University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Langue
ENZHFRPL

Change log

University of Nottingham

Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedJul 15, 2026Last changedJul 15, 2026Claims8Sources6Latest releasepublic-release-20260526-003Release records2
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Nottingham currently has 8 source-backed claim records and 6 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: Jul 15, 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 4 newly extracted claims, 1 source snapshot changes.

This page combines all public release diffs for University of Nottingham. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted4Evidence0Source snapshots1Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

University of Nottingham combined release diff

Combining 2 public release diffs for this university. Each section below keeps the original release-to-release comparison.

+14-2
11 # University of Nottingham AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: University of Nottingham says each assessment task will indicate whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.
5+Evidence (en-GB, 25a1ffa354fe): You will be advised whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited for each assessment task.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+academic_integrity: University of Nottingham equates prohibited generative AI use in an assessment task with false authorship.
10+Evidence (en-GB, 25a1ffa354fe): Where use of generative AI is prohibited for an assessment task, the university equates use of these tools with false authorship.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+academic_integrity: University of Nottingham says students are responsible for checking per assessment whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited.
15+Evidence (en-GB, 25a1ffa354fe): It is your responsibility to check on a per-assessment basis whether use of AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z
817 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
918 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
19+ai_tool_treatment: Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Nottingham in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
20+Evidence (en-GB, e71f3e956512): For study support outside assessments, the University of Nottingham provides access to and recommends Microsoft Copilot with a University login. It gives the Office 365 sign-in path and says logged-in Copilot does not record prompts, inputs or uploads as training data.
21+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-15T23:30:43.896Z
1022 ## Source snapshot hash changed
1123 The same source URL has a different snapshot hash. This may reflect policy text, page layout, navigation, or metadata changes; it is not by itself a policy change.
12-Source https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/studyingeffectively/ai/ai-support.aspx snapshot 57d04e1a4bef10cadbef375f7d1057bc3f05a6277b34590edd42ef57258e5ba3
13-Tracker checked at: 2026-07-15T23:30:43.896Z
24+Source https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/studyingeffectively/ai/ai-support.aspx snapshot e71f3e95651202984e886a811dce58a746ca7308b825f5077b83ca0ae48b7e2f
25+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-15T23:30:43.896Z

Release history

2 public release diffs

public-release-20260526-003

Compared with public-release-20260526-001.

Policy text0Newly extracted3Source snapshots0Source text0
Release diffDiff JSON

University of Nottingham public-release-20260526-003 diff

Comparing public-release-20260526-001 to public-release-20260526-003.

+9-0
11 # University of Nottingham AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: University of Nottingham says each assessment task will indicate whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.
5+Evidence (en-GB, 25a1ffa354fe): You will be advised whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited for each assessment task.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+academic_integrity: University of Nottingham equates prohibited generative AI use in an assessment task with false authorship.
10+Evidence (en-GB, 25a1ffa354fe): Where use of generative AI is prohibited for an assessment task, the university equates use of these tools with false authorship.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+academic_integrity: University of Nottingham says students are responsible for checking per assessment whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited.
15+Evidence (en-GB, 25a1ffa354fe): It is your responsibility to check on a per-assessment basis whether use of AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z

public-release-20260715-005

Compared with public-release-20260714-002.

Policy text0Newly extracted1Source snapshots1Source text0
Release diffDiff JSON

University of Nottingham public-release-20260715-005 diff

Comparing public-release-20260714-002 to public-release-20260715-005.

+5-2
11 # University of Nottingham AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Nottingham in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
5+Evidence (en-GB, e71f3e956512): For study support outside assessments, the University of Nottingham provides access to and recommends Microsoft Copilot with a University login. It gives the Office 365 sign-in path and says logged-in Copilot does not record prompts, inputs or uploads as training data.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-15T23:30:43.896Z
47 ## Source snapshot hash changed
58 The same source URL has a different snapshot hash. This may reflect policy text, page layout, navigation, or metadata changes; it is not by itself a policy change.
6-Source https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/studyingeffectively/ai/ai-support.aspx snapshot 57d04e1a4bef10cadbef375f7d1057bc3f05a6277b34590edd42ef57258e5ba3
7-Tracker checked at: 2026-07-15T23:30:43.896Z
9+Source https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/studyingeffectively/ai/ai-support.aspx snapshot e71f3e95651202984e886a811dce58a746ca7308b825f5077b83ca0ae48b7e2f
10+Tracker checked at: 2026-07-15T23:30:43.896Z

Claim changes

8 claim records

ai_tool_treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Nottingham in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

ai_tool_treatment

University of Nottingham says each assessment task will indicate whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

academic_integrity

University of Nottingham equates prohibited generative AI use in an assessment task with false authorship.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

academic_integrity

University of Nottingham says students are responsible for checking per assessment whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

academic_integrity

The University of Nottingham Quality Manual includes unpermitted generative-AI-generated or AI-improved assessment work within false authorship.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

ai_tool_treatment

University of Nottingham student guidance says AI use for assessed work is assessment-specific: module or assessment information should say whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited, and students should not assume permission.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

privacy

For study support outside assessments, University of Nottingham guidance recommends Microsoft Copilot with a Nottingham login and says logged-in Copilot will not record prompts, inputs, or uploads as training data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

academic_integrity

For assessments where AI use is essential or optional, University of Nottingham guidance says acknowledgement expectations should come from module or assessment information and that students should keep records or chat logs of AI interactions.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence92%Evidence1Languagesen-GB

Source snapshots

6 source attributions