Change log
Tracker history: 0 release records.
Current public record freshness and review state.
9 current claims; 4 official sources.
This page combines all public release diffs for Brno University of Technology. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No recorded updates are available in this tracker history.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Only recorded comparisons with an exact Claim ID match are shown.
No recorded updates are available in this tracker history.
Tracker history: 0 release records.
Current claim records: 9.
Brno University of Technology publishes official Czech-language guidance on generative AI use, including a central statement and recommendations for education, creative activity, and operational-administrative contexts.
VUT requires users to properly state when a result was achieved using generative AI, including the extent of use, and warns that incorrect or undisclosed use may be treated as an ethical violation such as ghost-writing or contract-cheating.
For education, VUT says copying generative-AI outputs and submitting them as student work is not permitted and will be treated similarly to contract-cheating, while assistant use for information search is permitted when the student independently assesses and uses the information.
VUT frames generative AI as an assistant and consultation tool and supports open use within that role, subject to university principles and recommendations.
VUT's education recommendations say student work and final theses must state whether generative AI tools were used, and if so, to what extent and for what purpose.
VUT warns users to ensure they are authorized to share data with generative-AI tools and to pay special attention to personal and other sensitive data.
VUT says teachers may use generative AI tools to prepare teaching materials, but must state which tools were used and the extent of use.
For creative activity, VUT supports generative-AI use by academic and research staff, but says employees must state which tools were used and the extent of use when creating scientific or artistic outputs.
For operational-administrative work, VUT supports employee use of generative AI and says employees may use it to perform work duties, while stating which tools were used and the extent of use.
Official source records: 4.
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 17, 2026, 1:55 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 17, 2026, 1:54 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 17, 2026, 1:51 AM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 17, 2026, 1:49 AM
