Change log

University of Leeds

Release-to-release tracker diff with separate policy-text, newly-extracted claim, evidence, and source snapshot categories.

Change summary

Current public record freshness and review state.

University of Leeds currently has 9 source-backed claim records and 8 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 13, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.

Diff categories

Semantic classification for this release diff.

Policy text0Newly extracted0Evidence0Source snapshots0Source text0Source added0Source removed0

Release diff

Unified tracker diff generated from the previous and current public release snapshots.

No tracker claim/evidence/source changes are recorded for this university in the latest public release.

Claim changes

9 claim records

privacy

University of Leeds data-restriction guidance says certain data, including passwords, usernames, PII, sensitive or confidential material, University IP, and some copyright-protected or third-party data, must never be put into AI software.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence96%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Leeds assessment guidance says students can use generative AI to help learning but cannot use AI to generate or falsify work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Leeds assessment guidance uses a red, amber, and green traffic-light system to indicate how GenAI should be used in taught student assessments.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Leeds GenAI acknowledgement guidance says students must acknowledge GenAI use in an Acknowledgements or Declarations section when it functionally assisted their academic work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

research

University of Leeds postgraduate researcher guidance says PGRs must not use GenAI to write their thesis, transfer report, or other work, falsify work, or breach research assessment and examination guidance.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence95%Evidence1Languagesen

teaching

In Leeds taught-student assessment guidance, amber-category assessments permit GenAI only in an assistive role as specified by the module tutor and required by the assessment.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

ai_tool_treatment

University of Leeds staff guidance says all material wholly or substantially generated using an AI tool should be declared clearly in the document in which it occurs.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

academic_integrity

University of Leeds Library guidance says unpermitted GenAI use or failure to correctly acknowledge allowed GenAI use in assessment will be classed as academic misconduct.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence94%Evidence1Languagesen

security_review

University of Leeds GenAI tools guidance says Copilot should be used for work purposes, including assessed work, unless there is a good reason why it cannot be used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence93%Evidence1Languagesen

Source snapshots

8 source attributions

University of Leeds AI Policy Tracker Release Diff | University AI Policy Tracker