Nottingham, United Kingdom

University of Nottingham

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Zrecenzowane twierdzenia

8 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Nottingham in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność97%

Wartość znormalizowana: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"University-provided and recommended protected Microsoft Copilot for study support outside assessments.","howToObtain":"Sign in to University Office 365 with the University login, select Copilot, and confirm the protected shield icon.","costToUser":"Not stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
For study support outside assessments, the University of Nottingham provides access to and recommends Microsoft Copilot with a University login. It gives the Office 365 sign-in path and says logged-in Copilot does not record prompts, inputs or uploads as training data.

Widok lokalny only

For study support outside assessments, the University of Nottingham provides access to and recommends Microsoft Copilot with a University login. It gives the Office 365 sign-in path and says logged-in Copilot does not record prompts, inputs or uploads as training data.

Academic Integrity

The University of Nottingham Quality Manual includes unpermitted generative-AI-generated or AI-improved assessment work within false authorship.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność95%

Wartość znormalizowana: unpermitted_genai_generated_or_improved_assessment_work_false_authorship

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
False Authorship includes the submission of work that is generated and/or improved by software that is not permitted for that assessment. This may include the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) software to produce text, images or data or other work (e.g., Copilot, ChatGPT, DeepSeek, BARD, Wordtune, Quillbot, DALL-E, chatbots and similar).

Widok lokalny only

The Quality Manual includes unpermitted AI-generated or AI-improved assessment work within false authorship.

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Nottingham student guidance says AI use for assessed work is assessment-specific: module or assessment information should say whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited, and students should not assume permission.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność94%

Wartość znormalizowana: assessment_specific_ai_use_essential_optional_prohibited_check_required

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Your module tutor and/or assessment documents should specify which uses of AI are essential, optional, and/or prohibited for each assessed piece of work. The information should also tell you how to acknowledge and provide evidence of any AI use. If you can't find this information, check with your module convenor. Do not make any assumptions about uses of AI in your assessments.

Widok lokalny only

Nottingham says AI use is assessment-specific and students should not assume permission when guidance is absent.

Prywatność

For study support outside assessments, University of Nottingham guidance recommends Microsoft Copilot with a Nottingham login and says logged-in Copilot will not record prompts, inputs, or uploads as training data.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność93%

Wartość znormalizowana: microsoft_copilot_recommended_for_study_support_with_login_privacy_note

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
When using generative AI to support your studies outside of your assessments, the university provides access to and recommends use of Microsoft Copilot, with your University of Nottingham login. When you are logged in, Copilot will not record your prompts, inputs, and uploads as training data. This is the best way to maintain privacy and data protection whilst using generative AI.

Widok lokalny only

For study support outside assessment, Nottingham recommends logged-in Microsoft Copilot and says prompts, inputs and uploads are not recorded as training data.

Academic Integrity

For assessments where AI use is essential or optional, University of Nottingham guidance says acknowledgement expectations should come from module or assessment information and that students should keep records or chat logs of AI interactions.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność92%

Wartość znormalizowana: allowed_ai_assessment_use_acknowledgement_and_records_expected

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Where use of AI in your assessed work is marked as essential or optional, information on how to acknowledge your use of AI should be included in your module handbook or assessment brief. Whenever you are interacting with generative AI, it is good practice to keep a full record or chat log of these interactions.

Widok lokalny only

For essential or optional AI use, Nottingham says acknowledgement instructions should be in module or assessment information and recommends keeping chat logs.

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Nottingham says each assessment task will indicate whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność90%

Wartość znormalizowana: University of Nottingham says each assessment task will indicate whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
You will be advised whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited for each assessment task.

Academic Integrity

University of Nottingham equates prohibited generative AI use in an assessment task with false authorship.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność90%

Wartość znormalizowana: University of Nottingham equates prohibited generative AI use in an assessment task with false authorship.

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Where use of generative AI is prohibited for an assessment task, the university equates use of these tools with false authorship.

Academic Integrity

University of Nottingham says students are responsible for checking per assessment whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność90%

Wartość znormalizowana: University of Nottingham says students are responsible for checking per assessment whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited.

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
It is your responsibility to check on a per-assessment basis whether use of AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.

Source record

Oficjalne źródła

6 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Recenzjaagent reviewedPewność97%Snapshot statusNieopublikowaneJSONPubliczne JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Nottingham AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-nottingham

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Otwórz dziennik zmian