Leeds, United Kingdom

University of Leeds

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

10 reviewed claims

Ai Tool Treatment

Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Leeds in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: {"tool":"microsoft_copilot","rawToolName":"Microsoft Copilot","description":"Browser-based Enterprise Copilot chat through the University's full Microsoft licence, with University-credential data protection.","howToObtain":"Sign in to browser-based Copilot with University login details; eligibility requires a full Microsoft licence.","costToUser":"Not stated.","availability":"allowed","endorsementType":"officially_endorsed"}

原始证据

证据 1
University of Leeds says everyone with a full Microsoft licence can access browser-based Copilot chat. Logging in with University details provides the Enterprise version, and for work purposes, including assessed work, Copilot should be used unless there is a good reason why it cannot be.

本地化显示 only

University of Leeds says everyone with a full Microsoft licence can access browser-based Copilot chat. Logging in with University details provides the Enterprise version, and for work purposes, including assessed work, Copilot should be used unless there is a good reason why it cannot be.

隐私

University of Leeds data-restriction guidance says certain data, including passwords, usernames, PII, sensitive or confidential material, University IP, and some copyright-protected or third-party data, must never be put into AI software.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%

标准化值: restricted_data_must_never_be_input_to_ai

原始证据

证据 1
Certain types of data must never be put into any AI software. These include: passwords and usernames; personally identifiable information (PII) or other sensitive or confidential material; any data related to University Intellectual Property; any data that is protected by Copyright, unless explicit permission for its use with AI tools has been obtained.

Academic Integrity

University of Leeds assessment guidance says students can use generative AI to help learning but cannot use AI to generate or falsify work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: genai_may_support_learning_not_generate_or_falsify_work

原始证据

证据 1
As a general principle, you can use generative AI to help you learn but cannot use AI to generate or falsify work.

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Leeds assessment guidance uses a red, amber, and green traffic-light system to indicate how GenAI should be used in taught student assessments.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: red_amber_green_genai_assessment_categories

原始证据

证据 1
The University of Leeds uses a three-tiered traffic light system to indicate how Gen AI should be used in assessments.

Academic Integrity

University of Leeds GenAI acknowledgement guidance says students must acknowledge GenAI use in an Acknowledgements or Declarations section when it functionally assisted their academic work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: must_acknowledge_functional_genai_assistance

原始证据

证据 1
You must acknowledge the use of Gen AI in an 'Acknowledgements' or 'Declarations' section when you have used it as a functional tool to assist you as you were creating any academic work.

研究

University of Leeds postgraduate researcher guidance says PGRs must not use GenAI to write their thesis, transfer report, or other work, falsify work, or breach research assessment and examination guidance.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: pgrs_must_not_use_genai_to_write_or_falsify_research_assessment_work

原始证据

证据 1
You must not use Gen AI to write your thesis, transfer report or other work, falsify work or breach guidelines for the research assessment and examination processes.

教学

In Leeds taught-student assessment guidance, amber-category assessments permit GenAI only in an assistive role as specified by the module tutor and required by the assessment.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: amber_genai_assistive_as_specified_by_tutor

原始证据

证据 1
Under this category, you are permitted to use Gen AI tools in an assistive role as specified by the module tutor and required by the assessment.

Ai Tool Treatment

University of Leeds staff guidance says all material wholly or substantially generated using an AI tool should be declared clearly in the document in which it occurs.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: staff_should_declare_wholly_or_substantially_ai_generated_material

原始证据

证据 1
All material that is wholly or substantially generated using an AI tool should be declared clearly in the document in which it occurs, whether the document is for internal or external use.

Academic Integrity

University of Leeds Library guidance says unpermitted GenAI use or failure to correctly acknowledge allowed GenAI use in assessment will be classed as academic misconduct.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度94%

标准化值: unpermitted_or_unacknowledged_genai_use_classed_as_academic_misconduct

原始证据

证据 1
If you are found to have used generative AI when you weren't supposed to, this will be classed as academic misconduct. If you do not correctly acknowledge the use of generative AI, this will be classed as academic misconduct.

Security Review

University of Leeds GenAI tools guidance says Copilot should be used for work purposes, including assessed work, unless there is a good reason why it cannot be used.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度93%

标准化值: copilot_should_be_used_for_work_purposes_unless_good_reason

原始证据

证据 1
For work purposes, including assessed work, Copilot should be used unless there is a good reason why it can't be.

Source record

官方来源

9 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度97%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "University of Leeds AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked July 19, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/university-of-leeds

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志