research
UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy tells reviewers and editors not to upload confidential manuscript or review materials into AI tools and not to use generative AI to evaluate manuscripts or make editorial judgments.
审核: 智能体已审核
变更日志
Diponegoro University
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
变更摘要
当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。
Diponegoro University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月17日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Diponegoro University。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。
目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。
差异类别
此版本差异的语义分类。
组合版本差异
由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。
Diponegoro University combined release 差异
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+10-0
11 # Diponegoro University AI policy record
2+research: UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy allows authors to use AI tools supportively, but requires substantive AI use to be disclosed in an AI Declaration Statement and states that AI tools may not be listed as authors or co-authors.
3+Evidence (en, fa374de70c0f): Authors may use AI Tools in the preparation of manuscripts submitted to JIS, provided that such use remains supportive rather than substitutive of scholarly judgment. ... The use of AI Tools must be declared at the time of submission in a dedicated AI Declaration Statement... AI Tools may not be listed as authors or co-authors.
4+research: UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy tells reviewers and editors not to upload confidential manuscript or review materials into AI tools and not to use generative AI to evaluate manuscripts or make editorial judgments.
5+Evidence (en, fa374de70c0f): Reviewers must not upload, share, or process submitted manuscripts or review reports through AI Tools... Generative AI must not be used to evaluate manuscripts, generate review reports, or formulate editorial judgments. ... Editors must not upload manuscripts, reviewer reports, or editorial correspondence into AI Tools.
6+academic_integrity: UNDIP Library guidance tells students that submitted assignments remain their own responsibility, and that using AI software without acknowledgement is treated seriously under academic misconduct procedures.
7+Evidence (id, bb02b9e84879): Sebagai mahasiswa Universitas Diponegoro, Anda memiliki tanggung jawab untuk memastikan bahwa setiap tugas yang dikumpulkan merupakan hasil karya pribadi. ... Pelanggaran seperti kolusi, plagiarisme, pembelian karya dari pihak ketiga, maupun penggunaan perangkat lunak AI tanpa pengakuan akan diperlakukan dengan sangat serius dan ditangani sesuai dengan prosedur pelanggaran akademik yang berlaku
8+ai_tool_treatment: UNDIP Library guidance permits AI as support for writing, editing, and literature searching, but says it must not replace human critical reasoning or become a shortcut for student work.
9+Evidence (id, bb02b9e84879): AI boleh membantu menulis, menyunting, atau mencari literatur, tetapi tidak boleh menjadi pengganti penalaran kritis manusia. ... Mahasiswa: menggunakan AI untuk mendukung kreativitas, bukan sebagai jalan pintas. Keterampilan berpikir kritis dan analitis tetap utama.
10+research: UNDIP Library guidance says AI use in data analysis, writing, or draft preparation should be explicitly disclosed in publications, and AI-generated results should be manually reverified.
11+Evidence (id, bb02b9e84879): Jika AI digunakan dalam analisis data, penulisan, atau penyusunan draft, kontribusi tersebut harus diungkapkan secara eksplisit dalam publikasi. ... Semua hasil yang dihasilkan AI harus diverifikasi ulang secara manual untuk mencegah bias, kesalahan faktual, atau manipulasi.
版本历史
0 public release diffs
声明变更
5 声明 条记录
research
UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy allows authors to use AI tools supportively, but requires substantive AI use to be disclosed in an AI Declaration Statement and states that AI tools may not be listed as authors or co-authors.
审核: 智能体已审核
research
UNDIP Library guidance says AI use in data analysis, writing, or draft preparation should be explicitly disclosed in publications, and AI-generated results should be manually reverified.
审核: 智能体已审核
ai_tool_treatment
UNDIP Library guidance permits AI as support for writing, editing, and literature searching, but says it must not replace human critical reasoning or become a shortcut for student work.
审核: 智能体已审核
academic_integrity
UNDIP Library guidance tells students that submitted assignments remain their own responsibility, and that using AI software without acknowledgement is treated seriously under academic misconduct procedures.
审核: 智能体已审核
源快照
2 source attributions
Editorial Policies
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月17日 13:28
PENGGUNAAN AI YANG ETIS DAN BERTANGGUNG JAWAB
official_guidance Tracker checked at 2026年5月17日 13:28