source_status
Czech Technical University in Prague has a current central methodological guideline for framework rules on generative AI use by bachelor and follow-up master students and teachers.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Czech Technical University in Prague
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Czech Technical University in Prague currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Claim/evidence diff preview
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Czech Technical University in Prague current policy evidence
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
+12-0
11 # Czech Technical University in Prague AI policy record
2+source_status: Czech Technical University in Prague has a current central methodological guideline for framework rules on generative AI use by bachelor and follow-up master students and teachers.
3+Evidence (en, e158054685d3): Current version: Methodical guideline No. 5/2023 - Framework rules for the use of artificial intelligence at CTU for study and pedagogical purposes in Bachelor and continuing Masters studies. Issued on: 29.01.2024. Effective as of: 29.01.2024. Valid as of: 19.02.2024.
4+ai_tool_treatment: For bachelor and follow-up master study at CTU, AI-tool use in fulfilling programme and subject requirements must be clearly defined and described and must comply with the relevant programme, subject, and thesis-ethics rules.
5+Evidence (en, d21c99396162): The use of AI tools in fulfilling the requirements of study programmes and individual subjects must always be clearly defined and described ... and must comply with the rules of the given study programme and the given subjects and the Methodological Guideline on Adherence to Ethical Principles in Preparation of Graduation Theses.
6+academic_integrity: CTU's graduation-thesis ethics guideline treats failure to acknowledge and document AI-tool text or other AI outcomes in a thesis, while presenting them as one's own, as plagiarism.
7+Evidence (en, 3f0b3d43cf64): Prohibited ways of working with information sources: Plagiarism ... not acknowledging and documenting the use of text or other outcomes of AI tools in the thesis and presenting them as one's own.
8+privacy: CTU's AI framework identifies sharing sensitive research data, personal data, and contractually concealed data with AI tools as significant cyber risks and states that AI cannot keep confidentiality or protect personal data.
9+Evidence (en, d21c99396162): The use of AI can present significant cyber risks. The most significant risks include the sharing of: sensitive data from ongoing or completed research; personal data ...; data created within the framework of contractual research under an agreement on data concealment. AI is not able to keep confidentiality of shared information or protect personal data.
10+academic_integrity: CTU's AI framework marks AI use for examinations, tests, and homework as not appropriate for students unless teacher instructions or the assessment design clearly allow it.
11+Evidence (en, d21c99396162): Using AI in other stages of learning: Doing examinations and tests - NO ... A breach of the rules may result in penalization in accordance with the Disciplinary Code for Students of CTU. Homework - NO ... When using AI tools, students must follow their teacher's instructions.
12+teaching: Where AI use is relevant for a CTU subject, teachers should set and publish clear subject-level rules for AI use, including the justification for those rules.
13+Evidence (en, d21c99396162): If relevant for the given subject, teachers should set and publish on the website of the subject clear rules for the use of AI in their subjects, including the justification of these rules so that students understand why the rules are set the way they are.
Claim changes
6 claim records
ai_tool_treatment
For bachelor and follow-up master study at CTU, AI-tool use in fulfilling programme and subject requirements must be clearly defined and described and must comply with the relevant programme, subject, and thesis-ethics rules.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
CTU's graduation-thesis ethics guideline treats failure to acknowledge and document AI-tool text or other AI outcomes in a thesis, while presenting them as one's own, as plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
CTU's AI framework identifies sharing sensitive research data, personal data, and contractually concealed data with AI tools as significant cyber risks and states that AI cannot keep confidentiality or protect personal data.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
CTU's AI framework marks AI use for examinations, tests, and homework as not appropriate for students unless teacher instructions or the assessment design clearly allow it.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
Where AI use is relevant for a CTU subject, teachers should set and publish clear subject-level rules for AI use, including the justification for those rules.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
3 source attributions
Framework Rules for the Use of Artificial Intelligence at CTU for Study and Teaching Purposes in Bachelor and Follow-up Master Studies
official_policy_page checked May 16, 2026
Legislation and Study Regulations - Public web - Czech technical university in Prague
official_policy_page checked May 16, 2026
Methodological guideline on Adherence to Ethical Principles in Preparation of Graduation Theses
official_guidance checked May 16, 2026