source_status
Brno University of Technology publishes official Czech-language guidance on generative AI use, including a central statement and recommendations for education, creative activity, and operational-administrative contexts.
Dziennik zmian
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Aktualna świeżość publicznych rekordów i stan weryfikacji.
Brno University of Technology currently has 9 source-backed claim records and 4 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 17 maj 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
Ta strona łączy wszystkie publiczne diffy wydań dla Brno University of Technology. Indywidualne migawki wersji pozostają dostępne pod adresami URL specyficznymi dla danej wersji.
Dla tej uczelni nie zarejestrowano jeszcze różnic między kolejnymi wydaniami. Strona nadal śledzi bieżące twierdzenia poparte źródłami, oficjalne przypisania źródeł, stan przeglądu, aktualność źródeł oraz publicznie dostępny JSON na potrzeby wyszukiwania i cytowania.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Właśnie wyodrębnione twierdzenia to dodania do trackeru i niekoniecznie są nowo opublikowane przez uniwersytet. Zmiany w migawce źródła pokazują zmiany sum kontrolnych dla tego samego URL źródłowego i same w sobie nie stanowią zmian polityki.
Klasyfikacja semantyczna dla tej różnicy wersji.
Zjednoczona różnica trackerów wygenerowana ze wszystkich publicznych migawek wydań dla tej uczelni.
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
0 public release diffs
9 Twierdzenie rekordów
Brno University of Technology publishes official Czech-language guidance on generative AI use, including a central statement and recommendations for education, creative activity, and operational-administrative contexts.
VUT requires users to properly state when a result was achieved using generative AI, including the extent of use, and warns that incorrect or undisclosed use may be treated as an ethical violation such as ghost-writing or contract-cheating.
For education, VUT says copying generative-AI outputs and submitting them as student work is not permitted and will be treated similarly to contract-cheating, while assistant use for information search is permitted when the student independently assesses and uses the information.
VUT frames generative AI as an assistant and consultation tool and supports open use within that role, subject to university principles and recommendations.
VUT's education recommendations say student work and final theses must state whether generative AI tools were used, and if so, to what extent and for what purpose.
VUT warns users to ensure they are authorized to share data with generative-AI tools and to pay special attention to personal and other sensitive data.
VUT says teachers may use generative AI tools to prepare teaching materials, but must state which tools were used and the extent of use.
For creative activity, VUT supports generative-AI use by academic and research staff, but says employees must state which tools were used and the extent of use when creating scientific or artistic outputs.
For operational-administrative work, VUT supports employee use of generative AI and says employees may use it to perform work duties, while stating which tools were used and the extent of use.
4 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at 17 maj 2026, 01:55
official_guidance Tracker checked at 17 maj 2026, 01:54
official_guidance Tracker checked at 17 maj 2026, 01:51
official_guidance Tracker checked at 17 maj 2026, 01:49