ai_tool_treatment
University of Nottingham says each assessment task will indicate whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
University of Nottingham
Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
University of Nottingham currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 5 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 23, 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 3 newly extracted claims, 0 source snapshot changes.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.
University of Nottingham release diff
Comparing public-release-20260526-001 to public-release-20260526-003.
+9-0
11 # University of Nottingham AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: University of Nottingham says each assessment task will indicate whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.
5+Evidence (en-GB, 25a1ffa354fe): You will be advised whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited for each assessment task.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+academic_integrity: University of Nottingham equates prohibited generative AI use in an assessment task with false authorship.
10+Evidence (en-GB, 25a1ffa354fe): Where use of generative AI is prohibited for an assessment task, the university equates use of these tools with false authorship.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+academic_integrity: University of Nottingham says students are responsible for checking per assessment whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited.
15+Evidence (en-GB, 25a1ffa354fe): It is your responsibility to check on a per-assessment basis whether use of AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z
Claim changes
7 claim records
academic_integrity
University of Nottingham equates prohibited generative AI use in an assessment task with false authorship.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
University of Nottingham says students are responsible for checking per assessment whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
The University of Nottingham Quality Manual includes unpermitted generative-AI-generated or AI-improved assessment work within false authorship.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
University of Nottingham student guidance says AI use for assessed work is assessment-specific: module or assessment information should say whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited, and students should not assume permission.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
For study support outside assessments, University of Nottingham guidance recommends Microsoft Copilot with a Nottingham login and says logged-in Copilot will not record prompts, inputs, or uploads as training data.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
For assessments where AI use is essential or optional, University of Nottingham guidance says acknowledgement expectations should come from module or assessment information and that students should keep records or chat logs of AI interactions.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
5 source attributions
Regulation on academic misconduct
official_policy_page Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:36 AM
Using AI in assessment
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 23, 2026, 6:20 PM
Using AI in assessment
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:36 AM
Using AI to support your studies
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:36 AM
Using generative artificial intelligence (AI)
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 14, 2026, 2:36 AM