Kingston, United States

University of Rhode Island

本站使用指南

使用工具前,查 syllabus AI 规则。

Fall 2025 memo 提供三种 syllabus 选项,实际课程采用的规则优先。URI 账号 Copilot Chat 不等于高级 Office 集成。作业、课程不及格及正式纪律申诉路线不同,本轮未建立统一数值期限。

本站解读;官方证据保留原文。

尚无完整的学生政策摘要;可先查看已收录条款及来源。

适用范围与过渡细节

Fall 2025 memo 提供三种 syllabus 选项,实际课程采用的规则优先。URI 账号 Copilot Chat 不等于高级 Office 集成。作业、课程不及格及正式纪律申诉路线不同,本轮未建立统一数值期限。

FIND THE SYLLABUS AI RULE. URI supplies three optional syllabus statements; the selected course instructions govern.
请核对所在学院及具体作业的规定。

AI 使用引发疑虑后,会发生什么?

补充资料采集: 2026-10-08 · 现行适用性未独立确认

对比已发布的大学记录 ↗

哪些行为会引发疑虑

AI 明示条款官方指导规范语气: 信息性

本站解读

Fall 2025 memo 提供三种建议 syllabus 选项:不允许、可选或要求 AI。这些是课程选项,不是单一全校默认。可选/要求的用途须记录工具、提示词及使用/修改,批判核实并对作品负责;须查实际采用的 syllabus。

适用范围: students · Recommended Fall 2025 syllabus models; actual current course policy controls.

查看原文与适用条件

英文来源摘要

The Fall 2025 memo offers three recommended syllabus options: AI not permitted, optional or required. These are course choices, not a single University default. Optional/required use calls for tool, prompts and use/edit records, critical review and responsibility for the work; check the actual adopted syllabus.

适用范围: students · university

URI Recommended Syllabus Statements (3 options) AI Use Not Permitted In this class, it is essential that all submitted work reflects your own understanding and skills. The use of AI tools such as ChatGPT, Claude, or similar technologies is not permitted. This ensures that your submitted work genuinely represents your personal knowledge and capabilities. Any use of AI tools on submitted work in this course will be considered a violation of the university’s Academic Requirements in the University Manual (see 8.27.10 - 8.27.22). AI Use Optional For certain assignments, you can choose to utilize AI tools to assist you. When you do, it is crucial to clearly document which tool you used, the prompts or questions you provided, and how you used the AI-generated output. This is similar to collaborating with a peer, where it's important to communicate each contribution to the project. However, you must also critically review and refine the AI’s output to Page 9 of 12 ensure the final work accurately reflects your own understanding and meets the academic standards expected by the university. Failure to properly document or cite use of AI will be considered a violation of the university’s Academic Requirements in the University Manual (see 8.27.10 - 8.27.22). AI Use Required In parts of this course, you will be asked by your instructor to use AI tools as a resource to enhance your learning experience. You can use these tools to explore ideas, draft projects, and get feedback. It’s important to acknowledge your use of AI by mentioning the tool, your prompts, and any edits you made based on its suggestions. Think of AI like a creative partner that can offer new perspectives, while you remain the one responsible for ensuring the originality and quality of your work.
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 412–441
SHA-256: 11381173ca142393f4a8a8ecdfb3d37bb167673aaa6293222ca2aa65b055e123

AI 明示条款官方指导规范语气: 信息性

本站解读

负责使用提示要求核实输出、保护隐私并按教师/院系要求披露。不输入学生数据、密码或保密大学内容;不确定时询问教师、导师或 IT 团队。

适用范围: students · Scope is limited to the cited official source and stated conditions; this is a local candidate, not a complete university rule set.

查看原文与适用条件

英文来源摘要

Responsible-use tips require checking outputs, protecting privacy and following instructor/department attribution. Do not enter student data, passwords or confidential University content; consult the instructor, supervisor or IT team if unsure.

适用范围: students · university

These quick tips apply to all users. They will help you use AI tools effectively while protecting privacy and supporting URI’s academic and ethical standards. Be Specific: Clear prompts produce more helpful results. Include your role, task, and goal. Check Accuracy: Always verify facts and sources. AI may give incorrect or biased information. Work Iteratively: Use AI like a collaborator. Ask for drafts, options, or revisions, and then apply your judgment. Protect Privacy: Do not enter student data, passwords, or confidential university content. Cite If Needed: If AI contributes to your work, follow citation or attribution guidelines provided by your instructor or department. Need help getting started with AI? Visit the Generative AI at URI page, review the Ethical Use of AI Guidelines, or talk to your instructor, supervisor, or IT support team.
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 25–31
SHA-256: 16d919797f1b51f5b881ab401e20aa729b667f83dc6cfe5f752d8b1c0bcf46c6

如何回应与说明

来源指导正式程序规范语气: 信息性

本站解读

学术诚信程序中,学生有 Conduct Advisor 权利。教师通知学生并向指定 Deans 及 Dean of Students 发正式通知;指定 Community Standards 人员书面通知学生。这属于一般诚信程序。

适用范围: students · Scope is limited to the cited official source and stated conditions; this is a local candidate, not a complete university rule set.

