University AI Policy Tracker

Otwarte, oparte na dowodach rekordy polityk AI uczelni do publicznego uzycia.

APIGitHub
Jezyk
ENZHFRPL

Change log

Diponegoro University

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Review: Agent reviewedLast checkedMay 17, 2026Last changedMay 17, 2026Claims5Sources2Release records0
University pagePublic JSONMonthly reportUniversity index

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

Diponegoro University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 17, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This page combines all public release diffs for Diponegoro University. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.

No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Combined release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.

Diponegoro University combined release diff

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Diponegoro University AI policy record
2+research: UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy allows authors to use AI tools supportively, but requires substantive AI use to be disclosed in an AI Declaration Statement and states that AI tools may not be listed as authors or co-authors.
3+Evidence (en, fa374de70c0f): Authors may use AI Tools in the preparation of manuscripts submitted to JIS, provided that such use remains supportive rather than substitutive of scholarly judgment. ... The use of AI Tools must be declared at the time of submission in a dedicated AI Declaration Statement... AI Tools may not be listed as authors or co-authors.
4+research: UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy tells reviewers and editors not to upload confidential manuscript or review materials into AI tools and not to use generative AI to evaluate manuscripts or make editorial judgments.
5+Evidence (en, fa374de70c0f): Reviewers must not upload, share, or process submitted manuscripts or review reports through AI Tools... Generative AI must not be used to evaluate manuscripts, generate review reports, or formulate editorial judgments. ... Editors must not upload manuscripts, reviewer reports, or editorial correspondence into AI Tools.
6+academic_integrity: UNDIP Library guidance tells students that submitted assignments remain their own responsibility, and that using AI software without acknowledgement is treated seriously under academic misconduct procedures.
7+Evidence (id, bb02b9e84879): Sebagai mahasiswa Universitas Diponegoro, Anda memiliki tanggung jawab untuk memastikan bahwa setiap tugas yang dikumpulkan merupakan hasil karya pribadi. ... Pelanggaran seperti kolusi, plagiarisme, pembelian karya dari pihak ketiga, maupun penggunaan perangkat lunak AI tanpa pengakuan akan diperlakukan dengan sangat serius dan ditangani sesuai dengan prosedur pelanggaran akademik yang berlaku
8+ai_tool_treatment: UNDIP Library guidance permits AI as support for writing, editing, and literature searching, but says it must not replace human critical reasoning or become a shortcut for student work.
9+Evidence (id, bb02b9e84879): AI boleh membantu menulis, menyunting, atau mencari literatur, tetapi tidak boleh menjadi pengganti penalaran kritis manusia. ... Mahasiswa: menggunakan AI untuk mendukung kreativitas, bukan sebagai jalan pintas. Keterampilan berpikir kritis dan analitis tetap utama.
10+research: UNDIP Library guidance says AI use in data analysis, writing, or draft preparation should be explicitly disclosed in publications, and AI-generated results should be manually reverified.
11+Evidence (id, bb02b9e84879): Jika AI digunakan dalam analisis data, penulisan, atau penyusunan draft, kontribusi tersebut harus diungkapkan secara eksplisit dalam publikasi. ... Semua hasil yang dihasilkan AI harus diverifikasi ulang secara manual untuk mencegah bias, kesalahan faktual, atau manipulasi.

Release history

0 public release diffs

Claim changes

5 claim records

research

UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy tells reviewers and editors not to upload confidential manuscript or review materials into AI tools and not to use generative AI to evaluate manuscripts or make editorial judgments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

research

UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy allows authors to use AI tools supportively, but requires substantive AI use to be disclosed in an AI Declaration Statement and states that AI tools may not be listed as authors or co-authors.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%Evidence1Languagesen

research

UNDIP Library guidance says AI use in data analysis, writing, or draft preparation should be explicitly disclosed in publications, and AI-generated results should be manually reverified.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%Evidence1Languagesid

ai_tool_treatment

UNDIP Library guidance permits AI as support for writing, editing, and literature searching, but says it must not replace human critical reasoning or become a shortcut for student work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence84%Evidence1Languagesid

academic_integrity

UNDIP Library guidance tells students that submitted assignments remain their own responsibility, and that using AI software without acknowledgement is treated seriously under academic misconduct procedures.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%Evidence1Languagesid

Source snapshots

2 source attributions