University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

Semarang, Indonesia

Diponegoro University

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: =624Updated2026年5月17日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

5 reviewed claims

研究

UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy allows authors to use AI tools supportively, but requires substantive AI use to be disclosed in an AI Declaration Statement and states that AI tools may not be listed as authors or co-authors.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度88%

标准化值: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial authors may use AI supportively with disclosure; AI cannot be an author.

最后检查时间
2026年5月17日
最后更改时间
2026年5月17日

原始证据

证据 1
Authors may use AI Tools in the preparation of manuscripts submitted to JIS, provided that such use remains supportive rather than substitutive of scholarly judgment. ... The use of AI Tools must be declared at the time of submission in a dedicated AI Declaration Statement... AI Tools may not be listed as authors or co-authors.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
fa374de7…
已检索
2026年5月17日
证据定位器
Policy on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), Policy for Authors

研究

UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy tells reviewers and editors not to upload confidential manuscript or review materials into AI tools and not to use generative AI to evaluate manuscripts or make editorial judgments.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度88%

标准化值: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial restricts reviewer/editor AI use for confidential peer-review and editorial judgment.

最后检查时间
2026年5月17日
最后更改时间
2026年5月17日

原始证据

证据 1
Reviewers must not upload, share, or process submitted manuscripts or review reports through AI Tools... Generative AI must not be used to evaluate manuscripts, generate review reports, or formulate editorial judgments. ... Editors must not upload manuscripts, reviewer reports, or editorial correspondence into AI Tools.
来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
fa374de7…
已检索
2026年5月17日
证据定位器
Policy on the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI), Policy for Reviewers and Policy for Editors

Academic Integrity

UNDIP Library guidance tells students that submitted assignments remain their own responsibility, and that using AI software without acknowledgement is treated seriously under academic misconduct procedures.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度86%

标准化值: Students should acknowledge AI use; unacknowledged AI use is framed as an academic integrity issue.

最后检查时间
2026年5月17日
最后更改时间
2026年5月17日

原始证据

证据 1
Sebagai mahasiswa Universitas Diponegoro, Anda memiliki tanggung jawab untuk memastikan bahwa setiap tugas yang dikumpulkan merupakan hasil karya pribadi. ... Pelanggaran seperti kolusi, plagiarisme, pembelian karya dari pihak ketiga, maupun penggunaan perangkat lunak AI tanpa pengakuan akan diperlakukan dengan sangat serius dan ditangani sesuai dengan prosedur pelanggaran akademik yang berlaku

本地化显示 only

As a Diponegoro University student, each submitted assignment is your own work; unacknowledged use of AI software is treated seriously under academic misconduct procedures.

来源语言
id
快照哈希
bb02b9e8…
已检索
2026年5月17日
证据定位器
Introductory section under page title

Ai Tool Treatment

UNDIP Library guidance permits AI as support for writing, editing, and literature searching, but says it must not replace human critical reasoning or become a shortcut for student work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度84%

标准化值: AI may support academic work, but should not replace critical reasoning or original student effort.

最后检查时间
2026年5月17日
最后更改时间
2026年5月17日

原始证据

证据 1
AI boleh membantu menulis, menyunting, atau mencari literatur, tetapi tidak boleh menjadi pengganti penalaran kritis manusia. ... Mahasiswa: menggunakan AI untuk mendukung kreativitas, bukan sebagai jalan pintas. Keterampilan berpikir kritis dan analitis tetap utama.

本地化显示 only

AI may help with writing, editing, or literature searching, but must not replace human critical reasoning; students should use AI to support creativity, not as a shortcut.

来源语言
id
快照哈希
bb02b9e8…
已检索
2026年5月17日
证据定位器
Pedoman dalam Konteks Akademik dan Pendidikan

研究

UNDIP Library guidance says AI use in data analysis, writing, or draft preparation should be explicitly disclosed in publications, and AI-generated results should be manually reverified.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度84%

标准化值: Research/publication AI use should be disclosed and AI output manually verified.

最后检查时间
2026年5月17日
最后更改时间
2026年5月17日

原始证据

证据 1
Jika AI digunakan dalam analisis data, penulisan, atau penyusunan draft, kontribusi tersebut harus diungkapkan secara eksplisit dalam publikasi. ... Semua hasil yang dihasilkan AI harus diverifikasi ulang secara manual untuk mencegah bias, kesalahan faktual, atau manipulasi.

本地化显示 only

If AI is used in data analysis, writing, or drafting, the contribution should be explicitly disclosed in publications; all AI-generated results should be manually reverified.

来源语言
id
快照哈希
bb02b9e8…
已检索
2026年5月17日
证据定位器
Pedoman dalam Penelitian dan Publikasi

Source record

官方来源

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度88%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Diponegoro University AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 17, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/diponegoro-university

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志