University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Language
ENZHFRPL

Bandung, Indonesia

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB)

RankingQS World University Rankings 2026: 255UpdatedMay 16, 2026

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Reviewed claims

6 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

FITB guidance says declaration of AI use for coursework outputs is mandatory rather than optional, and undeclared AI use may be considered a serious violation with academic consequences.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Normalized value: fitb_ai_use_declaration_required

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Deklarasi penggunaan AI adalah wajib, bukan opsional. Salah satu poin paling operasional dalam pedomen ITB adalah kewajiban deklarasi penggunaan AI untuk luaran perkuliahan ... Menggunakan AI tetapi tidak mendeklarasikan pemakaiannya, dapat dianggap pelanggaran serius, dengan konsekuensi akademik.

Localized display only

AI-use declaration is mandatory for coursework outputs; undeclared AI use may be considered a serious violation with academic consequences.

Source language
id
Snapshot hash
5ad08928…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Deklarasi penggunaan AI

Academic Integrity

FITB guidance states that, by default, using AI during exams, quizzes, or other evaluations is academic cheating and can be sanctioned unless the instructor allows or recommends AI use for a particular part of a course.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%

Normalized value: fitb_ai_assessment_default_cheating_unless_instructor_allows

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
AI digunakan saat ujian, kuis, ataupun bentuk evaluasi lainnya: Secara default, menggunakan AI saat evaluasi adalah kecurangan akademik dan dapat dikenai sanksi. Pengecualian: Jika dosen mengizinkan atau menyarankan.

Localized display only

By default, AI use during exams, quizzes, or other evaluations is academic cheating and may be sanctioned, with an exception where the instructor allows or recommends it.

Source language
id
Snapshot hash
5ad08928…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Tidak Boleh / Pengecualian

Privacy

FITB guidance says students are prohibited from entering personal, sensitive, and confidential data into GenAI and are prohibited from using deepfakes for disinformation or manipulation.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence89%

Normalized value: fitb_no_sensitive_data_into_genai_no_deepfake_disinformation

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Data sensitif, privasi, dan deepfake: Mahasiswa dilarang memasukan data pribadi, sensitive, dan rahasia ke dalam GenAI. Mahasiswa juga dilarang menggunakan deepfake untuk disinformasi atau manipulasi.

Localized display only

Students are prohibited from entering personal, sensitive, and confidential data into GenAI and from using deepfakes for disinformation or manipulation.

Source language
id
Snapshot hash
5ad08928…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Tidak Boleh

Academic Integrity

FITB guidance says students may not submit final academic work entirely generated by AI without original contribution.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: fitb_no_full_ai_final_work_without_original_contribution

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Menyerahkan hasil akhir full dari AI: Mahasiswa tidak boleh menyerahkan karya sepenuhnya dari hasil AI sebagai tugas akademik tanpa kontribusi original.

Localized display only

Students may not submit academic work entirely produced by AI without original contribution.

Source language
id
Snapshot hash
5ad08928…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Tidak Boleh

Ai Tool Treatment

FITB guidance says AI may be used as an aid in the learning process, while understanding, argumentation, analysis, and academic decisions remain human responsibilities.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%

Normalized value: fitb_ai_learning_aid_human_responsibility

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
AI boleh dipakai untuk proses belajar. Namun, pemahaman, argumentasi, analisa, dan keputusan-keputusan akademik tetap tanggung jawab manusia.

Localized display only

AI may be used for the learning process, but understanding, argumentation, analysis, and academic decisions remain human responsibility.

Source language
id
Snapshot hash
5ad08928…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Prinsip dasar

Teaching

FITB guidance says instructors need to set AI-use policies for their courses and communicate them at the start of the course; when AI use is allowed, permission should be clear and explicit, with boundaries and transparency.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence87%

Normalized value: fitb_instructors_set_course_ai_rules

Last checked
May 16, 2026
Last changed
May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Kebijakan ITB memberi ruang bahwa setiap mata kuliah dapat memiliki aturan yang berbeda, namun dosen perlu menetapkan kebijakan penggunaan AI untuk mata kuliahnya dan mengkomunikasikan sejak awal perkuliahan. Bila penggunaan AI diizinkan, maka perlu ditekankan bahwa izin harus jelas dan eksplisit dari dosen, disertai batasan dan transparansi.

Localized display only

Instructors need to set course AI-use policies and communicate them at the start; where AI is allowed, permission should be clear and explicit, with boundaries and transparency.

Source language
id
Snapshot hash
5ad08928…
Retrieved
May 16, 2026
Evidence locator
Section: Catatan untuk dosen FITB

Source record

Official sources

1 source

Record information, JSON & citation
Reviewagent reviewedConfidence90%Snapshot statusNot publishedJSONPublic JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 16, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/institut-teknologi-bandung

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Open change log