Kingston upon Thames, United Kingdom

Kingston University, London

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

已审核主张

5 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure defines unacceptable use of generative AI as presenting AI-generated content as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except when the assessment brief explicitly permits it.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%

标准化值: unacceptable_genai_presenting_ai_content_without_acknowledgement_unless_assessment_brief_permits

原始证据

证据 1
The University defines the unacceptable use of Generative Artificial Intelligence as the act of presenting content generated by artificial intelligence tools (such as text, media, tables etc - list not exhaustive), as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except where the nature of the assessment makes this permissible and is explicitly stated in the assessment brief.

Academic Integrity

Kingston University's AG2 guidance says that if generative AI is used as part of the editorial process, the student must acknowledge that use.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%

标准化值: generative_ai_editorial_process_use_must_be_acknowledged

原始证据

证据 1
Where a Generative AI has been used as part of the editorial process, then this must be acknowledged by the student.

Academic Integrity

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure says contributions by artificial intelligence tools must be properly acknowledged.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%

标准化值: ai_contributions_must_be_acknowledged

原始证据

证据 1
Contributions by artificial intelligence (AI) tools must also be properly acknowledged.

Ai Tool Treatment

Kingston University's AG2 editorial-help guidance covers software tools including generative AI when students use third-party help in draft or final assessment work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%

标准化值: generative_ai_treated_as_possible_third_party_editorial_help

原始证据

证据 1
This guidance is for use when a student is considering whether to employ a third party such as a professional copy editing or proof-reading company or software tool (including generative artificial intelligence (GAI)) when producing work in draft or final version.

Source Status

Kingston University's 2025/26 regulation-change summary states that AR6 and AR7 introduced a formal definition of generative AI use within types of academic misconduct, and that AG2 became standalone guidance referencing AI and non-AI editorial help.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%

标准化值: 2025_26_genai_academic_integrity_definition_and_ag2_editorial_help_source_status

原始证据

证据 1
Introduction of a formal definition of use of generative artificial intelligence articulated within our current different types for academic misconduct. This guidance was previously published as an Annex within the Academic Integrity Procedures for Taught and Research degrees (AR6 and AR7) but has been reviewed as a new standalone document which references both AI and non-AI editorial help.

Source record

官方来源

3 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
审核agent reviewed置信度97%Snapshot status未发布JSON公开 JSON

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Kingston University, London AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 18, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/kingston-university-london

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

打开变更日志