分析是什么意思
分析档案是公共声明/证据记录上的派生元数据；它们总结政策维度，但不替代来源证据。
政策分析
有来源证据的分析档案，不是政策建议
基于公共声明/证据记录派生的维度。每个非空结果保留声明 ID、来源 URL、来源语言和证据。
788
分析档案
6515
有证据的维度
82/100
平均公共覆盖分
57
保留的来源语言
覆盖分是什么意思
覆盖分衡量可见公共证据的广度，不代表政策质量、安全性、合法性、严格程度或合规性。
如何引用分析
把分析 JSON 与相关高校记录、依据声明 ID、来源 URL、审查状态和原始证据一起引用。
摘要
For citation context.
As of the current public release, University AI Policy Tracker has deterministic policy dimension analysis for 788 university records. 6515 records have source-backed evidence for this dimension; 228 records are classified as required. These analysis profiles are machine-candidate derived metadata and should be cited with their source claim IDs and public JSON.
Policy Coverage Score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage. It is not a quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or institutional compliance score.
边界
Derived metadata with source links.
- Dimensions summarize public tracker claims into consistent labels.
- Original-language evidence remains canonical.
- Confidence is separate from review state.
- This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
- not_mentioned means no matching public tracker evidence is present in the current profile.
- Open basis claim IDs and source URLs before reuse.
维度
All dimensions are visible and contract-backed.
Policy presence
Whether the public record contains official AI policy or guidance sources.
703: Unclear85: Not Mentioned
AI disclosure
Whether public guidance addresses disclosure, acknowledgement, citation, or declaration of AI use.
270: Required266: Not Mentioned249: Recommended3: Unclear
Coursework
Whether public guidance addresses coursework, assignments, syllabi, papers, homework, or submitted work.
286: Restricted200: Required128: Conditionally Allowed62: Blocked
Exams
Whether public guidance addresses exams, tests, quizzes, or examination conditions.
355: Restricted206: Required64: Conditionally Allowed61: Blocked
Privacy and data entry
Whether public guidance addresses personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
388: Restricted217: Not Mentioned80: Blocked43: Recommended
Academic integrity
Whether public guidance connects AI use to academic integrity, misconduct, dishonesty, plagiarism, or cheating rules.
228: Required219: Restricted115: Not Mentioned81: Conditionally Allowed
Approved tools
Whether public guidance identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
202: Restricted194: Not Mentioned145: Allowed82: Required
Named AI services
Whether public guidance names AI services such as ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude, Gemini, Grammarly, or DeepSeek.
336: Restricted143: Not Mentioned93: Blocked59: Unclear
Teaching guidance
Whether public guidance addresses instructors, teaching, classroom policy, assessment design, or syllabus language.
628: Recommended160: Not Mentioned
Research guidance
Whether public guidance addresses research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
333: Not Mentioned269: Recommended186: Restricted
Security and procurement
Whether public guidance addresses security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or licensing.
566: Not Mentioned79: Restricted57: Required27: Recommended
覆盖分
The score is a coverage breadth measure only.
Coverage score components sum to 100 points across public evidence categories such as central guidance, academic integrity, disclosure, coursework, exams, privacy/data entry, approved tools, and teaching or research guidance.
The score should never be described as best policy, worst policy, most compliant, legally safe, or institutionally endorsed.
质量门槛
Publication gates keep analysis pages useful for search and AI answer engines without turning sparse data into thin pages.
Current page-quality status: passes current quality gate. The report covers 5 public analysis pages and keeps review state separate from page publication readiness.
Server-rendered public content
Analysis conclusions, caveats, review state, evidence counts, and public JSON links must be visible in HTML.
Theme evidence threshold
Theme analysis pages are generated only when at least five records have source-backed evidence for the dimension.
Review state boundary
Review state must be visible and must remain separate from confidence.
Original-language evidence
Source-language evidence remains canonical; localized display cannot replace it.
Coverage score caveat
Coverage scores must be described only as breadth of public source-backed coverage, not quality, compliance, legality, safety, or ranking.
No-advice boundary
Pages must state that tracker analysis is not legal advice, academic integrity advice, or an official university statement.
Versioned public JSON
Public analysis metadata must use /api/public/v1/... endpoints.
审查流程
Quality checks do not publish canonical analysis. They route questionable records into review.
Analysis profiles remain machine_candidate until reviewers confirm evidence binding, not-mentioned reasoning, source-language preservation, page quality gates, and no-advice boundaries.
主题分析
Only themes with enough public evidence are linked from this index.
AI disclosure
Source-backed analysis of public university guidance on disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
打开分析Privacy and data entry
Source-backed analysis of public university guidance on personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
打开分析Approved AI tools
Source-backed analysis of public university guidance naming approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
打开分析公共 JSON
Versioned read-only endpoints for downstream reuse.
分析索引
Analysis endpoint manifest with dimension definitions and version metadata.
高校分析档案
Example per-university analysis profile with dimensions, basis evidence, and coverage score.
覆盖分
Coverage score list for public analysis profiles.
分析页面质量
Read-only report of page-quality gates, indexability status, analysis review workflow, and no-advice boundaries.
引用
Use the canonical page and public JSON together.
建议引用: University AI Policy Tracker. "University AI policy analysis profiles." Version v1. https://eduaipolicy.org/analysis
Tracker metadata uses CC-BY-4.0. Official source documents, source page text, PDFs, and other source materials retain their original rights and terms.