Wageningen, Netherlands

Wageningen University & Research

本站使用指南

读Brightspace,保留可重复AI用法。

沉默不允许生成作业。2026年1月MSc指南区分方法及写作记录,公开输入限制及收到起算考试上诉保持范围。

本站解读;官方证据保留原文。

尚无完整的学生政策摘要;可先查看已收录条款及来源。

适用范围与过渡细节

沉默不允许生成作业。2026年1月MSc指南区分方法及写作记录,公开输入限制及收到起算考试上诉保持范围。

Read Brightspace and preserve reproducible AI use. hero illustration; exact scope and conditions are in the adjacent source-linked text.
请核对所在学院及具体作业的规定。

AI 使用引发疑虑后,会发生什么?

补充资料采集: 2026-10-09 · 现行适用性未独立确认

对比已发布的大学记录 ↗

哪些行为会引发疑虑

AI 明示条款官方指导规范语气: 信息性

本站解读

2025年7月学生规则要求查Brightspace课程指南。未说明时不得生成作业内容,可能属违规或欺诈;论文同样适用,不确定须问教师/导师。

适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

查看原文与适用条件

英文来源摘要

The July 2025 student rules require checking the Brightspace course guide. Silence means GenAI-generated assignment content is not allowed and may be irregularity or fraud; this also applies to theses. Ask the lecturer/supervisor if uncertain.

适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university

条件与例外

No default permission from silence.

1. Always check your course guide in Brightspace We recognise that students can use GenAI to support their learning and carry out assignments. However, different courses may have different policies regarding the use of GenAI. Always check your course guide in Brightspace to understand whether, and to what extent, GenAI is permitted in your coursework. • If there is no information in your course guide, using GenAI to generate the content of your assignments is not allowed and can be considered as an irregularity or even fraud. See: article 16, paragraph 3 and article 22 of the Rules and Regulations of the Examining Boards of Wageningen University. • This also applies for theses; seek guidance from your lecturer or supervisor. • If you are uncertain about the rules, seek guidance from your lecturer or supervisor.
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-09 · 19–31
SHA-256: edbd666c8dbc4b5b5805605e2c1bec84c4be6dbb071435a03ce812bbff3d4728

WUR – Rules and Guidelines for Student Use of GenAI These rules and guidelines have been enacted on July 14, 2025
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-09 · 1–2
SHA-256: edbd666c8dbc4b5b5805605e2c1bec84c4be6dbb071435a03ce812bbff3d4728

如何回应与说明

AI 明示条款官方指导规范语气: 信息性

本站解读

不得将全部AI生成作品当本人作品或伪造数据。须说明何时、如何使用并引用生成内容;项目/论文须归档提示和输出以便重复验证。

适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

查看原文与适用条件

英文来源摘要

Never submit entirely AI-generated work as your own or fabricate data. Indicate when/how AI was used and cite generated content; projects/theses require an archive of prompts and outputs for reproducibility.

适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university

3. Maintain academic integrity and be transparent You are never allowed to submit work entirely generated by GenAI as your own or fabricate research data. Doing so constitutes academic fraud, as outlined in the ‘Rules and regulations Examining Boards’ and ‘Netherlands Code of Conduct for Scientific Practice’. When using GenAI tools, be transparent about their role in your work. You are ultimately responsible for the content you submit and for the accuracy and integrity of your work. • Always indicate when and how you have used GenAI and ensure that any generated content is properly cited. • When using GenAI for a project or a thesis, keep an archive of GenAI prompts and outputs for transparency and reproducibility. This allows you to document your GenAI usage transparently and reproduce your work if questions arise later. • If you are unsure how to cite GenAI-generated material, see Student Support for guidance.
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-09 · 44–56
SHA-256: edbd666c8dbc4b5b5805605e2c1bec84c4be6dbb071435a03ce812bbff3d4728

AI 明示条款官方指导规范语气: 信息性

本站解读

2026年1月7.4版MSc论文指南区分:研究方法中的AI须写入Materials and Methods并附提示,纯写作辅助在References前声明。大量交互须附录或资料库归档,要求随应用不同。

适用范围: MSc thesis students under course guide version 7.4 · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

查看原文与适用条件

英文来源摘要

The MSc thesis guide version 7.4 of January 2026 distinguishes AI integral to research methods, which belongs in Materials and Methods with prompts in an appendix, from writing-only assistance, acknowledged before References. Extensive interactions go in an appendix or repository; requirements depend on application.

