University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Langue
ENZHFRPL

Journal des modifications

Kingston University, London

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Révision: Révisé par un agentVérifié pour la dernière fois18 mai 2026Dernière modification18 mai 2026Affirmations5Sources3Enregistrements de version0
Page universitaireJSON publicRapport mensuelIndex des universités

Résumé des modifications

Actualité des dossiers publics et état d'examen actuel.

Kingston University, London currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 18 mai 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Cette page combine toutes les différences de publication publique pour Kingston University, London. Les instantanés des versions individuelles restent disponibles via leurs URL spécifiques à la version.

Aucune ligne de différence de politique entre les versions n'est encore enregistrée pour cette université. La page suit toujours les affirmations actuelles étayées par des sources, les attributions de sources officielles, l'état d'examen, la fraîcheur des sources et les JSON publics pour la découverte et la citation.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Les affirmations récemment extraites sont des ajouts au suivi et ne sont pas nécessairement de nouvelles publications de l'université. Les changements d'instantané source montrent des variations de hachage pour la même URL source et ne constituent pas en eux-mêmes des changements de politique.

Catégories de différences

Classification sémantique pour cette différence de version.

Texte de la politique0Récemment extraits0Preuve0Instantanés source0Texte source0Source ajoutée0Source supprimée0

Différentiel de version combinée

Diffusion unifiée du suivi générée à partir de toutes les captures instantanées de version publique pour cette université.

différentiel Kingston University, London combined release

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Kingston University, London AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure defines unacceptable use of generative AI as presenting AI-generated content as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except when the assessment brief explicitly permits it.
3+Evidence (en-GB, a65ad969e826): The University defines the unacceptable use of Generative Artificial Intelligence as the act of presenting content generated by artificial intelligence tools (such as text, media, tables etc - list not exhaustive), as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except where the nature of the assessment makes this permissible and is explicitly stated in the assessment brief.
4+academic_integrity: Kingston University's AG2 guidance says that if generative AI is used as part of the editorial process, the student must acknowledge that use.
5+Evidence (en-GB, c103d6c1350a): Where a Generative AI has been used as part of the editorial process, then this must be acknowledged by the student.
6+academic_integrity: Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure says contributions by artificial intelligence tools must be properly acknowledged.
7+Evidence (en-GB, a65ad969e826): Contributions by artificial intelligence (AI) tools must also be properly acknowledged.
8+ai_tool_treatment: Kingston University's AG2 editorial-help guidance covers software tools including generative AI when students use third-party help in draft or final assessment work.
9+Evidence (en-GB, c103d6c1350a): This guidance is for use when a student is considering whether to employ a third party such as a professional copy editing or proof-reading company or software tool (including generative artificial intelligence (GAI)) when producing work in draft or final version.
10+source_status: Kingston University's 2025/26 regulation-change summary states that AR6 and AR7 introduced a formal definition of generative AI use within types of academic misconduct, and that AG2 became standalone guidance referencing AI and non-AI editorial help.
11+Evidence (en-GB, 4fbe3423fc7b): Introduction of a formal definition of use of generative artificial intelligence articulated within our current different types for academic misconduct. This guidance was previously published as an Annex within the Academic Integrity Procedures for Taught and Research degrees (AR6 and AR7) but has been reviewed as a new standalone document which references both AI and non-AI editorial help.

Historique des versions

0 public release diffs

Modifications d'affirmations

5 Affirmation enregistrements

academic_integrity

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure defines unacceptable use of generative AI as presenting AI-generated content as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except when the assessment brief explicitly permits it.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance97%Preuve1Languesen-GB

academic_integrity

Kingston University's AG2 guidance says that if generative AI is used as part of the editorial process, the student must acknowledge that use.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance96%Preuve1Languesen-GB

academic_integrity

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure says contributions by artificial intelligence tools must be properly acknowledged.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance95%Preuve1Languesen-GB

ai_tool_treatment

Kingston University's AG2 editorial-help guidance covers software tools including generative AI when students use third-party help in draft or final assessment work.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance92%Preuve1Languesen-GB

source_status

Kingston University's 2025/26 regulation-change summary states that AR6 and AR7 introduced a formal definition of generative AI use within types of academic misconduct, and that AG2 became standalone guidance referencing AI and non-AI editorial help.

Révision: Révisé par un agentConfiance90%Preuve1Languesen-GB

Instantanés source

3 source attributions