University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

London, United Kingdom

Royal Holloway, University of London

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: =461Updated2026年5月16日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

7 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

Royal Holloway academic misconduct regulations list requesting or engaging an artificial intelligence tool to write or rewrite work for unfair advantage, and presenting AI-generated content as one’s own unless authorised and acknowledged, as examples of assessment offences.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%

标准化值: ai_commissioning_and_unauthorised_ai_in_regulations

最后检查时间
2026年5月16日
最后更改时间
2026年5月16日

原始证据

证据 1
Commissioning, which is requesting or engaging another person or artificial intelligence tool whether paid or unpaid to write or rewrite work in order to obtain an unfair advantage for oneself. Presenting content generated by artificial intelligence tools as your own unless specifically authorised in writing as part of the assessment brief and appropriately acknowledged.

本地化显示 only

Commissioning, which is requesting or engaging another person or artificial intelligence tool whether paid or unpaid to write or rewrite work in order to obtain an unfair advantage for oneself. Presenting content generated by artificial intelligence tools as your own unless specifically authorised in writing as part of the assessment brief and appropriately acknowledged.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
22a9f752…
已检索
2026年5月16日
证据定位器
Regulations on Academic Misconduct 2025/26, section 1(2)(b)-(c)

研究

Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance for postgraduate researchers says AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose, or other academic content, and that researchers are responsible for every output they submit.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: pgr_ai_may_not_author_research_claims_or_thesis_prose

最后检查时间
2026年5月16日
最后更改时间
2026年5月16日

原始证据

证据 1
Originality: AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose or other academic content. Transparency: declare that any AI use is within the permitted guidance outlined in this document. Accountability: you, the student, are responsible for every output that you submit.

本地化显示 only

Originality: AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose or other academic content. Transparency: declare that any AI use is within the permitted guidance outlined in this document. Accountability: you, the student, are responsible for every output that you submit.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
3b1a0e17…
已检索
2026年5月16日
证据定位器
Principles and scope

Academic Integrity

Royal Holloway requires students to include declaration statements for generative AI use or non-use, and says a list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: ai_declaration_and_prompt_list_required

最后检查时间
2026年5月16日
最后更改时间
2026年5月16日

原始证据

证据 1
Explicit acknowledgment of use of generative AI tools such as Large Language Models like Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini or ChatGPT or any other media generated through similar tools is required. If you have not used any such tools in any way a declaration statement is still required. Prompt List: A list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.

本地化显示 only

Explicit acknowledgment of use of generative AI tools such as Large Language Models like Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini or ChatGPT or any other media generated through similar tools is required. If you have not used any such tools in any way a declaration statement is still required. Prompt List: A list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
760f945e…
已检索
2026年5月16日
证据定位器
The Requirement of Declaration Statements; Prompt List

隐私

Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance says postgraduate researchers should not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party AI tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: pgr_no_confidential_personal_sensitive_data_to_third_party_ai_without_dpa_consent

最后检查时间
2026年5月16日
最后更改时间
2026年5月16日

原始证据

证据 1
Data protection: do not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required. Uploading Personal, Special-category, or Confidential Data to Public AI Services: Any content that could identify individuals, organisations, or sensitive locations. No.

本地化显示 only

Data protection: do not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required. Uploading Personal, Special-category, or Confidential Data to Public AI Services: Any content that could identify individuals, organisations, or sensitive locations. No.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
3b1a0e17…
已检索
2026年5月16日
证据定位器
Principles and scope; Data, privacy, and confidentiality

Ai Tool Treatment

Royal Holloway tells Foundation, undergraduate, and postgraduate taught students that module assessment briefs take precedence for AI use; if a brief says AI is not permitted, students must not use it and must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: assessment_brief_precedence

最后检查时间
2026年5月16日
最后更改时间
2026年5月16日

原始证据

证据 1
This guidance provides a broad overview, but all students must follow specific instructions in module assessment briefs as local guidance always takes precedence. If the brief says AI is not permitted, you must not use it. You must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.

本地化显示 only

This guidance provides a broad overview, but all students must follow specific instructions in module assessment briefs as local guidance always takes precedence. If the brief says AI is not permitted, you must not use it. You must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
8fac0216…
已检索
2026年5月16日
证据定位器
Key principles for using AI at Royal Holloway

Ai Tool Treatment

Royal Holloway recommends Microsoft Copilot for generative AI use when students log in with Royal Holloway account details, and warns students to be extremely careful when entering data into other generative AI tools.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%

标准化值: microsoft_copilot_recommended_with_rhul_login

最后检查时间
2026年5月16日
最后更改时间
2026年5月16日

原始证据

证据 1
From the many generative AI tools, Royal Holloway recommends that you use Microsoft Copilot, logging in with your Royal Holloway account details. Please be extremely careful when entering data into a generative AI tool: this is particularly important if you are using one other than MS Copilot and your RHUL login.

本地化显示 only

From the many generative AI tools, Royal Holloway recommends that you use Microsoft Copilot, logging in with your Royal Holloway account details. Please be extremely careful when entering data into a generative AI tool: this is particularly important if you are using one other than MS Copilot and your RHUL login.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
4bcf2424…
已检索
2026年5月16日
证据定位器
AI Tools

Source Status

The official AI guidance verified in this crawl is scoped to Foundation, undergraduate, postgraduate taught students, and postgraduate researchers; this crawl did not verify a separate staff-wide binding AI teaching policy.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度78%

标准化值: verified_sources_student_and_pgr_scoped_no_staffwide_policy_found

最后检查时间
2026年5月16日
最后更改时间
2026年5月16日

原始证据

证据 1
Guidance for our Foundation, Undergraduate and Postgraduate Taught Students. This guidance outlines how students at the University may and may not use Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in their academic work.

本地化显示 only

Guidance for our Foundation, Undergraduate and Postgraduate Taught Students. This guidance outlines how students at the University may and may not use Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in their academic work.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
8fac0216…
已检索
2026年5月16日
证据定位器
Guidance scope statements

原始证据

证据 2
This guidance sets out expectations for the ethical and responsible use of generative artificial intelligence by postgraduate researchers. It aligns with institutional research integrity, data protection, and academic misconduct regulations.

本地化显示 only

This guidance sets out expectations for the ethical and responsible use of generative artificial intelligence by postgraduate researchers. It aligns with institutional research integrity, data protection, and academic misconduct regulations.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
3b1a0e17…
已检索
2026年5月16日
证据定位器
Guidance scope statements

Source record

官方来源

8 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度96%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Royal Holloway, University of London AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/royal-holloway-university-of-london

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志