查看原文与适用条件

英文来源摘要

In academic-honesty proceedings students have a right to a Conduct Advisor. Instructors notify the student and send formal notices to the stated Deans and Dean of Students; the designated Community Standards officer notifies the student in writing. These are general honesty procedures.

适用范围: students · university

Academic Honesty Procedures Under the direction of Faculty Senate and guidelines outlined in the University Manual, the Dean of Students Office and the University Student Conduct System are charged with monitoring, tracking, and enforcing Academic Honesty policies. Students have the right to a Conduct Advisor during Academic Honesty proceedings. The following process applies when there is an allegation of academic dishonesty. Notification of Academic Honesty Violations Faculty and instructors are required to notify the student of Academic Honesty allegations. Faculty and instructors must also send formal written notice to the instructor’s College Dean, the student’s College Dean, and the Dean of Students Office. The Associate Dean of Students, Community Standards or designee notifies the student in writing of the Academic Honesty violation.
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 24–27
SHA-256: 7d69d32dd044fa681252f7cacda24ddd6d4affbaea5e020400377455a7b94886

可能的处理结果

来源指导正式程序规范语气: 信息性

本站解读

对已认定负责的学生,可令作业不及格、获教师所属 Dean 批准后令课程不及格,及/或正式纪律行动。首次且无正式纪律行动时发警告,重复案件须启动纪律行动。这些是附条件选项,不是所有 AI 使用的自动处罚。

适用范围: students · Scope is limited to the cited official source and stated conditions; this is a local candidate, not a complete university rule set.

查看原文与适用条件

英文来源摘要

For a student found responsible, options include failing the assignment, failing the course with the instructor’s Dean’s authorization, and/or formal conduct action. A first offence without formal conduct action receives a warning; repeated infractions require conduct action. The options are conditional, not automatic penalties for any AI use.

适用范围: students · university

Sanctions and Appeals for Academic Honesty Violations Academic Sanctions The instructor has three following options when sanctioning a student who has been found responsible for violating the University’s or faculty’s Academic Honesty standards. a) The Faculty may fail the student for the assignment b) The Faculty may fail the student for the course, with authorization from the instructor’s College Dean; and/or c) The Faculty may request formal Student Conduct action. This request may be made in lieu of or in addition to a grade adjustment. review student handbook Conduct Sanctions If it is a first offense and no formal conduct action is requested, students are sent a formal and official warning letter. Repeat infractions require conduct action is initiated against the student. Conduct action on an allegation of academic dishonesty may be requested by the instructor’s College Dean or by the instructor with a statement from the instructor’s College Dean. Appeals of formal conduct action will be followed in accordance with the Student Handbook appeals process.
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 32–40
SHA-256: 7d69d32dd044fa681252f7cacda24ddd6d4affbaea5e020400377455a7b94886

复核与申诉

来源指导正式程序规范语气: 信息性

本站解读

Manual 8.27 区分作业层级作弊/抄袭申诉至教师所属 Dean(最终)与课程不及格申诉至 Provost(最终)。正式纪律行动另走路线,疑案课程退课须 Dean 批准。本段未建立统一数值学术诚信申诉期限。

适用范围: students · Scope is limited to the cited official source and stated conditions; this is a local candidate, not a complete university rule set.

查看原文与适用条件

英文来源摘要

Manual 8.27 separates assignment-level cheating/plagiarism appeals to the instructor’s Dean (final) from course-failure appeals to the Provost (final). Formal conduct action is a separate route, and dropping an accused course requires the Dean’s permission. No universal numeric academic-honesty appeal deadline is established here.

