Bratislava, Slovakia

Comenius University Bratislava

Record status

Policy statusReviewed evidence-backed recordReview: Agent reviewedClaim coverage4 reviewedEvidence-backed claims4Reviewed4Candidate0Official sources2Source languageen, skPublic JSON/api/public/v1/universities/comenius-university-bratislava.json

Policy profile

Coverage score75/100Coverage labelbroad public coverageReview: Machine candidateAnalysis confidence69%

AI disclosure

Comenius University Bratislava has 1 source-backed public claim for ai disclosure; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence73%Evidence1Sources1

Privacy and data entry

No source-backed public claim about privacy or data-entry restrictions is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about personal, confidential, sensitive, regulated, or student data entry into AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Approved tools

No source-backed public claim identifying approved or licensed AI tools is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence that identifies institutionally approved, licensed, procured, or enterprise AI tools.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Teaching guidance

Comenius University Bratislava has 1 source-backed public claim for teaching guidance; deterministic analysis status: recommended.

RecommendedMachine candidateConfidence65%Evidence1Sources1

Research guidance

No source-backed public claim about research AI use is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about research use, publication ethics, research data, grants, or human-subjects compliance.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

Security and procurement

No source-backed public claim about AI security review or procurement is present in this profile.

The current public tracker record does not contain claim evidence about security review, procurement, vendor approval, risk assessment, authentication, SSO, or enterprise licensing.

Not MentionedMachine candidateConfidence0%Evidence0Sources0

AI tools

Derived tool records0

No tool-level evidence is published for this record yet. Broad AI tool mentions are not expanded into named tool conclusions.

Evidence-backed claims

4 reviewed evidence-backed public claim

Academic Integrity

For generative AI used to prepare materials or structure, the appendix recommends a general statement listing the AI tools and purpose, while keeping responsibility for correctness with the author.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence88%

Normalized value: recommended_generai_ai_use_statement_author_responsibility

Original evidence

Evidence 1
It is recommended to provide at least a general statement: "In the preparation of this work, AI tools [LIST OF TOOLS] were used for the purpose of [REASON]. Responsibility for the correctness of the resulting text lies with the author."

Localized display only

The appendix recommends a general statement naming the AI tools and purpose, and says the author remains responsible for correctness.

Academic Integrity

An official Comenius-hosted appendix recommends that work using artificial intelligence tools begin with an originality declaration indicating that AI tools were used.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence86%

Normalized value: recommended_originality_declaration_for_ai_tools

Original evidence

Evidence 1
It is recommended to begin work with a declaration on oath regarding the originality of the work... using the literature listed in the attached list and artificial intelligence tools.

Localized display only

The appendix recommends an originality declaration that discloses use of artificial intelligence tools.

Academic Integrity

The same official advisory source states that ChatGPT does not replace the full writing process and that the student remains responsible for the final submitted work.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence79%

Normalized value: student_responsibility_for_final_work_when_using_chatgpt

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Program nenahradzuje celý proces, za finálnu prácu je vždy zodpovedný práve študent.

Localized display only

The source says the program does not replace the whole process and the student remains responsible for the final work.

Teaching

An official Comenius University news interview presents ChatGPT as a study aid that should be taught for reasonable, critical use rather than treated as something to ban outright.

Review: Agent reviewedConfidence76%

Normalized value: official_news_advisory_chatgpt_reasonable_critical_use

Original evidence

Evidence 1
Preto si myslím, že nie je správne ich používanie zakazovať, radšej by sme študentov a študentky mali naučiť používať ich rozumným spôsobom.

Localized display only

An official university news interview says it is better to teach students to use ChatGPT reasonably than to ban it.

Candidate claims

0 machine or needs-review claim

Official sources

2 source attribution

Change log

Last checkedMay 18, 2026Last changedMay 18, 2026Open change log

Corrections

Back to universities