Policy presence
Palacký University Olomouc has 1 source-backed public claim for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Olomouc, Czechia
Palacký University Olomouc
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
Palacký University Olomouc has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
Palacký University Olomouc has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Exams
Palacký University Olomouc has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Privacy and data entry
Palacký University Olomouc has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
Palacký University Olomouc has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
Palacký University Olomouc has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Named AI services
Palacký University Olomouc has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
Palacký University Olomouc has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
Palacký University Olomouc has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
UP's recommendations state that generative AI use in professional texts and other creative work must be declared, and that staff and students may not claim authorship of texts or other creative outputs generated using AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Declare generative AI use in professional or creative work; do not claim authorship of AI-generated outputs.
Original evidence
Evidence 1The use of generative AI in professional texts and other creative work, including artistic output, must be declared. Neither staff nor students may claim to be the authors of texts and other creative outputs generated using AI.
Localized display only
UP says generative AI use in professional or creative work must be declared and AI-generated outputs may not be claimed as one's own authorship.
Privacy
UP's recommendations warn that personal data, sensitive information, and potential UP intellectual property entered into AI systems must be handled responsibly because such data is usually made available to a third party and control over it may be lost.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: Handle personal data, sensitive information, and intellectual property responsibly when using AI systems.
Original evidence
Evidence 1When using AI, personal data and other sensitive information (such as potential UP intellectual property) that is fed into AI systems must be handled responsibly. It should be understood that such data is usually made available to a third party and that the owner then loses control over it.
Localized display only
UP warns that data entered into AI systems is usually made available to a third party and may leave the owner's control.
Ai Tool Treatment
UP's generative AI recommendations state that AI systems at Palacky University Olomouc must be used in compliance with UP ethical principles and as tools to improve knowledge, skills, teaching, research, management, administration, or editing rather than as a full replacement for creative activity.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: AI use must align with UP ethical principles and responsible tool use.
Original evidence
Evidence 1All AI systems (generative or otherwise) at UP must be used in such a way as to comply with the ethical principles of UP as defined by the Code of Ethics for UP staff and students
Localized display only
UP says AI systems must comply with UP ethical principles for staff and students.
Teaching
UP's recommendations say that if an educator uses AI in any form of assessment of student activities, such as evaluating written work, the assessment should include the educator's own assessment and not be made solely by AI.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: AI-supported student assessment should include educator assessment and not rely solely on AI.
Original evidence
Evidence 1if an educator decides to use AI in any form of assessment of students' activities (e.g. evaluation of their written works), it should always include the educator's own assessment, not one made solely by AI.
Localized display only
UP says AI-supported assessment should include the educator's own assessment and not be solely AI-made.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
2 source attribution
UP's recommendations for the use of generative AI models
upol.cz
Uzitecne informace
pdf.upol.cz