适用范围: students · university

8.27.17 Instructors shall have the explicit duty to take action in known cases of cheating or plagiarism. The instructor shall have the right to fail a student on the assignment on which the instructor has determined that a student has cheated or plagiarized. The circumstances of this failure shall be reported to the student’s academic dean, the instructor’s dean, and the Dean of Students Office. The student may appeal the matter to the instructor’s dean, and the decision by the dean shall be expeditious and final. #09-10–12 #October 20, 2022 Informational Report #25-26-CBUM-03 8.27.18 If the violation warrants more severe censure, the instructor may recommend additional action to the instructor’s dean. Upon this recommendation the dean may authorize the instructor to fail the student in the course. The student or instructor may appeal the dean’s decision to the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs whose decision on the appeal shall be final. 8.27.19 Either the instructor, the instructor’s dean or the student’s dean may request conduct action (see 9.21.10 9.23.31) on an allegation against a student for cheating or plagiarism. Any of the conduct sanctions listed in sections 9.22.10 – 9.22.18 may be imposed after a finding of guilty. If the request comes from an instructor it shall be accompanied by a statement of position from the instructor’s dean (see 9.20.10 and 9.21.10). #January 27, 2022 Informational Report 8.27.20 Students accused of academic dishonesty within the drop period may be denied the opportunity to drop the course. This requires permission from the instructor’s dean. If the accusation is not upheld in an appeal, the student will be given the same options available before the end of the drop period without penalty. #04-05–32 8.27.21 Any record of scholastic integrity infractions where actions have been taken (i.e., assignment of an “F” on an assignment and notification of the student’s dean, dean’s authorization to assign an “F” for the course, referral to the University Board on Student Conduct) will be forwarded to the Dean of Students Office. A cumulative file will be maintained in that office. The Dean of Students shall notify the student’s dean of subsequent infractions and may initiate conduct action against the student. #04-05–32 #October 20, 2022 Informational Report 8.27.22. All course content (including but not limited to syllabi, outlines, presentation slides, lectures, lesson plans, class activities, exams, and assignments) created or facilitated by instructors shall be considered the instructors’ intellectual property. Course content shall not be recorded, distributed, shared in any public domain or third party website, or sold without prior written consent of the instructor. #15-16-30, #20-21-42
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 143–148
SHA-256: 14a98e94f5fe9b8d9a0cdcacd32e6b152e96dd4bd1239f39f0ab27e7ea470095

支持与合理调整

AI 明示条款官方指导规范语气: 信息性

本站解读

URI Copilot Chat 服务页称师生可用 URI Microsoft 365 账号登录,并区分现有聊天与该页称尚未提供的 Word/PowerPoint/Excel 高级集成。访问权不覆盖课程许可,本轮未独立实测账号。

适用范围: students · Scope is limited to the cited official source and stated conditions; this is a local candidate, not a complete university rule set.

查看原文与适用条件

英文来源摘要

URI’s Copilot Chat service page says faculty, staff and students can sign in with the URI Microsoft 365 account. It distinguishes the available chat from advanced Word/PowerPoint/Excel integrations, which the page says are not available. Access does not override course permission, and no independent account test was performed.

适用范围: students · university

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is a generative artificial intelligence (AI) service from Microsoft that helps you ask questions, summarize information, draft and revise content, analyze uploaded files, and brainstorm ideas. Copilot Chat is available to URI faculty, staff, and students through URI’s Microsoft 365 environment. While this provides access to a useful set of AI prompting capabilities, please note that more advanced features of Microsoft Copilot, such as integration across Microsoft tools like Word, PowerPoint, and Excel, are not available at this time. Executive Lead Robert Viens Technical Lead Mark Oliver moliver@uri.edu Support Team ITS Community Services Tier 2 Support About the Service: Features AI assistance: Ask questions and get conversational responses to help you research, learn, and work through ideas. Writing and summarization: Draft, rewrite, summarize, and refine content. File analysis: Upload supported files to summarize information, ask questions about their contents, or identify key points. Web information: Use information from the public web to support research and other tasks. Microsoft 365 access: Use Copilot Chat through supported Microsoft 365 experiences available with your URI account. Access Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is available to URI faculty, staff, and students. Sign in to Microsoft 365 Copilot with your URI Microsoft 365 account to get started.
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 22–41
SHA-256: 1a9065d1c46c1f75e039c18ac0b3b761c30f0cee6e706ba771121449b92a1ea9

AI 明示条款官方指导规范语气: 信息性

本站解读

URI 将负责 AI 指导标为初步指南,要求隐私/授权合规及 AI 工具可访问性。学生按教师政策,研究者就敏感/专有数据咨询院系。工具可访问性标准不是纪律听证调整规则。

适用范围: students · Scope is limited to the cited official source and stated conditions; this is a local candidate, not a complete university rule set.

查看原文与适用条件

英文来源摘要

URI labels its responsible-AI guidance preliminary. It calls for privacy/licensing compliance and accessible AI tools; students follow instructor policies and researchers consult their department about sensitive/proprietary data. AI-tool accessibility standards are not a disciplinary-hearing adjustment rule.

