Policy analysis

Source-backed analysis profiles, not policy advice

Derived dimensions over public claim/evidence records. Each non-empty result keeps claim IDs, source URLs, source language, and evidence.

Profiles828Schemauapt-policy-analysis-v1Review: Machine candidatePublic API/api/public/v1/analysis/index.json
828

analysis profiles

6998

evidence-backed dimensions

83/100

average public coverage score

60

source languages preserved

What analysis means

Analysis profiles are derived metadata over public claim/evidence records. They summarize policy dimensions without replacing source evidence.

What coverage score means

Coverage score measures breadth of visible public evidence, not policy quality, safety, legality, strictness, or compliance.

How to cite analysis

Cite the analysis JSON with the related university record, basis claim IDs, source URLs, review state, and original evidence.

Summary

For citation context.

As of the current public release, University AI Policy Tracker has deterministic policy dimension analysis for 828 university records. 6998 records have source-backed evidence for this dimension; 235 records are classified as required. These analysis profiles are machine-candidate derived metadata and should be cited with their source claim IDs and public JSON.

Policy Coverage Score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage. It is not a quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or institutional compliance score.

Boundary

Derived metadata with source links.

  • Dimensions summarize public tracker claims into consistent labels.
  • Original-language evidence remains canonical.
  • Confidence is separate from review state.
  • This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
  • not_mentioned means no matching public tracker evidence is present in the current profile.
  • Open basis claim IDs and source URLs before reuse.

Dimensions

All dimensions are visible and contract-backed.

Policy presence

Whether the public record contains official AI policy or guidance sources.

769: Unclear59: Not mentioned
Evidence-backed769Not mentioned59

AI disclosure

Whether public guidance addresses disclosure, acknowledgement, citation, or declaration of AI use.

282: Recommended280: Required263: Not mentioned3: Unclear
Evidence-backed565Not mentioned263

Coursework

Whether public guidance addresses coursework, assignments, syllabi, papers, homework, or submitted work.

246: Restricted239: Required150: Conditionally allowed67: Allowed
Evidence-backed796Not mentioned32

Exams

Whether public guidance addresses exams, tests, quizzes, or examination conditions.

311: Restricted237: Required93: Conditionally allowed62: Blocked
Evidence-backed795Not mentioned33

Privacy and data entry

Whether public guidance addresses personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

399: Restricted232: Not mentioned83: Blocked35: Recommended
Evidence-backed596Not mentioned232

Academic integrity

Whether public guidance connects AI use to academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.

235: Required227: Restricted135: Not mentioned82: Conditionally allowed
Evidence-backed693Not mentioned135

Approved tools

Whether public guidance identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

181: Restricted169: Allowed155: Not mentioned135: Required
Evidence-backed673Not mentioned155

Named AI services

Whether public guidance names AI services such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude, Gemini, Grammarly, or DeepSeek.

306: Restricted122: Not mentioned91: Required91: Blocked
Evidence-backed706Not mentioned122

Teaching guidance

Whether public guidance addresses instructors, teaching, classroom policy, assessment design, or syllabus language.

652: Recommended176: Not mentioned
Evidence-backed652Not mentioned176

Research guidance

Whether public guidance addresses research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

336: Not mentioned301: Recommended191: Restricted
Evidence-backed492Not mentioned336

Security and procurement

Whether public guidance addresses security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or licensing.

567: Not mentioned82: Restricted61: Required48: Allowed
Evidence-backed261Not mentioned567

Coverage score

The score is a coverage breadth measure only.

Coverage score components sum to 100 points across public evidence categories such as central guidance, academic integrity, disclosure, coursework, exams, privacy/data entry, approved tools, and teaching or research guidance.

The score should never be described as best policy, worst policy, most compliant, legally safe, or institutionally endorsed.

Quality gates

Publication gates keep analysis pages useful for search and AI answer engines without turning sparse data into thin pages.

Current page-quality status: passes current quality gate. The report covers 5 public analysis pages and keeps review state separate from page publication readiness.

Server-rendered public content

Analysis conclusions, caveats, review state, evidence counts, and public JSON links must be visible in HTML.

Gateserver_rendered_public_content

Theme evidence threshold

Theme analysis pages are generated only when at least five records have source-backed evidence for the dimension.

Gatetheme_evidence_threshold

Review state boundary

Review state must be visible and must remain separate from confidence.

Gatereview_state_boundary

Original-language evidence

Source-language evidence remains canonical; localized display cannot replace it.

Gateoriginal_language_evidence

Coverage score caveat

Coverage scores must be described only as breadth of public source-backed coverage, not quality, compliance, legality, safety, or ranking.

Gatecoverage_score_caveat

No-advice boundary

Pages must state that tracker analysis is not legal advice, academic integrity advice, or an official university statement.

Gateno_advice_boundary

Versioned public JSON

Public analysis metadata must use /api/public/v1/... endpoints.

Gateversioned_public_json

Review workflow

Quality checks do not publish canonical analysis. They route questionable records into review.

Analysis profiles remain machine_candidate until reviewers confirm evidence binding, not-mentioned reasoning, source-language preservation, page quality gates, and no-advice boundaries.

Queueanalysis_profile_reviewPublic mutationNot allowedReview states6

Theme analysis

Only themes with enough public evidence are linked from this index.

AI disclosure

Source-backed analysis of public university guidance on disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.

Open analysis

Privacy and data entry

Source-backed analysis of public university guidance on personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Open analysis

Approved AI tools

Source-backed analysis of public university guidance naming approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Open analysis

Public JSON

Versioned read-only endpoints for downstream reuse.

Citation

Use the canonical page and public JSON together.

Suggested citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University AI policy analysis profiles." Version v1. https://eduaipolicy.org/analysis

Tracker metadata uses CC-BY-4.0. Official source documents, source page text, PDFs, and other source materials retain their original rights and terms.