public-release-20260715-005
Compared with public-release-20260714-002.
University of Leeds public-release-20260715-005 diff
Comparing public-release-20260714-002 to public-release-20260715-005.
Change log
Release-to-release tracker diff history with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.
Current public record freshness and review state.
University of Leeds currently has 10 source-backed claim records and 9 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: Jul 15, 2026. Latest tracker diff: 0 comparable policy-text changes, 1 newly extracted claims, 1 source snapshot changes.
This page combines all public release diffs for University of Leeds. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Comparing public-release-20260714-002 to public-release-20260715-005.
1 public release diff
Compared with public-release-20260714-002.
Comparing public-release-20260714-002 to public-release-20260715-005.
10 claim records
Microsoft Copilot is listed for University of Leeds in an official university AI tools source. Derived availability: allowed. Derived endorsement type: officially endorsed.
University of Leeds data-restriction guidance says certain data, including passwords, usernames, PII, sensitive or confidential material, University IP, and some copyright-protected or third-party data, must never be put into AI software.
University of Leeds assessment guidance says students can use generative AI to help learning but cannot use AI to generate or falsify work.
University of Leeds assessment guidance uses a red, amber, and green traffic-light system to indicate how GenAI should be used in taught student assessments.
University of Leeds GenAI acknowledgement guidance says students must acknowledge GenAI use in an Acknowledgements or Declarations section when it functionally assisted their academic work.
University of Leeds postgraduate researcher guidance says PGRs must not use GenAI to write their thesis, transfer report, or other work, falsify work, or breach research assessment and examination guidance.
In Leeds taught-student assessment guidance, amber-category assessments permit GenAI only in an assistive role as specified by the module tutor and required by the assessment.
University of Leeds staff guidance says all material wholly or substantially generated using an AI tool should be declared clearly in the document in which it occurs.
University of Leeds Library guidance says unpermitted GenAI use or failure to correctly acknowledge allowed GenAI use in assessment will be classed as academic misconduct.
University of Leeds GenAI tools guidance says Copilot should be used for work purposes, including assessed work, unless there is a good reason why it cannot be used.
9 source attributions
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:10 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:10 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:10 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:10 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:10 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:10 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:10 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at Jul 15, 2026, 11:06 PM
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 13, 2026, 2:10 PM