academic_integrity
For generative AI used to prepare materials or structure, the appendix recommends a general statement listing the AI tools and purpose, while keeping responsibility for correctness with the author.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Comenius University Bratislava
Source-check timeline, source snapshot hashes, claim review state, and a diff-style preview of current source-backed claim evidence.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Comenius University Bratislava currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 18, 2026.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Claim/evidence diff preview
Diff-style preview built from current public claim/evidence records. Full old/new source diffs require paired historical snapshots.
Comenius University Bratislava current policy evidence
Inserted lines represent current public claim and evidence records in the source-backed dataset.
+8-0
11 # Comenius University Bratislava AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: For generative AI used to prepare materials or structure, the appendix recommends a general statement listing the AI tools and purpose, while keeping responsibility for correctness with the author.
3+Evidence (en, d27fb7f3481c): It is recommended to provide at least a general statement: "In the preparation of this work, AI tools [LIST OF TOOLS] were used for the purpose of [REASON]. Responsibility for the correctness of the resulting text lies with the author."
4+academic_integrity: An official Comenius-hosted appendix recommends that work using artificial intelligence tools begin with an originality declaration indicating that AI tools were used.
5+Evidence (en, d27fb7f3481c): It is recommended to begin work with a declaration on oath regarding the originality of the work... using the literature listed in the attached list and artificial intelligence tools.
6+academic_integrity: The same official advisory source states that ChatGPT does not replace the full writing process and that the student remains responsible for the final submitted work.
7+Evidence (sk, 8e66fa3b06b6): Program nenahradzuje celý proces, za finálnu prácu je vždy zodpovedný práve študent.
8+teaching: An official Comenius University news interview presents ChatGPT as a study aid that should be taught for reasonable, critical use rather than treated as something to ban outright.
9+Evidence (sk, 8e66fa3b06b6): Preto si myslím, že nie je správne ich používanie zakazovať, radšej by sme študentov a študentky mali naučiť používať ich rozumným spôsobom.
Claim changes
4 claim records
academic_integrity
An official Comenius-hosted appendix recommends that work using artificial intelligence tools begin with an originality declaration indicating that AI tools were used.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
The same official advisory source states that ChatGPT does not replace the full writing process and that the student remains responsible for the final submitted work.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
An official Comenius University news interview presents ChatGPT as a study aid that should be taught for reasonable, critical use rather than treated as something to ban outright.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
2 source attributions
Appendix No. 1 to the Internal Regulation No. 2/2024
official_pdf checked May 18, 2026
ŠTUDENTI MAJÚ CHATGPT POUŽÍVAŤ TAK, ABY SA NAUČILI MYSLIEŤ KRITICKY
official_guidance checked May 18, 2026