Policy presence
Brno University of Technology has 2 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Brno, Czechia
Brno University of Technology
Brno University of Technology has 9 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 9 reviewed claims. Last checked May 17, 2026.
Brno University of Technology AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Brno University of Technology has 9 source-backed AI policy claims from 4 official source attributions, including 9 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 17, 2026. Discovery context: Brno University of Technology is listed as QS 2026 rank =575.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Brno University of Technology as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 17, 2026 and last changed on May 17, 2026. The record contains 9 source-backed claims, including 9 reviewed claims, from 4 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/brno-university-of-technology.json. The entity-level confidence is 95%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Source status claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes AI tool treatment claims.
- Evidence includes Privacy claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Evidence includes Research claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Brno University of Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Brno University of Technology has 5 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Exams
Brno University of Technology has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Privacy and data entry
Brno University of Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Brno University of Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
Brno University of Technology has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Named AI services
Brno University of Technology has 3 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Brno University of Technology has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Brno University of Technology has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
9 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Source Status
Brno University of Technology publishes official Czech-language guidance on generative AI use, including a central statement and recommendations for education, creative activity, and operational-administrative contexts.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: official_czech_guidance_pages_identified
Original evidence
Evidence 1Užívání generativní AI na Vysokém učení technickém v Brně. verze ke dni 18. 9. 2023.
Localized display only
Use of generative AI at Brno University of Technology, version as of 18 September 2023.
Academic Integrity
VUT requires users to properly state when a result was achieved using generative AI, including the extent of use, and warns that incorrect or undisclosed use may be treated as an ethical violation such as ghost-writing or contract-cheating.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: disclosure_required_including_extent_undisclosed_use_may_be_ethics_violation
Original evidence
Evidence 1V případě, že bylo jakéhokoli výsledku dosaženo s využitím generativní AI, je povinností uživatele tuto skutečnost náležitě uvést v souladu s citačními pravidly zdrojů informací, a to včetně uvedení rozsahu, v jakém byla generativní AI užita. Nesprávné či nepřiznané použití generativní AI může být považováno za porušení etických zásad ve smyslu ghost-writing nebo contract-cheating.
Localized display only
When a result was achieved using generative AI, the user must state that fact according to citation rules, including the extent of use; incorrect or undisclosed use may be treated as an ethical violation.
Academic Integrity
For education, VUT says copying generative-AI outputs and submitting them as student work is not permitted and will be treated similarly to contract-cheating, while assistant use for information search is permitted when the student independently assesses and uses the information.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: copying_ai_outputs_as_student_work_not_permitted_assistant_search_use_permitted
Original evidence
Evidence 1Není přípustné kopírování výstupů nástrojů generativní AI (např. zkopírování textů vygenerovaných při použití ChatGPT) a jejich odevzdání jako výsledek studentské práce. Takové jednání bude považováno za obdobu tzv. contract-cheatingu. Je přípustné využití asistenční role nástrojů generativní AI, zejména pro vyhledání informací, které student následně samostatně posoudí a případně využije.
Localized display only
Copying generative-AI outputs and submitting them as student work is not permitted; assistant use for information search is permitted when the student independently assesses the information.
Ai Tool Treatment
VUT frames generative AI as an assistant and consultation tool and supports open use within that role, subject to university principles and recommendations.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: generative_ai_assistant_consultation_tool_open_use_with_conditions
Original evidence
Evidence 1Vysoké učení technické v Brně chápe generativní AI jako technologii, která může být užitečná výhradně jako asistenční a konzultační nástroj. V rámci tohoto určení podporuje Vysoké učení technické v Brně otevřený přístup k využívání nástrojů generativní AI, ale současně stanovuje i zásady a doporučení, kterými se má využívání této technologie řídit.
Localized display only
VUT treats generative AI as useful only as an assistant and consultation tool, supports open use within that role, and sets principles and recommendations for its use.
Academic Integrity
VUT's education recommendations say student work and final theses must state whether generative AI tools were used, and if so, to what extent and for what purpose.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: student_work_and_final_theses_must_state_ai_use_extent_and_purpose
Original evidence
Evidence 1Ve studentské práci musí být uvedeno, zda student využil nástrojů generativní AI, v jakém rozsahu a za jakým účelem. V závěrečné práci musí být uvedeno, zda student využil nástrojů generativní AI, v jakém rozsahu a za jakým účelem.
Localized display only
Student work and final theses must state whether the student used generative-AI tools, and if so, to what extent and for what purpose.
Privacy
VUT warns users to ensure they are authorized to share data with generative-AI tools and to pay special attention to personal and other sensitive data.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: verify_authorization_before_sharing_data_pay_attention_to_personal_sensitive_data
Original evidence
Evidence 1Při vkládání dat do nástrojů generativní AI je nutné se ujistit, že student či vyučující má oprávnění k použití dat, které takto sdílí. Zvláštního zřetele je třeba dbát při vkládání osobních a jiných citlivých údajů.
Localized display only
When entering data into generative-AI tools, students or teachers must ensure they are authorized to use the shared data and pay special attention to personal and other sensitive data.
Teaching
VUT says teachers may use generative AI tools to prepare teaching materials, but must state which tools were used and the extent of use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: teachers_may_prepare_materials_with_ai_but_must_state_tool_and_extent
Original evidence
Evidence 1Vyučující jsou oprávněni využít nástrojů generativní AI k přípravě podkladů pro výuku, ale musí v nich uvést, jaké nástroje a v jakém rozsahu byly použity.
Localized display only
Teachers may use generative-AI tools to prepare teaching materials, but must state which tools were used and to what extent.
Research
For creative activity, VUT supports generative-AI use by academic and research staff, but says employees must state which tools were used and the extent of use when creating scientific or artistic outputs.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_creative_ai_use_supported_with_tool_and_extent_disclosure
Original evidence
Evidence 1Využití nástrojů generativních AI při činnosti akademických pracovníků a vědecko-výzkumných zaměstnanců je na VUT podporováno. Zaměstnanci jsou oprávněni využít nástrojů generativní AI v rámci tvorby vědeckého výsledku či uměleckého výstupu, ale musí uvést, jaké nástroje a v jakém rozsahu byly použity.
Localized display only
VUT supports generative-AI use by academic and research staff; employees may use it for scientific or artistic outputs but must state which tools were used and to what extent.
Ai Tool Treatment
For operational-administrative work, VUT supports employee use of generative AI and says employees may use it to perform work duties, while stating which tools were used and the extent of use.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: administrative_employee_ai_use_supported_with_tool_and_extent_disclosure
Original evidence
Evidence 1Využití nástrojů generativních AI při pracovní činnosti zaměstnanců je na VUT podporováno. Zaměstnanci jsou oprávněni využít nástrojů generativní AI k plnění svých pracovních povinností, ale musí uvést, jaké nástroje a v jakém rozsahu byly použity.
Localized display only
VUT supports generative-AI use in employees' work; employees may use it to perform work duties but must state which tools were used and to what extent.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
4 source attribution
Doporučení pro oblast provozně-administrativní – VUT
vut.cz
Doporučení pro oblast tvůrčí činnosti – VUT
vut.cz
Doporučení pro oblast vzdělávání – VUT
vut.cz
Umělá inteligence a stanovisko k využívání nástrojů A.I. – VUT
vut.cz
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.