academic_integrity
FITB guidance says declaration of AI use for coursework outputs is mandatory rather than optional, and undeclared AI use may be considered a serious violation with academic consequences.
Journal des modifications
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Actualité des dossiers publics et état d'examen actuel.
Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB) currently has 6 source-backed claim records and 1 official source attribution. Latest tracked changed date: 16 mai 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
Cette page combine toutes les différences de publication publique pour Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB). Les instantanés des versions individuelles restent disponibles via leurs URL spécifiques à la version.
Aucune ligne de différence de politique entre les versions n'est encore enregistrée pour cette université. La page suit toujours les affirmations actuelles étayées par des sources, les attributions de sources officielles, l'état d'examen, la fraîcheur des sources et les JSON publics pour la découverte et la citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Les affirmations récemment extraites sont des ajouts au suivi et ne sont pas nécessairement de nouvelles publications de l'université. Les changements d'instantané source montrent des variations de hachage pour la même URL source et ne constituent pas en eux-mêmes des changements de politique.
Classification sémantique pour cette différence de version.
Diffusion unifiée du suivi générée à partir de toutes les captures instantanées de version publique pour cette université.
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
0 public release diffs
6 Affirmation enregistrements
FITB guidance says declaration of AI use for coursework outputs is mandatory rather than optional, and undeclared AI use may be considered a serious violation with academic consequences.
FITB guidance states that, by default, using AI during exams, quizzes, or other evaluations is academic cheating and can be sanctioned unless the instructor allows or recommends AI use for a particular part of a course.
FITB guidance says students are prohibited from entering personal, sensitive, and confidential data into GenAI and are prohibited from using deepfakes for disinformation or manipulation.
FITB guidance says students may not submit final academic work entirely generated by AI without original contribution.
FITB guidance says AI may be used as an aid in the learning process, while understanding, argumentation, analysis, and academic decisions remain human responsibilities.
FITB guidance says instructors need to set AI-use policies for their courses and communicate them at the start of the course; when AI use is allowed, permission should be clear and explicit, with boundaries and transparency.
1 attribution de source
official_guidance Tracker checked at 16 mai 2026, 02:36