Bandung, Indonesia

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB)

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Review: Agent reviewedConfidence90%

Public JSON Change log Monthly report Citation rules Dataset access Analysis JSON Submit correction

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage6 reviewedEvidence-backed claims6Reviewed6Candidate0Official sources1Source languageidPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/institut-teknologi-bandung.json

Coverage score100/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence75%

Policy presence

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.

UnclearMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence5Sources1

Claim claim-itb-fitb-ai-declaration-required Claim claim-itb-fitb-ai-assessment-default-cheating Claim claim-itb-fitb-ai-sensitive-data-deepfake

AI disclosure

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: required.

RequiredMachine candidateConfidence77%Evidence1Sources1

Claim claim-itb-fitb-ai-declaration-required

Coursework

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence4Sources1

Claim claim-itb-fitb-ai-declaration-required Claim claim-itb-fitb-ai-final-work-original-contribution Claim claim-itb-fitb-ai-aid-human-responsibility

Exams

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) has 5 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence5Sources1

Claim claim-itb-fitb-ai-declaration-required Claim claim-itb-fitb-ai-assessment-default-cheating Claim claim-itb-fitb-ai-final-work-original-contribution

Privacy and data entry

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) has 1 source-backed public claim for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.

BlockedMachine candidateConfidence76%Evidence1Sources1

Claim claim-itb-fitb-ai-sensitive-data-deepfake

Academic integrity

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.

RestrictedMachine candidateConfidence76%Evidence3Sources1

Claim claim-itb-fitb-ai-declaration-required Claim claim-itb-fitb-ai-assessment-default-cheating Claim claim-itb-fitb-ai-final-work-original-contribution

Approved tools

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) has 1 source-backed public claim for approved tools; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence74%Evidence1Sources1

Claim claim-itb-fitb-ai-aid-human-responsibility

Named AI services

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: blocked.

BlockedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence2Sources1

Claim claim-itb-fitb-ai-sensitive-data-deepfake Claim claim-itb-fitb-ai-aid-human-responsibility

Teaching guidance

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) has 2 source-backed public claims for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence75%Evidence2Sources1

Claim claim-itb-fitb-ai-assessment-default-cheating Claim claim-itb-fitb-instructors-course-ai-rules

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Normalized value: fitb_ai_use_declaration_required

Last checked: May 16, 2026
Last changed: May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Deklarasi penggunaan AI adalah wajib, bukan opsional. Salah satu poin paling operasional dalam pedomen ITB adalah kewajiban deklarasi penggunaan AI untuk luaran perkuliahan ... Menggunakan AI tetapi tidak mendeklarasikan pemakaiannya, dapat dianggap pelanggaran serius, dengan konsekuensi akademik.
Source: Panduan Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) untuk kegiatan Akademik di FITB

Localized display only

AI-use declaration is mandatory for coursework outputs; undeclared AI use may be considered a serious violation with academic consequences.

Source language: id
Snapshot hash: 5ad08928fe752d3e613493c93e6e703ada38dcef0fa72c2b3df0e84b56a7a0ed
Retrieved: May 16, 2026
Evidence locator: Section: Deklarasi penggunaan AI

Normalized value: fitb_ai_assessment_default_cheating_unless_instructor_allows

Last checked: May 16, 2026
Last changed: May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

AI digunakan saat ujian, kuis, ataupun bentuk evaluasi lainnya: Secara default, menggunakan AI saat evaluasi adalah kecurangan akademik dan dapat dikenai sanksi. Pengecualian: Jika dosen mengizinkan atau menyarankan.
Source: Panduan Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) untuk kegiatan Akademik di FITB

Localized display only

By default, AI use during exams, quizzes, or other evaluations is academic cheating and may be sanctioned, with an exception where the instructor allows or recommends it.

Source language: id
Snapshot hash: 5ad08928fe752d3e613493c93e6e703ada38dcef0fa72c2b3df0e84b56a7a0ed
Retrieved: May 16, 2026
Evidence locator: Section: Tidak Boleh / Pengecualian

Normalized value: fitb_no_sensitive_data_into_genai_no_deepfake_disinformation

Last checked: May 16, 2026
Last changed: May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Data sensitif, privasi, dan deepfake: Mahasiswa dilarang memasukan data pribadi, sensitive, dan rahasia ke dalam GenAI. Mahasiswa juga dilarang menggunakan deepfake untuk disinformasi atau manipulasi.
Source: Panduan Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) untuk kegiatan Akademik di FITB

Localized display only

Students are prohibited from entering personal, sensitive, and confidential data into GenAI and from using deepfakes for disinformation or manipulation.

