University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

Bratislava, Slovakia

Comenius University Bratislava

排行榜QS World University Rankings 2026: =684Updated2026年5月18日

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

4 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

For generative AI used to prepare materials or structure, the appendix recommends a general statement listing the AI tools and purpose, while keeping responsibility for correctness with the author.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度88%

标准化值: recommended_generai_ai_use_statement_author_responsibility

最后检查时间
2026年5月18日
最后更改时间
2026年5月18日

原始证据

证据 1
It is recommended to provide at least a general statement: "In the preparation of this work, AI tools [LIST OF TOOLS] were used for the purpose of [REASON]. Responsibility for the correctness of the resulting text lies with the author."

本地化显示 only

The appendix recommends a general statement naming the AI tools and purpose, and says the author remains responsible for correctness.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
d27fb7f3…
已检索
2026年5月18日
证据定位器
Section 1.4 Use of generative Artificial Intelligence Tools

Academic Integrity

An official Comenius-hosted appendix recommends that work using artificial intelligence tools begin with an originality declaration indicating that AI tools were used.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度86%

标准化值: recommended_originality_declaration_for_ai_tools

最后检查时间
2026年5月18日
最后更改时间
2026年5月18日

原始证据

证据 1
It is recommended to begin work with a declaration on oath regarding the originality of the work... using the literature listed in the attached list and artificial intelligence tools.

本地化显示 only

The appendix recommends an originality declaration that discloses use of artificial intelligence tools.

来源语言
English (en)
快照哈希
d27fb7f3…
已检索
2026年5月18日
证据定位器
Section 1.1 Use of Artificial Intelligence Tools

Academic Integrity

The same official advisory source states that ChatGPT does not replace the full writing process and that the student remains responsible for the final submitted work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度79%

标准化值: student_responsibility_for_final_work_when_using_chatgpt

最后检查时间
2026年5月18日
最后更改时间
2026年5月18日

原始证据

证据 1
Program nenahradzuje celý proces, za finálnu prácu je vždy zodpovedný práve študent.

本地化显示 only

The source says the program does not replace the whole process and the student remains responsible for the final work.

来源语言
sk
快照哈希
8e66fa3b…
已检索
2026年5月18日
证据定位器
Answer about students using AI while writing seminar papers

教学

An official Comenius University news interview presents ChatGPT as a study aid that should be taught for reasonable, critical use rather than treated as something to ban outright.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度76%

标准化值: official_news_advisory_chatgpt_reasonable_critical_use

最后检查时间
2026年5月18日
最后更改时间
2026年5月18日

原始证据

证据 1
Preto si myslím, že nie je správne ich používanie zakazovať, radšej by sme študentov a študentky mali naučiť používať ich rozumným spôsobom.

本地化显示 only

An official university news interview says it is better to teach students to use ChatGPT reasonably than to ban it.

来源语言
sk
快照哈希
8e66fa3b…
已检索
2026年5月18日
证据定位器
Question on whether students should use ChatGPT as a study aid

Source record

官方来源

2 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度88%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Comenius University Bratislava AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 18, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/comenius-university-bratislava

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志