research
UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy tells reviewers and editors not to upload confidential manuscript or review materials into AI tools and not to use generative AI to evaluate manuscripts or make editorial judgments.
審閱: 代理已審閱
變更紀錄
Diponegoro University
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
變更摘要
目前公開紀錄的時效性與審查狀態。
5 條當前主張；2 個官方來源。
此頁面整合了所有公開發布版本差異，適用於 Diponegoro University。個別發布快照仍可從其特定版本 URL 取得。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
本追蹤器並非法律意見，亦非學術誠信建議；除非所連結的來源為大學本身的官方網頁，否則亦不構成大學的正式聲明。
新擷取的主張屬於追蹤器的新增項目，不一定是大學新近發布的內容。來源快照的變更表示同一來源網址的雜湊值有所改變，本身並不等同於政策變動。
差異類別
此次版本差異的語意分類。
已記錄的文本比對
僅顯示具備完全符合 Claim ID 的已記錄比較。
此追蹤器歷史紀錄中無已記錄的更新。
發布歷程
追蹤器歷史：0 筆發布紀錄。
當前 Claim 記錄
現行主張紀錄：5。
research
UNDIP's Jurnal Ilmu Sosial editorial policy allows authors to use AI tools supportively, but requires substantive AI use to be disclosed in an AI Declaration Statement and states that AI tools may not be listed as authors or co-authors.
審閱: 代理已審閱
research
UNDIP Library guidance says AI use in data analysis, writing, or draft preparation should be explicitly disclosed in publications, and AI-generated results should be manually reverified.
審閱: 代理已審閱
ai_tool_treatment
UNDIP Library guidance permits AI as support for writing, editing, and literature searching, but says it must not replace human critical reasoning or become a shortcut for student work.
審閱: 代理已審閱
academic_integrity
UNDIP Library guidance tells students that submitted assignments remain their own responsibility, and that using AI software without acknowledgement is treated seriously under academic misconduct procedures.
審閱: 代理已審閱
來源快照
官方來源紀錄：2。
Editorial Policies
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 17, 2026, 1:28 PM
PENGGUNAAN AI YANG ETIS DAN BERTANGGUNG JAWAB
official_guidance 追蹤器檢查於 May 17, 2026, 1:28 PM