University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

Wageningen, Netherlands

Wageningen University & Research

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: =153Updated2026年5月14日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

7 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

The Wageningen University Examining Board rules treat AI-created ready-made assignment content as an irregularity that may lead to suspicion of fraud unless AI use is explicitly allowed in the assignment description and adequately documented.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%

标准化值: unauthorized ready made ai assignment content may be fraud suspicion

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
Any use of artificial intelligence (AI) to create ready-made content of an assignment is considered an irregularity that may lead to suspicion of fraud, unless the use of AI is explicitly allowed in the assignment description and the use of AI has been documented adequately.

本地化显示 only

The Examining Board rules treat unauthorized ready-made AI assignment content as an irregularity that may lead to suspicion of fraud.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
98810d0e…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Article 16, paragraph 3

隐私

WUR's student GenAI rules warn that content fed into external GenAI tools may be stored indefinitely and tell students never to put others' personal data, intellectual-property-infringing information, or sensitive or confidential research data into a public GenAI tool.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: no personal ip sensitive confidential data in public genai tools

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
Anything that you feed into external GenAI tools like ChatGPT may be stored by the company indefinitely and might be used in unspecified ways. Never put (personal) data of others, information that infringes on intellectual property rights or sensitive or confidential (research) data into a chatbot or any other public GenAI tool.

本地化显示 only

The GenAI rules warn about external GenAI storage and prohibit entering others' personal data, IP-infringing information, or sensitive/confidential research data into public GenAI tools.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
3d7718ac…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
5. Mind your data security

Academic Integrity

WUR's student GenAI rules tell students to check the course guide for whether and how GenAI is permitted; if the guide has no information, using GenAI to generate assignment content is not allowed and may be irregularity or fraud, including for theses.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: genai assignment content requires course guide permission

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
Always check your course guide in Brightspace to understand whether, and to what extent, GenAI is permitted in your coursework. If there is no information in your course guide, using GenAI to generate the content of your assignments is not allowed and can be considered as an irregularity or even fraud. This also applies for theses; seek guidance from your lecturer or supervisor.

本地化显示 only

The GenAI rules require students to check the course guide and say GenAI-generated assignment content is not allowed when the course guide is silent.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
3d7718ac…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
1. Always check your course guide in Brightspace

Academic Integrity

WUR's student GenAI rules say students are never allowed to submit work entirely generated by GenAI as their own or fabricate research data, and they must be transparent about GenAI's role in submitted work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: no entirely genai work as own; disclose genai role

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
You are never allowed to submit work entirely generated by GenAI as your own or fabricate research data. Doing so constitutes academic fraud. When using GenAI tools, be transparent about their role in your work. You are ultimately responsible for the content you submit and for the accuracy and integrity of your work.

本地化显示 only

The GenAI rules prohibit submitting wholly GenAI-generated work as one's own and require transparency about GenAI's role.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
3d7718ac…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
3. Maintain academic integrity and be transparent

研究

Wageningen University's MSc Thesis Course Guide says AI is in principle allowed for brainstorming, text feedback, code/script development, literature searching, and transcription, but only under conditions including skill support rather than replacement, student accountability, acknowledgement/documentation, data restrictions, copyright respect, and verification of code.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: msc thesis ai allowed use cases with conditions

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
In principle, the use of AI is allowed as/for: Sparring partner / Brainstorming; Feedback tool for textual improvement; Data processing script development; Literature searching; Transcription. Under the conditions that the use of AI may only be in support of the development of these skills and not a replacement of these skills; students remain accountable; and use must be acknowledged or documented.

本地化显示 only

The MSc thesis guide lists permitted AI use cases and attaches conditions around skill support, accountability, acknowledgement/documentation, data, copyright, literature searching, and code verification.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
e2e4ef08…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Section 3.4.1, Rules regarding AI usage

Source Status

Wageningen University's 2025-2026 Student Charter page lists Rules and guidelines for student use of GenAI as a code-of-conduct resource and says the charter comprises student rights and obligations.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: student charter links genai rules as student rights and obligations resource

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
The Student Charter 2025-2026 comprises the rights and obligations of Wageningen University students. The codes of conduct table lists Rules and guidelines for student use of GenAI and describes it as a description of the rules and guidelines for student use of GenAI in education.

本地化显示 only

The Student Charter page frames the charter as student rights and obligations and links the GenAI student rules/guidelines as a code-of-conduct resource.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
99d8db2c…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Summary and Codes of conduct education and research table

研究

WUR Library guidance says AI use should be documented, AI should not be cited as a source or author, publisher policies should be checked for writing and publishing, and peer reviewers should not upload non-published manuscripts into externally hosted tools.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度88%

标准化值: library research ai documentation publisher policy peer review confidentiality

最后检查时间
2026年5月14日
最后更改时间
2026年5月14日

原始证据

证据 1
It is important to always document your use of AI. In addition, do not cite AI as if it were a source or an author. WUR Library urges you to be transparent in your use of AI tools and to always check a publisher's policy before including AI-generated content in your publication. For confidentiality and proprietary reasons, WUR Library advises reviewers never to upload a non-published manuscript into any externally hosted tool.

本地化显示 only

The WUR Library guide gives research-oriented AI documentation, authorship/source, publisher-policy, and peer-review confidentiality guidance.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
733aa4a4…
已检索
2026年5月14日
证据定位器
Document your use of AI; Publishing and peer review

Source record

官方来源

6 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度96%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Wageningen University & Research AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 14, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/wageningen-university-and-research

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志