University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

Nottingham, United Kingdom

University of Nottingham

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: 97Updated2026年7月19日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

8 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Nottingham in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"University-provided and recommended protected Microsoft Copilot for study support outside assessments.","howToObtain":"Sign in to University Office 365 with the University login, select Copilot, and confirm the protected shield icon.","costToUser":"Not stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

最后检查时间
2026年7月15日
最后更改时间
2026年7月15日

原始证据

证据 1
For study support outside assessments, the University of Nottingham provides access to and recommends Microsoft Copilot with a University login. It gives the Office 365 sign-in path and says logged-in Copilot does not record prompts, inputs or uploads as training data.

本地化显示 only

For study support outside assessments, the University of Nottingham provides access to and recommends Microsoft Copilot with a University login. It gives the Office 365 sign-in path and says logged-in Copilot does not record prompts, inputs or uploads as training data.

来源语言
English (en-GB)
快照哈希
e71f3e95…
已检索
2026年7月15日

Academic Integrity

The University of Nottingham Quality Manual includes unpermitted generative-AI-generated or AI-improved assessment work within false authorship.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: unpermitted_genai_generated_or_improved_assessment_work_false_authorship

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
False Authorship includes the submission of work that is generated and/or improved by software that is not permitted for that assessment. This may include the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) software to produce text, images or data or other work (e.g., Copilot, ChatGPT, DeepSeek, BARD, Wordtune, Quillbot, DALL-E, chatbots and similar).

本地化显示 only

The Quality Manual includes unpermitted AI-generated or AI-improved assessment work within false authorship.

来源语言
English (en-GB)
快照哈希
f832520e…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Section 2.2.2 False Authorship

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Nottingham student guidance says AI use for assessed work is assessment-specific: module or assessment information should say whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited, and students should not assume permission.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: assessment_specific_ai_use_essential_optional_prohibited_check_required

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
Your module tutor and/or assessment documents should specify which uses of AI are essential, optional, and/or prohibited for each assessed piece of work. The information should also tell you how to acknowledge and provide evidence of any AI use. If you can't find this information, check with your module convenor. Do not make any assumptions about uses of AI in your assessments.

本地化显示 only

Nottingham says AI use is assessment-specific and students should not assume permission when guidance is absent.

来源语言
English (en-GB)
快照哈希
d67a490a…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
University of Nottingham approach

隐私

For study support outside assessments, University of Nottingham guidance recommends Microsoft Copilot with a Nottingham login and says logged-in Copilot will not record prompts, inputs, or uploads as training data.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: microsoft_copilot_recommended_for_study_support_with_login_privacy_note

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
When using generative AI to support your studies outside of your assessments, the university provides access to and recommends use of Microsoft Copilot, with your University of Nottingham login. When you are logged in, Copilot will not record your prompts, inputs, and uploads as training data. This is the best way to maintain privacy and data protection whilst using generative AI.

本地化显示 only

For study support outside assessment, Nottingham recommends logged-in Microsoft Copilot and says prompts, inputs and uploads are not recorded as training data.

来源语言
English (en-GB)
快照哈希
57d04e1a…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
What are the recommended AI tools for study support?

Academic Integrity

For assessments where AI use is essential or optional, University of Nottingham guidance says acknowledgement expectations should come from module or assessment information and that students should keep records or chat logs of AI interactions.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%

标准化值: allowed_ai_assessment_use_acknowledgement_and_records_expected

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
Where use of AI in your assessed work is marked as essential or optional, information on how to acknowledge your use of AI should be included in your module handbook or assessment brief. Whenever you are interacting with generative AI, it is good practice to keep a full record or chat log of these interactions.

本地化显示 only

For essential or optional AI use, Nottingham says acknowledgement instructions should be in module or assessment information and recommends keeping chat logs.

来源语言
English (en-GB)
快照哈希
be737894…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Acknowledging use of generative AI

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Nottingham says each assessment task will indicate whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: University of Nottingham says each assessment task will indicate whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.

最后检查时间
2026年5月23日
最后更改时间
2026年5月23日

原始证据

证据 1
You will be advised whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited for each assessment task.
来源语言
English (en-GB)
快照哈希
25a1ffa3…
已检索
2026年5月23日
证据定位器
assessment guidelines

Academic Integrity

University of Nottingham equates prohibited generative AI use in an assessment task with false authorship.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: University of Nottingham equates prohibited generative AI use in an assessment task with false authorship.

最后检查时间
2026年5月23日
最后更改时间
2026年5月23日

原始证据

证据 1
Where use of generative AI is prohibited for an assessment task, the university equates use of these tools with false authorship.
来源语言
English (en-GB)
快照哈希
25a1ffa3…
已检索
2026年5月23日
证据定位器
academic integrity section

Academic Integrity

University of Nottingham says students are responsible for checking per assessment whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: University of Nottingham says students are responsible for checking per assessment whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited.

最后检查时间
2026年5月23日
最后更改时间
2026年5月23日

原始证据

证据 1
It is your responsibility to check on a per-assessment basis whether use of AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.
来源语言
English (en-GB)
快照哈希
25a1ffa3…
已检索
2026年5月23日
证据定位器
student responsibility section

Source record

官方来源

6 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度97%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Nottingham AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-nottingham

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志