Policy presence
Comenius University Bratislava has 3 source-backed public claims for policy presence; deterministic analysis status: unclear.
Bratislava, Slovakia
Comenius University Bratislava
Comenius University Bratislava has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions. Review state: agent reviewed; 4 reviewed claims. Last checked May 18, 2026.
Comenius University Bratislava AI policy short answer
v1 public contract
Comenius University Bratislava has 4 source-backed AI policy claims from 2 official source attributions, including 4 reviewed claims. The record review state is agent reviewed; original-language evidence snippets, source URLs, confidence, and public JSON are preserved for citation. Last checked May 18, 2026. Discovery context: Comenius University Bratislava is listed as QS 2026 rank =684.
Citation-ready summary
As of this public record, University AI Policy Tracker lists Comenius University Bratislava as an agent-reviewed AI policy record last checked on May 18, 2026 and last changed on May 18, 2026. The record contains 4 source-backed claims, including 4 reviewed claims, from 2 official source attributions. Original-language evidence snippets and source URLs remain canonical, with public JSON available at https://eduaipolicy.org/api/public/v1/universities/comenius-university-bratislava.json. The entity-level confidence is 88%. This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless the linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy signals in this record
- Evidence includes Academic integrity claims.
- Evidence includes Teaching claims.
- Named AI services detected in public claims: ChatGPT.
Review: Agent reviewed
This reference record summarizes visible public data only. Official sources and original-language evidence remain canonical; confidence is separate from review state.
This page is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Policy profile
Deterministic source-backed dimensions derived from this record's public claims.
Review: Machine candidate
Policy profile rows are machine-candidate derived metadata. They are not final policy conclusions; inspect the linked claim evidence before reuse.
Analysis page-quality metadata is available at /api/public/v1/analysis/page-quality.json.
AI disclosure
Comenius University Bratislava has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Coursework
Comenius University Bratislava has 4 source-backed public claims for coursework; deterministic analysis status: required.
Exams
Comenius University Bratislava has 4 source-backed public claims for exams; deterministic analysis status: required.
Privacy and data entry
No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.
Academic integrity
Comenius University Bratislava has 3 source-backed public claims for academic integrity; deterministic analysis status: required.
Approved tools
No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.
Named AI services
Comenius University Bratislava has 2 source-backed public claims for named ai services; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Teaching guidance
Comenius University Bratislava has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.
Research guidance
No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.
Security and procurement
No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.
The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.
Coverage score measures breadth of public, source-backed coverage only. It is not a policy quality, strictness, legal adequacy, safety, or compliance score.
Evidence-backed claims
4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim
Academic Integrity
For generative AI used to prepare materials or structure, the appendix recommends a general statement listing the AI tools and purpose, while keeping responsibility for correctness with the author.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: recommended_generai_ai_use_statement_author_responsibility
Original evidence
Evidence 1It is recommended to provide at least a general statement: "In the preparation of this work, AI tools [LIST OF TOOLS] were used for the purpose of [REASON]. Responsibility for the correctness of the resulting text lies with the author."
Localized display only
The appendix recommends a general statement naming the AI tools and purpose, and says the author remains responsible for correctness.
Academic Integrity
An official Comenius-hosted appendix recommends that work using artificial intelligence tools begin with an originality declaration indicating that AI tools were used.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: recommended_originality_declaration_for_ai_tools
Original evidence
Evidence 1It is recommended to begin work with a declaration on oath regarding the originality of the work... using the literature listed in the attached list and artificial intelligence tools.
Localized display only
The appendix recommends an originality declaration that discloses use of artificial intelligence tools.
Academic Integrity
The same official advisory source states that ChatGPT does not replace the full writing process and that the student remains responsible for the final submitted work.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: student_responsibility_for_final_work_when_using_chatgpt
Original evidence
Evidence 1Program nenahradzuje celý proces, za finálnu prácu je vždy zodpovedný práve študent.
Localized display only
The source says the program does not replace the whole process and the student remains responsible for the final work.
Teaching
An official Comenius University news interview presents ChatGPT as a study aid that should be taught for reasonable, critical use rather than treated as something to ban outright.
Review: Agent reviewed
Normalized value: official_news_advisory_chatgpt_reasonable_critical_use
Original evidence
Evidence 1Preto si myslím, že nie je správne ich používanie zakazovať, radšej by sme študentov a študentky mali naučiť používať ich rozumným spôsobom.
Localized display only
An official university news interview says it is better to teach students to use ChatGPT reasonably than to ban it.
Candidate claims
0 machine or needs-review claim
Candidate claims are not final policy conclusions. They preserve source URL, source snapshot hash, evidence, confidence, and review state so the record can be audited before review.
Official sources
2 source attribution
Appendix No. 1 to the Internal Regulation No. 2/2024
jfmed.uniba.sk
ŠTUDENTI MAJÚ CHATGPT POUŽÍVAŤ TAK, ABY SA NAUČILI MYSLIEŤ KRITICKY
uniba.sk
Change log
Source-check timeline and diff-style claim/evidence preview.
View the public change record for this university, including source snapshot hashes, claim review states, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed evidence.
Corrections and missing evidence
Corrections create review tasks and do not directly change this public record.
If an official source is missing, stale, moved, blocked, or incorrectly summarized, submit a source URL, policy change report, or institution correction for review. Corrections must preserve source URLs, source language, original evidence, review state, and audit history.