University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Taal
ENZHFRPL

Verschil van release

University of Nottingham

Geünificeerde trackerdiff voor public-release-20260526-003. De volledige tekst van de bronpagina wordt niet gepubliceerd; korte bewijsfragmenten in de oorspronkelijke taal worden getoond voor citatiecontext.

Beoordeling: Door agent beoordeeldUitgavepublic-release-20260526-003Vorigepublic-release-20260526-001Beleidstekst0Zojuist geëxtraheerd3Bronhash0Bron tekst0
Laatste verschilUniversiteitspaginaDiff JSON

Geünificeerde diff

Veranderingen in de release-naar-release-tracker gegenereerd uit openbare releasesnapshots.

Universiteit of Nottingham public-release-20260526-003 verschil

public-release-20260526-001 vergelijken met public-release-20260526-003.

+9-0
11 # University of Nottingham AI policy diff
22 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
33 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
4+ai_tool_treatment: University of Nottingham says each assessment task will indicate whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.
5+Evidence (en-GB, 25a1ffa354fe): You will be advised whether use of generative AI is essential, optional, or prohibited for each assessment task.
6+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z
47 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
58 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
9+academic_integrity: University of Nottingham equates prohibited generative AI use in an assessment task with false authorship.
10+Evidence (en-GB, 25a1ffa354fe): Where use of generative AI is prohibited for an assessment task, the university equates use of these tools with false authorship.
11+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z
612 ## Newly extracted tracker claim
713 This claim was newly extracted or newly promoted in the tracker release. It is not necessarily newly published by the university.
14+academic_integrity: University of Nottingham says students are responsible for checking per assessment whether AI use is essential, optional, or prohibited.
15+Evidence (en-GB, 25a1ffa354fe): It is your responsibility to check on a per-assessment basis whether use of AI is essential, optional, or prohibited.
16+Tracker checked at: 2026-05-23T18:20:00.000Z

Hoe deze diff te lezen

Trackerreleasedata, geen direct bewijs van het tijdstip van universitair publiceren.

Zojuist geëxtraheerde beweringen zijn toevoegingen aan de tracker en zijn niet per se recent door de universiteit gepubliceerd. Wijzigingen in bron-snapshots betekenen dat dezelfde URL een andere hash opleverde; dit kan gaan om beleidstekst, lay-out, navigatie of metadata.

Rand

Alleen trackermetadata

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.