University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

Olomouc, Czechia

Palacký University Olomouc

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: =668Updated2026年7月19日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

5 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

ProQuest Research Assistant is listed for Palacký University Olomouc in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"proquest_research_assistant","rawToolName":"ProQuest Research Assistant","description":"Palacký University provides ProQuest Research Assistant as part of its ProQuest Central subscription.","howToObtain":"Open ProQuest Central through the university e-resources portal.","costToUser":"Included with the institutional subscription.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

最后检查时间
2026年7月19日
最后更改时间
2026年7月19日

原始证据

证据 1
As part of the subscription to the ProQuest Central database, you can use the new AI tool ProQuest Research Assistant.

本地化显示 only

As part of the subscription to the ProQuest Central database, you can use the new AI tool ProQuest Research Assistant.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
75209cd2…
已检索
2026年7月19日

Academic Integrity

UP's recommendations state that generative AI use in professional texts and other creative work must be declared, and that staff and students may not claim authorship of texts or other creative outputs generated using AI.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%

标准化值: Declare generative AI use in professional or creative work; do not claim authorship of AI-generated outputs.

最后检查时间
2026年5月18日
最后更改时间
2026年5月18日

原始证据

证据 1
The use of generative AI in professional texts and other creative work, including artistic output, must be declared. Neither staff nor students may claim to be the authors of texts and other creative outputs generated using AI.

本地化显示 only

UP says generative AI use in professional or creative work must be declared and AI-generated outputs may not be claimed as one's own authorship.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
cd03a1e3…
已检索
2026年5月18日
证据定位器
Ethical principles list, items (b) and (c)

隐私

UP's recommendations warn that personal data, sensitive information, and potential UP intellectual property entered into AI systems must be handled responsibly because such data is usually made available to a third party and control over it may be lost.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: Handle personal data, sensitive information, and intellectual property responsibly when using AI systems.

最后检查时间
2026年5月18日
最后更改时间
2026年5月18日

原始证据

证据 1
When using AI, personal data and other sensitive information (such as potential UP intellectual property) that is fed into AI systems must be handled responsibly. It should be understood that such data is usually made available to a third party and that the owner then loses control over it.

本地化显示 only

UP warns that data entered into AI systems is usually made available to a third party and may leave the owner's control.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
cd03a1e3…
已检索
2026年5月18日
证据定位器
Paragraph beginning 'When using AI, personal data'

Ai Tool Treatment

UP's generative AI recommendations state that AI systems at Palacky University Olomouc must be used in compliance with UP ethical principles and as tools to improve knowledge, skills, teaching, research, management, administration, or editing rather than as a full replacement for creative activity.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度89%

标准化值: AI use must align with UP ethical principles and responsible tool use.

最后检查时间
2026年5月18日
最后更改时间
2026年5月18日

原始证据

证据 1
All AI systems (generative or otherwise) at UP must be used in such a way as to comply with the ethical principles of UP as defined by the Code of Ethics for UP staff and students

本地化显示 only

UP says AI systems must comply with UP ethical principles for staff and students.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
cd03a1e3…
已检索
2026年5月18日
证据定位器
Section beginning 'All AI systems (generative or otherwise) at UP'

教学

UP's recommendations say that if an educator uses AI in any form of assessment of student activities, such as evaluating written work, the assessment should include the educator's own assessment and not be made solely by AI.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度88%

标准化值: AI-supported student assessment should include educator assessment and not rely solely on AI.

最后检查时间
2026年5月18日
最后更改时间
2026年5月18日

原始证据

证据 1
if an educator decides to use AI in any form of assessment of students' activities (e.g. evaluation of their written works), it should always include the educator's own assessment, not one made solely by AI.

本地化显示 only

UP says AI-supported assessment should include the educator's own assessment and not be solely AI-made.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
cd03a1e3…
已检索
2026年5月18日
证据定位器
Paragraph discussing automated processing and student assessment

Source record

官方来源

3 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度97%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Palacký University Olomouc AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/palacky-university-olomouc

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志