University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Idioma
ENZHFRPLES

Registro de cambios

Diponegoro University

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteÚltima verificación17 may 2026Último cambio17 may 2026Afirmaciones5Fuentes2Registros de versiones0
Página universitariaJSON públicoInforme mensualÍndice universitario

Resumen de cambios

Estado actual de actualización y revisión del registro público.

Diponegoro University currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 17 may 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Esta página combina todas las diferencias de versiones públicas para Diponegoro University. Las instantáneas individuales de lanzamiento siguen disponibles desde sus URL específicas del lanzamiento.

Aún no se han registrado filas de diferencias de políticas entre versiones para esta universidad. La página sigue rastreando afirmaciones respaldadas por fuentes actuales, atribuciones de fuentes oficiales, estado de revisión, actualidad de las fuentes y JSON públicas para su descubrimiento y citación.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen muestran cambios de hash para la misma URL de origen y no constituyen por sí mismos cambios en la política.

Categorías de diferencias

Clasificación semántica para esta diferencia de versión.

Texto de la política0Extraído recientemente0Evidencia0Instantáneas de origen0Texto de origen0Fuente añadida0Fuente eliminada0

Diferencias de versión combinadas

Diferencia del seguimiento unificado generada a partir de todas las instantáneas de lanzamiento público para esta universidad.

Diponegoro University combined release diferencias

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Diponegoro University AI policy record
2+research: UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy allows authors to use AI tools supportively, but requires substantive AI use to be disclosed in an AI Declaration Statement and states that AI tools may not be listed as authors or co-authors.
3+Evidence (en, fa374de70c0f): Authors may use AI Tools in the preparation of manuscripts submitted to JIS, provided that such use remains supportive rather than substitutive of scholarly judgment. ... The use of AI Tools must be declared at the time of submission in a dedicated AI Declaration Statement... AI Tools may not be listed as authors or co-authors.
4+research: UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy tells reviewers and editors not to upload confidential manuscript or review materials into AI tools and not to use generative AI to evaluate manuscripts or make editorial judgments.
5+Evidence (en, fa374de70c0f): Reviewers must not upload, share, or process submitted manuscripts or review reports through AI Tools... Generative AI must not be used to evaluate manuscripts, generate review reports, or formulate editorial judgments. ... Editors must not upload manuscripts, reviewer reports, or editorial correspondence into AI Tools.
6+academic_integrity: UNDIP Library guidance tells students that submitted assignments remain their own responsibility, and that using AI software without acknowledgement is treated seriously under academic misconduct procedures.
7+Evidence (id, bb02b9e84879): Sebagai mahasiswa Universitas Diponegoro, Anda memiliki tanggung jawab untuk memastikan bahwa setiap tugas yang dikumpulkan merupakan hasil karya pribadi. ... Pelanggaran seperti kolusi, plagiarisme, pembelian karya dari pihak ketiga, maupun penggunaan perangkat lunak AI tanpa pengakuan akan diperlakukan dengan sangat serius dan ditangani sesuai dengan prosedur pelanggaran akademik yang berlaku
8+ai_tool_treatment: UNDIP Library guidance permits AI as support for writing, editing, and literature searching, but says it must not replace human critical reasoning or become a shortcut for student work.
9+Evidence (id, bb02b9e84879): AI boleh membantu menulis, menyunting, atau mencari literatur, tetapi tidak boleh menjadi pengganti penalaran kritis manusia. ... Mahasiswa: menggunakan AI untuk mendukung kreativitas, bukan sebagai jalan pintas. Keterampilan berpikir kritis dan analitis tetap utama.
10+research: UNDIP Library guidance says AI use in data analysis, writing, or draft preparation should be explicitly disclosed in publications, and AI-generated results should be manually reverified.
11+Evidence (id, bb02b9e84879): Jika AI digunakan dalam analisis data, penulisan, atau penyusunan draft, kontribusi tersebut harus diungkapkan secara eksplisit dalam publikasi. ... Semua hasil yang dihasilkan AI harus diverifikasi ulang secara manual untuk mencegah bias, kesalahan faktual, atau manipulasi.

Historial de versiones

0 public release diffs

Cambios en las afirmaciones

5 Afirmación registros

research

UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy tells reviewers and editors not to upload confidential manuscript or review materials into AI tools and not to use generative AI to evaluate manuscripts or make editorial judgments.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza88%Evidencia1Idiomasen

research

UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy allows authors to use AI tools supportively, but requires substantive AI use to be disclosed in an AI Declaration Statement and states that AI tools may not be listed as authors or co-authors.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza88%Evidencia1Idiomasen

research

UNDIP Library guidance says AI use in data analysis, writing, or draft preparation should be explicitly disclosed in publications, and AI-generated results should be manually reverified.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza84%Evidencia1Idiomasid

ai_tool_treatment

UNDIP Library guidance permits AI as support for writing, editing, and literature searching, but says it must not replace human critical reasoning or become a shortcut for student work.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza84%Evidencia1Idiomasid

academic_integrity

UNDIP Library guidance tells students that submitted assignments remain their own responsibility, and that using AI software without acknowledgement is treated seriously under academic misconduct procedures.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza86%Evidencia1Idiomasid

Instantáneas de origen

2 source attributions