academic_integrity
FITB guidance says declaration of AI use for coursework outputs is mandatory rather than optional, and undeclared AI use may be considered a serious violation with academic consequences.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB)
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: May 16, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB). Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+12-0
11 # Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: FITB guidance says declaration of AI use for coursework outputs is mandatory rather than optional, and undeclared AI use may be considered a serious violation with academic consequences.
3+Evidence (id, 5ad08928fe75): Deklarasi penggunaan AI adalah wajib, bukan opsional. Salah satu poin paling operasional dalam pedomen ITB adalah kewajiban deklarasi penggunaan AI untuk luaran perkuliahan ... Menggunakan AI tetapi tidak mendeklarasikan pemakaiannya, dapat dianggap pelanggaran serius, dengan konsekuensi akademik.
4+academic_integrity: FITB guidance states that, by default, using AI during exams, quizzes, or other evaluations is academic cheating and can be sanctioned unless the instructor allows or recommends AI use for a particular part of a course.
5+Evidence (id, 5ad08928fe75): AI digunakan saat ujian, kuis, ataupun bentuk evaluasi lainnya: Secara default, menggunakan AI saat evaluasi adalah kecurangan akademik dan dapat dikenai sanksi. Pengecualian: Jika dosen mengizinkan atau menyarankan.
6+privacy: FITB guidance says students are prohibited from entering personal, sensitive, and confidential data into GenAI and are prohibited from using deepfakes for disinformation or manipulation.
7+Evidence (id, 5ad08928fe75): Data sensitif, privasi, dan deepfake: Mahasiswa dilarang memasukan data pribadi, sensitive, dan rahasia ke dalam GenAI. Mahasiswa juga dilarang menggunakan deepfake untuk disinformasi atau manipulasi.
8+academic_integrity: FITB guidance says students may not submit final academic work entirely generated by AI without original contribution.
9+Evidence (id, 5ad08928fe75): Menyerahkan hasil akhir full dari AI: Mahasiswa tidak boleh menyerahkan karya sepenuhnya dari hasil AI sebagai tugas akademik tanpa kontribusi original.
10+ai_tool_treatment: FITB guidance says AI may be used as an aid in the learning process, while understanding, argumentation, analysis, and academic decisions remain human responsibilities.
11+Evidence (id, 5ad08928fe75): AI boleh dipakai untuk proses belajar. Namun, pemahaman, argumentasi, analisa, dan keputusan-keputusan akademik tetap tanggung jawab manusia.
12+teaching: FITB guidance says instructors need to set AI-use policies for their courses and communicate them at the start of the course; when AI use is allowed, permission should be clear and explicit, with boundaries and transparency.
13+Evidence (id, 5ad08928fe75): Kebijakan ITB memberi ruang bahwa setiap mata kuliah dapat memiliki aturan yang berbeda, namun dosen perlu menetapkan kebijakan penggunaan AI untuk mata kuliahnya dan mengkomunikasikan sejak awal perkuliahan. Bila penggunaan AI diizinkan, maka perlu ditekankan bahwa izin harus jelas dan eksplisit dari dosen, disertai batasan dan transparansi.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
6 claim records
academic_integrity
FITB guidance states that, by default, using AI during exams, quizzes, or other evaluations is academic cheating and can be sanctioned unless the instructor allows or recommends AI use for a particular part of a course.
Review: Agent reviewed
privacy
FITB guidance says students are prohibited from entering personal, sensitive, and confidential data into GenAI and are prohibited from using deepfakes for disinformation or manipulation.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
FITB guidance says students may not submit final academic work entirely generated by AI without original contribution.
Review: Agent reviewed
ai_tool_treatment
FITB guidance says AI may be used as an aid in the learning process, while understanding, argumentation, analysis, and academic decisions remain human responsibilities.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
FITB guidance says instructors need to set AI-use policies for their courses and communicate them at the start of the course; when AI use is allowed, permission should be clear and explicit, with boundaries and transparency.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
1 source attribution
Panduan Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan (Artificial Intelligence) untuk kegiatan Akademik di FITB
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 16, 2026, 2:36 AM