适用范围: students · university

Please note that this is preliminary guidance. URI Data Classification Schema and Guidelines Details the classification and management of data, including restricted and sensitive information, relevant to AI practices. Guidelines for the Secure and Ethical Use of Artificial Intelligence Provides comprehensive guidance on AI transparency, accountability, and compliance with accessibility, privacy, and intellectual property standards​. Guidelines and Standards To ensure the secure and ethical use of AI, URI enforces the following standards: Data Security and Privacy: Follow URI’s Data Classification Guidelines to avoid exposing restricted or sensitive information. Accessibility: Ensure all AI tools comply with Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Prohibited Data Use: Avoid inputting private or restricted data, such as Personally Identifiable Information (PII) or patient records, into public AI tools like ChatGPT. Data Handling Awareness: Be cautious when using AI platforms, as data entered may be transmitted to third-party servers. Disabling Data Logging: Where possible, disable history and logging features to prevent information from being stored or used for AI training without consent. Intellectual Property Compliance: Respect copyrights and ensure proper protections when using AI systems. Do not input confidential data or licensed library content (e.g., online journals, e-books, and databases) into AI tools unless permitted by licensing agreements and institutional policies. Education and Training URI provides ongoing opportunities to learn about secure and ethical AI practices: Workshops and Seminars: Attend sessions on responsible AI use tailored for faculty, staff, and students. Training Materials: Access documents and guidelines like the AI Use Guidelines to deepen understanding. Accessibility Resources: Learn how to make AI tools and outputs more inclusive through URI’s accessibility programs. Understanding AI Functionality: Before using any AI platform, take the time to understand how it works, what data it collects, and how it handles that data. Awareness of these factors helps ensure responsible and secure use of AI tools. Additional Guidelines Educators: Incorporate URI’s guidelines into course design, clearly communicate acceptable AI use to students, and disclose when AI was used to create course materials​. Students: Follow instructors’ AI policies, properly attribute AI-generated content, and avoid using AI in ways that breach URI’s Student Code of Conduct​. Researchers: Consult with your department and comply with regulations when using AI tools in research, particularly for handling sensitive or proprietary data​.
查看官方来源 ↗

采集日期: 2026-10-08 · 35–57
SHA-256: 2a71dfbf1ba620010cbce97a609966ed98f0ba34d014608eb19531ea1f2e246f

采集与版本说明

已发布的来源补充。英文摘要与原语言引文和已审核记录分开展示。这里列出可能的程序与结果,不是使用 AI 的自动处罚;现行适用性尚未独立确认,请核对来源的适用范围和版本。

按所存原文核对;不是官方译文

哈希仅用于核对所存内容,不证明现行有效性或不可篡改。这些主题不表示每个学生都会经历的流程。

AI 工具与获取方式

能获取工具不等于获准在作业中使用。请同时核对任务规则、适用人员和数据限制。

存档工具记录;当前获取方式请核对官方来源。 以下获取说明与证据引用保留原文语言。

  • Adobe Firefly校方提供/采购许可在来源适用范围内允许
    获取条件与官方原文

    University of Rhode Island provides or institutionally supports Adobe Firefly.

    Use the URI Adobe access instructions.

    Free.

    官方来源 1 ↗

    原文引用

    URI faculty have free access to the Adobe Firefly AI image generator bot
  • Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat校方提供/采购许可在来源适用范围内允许
    获取条件与官方原文

    University of Rhode Island provides or institutionally supports Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat.

    Use the URI Microsoft 365 account.

    No individual price is stated.

    官方来源 1 ↗

    原文引用

    All faculty, staff, and students at URI have access to the base level of this tool through the Microsoft 365 suite
  • Microsoft Copilot工具提及;未确认校方提供尚未确认可用性
    获取条件与官方原文
    官方来源 1 ↗

    原文引用

    URI ITS points users to URI-supported AI tools such as LibreChat and Microsoft Copilot, and its Generative AI service page says role-based service search displays AI-related tools vetted for use at URI.
    官方来源 2 ↗

    原文引用

    Start with URI-Supported Tools - LibreChat: Use a variety of LLMs with secure options - Microsoft Copilot: Integrated into Word, Outlook, Excel - URI Libraries GenAI Resources: Learn how to use AI in research and writing
    官方来源 3 ↗

    原文引用

    URI ITS points users to URI-supported AI tools such as LibreChat and Microsoft Copilot, and its Generative AI service page says role-based service search displays AI-related tools vetted for use at URI.