适用范围: MSc thesis students under course guide version 7.4 · university

条件与例外

Research-method and writing-only documentation differ.

3.4.2. Documenting and acknowledging AI usage In case AI is applied as an integral part of your research methodology (e.g. as a transcription tool or for data analysis), its usage needs to be documented in the Materials and Methods section. This should be done in line with research methodology standards, aimed at reproducibility and verifiability. Prompts or instructions applied in this context should be made available in the appendix. If AI was used only in the writing of the report, this should be acknowledged in a separate section before the References, using the standard format presented below: “During the preparation of this work the author used [TOOL, VERSION IF APPLICABLE, METHOD OF ACCESS] in order to [GOAL OF APPLICATION]. After using this tool/service, the author reviewed and edited the content as needed and takes full responsibility for the content of the report.” More examples for documentation are available via: https://wur- studentsupport.screenstepslive.com/m/118226/l/1878197-how-to-document-your-genai-use. Extensive interactions with AI should be documented via documentation in the appendix or via your data repository (as PDF or text file). It is recommended to maintain a version history of your thesis documents to be able to show the progression of your work over time. The documentation and acknowledgement of AI usage depends on its application. For each application the requirement may differ. Please consult the table below for information:
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-09 · 476–498
SHA-256: 675435d4f7376c3677d0d328e49c229500203a36419c046289a7442bc8325f95

MSc Thesis Course Guide Wageningen University • Part A: information about MSc theses at WU • Part B: chair group specific regulations Version: 7.4 (2026-01-09)
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-09 · 1–4
SHA-256: 675435d4f7376c3677d0d328e49c229500203a36419c046289a7442bc8325f95

来源指导正式程序规范语气: 信息性

本站解读

所取2025年9月考试委员会规则要求教师/监考报告严重欺诈疑虑。学生可继续中期考试,但规定情形中扰乱秩序或拒从考官指令除外。学生须获告知及回应机会;疑虑本身不等于认定。

适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

查看原文与适用条件

英文来源摘要

Under the captured Examining Board rules as of September 2025, an examiner/invigilator reports serious fraud suspicion. Students may continue the interim exam unless they disturb order or refuse examiner instructions in the specified circumstances. The student is informed and has an opportunity to respond; a suspicion is not itself a fraud finding.

适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university

条件与例外

Continuation excludes disturbance of order or refusal of examiner instructions under Article 18; captured September 2025 version only.

Article 23. Procedure following detection of fraud, measures and sanctions 1. If fraud is detected during or with respect to an interim examination, or if there is serious suspicion of fraud, then the Examiner or the invigilator immediately informs the student concerned and makes a note on the work that is submitted by the student. In addition, the Examiner or invigilator confiscates any evidence of fraud. The student can continue to work on their interim examination unless in case of disturbance of order or refusal to follow up instructions of the Examiner by the student, as meant in Article 18 section 10, which gives reason to exclude the student from further participation as meant in Article 18 section 12. 2. As soon as possible after the suspicion of fraud arises, during the taking or grading of the test, the examiner or invigilator shall make a written report of the suspicious circumstances found. If the student concerned has refused to hand Rules and Regulations of the Examining Boards WU as of 1 September 2025 13 18 over possible evidence, then this is noted in the report. The Examiner submits this report to the Examining Board and can propose sanctions. The Examining Board gives the student the opportunity to submit written commentary on the report and to be heard, before imposing a sanction as mentioned in paragraph 5 of this Article. 3. If a possible case of fraud is discovered or seriously suspected in relation to other educational activities, the procedure laid out in paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Article shall be followed. 4. If the Examining Board has concluded that fraud has been committed, this will be
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-09 · 737–765
SHA-256: 5624eaf1891f18aacae76c02c374232e86ee06b68c177de61168692e0b7c9c8e

复核与申诉

来源指导正式程序规范语气: 信息性

本站解读

相关人可对所列教师、考试委员会或录取决定,在收到决定后六周内向CBE上诉。这是所取考试上诉路线,不是每类投诉统一期限。

WUR examination CBE appeal · 6 周

学生 · 采用此程序时须遵守

学生 · 起算:receipt of the relevant decision

Source unit preserved; no invented exclusions or automatic date calculation.;Only cited stage/version; no automatic extension.

