Policy presence
Gadjah Mada University has 5 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Gadjah Mada University
Gadjah Mada University is listed as QS 2026 rank 224. Gadjah Mada University has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Short answer
v1 public contract
Gadjah Mada University is listed as QS 2026 rank 224. Gadjah Mada University has 6 source-backed AI policy claim records from 3 official source attributions. The public record preserves original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, snapshot hashes, confidence, and review state.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Gadjah Mada University as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 15, 2026 and last changed on May 15, 2026. The record contains 6 source-backed claims, including 6 reviewed claims, from 3 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/gadjah-mada-university.json. The entity-level confidence is 90%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Other policy claims.
- Evidence includes Research claims.
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- No specific AI service name is highlighted by the current public claim text.
- Privacy, sensitive-data, or security language appears in the public claim text.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
No source-backed public claim about AI disclosure or acknowledgement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about disclosing, acknowledging, citing, or declaring AI use.
Coursework
Gadjah Mada University has 1 source-backed public claim for coursework; deterministic analysis status: conditionally_allowed.
Exams
Gadjah Mada University has 1 source-backed public claim for exams; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Privacy and data entry
Gadjah Mada University has 2 source-backed public claims for privacy and data entry; deterministic analysis status: blocked.
Academic integrity
Gadjah Mada University has 1 source-backed public claim for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
No source-backed public claim naming a specific AI service is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence naming a specific AI service.
Teaching guidance
No source-backed public claim about teaching guidance is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about instructor, classroom, assessment-design, or syllabus guidance.
Research guidance
Gadjah Mada University has 3 source-backed public claims for research guidance; deterministic analysis status: restricted.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
6 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Other
UGM says it is formulating a comprehensive AI policy and 2025-2030 roadmap.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_policy_roadmap_in_formulation
Original evidence
Evidence 1Universitas Gadjah Mada (UGM) is currently formulating a comprehensive Artificial Intelligence (AI) policy and roadmap for the 2025-2030 period.
Research
PCD Journal's publication policy permits authors to use AI tools for copy-editing, translation, grammar correction, and formatting.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: pcd_journal_ai_limited_author_use_permitted
Original evidence
Evidence 1Authors are permitted to use AI tools for copy-editing, translation, grammar correction, and formatting to improve the readability of the manuscript.
Research
PCD Journal's publication policy prohibits AI-generated arguments, substantive text, intellectual conclusions, literature reviews, bibliographies, fabricated data, and sensitive un-anonymized human-subject data entered into public AI platforms.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: pcd_journal_ai_substantive_and_sensitive_data_uses_prohibited
Original evidence
Evidence 1AI must not be used to generate arguments, substantive text, or the intellectual conclusions of the manuscript.
Research
PCD Journal's publication policy prohibits reviewers and editors from uploading submitted unpublished manuscripts into generative AI tools.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: pcd_journal_reviewers_editors_no_unpublished_manuscripts_in_genai
Original evidence
Evidence 1Reviewers and editorial board members are prohibited from uploading submitted, unpublished manuscripts into generative AI tools
Other
UGM's AI roadmap article says AI guidelines and an AI Ethics Committee are planned to begin in 2025.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: ai_guidelines_ethics_committee_planned_2025
Original evidence
Evidence 1The UGM AI roadmap (2025-2030) will begin with the formulation of AI Guidelines and the establishment of an AI Ethics Committee in 2025.
Academic Integrity
UGM's official news coverage frames AI and plagiarism as academic-integrity challenges and reports a rector statement supporting zero tolerance for plagiarism.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: academic_integrity_ai_plagiarism_zero_tolerance_plagiarism
Original evidence
Evidence 1Integritas akademik di perguruan tinggi menghadapi tantangan yang tidak mudah seiring masifnya penggunaan kecerdasan buatan (AI)
Localized display only
UGM's Indonesian article says academic integrity faces challenges as AI use becomes widespread.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
3 source attribution
Artificial Intelligence (AI) Usage Policy | PCD Journal
journal.ugm.ac.id
Menjaga Integritas Akademik di Tengah Serbuan AI dan Plagiarisme
ugm.ac.id
Universitas Gadjah Mada Prepares a Comprehensive AI Roadmap
ai.ugm.ac.id
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.