Bijdragen

Dien bewijs in bij een reviewrij

Bijdragen vergroten dekking, maar maken niet direct canonieke feiten.

Bijdragepaden

The first live intake channel is GitHub issue templates, so submissions are visible, auditable, and reviewable before publication.

Submit an official source URL

Suggest a public university AI policy, teaching guidance, academic integrity, privacy, procurement, or security-review source.

Queuesource_discovery_reviewCanonical factNo

Report a policy change

Report that an existing tracked source changed or that a university added, moved, removed, or blocked an AI policy source.

Queueclaim_evidence_reviewCanonical factNo

Submit an institution correction

Request correction of an institution name, source attribution, review-state interpretation, or canonical page metadata.

Queueinstitution_correction_reviewCanonical factNo

Submit a course AI policy

Submit structured course-level AI policy evidence. Course data remains pending until moderation, rights, and claim/evidence review are complete.

Queuecourse_submission_reviewCanonical factNo

Submit a translation or evidence-display correction

Correct localized display text while preserving the original-language evidence as canonical.

Queuetranslation_reviewCanonical factNo

Report a dataset or API issue

Report broken JSON, stale links, checksum issues, field-shape problems, or inconsistency between public pages and public JSON.

Queueclaim_evidence_reviewCanonical factNo

Wat een inzending kan doen

This is the publication boundary for all contribution types.

  • Submissions create review tasks, not canonical facts.
  • Every published claim must keep source URL, source language, evidence snippet, confidence, and review state.
  • Confidence and review state remain separate.
  • Original-language evidence remains canonical; localized display is helper text only.
  • Analysis profiles stay machine_candidate until analysis profile review confirms evidence binding, quality gates, and reuse caveats.
  • Institution corrections preserve audit history.

The tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Cursusinzendingen

Course-level policy submissions are useful, but they are handled as evidence records, not as open comments.

Course records must reuse the same claim/evidence structure as university records: entity, term, source type, claim, original-language evidence, source language, review state, and moderation status. Do not paste full syllabi, LMS content, private student information, or non-public instructor data.

Allowed starting point
Short excerpt or public syllabus URL for review
Initial state
pending review task, not a public claim
Publication model
claim/evidence after moderation and rights review

API-metadata voor bijdragen

Machine-readable intake policy for agents, developers, and contributors.