Kingston upon Thames, United Kingdom

Kingston University, London

No reviewed summary yet

Reviewed record

Afirmaciones revisadas

5 reviewed claims

Academic Integrity

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure defines unacceptable use of generative AI as presenting AI-generated content as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except when the assessment brief explicitly permits it.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza97%

Valor normalizado: unacceptable_genai_presenting_ai_content_without_acknowledgement_unless_assessment_brief_permits

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
The University defines the unacceptable use of Generative Artificial Intelligence as the act of presenting content generated by artificial intelligence tools (such as text, media, tables etc - list not exhaustive), as one's own without proper acknowledgement, except where the nature of the assessment makes this permissible and is explicitly stated in the assessment brief.

Academic Integrity

Kingston University's AG2 guidance says that if generative AI is used as part of the editorial process, the student must acknowledge that use.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza96%

Valor normalizado: generative_ai_editorial_process_use_must_be_acknowledged

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Where a Generative AI has been used as part of the editorial process, then this must be acknowledged by the student.

Academic Integrity

Kingston University's 2025/26 Academic Integrity procedure says contributions by artificial intelligence tools must be properly acknowledged.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza95%

Valor normalizado: ai_contributions_must_be_acknowledged

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Contributions by artificial intelligence (AI) tools must also be properly acknowledged.

Ai Tool Treatment

Kingston University's AG2 editorial-help guidance covers software tools including generative AI when students use third-party help in draft or final assessment work.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza92%

Valor normalizado: generative_ai_treated_as_possible_third_party_editorial_help

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
This guidance is for use when a student is considering whether to employ a third party such as a professional copy editing or proof-reading company or software tool (including generative artificial intelligence (GAI)) when producing work in draft or final version.

Source Status

Kingston University's 2025/26 regulation-change summary states that AR6 and AR7 introduced a formal definition of generative AI use within types of academic misconduct, and that AG2 became standalone guidance referencing AI and non-AI editorial help.

Revisión: Revisado por un agenteConfianza90%

Valor normalizado: 2025_26_genai_academic_integrity_definition_and_ag2_editorial_help_source_status

Evidencia original

Evidencia 1
Introduction of a formal definition of use of generative artificial intelligence articulated within our current different types for academic misconduct. This guidance was previously published as an Annex within the Academic Integrity Procedures for Taught and Research degrees (AR6 and AR7) but has been reviewed as a new standalone document which references both AI and non-AI editorial help.

Source record

Fuentes oficiales

3 sources

Record information, JSON & citation
Revisiónagent reviewedConfianza97%Snapshot statusNo publicadoJSONJSON público

Citation: University AI Policy Tracker. "Kingston University, London AI Policy Tracker record." Last checked May 18, 2026. https://eduaipolicy.org/universities/kingston-university-london

Original university source language remains canonical. This tracker is not an official university statement.

Abrir registro de cambios