University AI Policy Tracker
APIGitHub
Idioma
ENZHFRPL

Registro de cambios

Kingston University, London

Source-backed change history with no release-to-release policy diff rows recorded yet; current claims, official sources, review state, and freshness remain visible across 0 public release records.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteÚltima verificación18 may 2026Último cambio18 may 2026Afirmaciones5Fuentes3Registros de versiones0
Página universitariaJSON públicoInforme mensualÍndice universitario

Resumen de cambios

Estado actual de actualización y revisión del registro público.

Kingston University, London currently has 5 source-backed claim records and 3 official source attributions. Latest tracked changed date: 18 may 2026. No tracker diff rows are recorded in the latest public release.

Esta página combina todas las diferencias de versiones públicas para Kingston University, London. Las instantáneas individuales de lanzamiento siguen disponibles desde sus URL específicas del lanzamiento.

Aún no se han registrado filas de diferencias de políticas entre versiones para esta universidad. La página sigue rastreando afirmaciones respaldadas por fuentes actuales, atribuciones de fuentes oficiales, estado de revisión, actualidad de las fuentes y JSON públicas para su descubrimiento y citación.

This tracker is not legal advice, not academic integrity advice, and not an official university statement unless a linked source is the university's own official page.

Las afirmaciones extraídas recientemente son adiciones al seguimiento y no necesariamente han sido publicadas por la universidad. Los cambios en las instantáneas de origen muestran cambios de hash para la misma URL de origen y no constituyen por sí mismos cambios en la política.

Categorías de diferencias

Clasificación semántica para esta diferencia de versión.

Texto de la política0Extraído recientemente0Evidencia0Instantáneas de origen0Texto de origen0Fuente añadida0Fuente eliminada0

Diferencias de versión combinadas

Diferencia del seguimiento unificado generada a partir de todas las instantáneas de lanzamiento público para esta universidad.

Kingston University, London combined release diferencias

Initial tracked release. Lines represent public claim/evidence records entering the release snapshot.

+10-0
11 # Kingston University, London AI policy record
2+academic_integrity: Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure defines unacceptable use of generative AI as presenting AI-generated content as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except when the assessment brief explicitly permits it.
3+Evidence (en-GB, a65ad969e826): The University defines the unacceptable use of Generative Artificial Intelligence as the act of presenting content generated by artificial intelligence tools (such as text, media, tables etc - list not exhaustive), as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except where the nature of the assessment makes this permissible and is explicitly stated in the assessment brief.
4+academic_integrity: Kingston University's AG2 guidance says that if generative AI is used as part of the editorial process, the student must acknowledge that use.
5+Evidence (en-GB, c103d6c1350a): Where a Generative AI has been used as part of the editorial process, then this must be acknowledged by the student.
6+academic_integrity: Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure says contributions by artificial intelligence tools must be properly acknowledged.
7+Evidence (en-GB, a65ad969e826): Contributions by artificial intelligence (AI) tools must also be properly acknowledged.
8+ai_tool_treatment: Kingston University's AG2 editorial-help guidance covers software tools including generative AI when students use third-party help in draft or final assessment work.
9+Evidence (en-GB, c103d6c1350a): This guidance is for use when a student is considering whether to employ a third party such as a professional copy editing or proof-reading company or software tool (including generative artificial intelligence (GAI)) when producing work in draft or final version.
10+source_status: Kingston University's 2025/26 regulation-change summary states that AR6 and AR7 introduced a formal definition of generative AI use within types of academic misconduct, and that AG2 became standalone guidance referencing AI and non-AI editorial help.
11+Evidence (en-GB, 4fbe3423fc7b): Introduction of a formal definition of use of generative artificial intelligence articulated within our current different types for academic misconduct. This guidance was previously published as an Annex within the Academic Integrity Procedures for Taught and Research degrees (AR6 and AR7) but has been reviewed as a new standalone document which references both AI and non-AI editorial help.

Historial de versiones

0 public release diffs

Cambios en las afirmaciones

5 Afirmación registros

academic_integrity

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure defines unacceptable use of generative AI as presenting AI-generated content as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except when the assessment brief explicitly permits it.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza97%Evidencia1Idiomasen-GB

academic_integrity

Kingston University's AG2 guidance says that if generative AI is used as part of the editorial process, the student must acknowledge that use.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza96%Evidencia1Idiomasen-GB

academic_integrity

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure says contributions by artificial intelligence tools must be properly acknowledged.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza95%Evidencia1Idiomasen-GB

ai_tool_treatment

Kingston University's AG2 editorial-help guidance covers software tools including generative AI when students use third-party help in draft or final assessment work.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza92%Evidencia1Idiomasen-GB

source_status

Kingston University's 2025/26 regulation-change summary states that AR6 and AR7 introduced a formal definition of generative AI use within types of academic misconduct, and that AG2 became standalone guidance referencing AI and non-AI editorial help.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza90%Evidencia1Idiomasen-GB

Instantáneas de origen

3 source attributions