University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Olomouc, Czechia

Palacký University Olomouc

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: =668UpdatedJul 19, 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

5 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

ProQuest Research Assistant is listed for Palacký University Olomouc in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence97%

Normalized value: {"tool":"proquest_research_assistant","rawToolName":"ProQuest Research Assistant","description":"Palacký University provides ProQuest Research Assistant as part of its ProQuest Central subscription.","howToObtain":"Open ProQuest Central through the university e-resources portal.","costToUser":"Included with the institutional subscription.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

Last checked
Jul 19, 2026
Last changed
Jul 19, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
As part of the subscription to the ProQuest Central database, you can use the new AI tool ProQuest Research Assistant.

Localized display only

As part of the subscription to the ProQuest Central database, you can use the new AI tool ProQuest Research Assistant.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
75209cd2…
Retrieved
Jul 19, 2026

Academic Integrity

UP's recommendations state that generative AI use in professional texts and other creative work must be declared, and that staff and students may not claim authorship of texts or other creative outputs generated using AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence91%

Normalized value: Declare generative AI use in professional or creative work; do not claim authorship of AI-generated outputs.

Last checked
May 18, 2026
Last changed
May 18, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
The use of generative AI in professional texts and other creative work, including artistic output, must be declared. Neither staff nor students may claim to be the authors of texts and other creative outputs generated using AI.

Localized display only

UP says generative AI use in professional or creative work must be declared and AI-generated outputs may not be claimed as one's own authorship.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
cd03a1e3…
Retrieved
May 18, 2026
Evidence locator
Ethical principles list, items (b) and (c)

Privacy

UP's recommendations warn that personal data, sensitive information, and potential UP intellectual property entered into AI systems must be handled responsibly because such data is usually made available to a third party and control over it may be lost.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: Handle personal data, sensitive information, and intellectual property responsibly when using AI systems.

Last checked
May 18, 2026
Last changed
May 18, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
When using AI, personal data and other sensitive information (such as potential UP intellectual property) that is fed into AI systems must be handled responsibly. It should be understood that such data is usually made available to a third party and that the owner then loses control over it.

Localized display only

UP warns that data entered into AI systems is usually made available to a third party and may leave the owner's control.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
cd03a1e3…
Retrieved
May 18, 2026
Evidence locator
Paragraph beginning 'When using AI, personal data'

Ai Tool Treatment

UP's generative AI recommendations state that AI systems at Palacky University Olomouc must be used in compliance with UP ethical principles and as tools to improve knowledge, skills, teaching, research, management, administration, or editing rather than as a full replacement for creative activity.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%

Normalized value: AI use must align with UP ethical principles and responsible tool use.

Last checked
May 18, 2026
Last changed
May 18, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
All AI systems (generative or otherwise) at UP must be used in such a way as to comply with the ethical principles of UP as defined by the Code of Ethics for UP staff and students

Localized display only

UP says AI systems must comply with UP ethical principles for staff and students.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
cd03a1e3…
Retrieved
May 18, 2026
Evidence locator
Section beginning 'All AI systems (generative or otherwise) at UP'

Teaching

UP's recommendations say that if an educator uses AI in any form of assessment of student activities, such as evaluating written work, the assessment should include the educator's own assessment and not be made solely by AI.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: AI-supported student assessment should include educator assessment and not rely solely on AI.

Last checked
May 18, 2026
Last changed
May 18, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
if an educator decides to use AI in any form of assessment of students' activities (e.g. evaluation of their written works), it should always include the educator's own assessment, not one made solely by AI.

Localized display only

UP says AI-supported assessment should include the educator's own assessment and not be solely AI-made.

Source language
English (en)
Snapshot hash
cd03a1e3…
Retrieved
May 18, 2026
Evidence locator
Paragraph discussing automated processing and student assessment

Source record

Official sources

3 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence97%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Palacký University Olomouc AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/palacky-university-olomouc

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log