Source language: id
Snapshot hash: 5ad08928fe752d3e613493c93e6e703ada38dcef0fa72c2b3df0e84b56a7a0ed
Retrieved: May 16, 2026
Evidence locator: Section: Tidak Boleh

Normalized value: fitb_no_full_ai_final_work_without_original_contribution

Last checked: May 16, 2026
Last changed: May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Menyerahkan hasil akhir full dari AI: Mahasiswa tidak boleh menyerahkan karya sepenuhnya dari hasil AI sebagai tugas akademik tanpa kontribusi original.
Source: Panduan Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) untuk kegiatan Akademik di FITB

Localized display only

Students may not submit academic work entirely produced by AI without original contribution.

Source language: id
Snapshot hash: 5ad08928fe752d3e613493c93e6e703ada38dcef0fa72c2b3df0e84b56a7a0ed
Retrieved: May 16, 2026
Evidence locator: Section: Tidak Boleh

Normalized value: fitb_ai_learning_aid_human_responsibility

Last checked: May 16, 2026
Last changed: May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

AI boleh dipakai untuk proses belajar. Namun, pemahaman, argumentasi, analisa, dan keputusan-keputusan akademik tetap tanggung jawab manusia.
Source: Panduan Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) untuk kegiatan Akademik di FITB

Localized display only

AI may be used for the learning process, but understanding, argumentation, analysis, and academic decisions remain human responsibility.

Source language: id
Snapshot hash: 5ad08928fe752d3e613493c93e6e703ada38dcef0fa72c2b3df0e84b56a7a0ed
Retrieved: May 16, 2026
Evidence locator: Section: Prinsip dasar

Normalized value: fitb_instructors_set_course_ai_rules

Last checked: May 16, 2026
Last changed: May 16, 2026

Original evidence

Evidence 1

Kebijakan ITB memberi ruang bahwa setiap mata kuliah dapat memiliki aturan yang berbeda, namun dosen perlu menetapkan kebijakan penggunaan AI untuk mata kuliahnya dan mengkomunikasikan sejak awal perkuliahan. Bila penggunaan AI diizinkan, maka perlu ditekankan bahwa izin harus jelas dan eksplisit dari dosen, disertai batasan dan transparansi.
Source: Panduan Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) untuk kegiatan Akademik di FITB

Localized display only

Instructors need to set course AI-use policies and communicate them at the start; where AI is allowed, permission should be clear and explicit, with boundaries and transparency.

Source language: id
Snapshot hash: 5ad08928fe752d3e613493c93e6e703ada38dcef0fa72c2b3df0e84b56a7a0ed
Retrieved: May 16, 2026
Evidence locator: Section: Catatan untuk dosen FITB

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

1 source attribution

Panduan Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) untuk kegiatan Akademik di FITB

fitb.itb.ac.id

Source URL: https://fitb.itb.ac.id/panduan-penggunaan-ai-di-fitb-berdasarkan-pedoman-ai-itb-2024/
Snapshot hash: 5ad08928fe752d3e613493c93e6e703ada38dcef0fa72c2b3df0e84b56a7a0ed

Last checkedMay 16, 2026Last changedMay 16, 2026Open change log

Open contribution paths Review workflow

Back to universities

Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB)

Record status

Policy profile

Policy presence

AI disclosure

Coursework

Exams

Privacy and data entry

Academic integrity

Approved tools

Named AI services

Teaching guidance

Research guidance

Security and procurement

AI tools

Evidence-backed claims

FITB guidance says declaration of AI use for coursework outputs is mandatory rather than optional, and undeclared AI use may be considered a serious violation with academic consequences.

FITB guidance states that, by default, using AI during exams, quizzes, or other evaluations is academic cheating and can be sanctioned unless the instructor allows or recommends AI use for a particular part of a course.

FITB guidance says students are prohibited from entering personal, sensitive, and confidential data into GenAI and are prohibited from using deepfakes for disinformation or manipulation.

FITB guidance says students may not submit final academic work entirely generated by AI without original contribution.

FITB guidance says AI may be used as an aid in the learning process, while understanding, argumentation, analysis, and academic decisions remain human responsibilities.

FITB guidance says instructors need to set AI-use policies for their courses and communicate them at the start of the course; when AI use is allowed, permission should be clear and explicit, with boundaries and transparency.

Candidate claims

Official sources

Panduan Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) untuk kegiatan Akademik di FITB

Change log

Corrections