Reviewed record

已审核条款

8 条已审核条款

学术诚信2 条已审核条款

Academic Integrity

URI Libraries guidance says generative AI use should be acknowledged or cited, students should check professor expectations before using AI in coursework, and directly used AI output needs a formal citation.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: ai_use_acknowledgement_citation_check_professor_formal_citation_for_direct_output

原始证据

证据 1
If you use generative AI in your work, you should include a formal acknowledgement or citation, just as you would if you were citing a human author or artist. Before using AI on a course assignment or project, be sure to check with your professor!

Academic Integrity

URI ITS tells students to follow instructors' AI policies, attribute AI-generated content, and avoid AI use that breaches URI's Student Code of Conduct.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度89%

标准化值: students_follow_instructor_ai_policy_attribute_ai_content_avoid_code_breach

原始证据

证据 1
Students: Follow instructors’ AI policies, properly attribute AI-generated content, and avoid using AI in ways that breach URI’s Student Code of Conduct.
教学1 条已审核条款

教学

URI AI guidance asks educators to incorporate URI guidance into course design, communicate acceptable AI use to students, disclose AI use in course materials, and the Provost memo frames new AI syllabus statements as optional faculty resources.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度87%

标准化值: educators_communicate_course_ai_expectations_optional_syllabus_statements

原始证据

证据 1
Educators: Incorporate URI’s guidelines into course design, clearly communicate acceptable AI use to students, and disclose when AI was used to create course materials.

原始证据

证据 2
The recommended syllabus information includes new, optional AI syllabus statements vetted by members of URI’s AI Coordination Working Group.
隐私1 条已审核条款

隐私

URI ITS preliminary responsible-AI standards direct users to follow URI data classification guidance, avoid entering private or restricted data into public AI tools, and be cautious that data may be transmitted to third-party servers.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度91%

标准化值: avoid_private_restricted_data_public_ai_tools_follow_data_classification

原始证据

证据 1
Data Security and Privacy: Follow URI’s Data Classification Guidelines to avoid exposing restricted or sensitive information. Prohibited Data Use: Avoid inputting private or restricted data, such as Personally Identifiable Information (PII) or patient records, into public AI tools like ChatGPT.
AI 工具使用规则3 条已审核条款

Ai Tool Treatment

Adobe Firefly is listed for University of Rhode Island in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"adobe_firefly","rawToolName":"Adobe Firefly","description":"University of Rhode Island provides or institutionally supports Adobe Firefly.","howToObtain":"Use the URI Adobe access instructions.","costToUser":"Free.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

原始证据

证据 1
URI faculty have free access to the Adobe Firefly AI image generator bot

本地化显示 only

URI faculty have free access to the Adobe Firefly AI image generator bot

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat is listed for University of Rhode Island in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: institutionally licensed or procured.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat","description":"University of Rhode Island provides or institutionally supports Microsoft 365 Copilot Chat.","howToObtain":"Use the URI Microsoft 365 account.","costToUser":"No individual price is stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"institutionally_licensed_or_procured"}

原始证据

证据 1
All faculty, staff, and students at URI have access to the base level of this tool through the Microsoft 365 suite

本地化显示 only

All faculty, staff, and students at URI have access to the base level of this tool through the Microsoft 365 suite

Ai Tool Treatment

URI ITS points users to URI-supported AI tools such as LibreChat and Microsoft Copilot, and its Generative AI service page says role-based service search displays AI-related tools vetted for use at URI.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度86%

标准化值: supported_tools_librechat_microsoft_copilot_vetted_role_based_service_search

原始证据

证据 1
Want to Try It? Start with URI-Supported Tools - LibreChat: Use a variety of LLMs with secure options - Microsoft Copilot: Integrated into Word, Outlook, Excel - URI Libraries GenAI Resources: Learn how to use AI in research and writing

原始证据

证据 2
You can easily explore approved Generative AI (GenAI) tools available to you based on your role at the University of Rhode Island. Within your role, use the search bar to type “AI.” This will display service pages for AI-related tools vetted for use at URI.
来源状态1 条已审核条款

Source Status

As of July 2025, a Provost syllabus memo stated that URI did not have a university-wide policy governing generative AI use in coursework, while offering optional AI syllabus statements for faculty.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: no_university_wide_coursework_policy_as_of_2025_07_with_optional_syllabus_statements

原始证据

证据 1
As of July 2025, the University of Rhode Island does not have a university-wide policy governing the use of generative AI in coursework.

Source record

官方来源

8 个来源

展开官方来源列表
记录信息、JSON 与引用
审核AI 辅助审核置信度97%快照状态未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Rhode Island AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-rhode-island

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志

Saved from University AI Policy Tracker. This record summarizes the cited sources; it is not an official university statement or assessment permission. Source and review dates are listed above. Hashes identify retained content, not authorization.