University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Prague, Czechia

Czech Technical University in Prague

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: =416UpdatedJul 19, 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

8 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

GitHub Copilot is listed for Czech Technical University in Prague in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"github_copilot","rawToolName":"GitHub Copilot","description":"CTU states that GitHub Copilot is free for CTU students and teachers when they sign in with a university email address.","howToObtain":"Sign in using a CTU university email address.","costToUser":"Free for eligible CTU students and teachers.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Last checked
Jul 16, 2026
Last changed
Jul 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
GitHub Copilot je k dispozici zdarma pouze pro studující a vyučující na ČVUT. Podmínkou správného přihlášení je použití univerzitní e-mailové adresy.

Localized display only

GitHub Copilot je k dispozici zdarma pouze pro studující a vyučující na ČVUT. Podmínkou správného přihlášení je použití univerzitní e-mailové adresy.

Source language
cs
Snapshot hash
b677d592…
Retrieved
Jul 16, 2026

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot for Education is listed for Czech Technical University in Prague in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: conditionally allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot for Education","description":"CTU recommends Microsoft Copilot for Education for broad use because its security risks are contractually and technically addressed; it is available to employees with an A3 license.","howToObtain":"Use the CTU Microsoft Copilot for Education service with an eligible A3 employee license.","costToUser":"Not specified.","availability":"conditionally_allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

Last checked
Jul 16, 2026
Last changed
Jul 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Doporučujeme proto používání nástrojů, které mají bezpečnostní rizika smluvně i technicky ošetřena, tedy pro nejširší užití na ČVUT je doporučený nástroj Microsoft Copilot for Education, dostupný všem zaměstnancům s licencí A3.

Localized display only

Doporučujeme proto používání nástrojů, které mají bezpečnostní rizika smluvně i technicky ošetřena, tedy pro nejširší užití na ČVUT je doporučený nástroj Microsoft Copilot for Education, dostupný všem zaměstnancům s licencí A3.

Source language
cs
Snapshot hash
b677d592…
Retrieved
Jul 16, 2026

Source Status

Czech Technical University in Prague has a current central methodological guideline for framework rules on generative AI use by bachelor and follow-up master students and teachers.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%

Normalized value: current_central_ai_methodological_guideline

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Current version: Methodical guideline No. 5/2023 - Framework rules for the use of artificial intelligence at CTU for study and pedagogical purposes in Bachelor and continuing Masters studies. Issued on: 29.01.2024. Effective as of: 29.01.2024. Valid as of: 19.02.2024.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
e1580546…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Methodical Guidelines > During the study > Use of artificial intelligence

Ai Tool Treatment

For bachelor and follow-up master study at CTU, AI-tool use in fulfilling programme and subject requirements must be clearly defined and described and must comply with the relevant programme, subject, and thesis-ethics rules.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: ai_use_must_be_defined_by_programme_subject_and_ethics_rules

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The use of AI tools in fulfilling the requirements of study programmes and individual subjects must always be clearly defined and described ... and must comply with the rules of the given study programme and the given subjects and the Methodological Guideline on Adherence to Ethical Principles in Preparation of Graduation Theses.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
d21c9939…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Article 1.3

Academic Integrity

CTU's graduation-thesis ethics guideline treats failure to acknowledge and document AI-tool text or other AI outcomes in a thesis, while presenting them as one's own, as plagiarism.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%

Normalized value: unacknowledged_ai_outputs_in_thesis_are_plagiarism

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Prohibited ways of working with information sources: Plagiarism ... not acknowledging and documenting the use of text or other outcomes of AI tools in the thesis and presenting them as one's own.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
3f0b3d43…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Article 4.1(i)

Privacy

CTU's AI framework identifies sharing sensitive research data, personal data, and contractually concealed data with AI tools as significant cyber risks and states that AI cannot keep confidentiality or protect personal data.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%

Normalized value: ai_tools_create_privacy_confidentiality_risks

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The use of AI can present significant cyber risks. The most significant risks include the sharing of: sensitive data from ongoing or completed research; personal data ...; data created within the framework of contractual research under an agreement on data concealment. AI is not able to keep confidentiality of shared information or protect personal data.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
d21c9939…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Article 3.1-3.3

Academic Integrity

CTU's AI framework marks AI use for examinations, tests, and homework as not appropriate for students unless teacher instructions or the assessment design clearly allow it.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: ai_use_restricted_for_exams_tests_homework

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Using AI in other stages of learning: Doing examinations and tests - NO ... A breach of the rules may result in penalization in accordance with the Disciplinary Code for Students of CTU. Homework - NO ... When using AI tools, students must follow their teacher's instructions.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
d21c9939…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Article 4.2

Teaching

Where AI use is relevant for a CTU subject, teachers should set and publish clear subject-level rules for AI use, including the justification for those rules.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: teachers_should_publish_subject_ai_rules

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
If relevant for the given subject, teachers should set and publish on the website of the subject clear rules for the use of AI in their subjects, including the justification of these rules so that students understand why the rules are set the way they are.
Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
d21c9939…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Article 5.3

Source record

Official sources

4 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence97%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Czech Technical University in Prague AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/czech-technical-university-in-prague

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log