适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

查看原文与适用条件

英文来源摘要

A concerned party may appeal the listed examiner, Examining Board or admission decisions to the CBE within six weeks after receipt of the decision. This is the captured examination appeal route, not a universal deadline for every complaint.

适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university

Article 29. Right of appeal 1. A concerned party can appeal against all decisions referred to in Article 7.61 clause 1 WHW. These are primarily the following decisions: a. all decisions of the Examining Board or the Examiner; b. decisions based on the provisions in Article 7.29 of the WHW regarding the admission test Colloquium Doctum; c. decisions of the Bachelor’s admission committee and the Master’s admission committees; d. the decision to de-enrol a student or refuse re-enrolment based on a binding negative study advice. 2. The appeal must be submitted within six weeks after receipt of the decision to the Examination Appeals Board (CBE). For this purpose, the concerned party submits a notification of appeal to the facility.
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-09 · 933–945
SHA-256: 5624eaf1891f18aacae76c02c374232e86ee06b68c177de61168692e0b7c9c8e

支持与合理调整

AI 明示条款官方指导规范语气: 信息性

本站解读

不得向公开GenAI输入他人个人数据、侵犯知识产权材料或敏感/机密科研数据。大学、数据库、资助及实习合同可加限制;可访问版权材料并不意味着可上传。

适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · Only the captured source, version, audience and conditions; no exhaustive currency certification.

查看原文与适用条件

英文来源摘要

Do not enter other people’s personal data, IP-infringing material or sensitive/confidential research data into public GenAI tools. Institutional, database, sponsor and internship agreements may add restrictions; copyright-protected material must not be uploaded merely because it is accessible.

适用范围: Students in the cited programme/course/stage only · university

5. Mind your data security Anything that you feed into external GenAI tools like ChatGPT may be stored by the company indefinitely and might be used in unspecified ways. This means that you should think carefully about what information you provide them. It is your responsibility to prevent harmful, undesirable or otherwise sensitive forms of data, be it personal or otherwise, from being shared, stored, or misused in ways that could compromise privacy, security, or ethical considerations. • Never put (personal) data of others, information that infringes on intellectual property rights or sensitive or confidential (research) data into a chatbot or any other public GenAI tool. • Be aware of institutional policies regarding data usage. Some databases, chair groups, internship companies, etc., might not allow you to share their data with GenAI tools, as this may violate agreements with financiers of projects or may even violate intellectual property rights (IPs). For more information, see: Personal data protection regulations WUR and Data policy at WUR • Always respect copyright laws and the intellectual property rights of others. Do not upload materials that are copyright-protected in a GenAI tool, this can have severe consequences.
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-09 · 75–92
SHA-256: edbd666c8dbc4b5b5805605e2c1bec84c4be6dbb071435a03ce812bbff3d4728

采集与版本说明

已发布的来源补充。英文摘要与原语言引文和已审核记录分开展示。这里列出可能的程序与结果,不是使用 AI 的自动处罚;现行适用性尚未独立确认,请核对来源的适用范围和版本。

按所存原文核对;不是官方译文

哈希仅用于核对所存内容,不证明现行有效性或不可篡改。这些主题不表示每个学生都会经历的流程。

AI 工具与获取方式

能获取工具不等于获准在作业中使用。请同时核对任务规则、适用人员和数据限制。

尚未建立这所大学的可靠工具记录。这不代表工具不存在,也不代表禁止使用 AI。

Reviewed record

已审核条款

7 条已审核条款

学术诚信3 条已审核条款

Academic Integrity

The Wageningen University Examining Board rules treat AI-created ready-made assignment content as an irregularity that may lead to suspicion of fraud unless AI use is explicitly allowed in the assignment description and adequately documented.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%

标准化值: unauthorized ready made ai assignment content may be fraud suspicion

原始证据

证据 1
Any use of artificial intelligence (AI) to create ready-made content of an assignment is considered an irregularity that may lead to suspicion of fraud, unless the use of AI is explicitly allowed in the assignment description and the use of AI has been documented adequately.

本地化显示 only

The Examining Board rules treat unauthorized ready-made AI assignment content as an irregularity that may lead to suspicion of fraud.

