academic_integrity
For generative AI used to prepare materials or structure, the appendix recommends a general statement listing the AI tools and purpose, while keeping responsibility for correctness with the author.
Review: Agent reviewed
Change log
Comenius University Bratislava
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Change summary
Current public record freshness and review state.
Comenius University Bratislava currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: May 18, 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
This page combines all public release diffs for Comenius University Bratislava. Individual release snapshots remain available from their release-specific URLs.
No release-to-release policy diff rows are recorded for this university yet. The page still tracks current source-backed claims, official source attributions, review state, source freshness, and public JSON for discovery and citation.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Newly extracted claims are tracker additions and are not necessarily newly published by the university. Source snapshot changes show hash changes for the same source URL and are not by themselves policy changes.
Diff categories
Semantic classification for this release diff.
Combined release diff
Unified tracker diff generated from all public release snapshots for this university.
Comenius University Bratislava combined release diff
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+8-0
11 # Comenius University Bratislava AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: For generative AI used to prepare materials or structure, the appendix recommends a general statement listing the AI tools and purpose, while keeping responsibility for correctness with the author.
3+Evidence (en, d27fb7f3481c): It is recommended to provide at least a general statement: "In the preparation of this work, AI tools [LIST OF TOOLS] were used for the purpose of [REASON]. Responsibility for the correctness of the resulting text lies with the author."
4+academic_integrity: An official Comenius-hosted appendix recommends that work using artificial intelligence tools begin with an originality declaration indicating that AI tools were used.
5+Evidence (en, d27fb7f3481c): It is recommended to begin work with a declaration on oath regarding the originality of the work... using the literature listed in the attached list and artificial intelligence tools.
6+academic_integrity: The same official advisory source states that ChatGPT does not replace the full writing process and that the student remains responsible for the final submitted work.
7+Evidence (sk, 8e66fa3b06b6): Program nenahradzuje celý proces, za finálnu prácu je vždy zodpovedný práve študent.
8+teaching: An official Comenius University news interview presents ChatGPT as a study aid that should be taught for reasonable, critical use rather than treated as something to ban outright.
9+Evidence (sk, 8e66fa3b06b6): Preto si myslím, že nie je správne ich používanie zakazovať, radšej by sme študentov a študentky mali naučiť používať ich rozumným spôsobom.
Release history
0 public release diffs
Claim changes
4 claim records
academic_integrity
An official Comenius-hosted appendix recommends that work using artificial intelligence tools begin with an originality declaration indicating that AI tools were used.
Review: Agent reviewed
academic_integrity
The same official advisory source states that ChatGPT does not replace the full writing process and that the student remains responsible for the final submitted work.
Review: Agent reviewed
teaching
An official Comenius University news interview presents ChatGPT as a study aid that should be taught for reasonable, critical use rather than treated as something to ban outright.
Review: Agent reviewed
Source snapshots
2 source attributions
Appendix No. 1 to the Internal Regulation No. 2/2024
official_pdf Tracker checked at May 18, 2026, 4:54 AM
ŠTUDENTI MAJÚ CHATGPT POUŽÍVAŤ TAK, ABY SA NAUČILI MYSLIEŤ KRITICKY
official_guidance Tracker checked at May 18, 2026, 4:54 AM