Nottingham, United Kingdom

University of Nottingham

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Beoordeelde beweringen

8 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Nottingham in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen97%

Genormaliseerde waarde: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"University-provided and recommended protected Microsoft Copilot for study support outside assessments.","howToObtain":"Sign in to University Office 365 with the University login, select Copilot, and confirm the protected shield icon.","costToUser":"Not stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
For study support outside assessments, the University of Nottingham provides access to and recommends Microsoft Copilot with a University login. It gives the Office 365 sign-in path and says logged-in Copilot does not record prompts, inputs or uploads as training data.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

For study support outside assessments, the University of Nottingham provides access to and recommends Microsoft Copilot with a University login. It gives the Office 365 sign-in path and says logged-in Copilot does not record prompts, inputs or uploads as training data.

Academic Integrity

The University of Nottingham Quality Manual includes unpermitted generative-AI-generated or AI-improved assessment work within false authorship.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen95%

Genormaliseerde waarde: unpermitted_genai_generated_or_improved_assessment_work_false_authorship

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
False Authorship includes the submission of work that is generated and/or improved by software that is not permitted for that assessment. This may include the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) software to produce text, images or data or other work (e.g., Copilot, ChatGPT, DeepSeek, BARD, Wordtune, Quillbot, DALL-E, chatbots and similar).

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

The Quality Manual includes unpermitted AI-generated or AI-improved assessment work within false authorship.

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Nottingham student guidance says AI use for assessed work is assessment-specific: module or assessment information should say whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited, and students should not assume permission.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen94%

Genormaliseerde waarde: assessment_specific_ai_use_essential_optional_prohibited_check_required

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Your module tutor and/or assessment documents should specify which uses of AI are essential, optional, and/or prohibited for each assessed piece of work. The information should also tell you how to acknowledge and provide evidence of any AI use. If you can't find this information, check with your module convenor. Do not make any assumptions about uses of AI in your assessments.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

Nottingham says AI use is assessment-specific and students should not assume permission when guidance is absent.

Privacy

For study support outside assessments, University of Nottingham guidance recommends Microsoft Copilot with a Nottingham login and says logged-in Copilot will not record prompts, inputs, or uploads as training data.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen93%

Genormaliseerde waarde: microsoft_copilot_recommended_for_study_support_with_login_privacy_note

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
When using generative AI to support your studies outside of your assessments, the university provides access to and recommends use of Microsoft Copilot, with your University of Nottingham login. When you are logged in, Copilot will not record your prompts, inputs, and uploads as training data. This is the best way to maintain privacy and data protection whilst using generative AI.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

For study support outside assessment, Nottingham recommends logged-in Microsoft Copilot and says prompts, inputs and uploads are not recorded as training data.

Academic Integrity

For assessments where AI use is essential or optional, University of Nottingham guidance says acknowledgement expectations should come from module or assessment information and that students should keep records or chat logs of AI interactions.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen92%

Genormaliseerde waarde: allowed_ai_assessment_use_acknowledgement_and_records_expected

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Where use of AI in your assessed work is marked as essential or optional, information on how to acknowledge your use of AI should be included in your module handbook or assessment brief. Whenever you are interacting with generative AI, it is good practice to keep a full record or chat log of these interactions.

Gelokaliseerde weergave only

For essential or optional AI use, Nottingham says acknowledgement instructions should be in module or assessment information and recommends keeping chat logs.

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Nottingham says each assessment task will indicate whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen90%

Genormaliseerde waarde: University of Nottingham says each assessment task will indicate whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
You will be advised whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited for each assessment task.

Academic Integrity

University of Nottingham equates prohibited generative AI use in an assessment task with false authorship.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen90%

Genormaliseerde waarde: University of Nottingham equates prohibited generative AI use in an assessment task with false authorship.

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
Where use of generative AI is prohibited for an assessment task, the university equates use of these tools with false authorship.

Academic Integrity

University of Nottingham says students are responsible for checking per assessment whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldVertrouwen90%

Genormaliseerde waarde: University of Nottingham says students are responsible for checking per assessment whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited.

Oorspronkelijk bewijs

Bewijs 1
It is your responsibility to check on a per-assessment basis whether use of AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.

Source record

Officiële bronnen

6 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Beoordelenagent reviewedVertrouwen97%Snapshot statusNiet gepubliceerdJSONOpenbaar JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Nottingham AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-nottingham

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Wijzigingslogboek openen