorized study aids, materials, information, or assistance in any academic activity or assessment. ... Plagiarism: Using words, ideas, assertions, data, creative works, or graphics of another without proper attribution in any academic activity.
Teaching
Normalized value: transparent_ai_use_and_citation_guidance
Original evidence
Evidence 1In general, you should always be transparent about your use of AI tools. Since AI tools cannot be considered an author ... they are generally considered a collaborator. Cite AI tools when they are used to: Gather information; Write text or generate media; Edit text; Synthesize ideas or find connections; "Clean" or manipulate data.
Ai Tool Treatment
Normalized value: instructor_discretion
Original evidence
Evidence 1At WPI professors have broad discretion and many valid perspectives on whether, how, and when students can use ChatGPT or other content produced by generative artificial intelligence in assignments and projects.
0 machine or needs-review claim
3 source attribution
libguides.wpi.edu
libguides.wpi.edu
wpi.edu