University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Język
ENZHFRPL

London, United Kingdom

Royal Holloway, University of London

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: =461Updated16 maj 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Zrecenzowane twierdzenia

7 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

Royal Holloway academic misconduct regulations list requesting or engaging an artificial intelligence tool to write or rewrite work for unfair advantage, and presenting AI-generated content as one’s own unless authorised and acknowledged, as examples of assessment offences.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność96%

Wartość znormalizowana: ai_commissioning_and_unauthorised_ai_in_regulations

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Commissioning, which is requesting or engaging another person or artificial intelligence tool whether paid or unpaid to write or rewrite work in order to obtain an unfair advantage for oneself. Presenting content generated by artificial intelligence tools as your own unless specifically authorised in writing as part of the assessment brief and appropriately acknowledged.

Widok lokalny only

Commissioning, which is requesting or engaging another person or artificial intelligence tool whether paid or unpaid to write or rewrite work in order to obtain an unfair advantage for oneself. Presenting content generated by artificial intelligence tools as your own unless specifically authorised in writing as part of the assessment brief and appropriately acknowledged.

Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
22a9f752…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Regulations on Academic Misconduct 2025/26, section 1(2)(b)-(c)

Badania

Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance for postgraduate researchers says AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose, or other academic content, and that researchers are responsible for every output they submit.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność95%

Wartość znormalizowana: pgr_ai_may_not_author_research_claims_or_thesis_prose

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Originality: AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose or other academic content. Transparency: declare that any AI use is within the permitted guidance outlined in this document. Accountability: you, the student, are responsible for every output that you submit.

Widok lokalny only

Originality: AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose or other academic content. Transparency: declare that any AI use is within the permitted guidance outlined in this document. Accountability: you, the student, are responsible for every output that you submit.

Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
3b1a0e17…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Principles and scope

Academic Integrity

Royal Holloway requires students to include declaration statements for generative AI use or non-use, and says a list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność94%

Wartość znormalizowana: ai_declaration_and_prompt_list_required

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Explicit acknowledgment of use of generative AI tools such as Large Language Models like Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini or ChatGPT or any other media generated through similar tools is required. If you have not used any such tools in any way a declaration statement is still required. Prompt List: A list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.

Widok lokalny only

Explicit acknowledgment of use of generative AI tools such as Large Language Models like Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini or ChatGPT or any other media generated through similar tools is required. If you have not used any such tools in any way a declaration statement is still required. Prompt List: A list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.

Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
760f945e…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
The Requirement of Declaration Statements; Prompt List

Prywatność

Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance says postgraduate researchers should not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party AI tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność94%

Wartość znormalizowana: pgr_no_confidential_personal_sensitive_data_to_third_party_ai_without_dpa_consent

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Data protection: do not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required. Uploading Personal, Special-category, or Confidential Data to Public AI Services: Any content that could identify individuals, organisations, or sensitive locations. No.

Widok lokalny only

Data protection: do not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required. Uploading Personal, Special-category, or Confidential Data to Public AI Services: Any content that could identify individuals, organisations, or sensitive locations. No.

Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
3b1a0e17…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Principles and scope; Data, privacy, and confidentiality

Ai Tool Treatment

Royal Holloway tells Foundation, undergraduate, and postgraduate taught students that module assessment briefs take precedence for AI use; if a brief says AI is not permitted, students must not use it and must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność93%

Wartość znormalizowana: assessment_brief_precedence

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
This guidance provides a broad overview, but all students must follow specific instructions in module assessment briefs as local guidance always takes precedence. If the brief says AI is not permitted, you must not use it. You must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.

Widok lokalny only

This guidance provides a broad overview, but all students must follow specific instructions in module assessment briefs as local guidance always takes precedence. If the brief says AI is not permitted, you must not use it. You must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.

Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
8fac0216…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Key principles for using AI at Royal Holloway

Ai Tool Treatment

Royal Holloway recommends Microsoft Copilot for generative AI use when students log in with Royal Holloway account details, and warns students to be extremely careful when entering data into other generative AI tools.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność92%

Wartość znormalizowana: microsoft_copilot_recommended_with_rhul_login

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
From the many generative AI tools, Royal Holloway recommends that you use Microsoft Copilot, logging in with your Royal Holloway account details. Please be extremely careful when entering data into a generative AI tool: this is particularly important if you are using one other than MS Copilot and your RHUL login.

Widok lokalny only

From the many generative AI tools, Royal Holloway recommends that you use Microsoft Copilot, logging in with your Royal Holloway account details. Please be extremely careful when entering data into a generative AI tool: this is particularly important if you are using one other than MS Copilot and your RHUL login.

Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
4bcf2424…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
AI Tools

Source Status

The official AI guidance verified in this crawl is scoped to Foundation, undergraduate, postgraduate taught students, and postgraduate researchers; this crawl did not verify a separate staff-wide binding AI teaching policy.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność78%

Wartość znormalizowana: verified_sources_student_and_pgr_scoped_no_staffwide_policy_found

Ostatnio sprawdzono
16 maj 2026
Ostatnio zmieniono
16 maj 2026

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 1
Guidance for our Foundation, Undergraduate and Postgraduate Taught Students. This guidance outlines how students at the University may and may not use Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in their academic work.

Widok lokalny only

Guidance for our Foundation, Undergraduate and Postgraduate Taught Students. This guidance outlines how students at the University may and may not use Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in their academic work.

Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
8fac0216…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Guidance scope statements

Oryginalny dowód

Dowód 2
This guidance sets out expectations for the ethical and responsible use of generative artificial intelligence by postgraduate researchers. It aligns with institutional research integrity, data protection, and academic misconduct regulations.

Widok lokalny only

This guidance sets out expectations for the ethical and responsible use of generative artificial intelligence by postgraduate researchers. It aligns with institutional research integrity, data protection, and academic misconduct regulations.

Język źródła
English (en)
Skrót migawki
3b1a0e17…
Pobrano
16 maj 2026
Lokalizator dowodów
Guidance scope statements

Source record

Oficjalne źródła

8 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Recenzjaagent reviewedPewność96%Snapshot statusNieopublikowaneJSONPubliczne JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Royal Holloway, University of London AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/royal-holloway-university-of-london

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Otwórz dziennik zmian