Academic Integrity

WUR's student GenAI rules tell students to check the course guide for whether and how GenAI is permitted; if the guide has no information, using GenAI to generate assignment content is not allowed and may be irregularity or fraud, including for theses.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: genai assignment content requires course guide permission

原始证据

证据 1
Always check your course guide in Brightspace to understand whether, and to what extent, GenAI is permitted in your coursework. If there is no information in your course guide, using GenAI to generate the content of your assignments is not allowed and can be considered as an irregularity or even fraud. This also applies for theses; seek guidance from your lecturer or supervisor.

本地化显示 only

The GenAI rules require students to check the course guide and say GenAI-generated assignment content is not allowed when the course guide is silent.

Academic Integrity

WUR's student GenAI rules say students are never allowed to submit work entirely generated by GenAI as their own or fabricate research data, and they must be transparent about GenAI's role in submitted work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: no entirely genai work as own; disclose genai role

原始证据

证据 1
You are never allowed to submit work entirely generated by GenAI as your own or fabricate research data. Doing so constitutes academic fraud. When using GenAI tools, be transparent about their role in your work. You are ultimately responsible for the content you submit and for the accuracy and integrity of your work.

本地化显示 only

The GenAI rules prohibit submitting wholly GenAI-generated work as one's own and require transparency about GenAI's role.

隐私1 条已审核条款

隐私

WUR's student GenAI rules warn that content fed into external GenAI tools may be stored indefinitely and tell students never to put others' personal data, intellectual-property-infringing information, or sensitive or confidential research data into a public GenAI tool.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: no personal ip sensitive confidential data in public genai tools

原始证据

证据 1
Anything that you feed into external GenAI tools like ChatGPT may be stored by the company indefinitely and might be used in unspecified ways. Never put (personal) data of others, information that infringes on intellectual property rights or sensitive or confidential (research) data into a chatbot or any other public GenAI tool.

本地化显示 only

The GenAI rules warn about external GenAI storage and prohibit entering others' personal data, IP-infringing information, or sensitive/confidential research data into public GenAI tools.

研究2 条已审核条款

研究

Wageningen University's MSc Thesis Course Guide says AI is in principle allowed for brainstorming, text feedback, code/script development, literature searching, and transcription, but only under conditions including skill support rather than replacement, student accountability, acknowledgement/documentation, data restrictions, copyright respect, and verification of code.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: msc thesis ai allowed use cases with conditions

原始证据

证据 1
In principle, the use of AI is allowed as/for: Sparring partner / Brainstorming; Feedback tool for textual improvement; Data processing script development; Literature searching; Transcription. Under the conditions that the use of AI may only be in support of the development of these skills and not a replacement of these skills; students remain accountable; and use must be acknowledged or documented.

本地化显示 only

The MSc thesis guide lists permitted AI use cases and attaches conditions around skill support, accountability, acknowledgement/documentation, data, copyright, literature searching, and code verification.

研究

WUR Library guidance says AI use should be documented, AI should not be cited as a source or author, publisher policies should be checked for writing and publishing, and peer reviewers should not upload non-published manuscripts into externally hosted tools.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度88%

标准化值: library research ai documentation publisher policy peer review confidentiality

原始证据

证据 1
It is important to always document your use of AI. In addition, do not cite AI as if it were a source or an author. WUR Library urges you to be transparent in your use of AI tools and to always check a publisher's policy before including AI-generated content in your publication. For confidentiality and proprietary reasons, WUR Library advises reviewers never to upload a non-published manuscript into any externally hosted tool.

本地化显示 only

The WUR Library guide gives research-oriented AI documentation, authorship/source, publisher-policy, and peer-review confidentiality guidance.

来源状态1 条已审核条款

Source Status

Wageningen University's 2025-2026 Student Charter page lists Rules and guidelines for student use of GenAI as a code-of-conduct resource and says the charter comprises student rights and obligations.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: student charter links genai rules as student rights and obligations resource

原始证据

证据 1
The Student Charter 2025-2026 comprises the rights and obligations of Wageningen University students. The codes of conduct table lists Rules and guidelines for student use of GenAI and describes it as a description of the rules and guidelines for student use of GenAI in education.

本地化显示 only

The Student Charter page frames the charter as student rights and obligations and links the GenAI student rules/guidelines as a code-of-conduct resource.

Source record

官方来源

6 个来源

展开官方来源列表
记录信息、JSON 与引用
审核AI 辅助审核置信度96%快照状态未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Wageningen University & Research AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 14, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/wageningen-university-and-research

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志

Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.