Dziennik zmian

Royal Holloway, University of London

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaOstatnio sprawdzono16 maj 2026Ostatnio zmieniono16 maj 2026Twierdzenia7Źródła8Rejestry wydań0

Strona uczelni Publiczne JSON Raport miesięczny Indeks uczelni

Royal Holloway, University of London currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 8 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 16 maj 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Ta strona łączy wszystkie publiczne diffy wydań dla Royal Holloway, University of London. Indywidualne migawki wersji pozostają dostępne pod adresami URL specyficznymi dla danej wersji.

Dla tej uczelni nie zarejestrowano jeszcze różnic między kolejnymi wydaniami. Strona nadal śledzi bieżące twierdzenia poparte źródłami, oficjalne przypisania źródeł, stan przeglądu, aktualność źródeł oraz publicznie dostępny JSON na potrzeby wyszukiwania i cytowania.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Właśnie wyodrębnione twierdzenia to dodania do trackeru i niekoniecznie są nowo opublikowane przez uniwersytet. Zmiany w migawce źródła pokazują zmiany sum kontrolnych dla tego samego URL źródłowego i same w sobie nie stanowią zmian polityki.

Tekst polityki0Właśnie wyodrębnione0Dowód0Migawki źródłowe0Tekst źródłowy0Dodano źródło0Usunięto źródło0

11 # Royal Holloway, University of London AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Royal Holloway academic misconduct regulations list requesting or engaging an artificial intelligence tool to write or rewrite work for unfair advantage, and presenting AI-generated content as one’s own unless authorised and acknowledged, as examples of assessment offences.
3+Evidence (en, 22a9f7526500): Commissioning, which is requesting or engaging another person or artificial intelligence tool whether paid or unpaid to write or rewrite work in order to obtain an unfair advantage for oneself. Presenting content generated by artificial intelligence tools as your own unless specifically authorised in writing as part of the assessment brief and appropriately acknowledged.
4+research: Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance for postgraduate researchers says AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose, or other academic content, and that researchers are responsible for every output they submit.
5+Evidence (en, 3b1a0e17e1f5): Originality: AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose or other academic content. Transparency: declare that any AI use is within the permitted guidance outlined in this document. Accountability: you, the student, are responsible for every output that you submit.
6+academic_integrity: Royal Holloway requires students to include declaration statements for generative AI use or non-use, and says a list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.
7+Evidence (en, 760f945e2237): Explicit acknowledgment of use of generative AI tools such as Large Language Models like Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini or ChatGPT or any other media generated through similar tools is required. If you have not used any such tools in any way a declaration statement is still required. Prompt List: A list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.
8+privacy: Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance says postgraduate researchers should not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party AI tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required.
9+Evidence (en, 3b1a0e17e1f5): Data protection: do not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required. Uploading Personal, Special-category, or Confidential Data to Public AI Services: Any content that could identify individuals, organisations, or sensitive locations. No.
10+ai_tool_treatment: Royal Holloway tells Foundation, undergraduate, and postgraduate taught students that module assessment briefs take precedence for AI use; if a brief says AI is not permitted, students must not use it and must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.
11+Evidence (en, 8fac02163e39): This guidance provides a broad overview, but all students must follow specific instructions in module assessment briefs as local guidance always takes precedence. If the brief says AI is not permitted, you must not use it. You must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.
12+ai_tool_treatment: Royal Holloway recommends Microsoft Copilot for generative AI use when students log in with Royal Holloway account details, and warns students to be extremely careful when entering data into other generative AI tools.
13+Evidence (en, 4bcf2424c1fb): From the many generative AI tools, Royal Holloway recommends that you use Microsoft Copilot, logging in with your Royal Holloway account details. Please be extremely careful when entering data into a generative AI tool: this is particularly important if you are using one other than MS Copilot and your RHUL login.
14+source_status: The official AI guidance verified in this crawl is scoped to Foundation, undergraduate, postgraduate taught students, and postgraduate researchers; this crawl did not verify a separate staff-wide binding AI teaching policy.
15+Evidence (en, 8fac02163e39): Guidance for our Foundation, Undergraduate and Postgraduate Taught Students. This guidance outlines how students at the University may and may not use Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in their academic work.

Historia wydań

0 public release diffs

Zmiany twierdzeń

7 Twierdzenie rekordów

academic_integrity

Royal Holloway academic misconduct regulations list requesting or engaging an artificial intelligence tool to write or rewrite work for unfair advantage, and presenting AI-generated content as one’s own unless authorised and acknowledged, as examples of assessment offences.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność96%Dowód1Językien

research

Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance for postgraduate researchers says AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose, or other academic content, and that researchers are responsible for every output they submit.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność95%Dowód1Językien

academic_integrity

Royal Holloway requires students to include declaration statements for generative AI use or non-use, and says a list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność94%Dowód1Językien

privacy

Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance says postgraduate researchers should not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party AI tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność94%Dowód1Językien

ai_tool_treatment

Royal Holloway tells Foundation, undergraduate, and postgraduate taught students that module assessment briefs take precedence for AI use; if a brief says AI is not permitted, students must not use it and must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność93%Dowód1Językien

ai_tool_treatment

Royal Holloway recommends Microsoft Copilot for generative AI use when students log in with Royal Holloway account details, and warns students to be extremely careful when entering data into other generative AI tools.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność92%Dowód1Językien

source_status

The official AI guidance verified in this crawl is scoped to Foundation, undergraduate, postgraduate taught students, and postgraduate researchers; this crawl did not verify a separate staff-wide binding AI teaching policy.

Przegląd: Sprawdzone przez agentaPewność78%Dowód2Językien