变更日志

Royal Holloway, University of London

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

审核: 智能体已审核最后检查时间2026年5月16日最后更改时间2026年5月16日声明7来源8版本记录0

大学页面公开 JSON 月度报告大学索引

Royal Holloway, University of London currently has 7 source-backed claim records and 8 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月16日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Royal Holloway, University of London。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

政策文本0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

11 # Royal Holloway, University of London AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Royal Holloway academic misconduct regulations list requesting or engaging an artificial intelligence tool to write or rewrite work for unfair advantage, and presenting AI-generated content as one’s own unless authorised and acknowledged, as examples of assessment offences.
3+Evidence (en, 22a9f7526500): Commissioning, which is requesting or engaging another person or artificial intelligence tool whether paid or unpaid to write or rewrite work in order to obtain an unfair advantage for oneself. Presenting content generated by artificial intelligence tools as your own unless specifically authorised in writing as part of the assessment brief and appropriately acknowledged.
4+research: Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance for postgraduate researchers says AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose, or other academic content, and that researchers are responsible for every output they submit.
5+Evidence (en, 3b1a0e17e1f5): Originality: AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose or other academic content. Transparency: declare that any AI use is within the permitted guidance outlined in this document. Accountability: you, the student, are responsible for every output that you submit.
6+academic_integrity: Royal Holloway requires students to include declaration statements for generative AI use or non-use, and says a list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.
7+Evidence (en, 760f945e2237): Explicit acknowledgment of use of generative AI tools such as Large Language Models like Microsoft Copilot, Google Gemini or ChatGPT or any other media generated through similar tools is required. If you have not used any such tools in any way a declaration statement is still required. Prompt List: A list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.
8+privacy: Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance says postgraduate researchers should not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party AI tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required.
9+Evidence (en, 3b1a0e17e1f5): Data protection: do not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required. Uploading Personal, Special-category, or Confidential Data to Public AI Services: Any content that could identify individuals, organisations, or sensitive locations. No.
10+ai_tool_treatment: Royal Holloway tells Foundation, undergraduate, and postgraduate taught students that module assessment briefs take precedence for AI use; if a brief says AI is not permitted, students must not use it and must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.
11+Evidence (en, 8fac02163e39): This guidance provides a broad overview, but all students must follow specific instructions in module assessment briefs as local guidance always takes precedence. If the brief says AI is not permitted, you must not use it. You must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.
12+ai_tool_treatment: Royal Holloway recommends Microsoft Copilot for generative AI use when students log in with Royal Holloway account details, and warns students to be extremely careful when entering data into other generative AI tools.
13+Evidence (en, 4bcf2424c1fb): From the many generative AI tools, Royal Holloway recommends that you use Microsoft Copilot, logging in with your Royal Holloway account details. Please be extremely careful when entering data into a generative AI tool: this is particularly important if you are using one other than MS Copilot and your RHUL login.
14+source_status: The official AI guidance verified in this crawl is scoped to Foundation, undergraduate, postgraduate taught students, and postgraduate researchers; this crawl did not verify a separate staff-wide binding AI teaching policy.
15+Evidence (en, 8fac02163e39): Guidance for our Foundation, Undergraduate and Postgraduate Taught Students. This guidance outlines how students at the University may and may not use Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in their academic work.

版本历史

0 public release diffs

声明变更

7 声明条记录

academic_integrity

Royal Holloway academic misconduct regulations list requesting or engaging an artificial intelligence tool to write or rewrite work for unfair advantage, and presenting AI-generated content as one’s own unless authorised and acknowledged, as examples of assessment offences.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%证据1语言en

research

Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance for postgraduate researchers says AI may not author or generate research claims, thesis prose, or other academic content, and that researchers are responsible for every output they submit.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%证据1语言en

academic_integrity

Royal Holloway requires students to include declaration statements for generative AI use or non-use, and says a list of all prompts entered into any large language model must be provided.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%证据1语言en

privacy

Royal Holloway Doctoral School guidance says postgraduate researchers should not expose confidential, personal, or sensitive data to third-party AI tools unless there is an approved data processing agreement and explicit consent where required.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%证据1语言en

ai_tool_treatment

Royal Holloway tells Foundation, undergraduate, and postgraduate taught students that module assessment briefs take precedence for AI use; if a brief says AI is not permitted, students must not use it and must declare any AI use clearly and honestly.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%证据1语言en

ai_tool_treatment

Royal Holloway recommends Microsoft Copilot for generative AI use when students log in with Royal Holloway account details, and warns students to be extremely careful when entering data into other generative AI tools.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%证据1语言en

source_status

The official AI guidance verified in this crawl is scoped to Foundation, undergraduate, postgraduate taught students, and postgraduate researchers; this crawl did not verify a separate staff-wide binding AI teaching policy.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度78%证据2语言en