University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
语言
ENZHFRPL

变更日志

Kingston University, London

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

审核: 智能体已审核最后检查时间2026年5月18日最后更改时间2026年5月18日声明5来源3版本记录0
大学页面公开 JSON月度报告大学索引

变更摘要

当前公共记录的新鲜度与审核状态。

Kingston University, London currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 2026年5月18日. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

此页面汇总了所有针对的公开版本差异记录 Kingston University, London。各个版本的发布快照仍可通过其特定发布的 URL 访问。

目前尚未记录该大学的版本间策略差异行。页面仍会追踪当前基于来源的主张、官方来源归属、审核状态、来源时效性以及用于发现和引用的公开JSON。

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

新提取的主张是追踪器的新增项，不一定是大学新发布的。来源快照变更显示了同一来源 URL 的哈希值变化，这本身并不代表政策发生了变化。

差异类别

此版本差异的语义分类。

政策文本0新提取的0证据0源快照0源文本0已添加来源0已移除来源0

组合版本差异

由该大学的所有公开发布快照生成的统一追踪器差异。

Kingston University, London combined release 差异

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Kingston University, London AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure defines unacceptable use of generative AI as presenting AI-generated content as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except when the assessment brief explicitly permits it.
3+Evidence (en-GB, a65ad969e826): The University defines the unacceptable use of Generative Artificial Intelligence as the act of presenting content generated by artificial intelligence tools (such as text, media, tables etc - list not exhaustive), as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except where the nature of the assessment makes this permissible and is explicitly stated in the assessment brief.
4+academic_integrity: Kingston University's AG2 guidance says that if generative AI is used as part of the editorial process, the student must acknowledge that use.
5+Evidence (en-GB, c103d6c1350a): Where a Generative AI has been used as part of the editorial process, then this must be acknowledged by the student.
6+academic_integrity: Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure says contributions by artificial intelligence tools must be properly acknowledged.
7+Evidence (en-GB, a65ad969e826): Contributions by artificial intelligence (AI) tools must also be properly acknowledged.
8+ai_tool_treatment: Kingston University's AG2 editorial-help guidance covers software tools including generative AI when students use third-party help in draft or final assessment work.
9+Evidence (en-GB, c103d6c1350a): This guidance is for use when a student is considering whether to employ a third party such as a professional copy editing or proof-reading company or software tool (including generative artificial intelligence (GAI)) when producing work in draft or final version.
10+source_status: Kingston University's 2025/26 regulation-change summary states that AR6 and AR7 introduced a formal definition of generative AI use within types of academic misconduct, and that AG2 became standalone guidance referencing AI and non-AI editorial help.
11+Evidence (en-GB, 4fbe3423fc7b): Introduction of a formal definition of use of generative artificial intelligence articulated within our current different types for academic misconduct. This guidance was previously published as an Annex within the Academic Integrity Procedures for Taught and Research degrees (AR6 and AR7) but has been reviewed as a new standalone document which references both AI and non-AI editorial help.

版本历史

0 public release diffs

声明变更

5 声明 条记录

academic_integrity

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure defines unacceptable use of generative AI as presenting AI-generated content as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except when the assessment brief explicitly permits it.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度97%证据1语言en-GB

academic_integrity

Kingston University's AG2 guidance says that if generative AI is used as part of the editorial process, the student must acknowledge that use.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度96%证据1语言en-GB

academic_integrity

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure says contributions by artificial intelligence tools must be properly acknowledged.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度95%证据1语言en-GB

ai_tool_treatment

Kingston University's AG2 editorial-help guidance covers software tools including generative AI when students use third-party help in draft or final assessment work.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度92%证据1语言en-GB

source_status

Kingston University's 2025/26 regulation-change summary states that AR6 and AR7 introduced a formal definition of generative AI use within types of academic misconduct, and that AG2 became standalone guidance referencing AI and non-AI editorial help.

审核: 智能体已审核置信度90%证据1语言en-GB

源快照

3 source attributions