academic_integrity
For generative AI used to prepare materials or structure, the appendix recommends a general statement listing the AI tools and purpose, while keeping responsibility for correctness with the author.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
Registro de cambios
Comenius University Bratislava
Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.
Resumen de cambios
Estado actual de actualización y revisión del registro público.
Comenius University Bratislava currently has 4 source-backed claim records and 2 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 18 may 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.
Esta página combina todas las diferencias de versiones públicas para Comenius University Bratislava. Las instantáneas individuales de lanzamiento siguen disponibles desde sus URL específicas del lanzamiento.
Aún no se han registrado filas de diferencias de políticas entre versiones para esta universidad. La página sigue rastreando afirmaciones respaldadas por fuentes actuales, atribuciones de fuentes oficiales, estado de revisión, actualidad de las fuentes y JSON públicas para su descubrimiento y citación.
This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.
Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen muestran cambios de hash para la misma URL de origen y no constituyen por sí mismos cambios en la política.
Categorías de diferencias
Clasificación semántica para esta diferencia de versión.
Diferencias de versión combinadas
Diferencia del seguimiento unificado generada a partir de todas las instantáneas de lanzamiento público para esta universidad.
Comenius University Bratislava combined release diferencias
Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.
+8-0
11 # Comenius University Bratislava AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: For generative AI used to prepare materials or structure, the appendix recommends a general statement listing the AI tools and purpose, while keeping responsibility for correctness with the author.
3+Evidence (en, d27fb7f3481c): It is recommended to provide at least a general statement: "In the preparation of this work, AI tools [LIST OF TOOLS] were used for the purpose of [REASON]. Responsibility for the correctness of the resulting text lies with the author."
4+academic_integrity: An official Comenius-hosted appendix recommends that work using artificial intelligence tools begin with an originality declaration indicating that AI tools were used.
5+Evidence (en, d27fb7f3481c): It is recommended to begin work with a declaration on oath regarding the originality of the work... using the literature listed in the attached list and artificial intelligence tools.
6+academic_integrity: The same official advisory source states that ChatGPT does not replace the full writing process and that the student remains responsible for the final submitted work.
7+Evidence (sk, 8e66fa3b06b6): Program nenahradzuje celý proces, za finálnu prácu je vždy zodpovedný práve študent.
8+teaching: An official Comenius University news interview presents ChatGPT as a study aid that should be taught for reasonable, critical use rather than treated as something to ban outright.
9+Evidence (sk, 8e66fa3b06b6): Preto si myslím, že nie je správne ich používanie zakazovať, radšej by sme študentov a študentky mali naučiť používať ich rozumným spôsobom.
Historial de versiones
0 public release diffs
Cambios en las afirmaciones
4 Afirmación registros
academic_integrity
An official Comenius-hosted appendix recommends that work using artificial intelligence tools begin with an originality declaration indicating that AI tools were used.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
academic_integrity
The same official advisory source states that ChatGPT does not replace the full writing process and that the student remains responsible for the final submitted work.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
teaching
An official Comenius University news interview presents ChatGPT as a study aid that should be taught for reasonable, critical use rather than treated as something to ban outright.
Revisión: Revisado por un agente
Instantáneas de origen
2 source attributions
Appendix No. 1 to the Internal Regulation No. 2/2024
official_pdf Tracker checked at 18 may 2026, 4:54
ŠTUDENTI MAJÚ CHATGPT POUŽÍVAŤ TAK, ABY SA NAUČILI MYSLIEŤ KRITICKY
official_guidance Tracker checked at 18 may 2026, 4:54