Policy presence
IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University) has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Bogor, Indonesia
IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University)
Record status
Review: Agent reviewed
Policy profile
Review: Machine candidate
AI disclosure
IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University) has 2 source-backed public claims for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.
Coursework
IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University) has 3 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Exams
IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University) has 3 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Privacy and data entry
IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University) has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Academic integrity
IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University) has 2 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Approved tools
IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University) has 2 source-backed public claims for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: required.
Named AI services
IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University) has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Teaching guidance
IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University) has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University) has 2 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
IPB University (aka Bogor Agricultural University) has 1 source-backed public claim for security and procurement; deterministic analysis status: required.
AI tools
No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.
Evidence-backed claims
7 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Privacy
IPB guidance says AI use must consider IPB security and confidentiality rules; AI use must not disclose or store personal information of students, lecturers, or education staff without permission, and must protect academic data.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_use_must_protect_personal_and_academic_data
Original evidence
Evidence 1Penggunaan AI harus memperhatikan konsep keamanan dan kerahasiaan data yang telah ditetapkan di IPB... Data Pribadi Mahasiswa, Dosen dan Tendik: Penggunaan AI tidak boleh mengungkapkan atau menyimpan informasi pribadi mahasiswa, dosen, dan tenaga kependidikan tanpa izin. Data Akademik: Penggunaan AI dalam tugas, penelitian, dan administrasi harus mempertimbangkan perlindungan data akademik agar tidak disalahgunakan oleh pihak eksternal
Localized display only
AI use must consider IPB security and confidentiality rules; personal data must not be disclosed or stored without permission, and academic data should be protected.
Security Review
IPB guidance identifies LMITD, DRI, and DTPTP as bodies authorized to regulate AI use supporting IPB academic activities; IPB academic community members must comply with established AI-use rules and consult the relevant body where required.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_technology_evaluation_and_consultation_by_ipb_bodies
Original evidence
Evidence 1Di IPB, terdapat beberapa lembaga yang berwenang untuk mengatur penggunaan AI dalam menunjang kegiatan akademik, di antaranya: Lembaga Manajemen Informasi dan Transformasi Digital (LMITD) IPB, Direktorat Riset dan Inovasi (DRI) IPB, dan Direktorat Transformasi Pendidikan dan Teknologi Pembelajaran (DTPTP) IPB... Setiap civitas akademik IPB wajib mematuhi peraturan penggunaan teknologi AI yang telah ditetapkan... maka civitas akademik IPB wajib berkonsultasi dengan lembaga terkait.
Localized display only
LMITD, DRI, and DTPTP are named as authorized bodies for AI-use rules; IPB community members must comply with established rules and consult for unevaluated AI technology or usage modes.
Source Status
IPB has a central Indonesian-language AI guidance document for Tridarma use, intended as an IPB guide for lecturers, students, education staff, and units, and it cites IPB Academic Senate Regulation No. 47 of 2023 as a basis.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: central_ai_guidance_for_tridarma
Original evidence
Evidence 1Panduan ini disusun untuk memberikan pemahaman mendalam tentang bagaimana dosen, mahasiswa dan tenaga kependidikan dapat menggunakan AI dengan bijak, sesuai dengan standar akademik... Sebagai acuan bagi fakultas/sekolah dan unit dalam membuat panduan penggunaan AI sesuai dengan tugas pokok dan fungsinya. Dasar penyusunan... Peraturan Senat Akademik Institut Pertanian Bogor Nomor 47 Tahun 2023 tentang Norma Dan Etika Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) dalam Penyelenggaraan Tridharma Perguruan Tinggi di Lingkungan Institut Pertanian Bogor
Localized display only
The guide is intended for lecturers, students, education staff, faculties/schools and units, and cites IPB Academic Senate Regulation No. 47 of 2023 on AI norms and ethics in Tridarma.
Academic Integrity
IPB guidance says AI-generated publication content should be thoroughly reviewed for factual accuracy, validity, originality, academic standards, and copyright compliance, and that IPB AI users are fully responsible for content they publish or share.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_generated_publication_content_requires_review_and_user_responsibility
Original evidence
Evidence 1Konten yang dihasilkan oleh AI harus diperiksa secara menyeluruh untuk memastikan tidak ada kesalahan faktual atau penyebaran informasi yang tidak valid. Dalam kegiatan tridarma perguruan tinggi, pengguna AI di IPB bertanggung jawab penuh atas setiap konten yang dipublikasikan atau dibagikan.
Localized display only
AI-generated content must be reviewed for factual errors or invalid information, and IPB users are fully responsible for content they publish or share.
Ai Tool Treatment
IPB supports AI use in Tridarma activities when it is ethical, responsible, and consistent with academic principles and professionalism.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_supported_with_ethical_responsible_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Institut Pertanian Bogor (IPB) mendukung pemanfaatan kecerdasan buatan (AI) untuk kegiatan Tridarma Perguruan Tinggi secara etis dan bertanggung jawab, dengan tetap menjunjung tinggi prinsip-prinsip akademik dan profesionalisme.
Localized display only
IPB supports AI use for Tridarma activities when used ethically and responsibly while upholding academic principles and professionalism.
Research
For research writing, IPB guidance says lecturers and students must not use AI outputs as-is without re-editing, content evaluation, and proper references; directly copying AI text risks academic-ethics violations and plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: research_ai_outputs_require_editing_evaluation_references
Original evidence
Evidence 1Dosen dan mahasiswa tidak boleh menggunakan hasil keluaran dari AI begitu saja tanpa melakukan proses penyuntingan ulang, evaluasi isi, dan pemberian rujukan yang sesuai... Menyalin teks tanpa penyuntingan juga berisiko melanggar etika akademik dan dapat dianggap sebagai plagiarisme. Oleh karena itu, hasil dari AI harus ditulis ulang dengan gaya penulisan ilmiah, disesuaikan dengan tujuan penelitian, dan jika mengandung informasi atau gagasan penting, wajib disertai dengan referensi yang sahih.
Localized display only
Lecturers and students must not use AI output as-is; AI text should be edited, evaluated, and properly referenced to avoid academic-ethics and plagiarism risks.
Teaching
For education, IPB guidance says GenAI use should be human-centered, pedagogically appropriate, ethical, human-controlled, aligned with learning objectives, and accountable for AI-content accuracy and impact.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: genai_education_human_centered_ethics_human_control_accountability
Original evidence
Evidence 1Penggunaan GenAI pada dasarnya perlu pendekatan 'human-centred and pedagogically appropriate interaction'... Lima pertimbangan utama dalam penggunaan GenAI meliputi: penggunaan GenAI harus lebih efektif dari tanpa GenAI, etika harus mendasari penggunaan GenAI oleh dosen dan mahasiswa, proses penggunaan GenAI harus dikendalikan oleh manusia, pemilihan GenAI dan konten sesuai dengan tujuan pembelajaran... dan akuntabilitas manusia atas keakuratan konten AI serta dampaknya.
Localized display only
GenAI use in education should be human-centered and pedagogically appropriate, with ethics, human control, alignment to learning objectives, and human accountability for AI content.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Official sources
1 source attribution
Panduan Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (AI) dalam Penyelenggaraan Tridarma di Lingkungan Institut Pertanian Bogor
panduan.ipb.ac.id